ML19269C245

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summarizes 781218 Meeting on Environ Qualification Programs of Equipment.Review Will Be Completed Consistent W/Schedule of OL Review
ML19269C245
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 01/17/1979
From: Naventi R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7901310003
Download: ML19269C245 (58)
v • d • e


Text

'

)

MEETING Sulf!ARY~ ~ ~ ~

JAN 171979 Dockot File dipr pnb Local PDR TIC llRR Reading LWR #4 File E. Case R. Boyd R. DeYoung D. Vassallo J. Stolz K. Kniel

0. Parr S. Varga L. Crocker D. Crutchfield F. Williams R. Mattson H. Denton D. Muller Project Manager:

R. Naventi Attorney, ELD M. Service IE (3)

ACRS (16)

L. Dreher S. Rubenstein NRC

Participants:

J. Zwolinski

11. Li R. Satterfield J. Knox M. Srinivasan A. Szukiewic:

L. So f fer R. Feit C. Miller R. Stephens P. 01en

~

790131OOO)

1 UNITED STATES

'/

rk NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

{ N 3

W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 e

%,

  • s., * /

JAN 171979 Docket Nos: 50-445 50-446 APPLICANT:

Texas Utilities Generating Company FACILITY:

Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 & 2

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF DECEMBER 18, 1978 MEETING ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT FOR COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION A meeting was held t 'th representatives of Texas Utilities Generating Company, Gibbs & Hill and Westinghouse on December 18, 1978 in Bethesda, Maryland. The purposes of the meeting were to discuss the equipment qualification programs for Comanche Peak and their review by the NRC.

The attendees are listed in Enclosure 1.

The meeting notice is provided as Enclosure 2.

Westinghouse presented a review of their environmental qualification program. Enclosure 3 is a copy of the presentation viewgraphs. The presentation included a summary of the information provided in WCAP 8587 Supplement 1, Revision 1.

The changes resulting from comments at the July ll,1978 meeting were reviewed. Westinghouse also described their interpretation of the information requested in PSB Standard Question No. 4 The information included in Revision 1 of the supplement in response to this question was highlighted and the additional information still to be included was addressed. Westinghouse described the interfaces between the Equipment Qualification Date Package, WCAP 8587 and individual plants.

During the presentation the staff noted their concerns regarding the numerous references in the supplement to WCAP 8587 and tiie fact that this document was unacceptable to the staff. The staff also noted that they had requested that each equipment qualification data package (EQPD) in Supplement i be developed as a stand alone document. Westinghouse stated that in considering this approach it was their conclusion that there was still a need for a single document describing their qualifica-tion program and methodology. They did state that a revision to WCAP 8587 would be submitted in the near future to include information in response to NRC questions. Westinghouse stated that the revision to the WCAP plus Supplement 1 Revision 1 would minimize the cross referencing between individual EQDPs and the methodology topical. The staff stated that this would still present problems for the Comanche Peak review since the

,r.

JAN 171979 Texas Utilities Ge 7 rating Company

-2 topical report review would not be completed prior to the required date for completing the Comanche Peak OL review. This issue was discussed It was agreed that the staff would evaluate the en-at some length.

vironmental qualification review approach to be used for NSSS supplied equipment for Comanche Peak and infonn Westinghouse and TUGC0 of their approach to reviewing NSSS equipment qualification and the applicability of WCAP 8587 and Supplement i for Comanche Feak.

Gibbs & Hill presented a review of environmental qualification for 80P supplied equipment. Enclosure 4 is a copy of the presentation viewgraphs.

The responsibilities of Gibbs & Hill, TUGC0 and vendors in developing qualification plans for BOP equipment was described.

It was noted that, due to a number of different vendors for B0P equipment, there was a wide variance in qualification approaches.

In discussing the qualification methods being proposed, the staff questioned the extent to which vendors Gibbs &

were relying on analyses rather than testing for qualification.

Hill indicated that the use of analysis was limited primarily for radiation and for selected seismic qualifications. The staff also noted that definitive acceptance criteria appeared to be lacking in most of the information presented. The importance of acceptance criteria was em-phasized, particularly for on-going qualification programs which will require periodic auditing by NRC. The six B0P qualification plans pre-viously submitted were discussed in detail. Comments from the Power Systems Branch on these B0P qualification plans (Enclosure 5) were discussed. Gibbs & Hill indicated that the plans could be revised in response to the PSB comments.

In the concluding summary the staff stated that the environmental qual-ification review would be completed consistent with the review schedule for other aspects of the Comanche Peak OL review.

It was noted that the Comanche Peak schedule had been recently revised and would be forwarded to TUGC0 shortly.

It was noted that this revised schedule included the schedule for the Instrumentation and Control Systems Branch review and the review of environmental qualification. The staff's concerns re-garding the reference to WCAP 8587 as an unapproved topical report were re-stated. As noted previously, the staff agreed to evaluate the ref-erencing of WCAP 8587 for Comanche Peak NSSS equipment qualification.

This evaluation will determine the information to be submitted and reviewed as part of the Comanche Peak docket and the extent of the re-view of WCAP 8587 to be required to determine the acceptability of the NSSS qualification program. The staff agreed to notify TUGC0 and Westinghouse as soon as a determination is made.

o Ron Nave ti, roject Manager Light Water Reactors Branch No. 4 Division of Project Management

Enclosures:

As stated cc: See next page

JAN 171979 Texas Utilities Generating Company ccs:

Nicholas S. Reynolds, Esq.

Debevoise & Liberman 1200 Seventeenth Street Washington, D.C.

20036 Spencer C. Relyea, Esq.

Wcrsham, Forsythe & Sampels 2001 Bryan Tower Dallas, Texas 75201 Mr. Homer C. Schmidt Project Manager - Nuclear Plants Texas Utilities Generating Company 2001 Bryan Tower Dallas, Texas 75201 Mr. H. R. Rock Gibbs and 11111, Inc.

393 Seventh Avenue New York, New York 10001 Mr. G. L. Hohmann Westinghouse Electric Corporation P. O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 Richard Lawene, Esq.

Office of the Attorney General P. O. Box 12548 Austin, Texas 78711 Mr. R. J. Gary Executive Vice President 6 General Manager Texas Utilities Generating Company 2001 Ilryan Tower Dallas, Texas 75201

List of Attendees Texas Utilities Service, Inc.

C.K. Feist H.C. Schmidt Texas Utilities Generating Co.

S.M. Ward Westinghouse G. Butterworth W.R. Sugnet Gibbs & Hill M.S. Kumar D.J. Castro J.R. Isgro W.C. Dumper NRC J.A. Zwolinski H.C. Li R.H. Satterfield J.L. Knox M. Srinivasan A.J. Sziekiewicz L. Soffer R. Feit C.F. Miller R.M. Stephens P. Chen R. Naventi

ENCLOSURE 2

/e- -= = u,%

vm u u :. i a u s nucle AR REGUL ATORY COMMISSION

{.'+'

i W A%6HNGlqN. O C M%

o gi' NOV 2 21978 Docket Nos:

50-145 50-44(i Ml!M0llANilllM l'Oll:

Steven A.

Varga, Chief,

l. i gh t Water l(e a c t o r '. liranch No.

1, lil'M I: ROM:

R.

N;'ven t i,

l' roj e c t Manay.cr,

l. i eli t Water Reactor, Ilranch No.

1, Dl'M SilB,ll!CT :

1 LIRTilCOMI M MI.lil'! Nt. h l Ill iI N A l'1 II I I II 5 GI NI.P A l' I NG COMI'AN Y 'l O D l 4t:ll4 S l y!Il l'MI.N !

OllAl. l 1: t CA I I ON 11ecember 18, 1978 Date 6 Time:

i 9:00 to 4:00 p.m.

Location:

P-114 Bethesda, Maryland l'u rpo s e :

To discuss review of equipment qual i ficat ion for Comanche l'eak l'a rt i cipan t s :

Texas lit i li t i es Generating Company C leist it. Schmidt et al Gibbe 6 liill 0.

Schacffer et a1 Westinghouse R.

Sero et al NRC R.

Satterfield

.I. Knox C.

Miiler R.

Naventi 11.

1. i A.

S:ukiewicz

&a Ron Nat nti, l' roj e c t Manager Light Water Reactor.< Branch No. 4 Division of Project Management cc See next page

ENCLOSURE 3 SLIDES OF WESTIN, IOUSE PRESENTATION G

DECEMBER 18, 1978 MEETING ON COM\\NOIE PEAK EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATIONS BNIRffiBffAL QUALIFICATI0ft 0F SAFEiY ELATED ELECTRICALEQUIPIBffTOIEEE-323-1974 SCOPEOFDISCUSS10tl e

LICENSim UPIV\\TE hESTIfG0JSE OUALIFICATI0flIGODS e

e FlfiUE PR03P#1 1

e

LICBISING UPDATE e

WESTINGHOUSE SlHilTTED SUPPlBBff 1 Ll/78 TO PROVIDE ADDITIGlAL DETAIL REDUESTED BY NRC FOR C0ffTINUED GENERIC PEVIB10F WCAP 8587. SUPPLBEff ALSO StBilTTED ON C0WlCHE PEAK DOCKET.

e 7/11/78 EETI!!G NRC/TUSI/G&H/E G1 C0WICHE PEAK DOCKET -

CLASS 1E EQUIRUfr nUALIFICATION flRC INDICATED SUPPlHHff TO BE SIG'lIFICNfT ADVANCE OVER PREVIOUS stb 1ITTALS NRC STATED Tl!AT E0DP'S APPLICABLE In.C01AtlCHE PEAK WILL BE SUBJECT TO REVIB!, BUT DUE TO WIDER APPLICABILITY STAFF WILL C01 SIDER REVIEtl ASGENERIC NRC VAY GiLY PEVIB4 SATLE OF E0DP'S O

LICEt61tBljPDATE NRC NETIt0 (F JULY IL 1978 (C0ffTIflUED) e

- EVIEll WIll BE CARRIED OliT AS PART OF lliE I&C EVIBl 0F COWlCHE PEAK APPLICATION 9/8/78 IST ROUND OLESTI0ris APPLICAllTRESP0flSES 11/17/78 2fD P0l10 CUESTI0tE 2/5/79 APPLICfMT ESPONSES 4/2/79 SAFETY EVALlRTIQ1 EPORT 8/79

- PSB DRAFT STAI0APD OUESTI0tl #4 PRESBfiED DEFl!IlilG IN EQUIRED FOR STAFF REVIBl. INDICATED FDDITI0f%L INFORAATION EQUIRED IN SUPPLBET.

ESAR 414 PRELIMIrlARY DESIGN APPROVAL ISSUED 11/78 9

INDICATES COMNDE PEAK TO BE LEAD PLNff FOR EVIBI 0F QUALIFICATION PROGPAMS FOR SIMILAR EQUIR' BIT.

e

TABLE 3.11N-3 EQUIPmlTGUALIFICATIO:1 EQUIPI M DATAPACKAGE*

SAFETY ELATED VALVE EECTRIC mTOR OPEPATORS EODP-HE-1 NID 4 SAFET( ELATED PILOT SOLEDID VitVES EODP-lE-2 NC 5 SAFELY EU\\TED EXIER'lalLY WJtfTl] LIMIT SWITOES EQDP-HE-3 ND 6 LARGE PLPP MOTOPS (OLITSIDE C0'ITAlf[HfD EODP-AE-2 C/#iED PirP MTORS (0UTSIDE C0:!TAlifafD E0DP-AE-3 ELECBllC HYDROGBl PECOTI!ER EODP-SP-1 PESSUE TP#lS'imERS EODP-ESE-1 NO 2 DIFFEPHfTIAL PESSURE TPMG11TTEPS EODP-ESE-3 N O 4 RSISTNiCE lT7PEPATUPE DETECIORS: tEli[10lffTED EQDP-ESE-6 ESISTNiCE lHPEPAR!PE DEIECTOPS: FAST IFSPO:iSE EODP-ESE-7 D(CDPE EllTPDil DElECTOPS: PCAER PREE EODP-ESE-22 EX0IE NERlR0:1 DETECTORS: SOURCE & IlfTFEEDIATE EODP-ESE-9 NUCLEARIrlSTRUPBITAT10:1SYSTB1(NIS)

EODP-ESE-10 NIS - SOURCE IMNGE PPENPLIFIER EDDP-ESE-11 PAIN C0iffROL P,0\\RD S'flTCH MODUES E0DP-ESE-12 PROCESS PROTECTION SYSlD1 EODP-ESE.J IND!CATORS, POST-ACCIDBIT I'/JilTORIIS EODP-ESE-14 ECORDERS, POST-ACCIDBIT VmiTORII!G EQDP-ESE-15 SOLID-STATE PROTECfl0:1 SYSTD1 & S/FEGlMRD TESTCASINET(2 TRAIN)

EODP-ESE-16 INSTIFBIT BUS POER SUPPLY (STATIC IflVERTER)

EQDP-ESE-18 EACTOR 1TllP SWITCHGEAR EODP-ESE-20 PESSUPE SENSOR EODP-ESE-21 NITROGBi-16 DETECTOR EQDP-ESE-27

PSB (DRAFD STND\\RD.0UESTION fD, 4 liF0RPAT10'l EQUIRED BY f!RC FOR EVIEW 0F 0/L LICB4SE A IDBTIFICATION OF CLASS 1E EQUIREIT e

CLASS 1E EQUIPIEE DESIGN SPECIFICATI0i1 If4CLUDING:

e SAFETY ELATED FUilCTIO'ML EQUIPBEITS APPLICABLE BNIROREffAL PAPNETERS FOR SPECIFIED EQUIRED DURATION OF SAFETY FUNCTI0il o / CLASS 1E EQUIREff SUBJECT T0. HELB BNIR0ifETT, IDBfT EQUIREIT EQUIRED T0 tilTilGATE ELB EQUIREIT WHICH f!EED fl0T PERFO3M SAFETY FliiCTION, BlK WH C#E10T FAIL IN ADVERSE f1ANNER.

EQUIREff milch CN1 FAIL IN #1Y MN1NER QUALIFICATION ?R03RNi PlR1, PROCEDUES RO ACCEPTANCE CRITER e

TEST EWELOPES TO BE BPLOYED e

lEST ESULTS OR SOEDULE FOR CGPLETION e

SUPPlDEU1OPDATE11H8 UPDATE DESIGED TO PROVIDE liFOR%TI0il EQUESTED BY PSB (DRAFD STANDAR OUESTIONf10.4:

e DETAIED FurtCTIO!AL EQUIRBERS SAFETY RELAED FUNCTION SAFEIY ELAED RPFORW!CE EQUIPBEITS FOR for(L ABNORE ACCIDBH AVD POST-ACCIDBIT TIME DUPATION OF PERFORPANCE EQUIPBETT NOTE: SOME EQUIPMENT IS EMPLOYED TO PERFORM l' ORE Watt ONE SAFET/ RELATED FUNCTION - NEED TO BE SEPARATELY SPECIFIED.

i e

APPLICABE BNIROGEUS FOR t0RL ABNORE ACCIDBH AND POST ACCIDBIT CONDITIONS:

PESSUE, TBPEPATUE, Hif1IDITY, PADIATION, CHB 11CALS, VIBRATI0il, SEISMIC.

k

~

ItHERFACE5 OJRPBE PEQUIPB'BfTS FOR CLASS lE EQUIREiT QUALIFICATI0f1 RAISE SPECIA If0ERFACE PROBLB1S.

SUPPLIERS TEED CLEARLY DEFIfED FUilCTIONAL PECUIPBERS NO e

CORRESPaolilG BNIROWBRS TO PR0/IDE tECESSARY OUALIFICATI0fl e

NSSS SUPPLIER RESPONSIBLE FOR DEFIllING F#1Y PRIE FUf1CTI0fML EQUIPBERS HO B ER:

e QER/AE USUALLY RESP 0:lSIBLE FOR DEFlfilflG LCCATION T EQUIREIT NO CONSEQUBIT fl0TAL, ABNORI'AL NO ACCIDSR ENIR0ifEITS, e

10 ESTABLISH GENERIC OU/tIFICATION PROGPM1 RD DEFItE REQUIPSURS TO OlRSIDE SUPPLIERS, IESTIllGHOUSE RTS BEB1 FORCED TO DEFIfE BNELOPE BNIR0ifGRAL PAP #EIERS e

SECTION 1 & EODP DEFINES LIMITS T EDUlfiBfT GUALIFICATION. USER RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATION NO OPERATI0il T EQUIPiBff ilITHIN QUALIFI-CATION SPECIFICATION.

\\

EQDP-ESE-3 Rev.1 U /78 Performance Requ.irements for Function (4)(5);

S. team Genera, tor, k'ater Level (NR) 1.7 f

7 Post DBE Cont.

D8E Conditicn fiormal Abnormal Test SEISMIC SEIS:4IC FLB v

LOCA/SLB FLB/SLB LOCA (6)

Parcmeter

.7.1. Time requirement Continuous included test

< 5 mins.

event '

event 4 months 4 months Continuous under duration duration duration normal no i 5%

as post i11%

+ 16%

+ 16%

1%

T0 secs.

To secs.

0.4 secs.

1.7.2 Perf emance (a) il%

requirement (b) 0.4 secs.

d. image 0.4 secs.

OBE 1

1 l

1 Environmental Conditions for Same Function (4) 1.8 I

I I

1 50 - 120 included ambient cig. 2 Fig. 2/3 ambient Fig. 2 Fig. 3 ambient conditions 1.'8.1 Temperature (OF)

~

under 1.8.2 Pressure (psig)

-0.1/+ 0.3 normal 70 Fig. 2 Fig. 2/3 0

Fig. 2 Fig. 3 1.8.3 Humidity (%RH) 0 - 95 ambient 100 300 ambient too too

'9[10 4

6 8

h

<4 x 10 None

< 10 Y see post None 6.4x10 S 4

3.9x10y( 4.1x10 y j

4

~

7 1.8.4 Radiation (R) 5 08E

< 10 g Q.-

None Fig. 2 Fig. 3 None None Fig. 2 Fig. 2/3 1.8.5 Chemicals None None None None None None None 1.8.6 Vibration tione None None tiene Fig. 1 tbne None 1.8.7 Acceleration (g)

(a) Reference accuracy.specified (b) Time response

e EQDP-ESE-3 Performance Requirements for Function (4)(S):

Pressurizer Level 1.7-Condition Cont.

DBE Post DBE l'ormal Abnormal Test SEISMIC SEISMIC Parameter FLE,/SLB LOCA FLB/SLB LOCA (6) 1.7.1. Time requirement continuous included test event event event 4 months 4 months continuous under duration duration duration duration normal 1.7.2 Perfomance (a)

+ 1%

No as post as post Note.C

+ 16%

+ 16%

+ 1%

requirement (b)

U.4 secs.

damage DBE DBE To secs.

T0 secs.

E.4 secs.

g g

}

Environmental Conditions for Same Function (4) 1.8 I

i i

i

1. 8.1 Temperature (PF) 50 - 120 included ambient Fig. 2 Fig. 3 ambient Fig. 2 Fig. 3 ambient conditions under 1.8.2 Pressure (psig)

-0.1/+0.3 nomal.

70 Fig. 7.

Fia. 3 0

Fig. 2 Fig. 3-1.8.3 Humidity (%RH) 0 - 95 ambient 100 100 ambient 100 100 4

7 1.8.4 Radihtion (R)

< 4 x 10 X None see post see post None' 3.9x10 y 4.1x10 y 4

8 DBE 5

0 6.4x10 S 9x10 8 1.8.5 Chemicals None.

None Fig. 2 Fig. 3 None Fig. 2 Fig. 3 1.8.6 Vibration None None None None None None None 1.8.7 Acceleration (g)

None None None None Fig. I None None (a) Ref erence accuracy specified (b) Time response (c)

Continued _ cperation required, no specified accurac3

~

GBERIC DESIGI.l BNELOPES M P. :. r

' k' BNELOPES FOR fl0PFA!1ABNOPPAL OPEPATIfS CONDIT Y!. d'.

?"

e AVAILABLE A/E DATA AfD IEEE DPAFT ECGTESATIWS

  • L

..(.,, j u-IN-ORAlf!"dflT lilGli BERGY LIFE BPEAK BOELOPES PR0/I BASED ON SURVEY OF EXISTIfS PELIf1IfMRY ACCIDBE I/""d F.-/

e ESTINGliOUSE PLAIRS CGTilTTED TO IEEE 323-74.

'# eg.

SHOULD SNElfPE PRO'E DERCO:lSERVATIVE WHEN F BEC0iE AVAILABLE, BTELOPE PAY BE REDUCED.

DOSE CALCULATIONS PASED Oil ASSLFPTI0fS P e

OPEPATING T!E PEOUIPBERS SPECIFIED lil SECTION 1 PASIC SEISlilC BNELOIS PAVE BEB1 DEFINED FO e

DIRECTI0il FOR EE FOLLO,IIIE GBERAL ELEVATI0iG OPEPATIfGDECK CONTROL Pfui GRROL BOARD MOUNTED EQUIR1BU - CUTTROL R00 ADDIII0ilAL EQUIPMEIR SPECIFIC PESPONSE SPE lllE BNELOPES PROVE GERLY 00NSERVATIVE FOR e

LOCATION.

100 t.EGEND:

l Air Conditioning -

\\

~

\\

N 2 \\'e ation - Normal 2&3 Loss of Ventilation 80 or non class 1E Air Conditioning 6

3 3

b n

i

\\

40 50 60 7r 80 90-100 110 120 DRY BULB TEMPERATURE ('F)

Figure Temperature versus Humidity - Enclosed Environments Outside Containment Ic y

~<r..

2-w e

.I

'. g H UI.

l

.b a.[:f'.i I l

.!k:

l 0,

,P h..

.." : P':k

.t.:. Pressure (PS19)

'N na JL

.; -J_'.l'

}. a _ --

n;.

'! 1 a.

.O ir

.. o. 0

'j

.I,'

I~

.!)

_r b.

_b

_;t o

.:i.

.]

O

! o o_

1

_ _.i i.._!

O

' li

'r N'

e __

.o M

l'I

  • t i

so

Ln -

g g {,.t i l i.t

' l l '..' _

.. _. g;;l'!

1.:...'7' l.

g.

t!

.. ; '..l.I.

..ii I:

i-

. l:

l p._

.l.

f.:.

ll

. _....' 7

!. g'f l.

la.

7

..:. " q.

.pl ll.! 1' l.,1

l.
t. -

1.

i

'(.'

..l'.1

!p! I ; !. -

??.

.. l ;;-* *~ g t

't 'l ' ll.j

. i

l.

-~~

7J,*t '

i

't'

y'...
    • i}

.l t.

i 4 -

t.

a:;:

    • t* J "l' :!' "H"l j pI.tip

,lgM un

-}--

    • ~
  • T' lllP

~*~

h.l H "*' 7

!I d

ini P

llN

.,.P ;;p' ps:i,g' gp r.

7 y

p o

t'

.h h,t t

u

'.:.l.f.:l j

p. g..

~'

l{j'

  • lll
11

,1l 1

.j{

a.n

.'_5. I _. s

,. ;.1 g lh

_4' _

p j..

,1: gl i!ll ::l:

a'..au aa.d. ;. dH :; h.:._n

_a.

o-

__O

't

~~

^

ltl!

{'

l'!' 1 1 l:

1.,.

i or :p

' :' : 'p' iT,l.

m. _n

- t c

m.

'g: p 'i g_

__.o,_

.__,t l f,.p I

el nlli p',:' _

-c

. c.. :R i p. i..l $ l

g. l j'

nu

i, p!

n.' "} p g! ' ;

1 c

7. ! j e.I..

l.;l

.g

.j

.'.n

'l

.4 o

l

,,. y l..

.. g l:..it.lig p

i4

.g g

11.

It:j, !!

6

~3

__ 7,_.

g.

ifff

.I

!g:

It

~ '~~ u f.

.i.

t

1..

i.;

...i i

  • !'! f,,,,'

i

.,lj

.I
l l'*;

i

!.*}i'll1.

.ti:

7

. I. _.m_

~****

.g it hi '. l

li! *T.t*l

.o c

. :;"; g

  • ,1 T* l i.
  • t -'*
  • T

'* i*i

~~; 't *

.f

..o I

11,,

T** * **l~

  • * ~

. t.g.i t l. l

.!*"l I'

!.g f:

M.

~*~-~

l.'

!.!.f,.h n{'

p.

.g'

.;.- n.

l' i

l;'

'l:

.. q:.

[__..

7:.:

n:

p

... g m

d i.

' g.

.in

.'a a

I p m

.g m,.

z q: n,

a.j l o

jt.

n n.

n p:

a o:

s.

t Lt.

~

,n i,t. ', n::.

c

==

n en-a.c n.

=

.:: u=.u.._ g ;;p s_

. d.

-Ji*

m; br 1

m o...t.. : -

ip.

n:

.' : n

.. e.. n..u.t

a=

.I

.a n

e n Mt

~

,.. r_......c 2

1._

_qr

.. 'jjj

...n....

..d

.lj

___4i... _.. _..

i

l
lltj

. j h.

",' '..t.l.

I.p:.f_!l.1 :

.a } i n.: ::tr : *: *;-

r:

1.

M:

c i

c tll. d.'

._!!. :l',

's::

.t* llt'l l

_h; ;;

.!.m :.u.h..c_l..' P..[III.t'.il l

'JI'l

ll' oo o

1:

. ~.

_ l_ O _.' _. _.-

. m

^

En g

ll71

ll;.!j; l'jj j;t' :l'sj';l' :}'9

'1

.'O.

.!!.f

'?

II:

C N, _._... _. c

j.
'.;lf'!'

,' 1. 1.'

I

.:.i.;.,..

...;.l f!.I.!.!-..'

!.l. l !'

.'.' :'. 1 i,

o g

__'.! _! N 1

f u

7.,. t ' +-

~ - * - - - -

'll' l

,jO -

4.

U 7

.'i, ili !:!!f{

fl f

II j jfi{

.ll jj}f !!p i;Iff

!I f

O m.

m

.k f

c.c

'I

'ff

..;j

,0.-

_ii. r. 1.-

o4 e g

~l }

m.1, 1

.i !

li.

m 1.

t

.:1 'i 1 !:

  • 9If i-'

7,1

--- -o

-.. U "3

..' W

.!l

.l.

O

.i i

l:!. g!!l

.ll

.E f' ' l '.

  • t*'

.' 9,.

  1. j:

1

  • l-'!. I

. l' !'l. l l r*-

_. l, ;

l,l1 f'f,.- f '.3C

.'_.4-

rlt

..o I

j f l. !

4

.ti

    • F*

7-

'.l'.

c l

,f.j ; l. '.';

l

.;;l l1

,e l!!:

(

++_l. ; y lI l

.,,[ +.

.i.i.~.'_

i !.t '

oo g

1

O

..+

.~.

'l.

.4

+++

.:.c s_ a:

g d.o..

!.U a.t l e l.'

n o

.m 7

l.p pn un l9, i

.' n h-p a:

,t ib.: h.i pt.._

n o

t..

_a. y o _,

c h

n in

. i,,,.

.e pt n

.t, n. u -

u.n.

o..
n..

.i

._ _1_. _.

. _ o._ _.

n. '

n

n. 7..
n. n,

'.Hu.

7-g ni

.lli

n...ln 4{'

.{#..

O -

a E

a

.N m

,l g

n.

i-

! l l1il ;

'. ; ' e. -

i

' o :2 '-

o-om --

'i-

-l 7.

.O

. 'i i e c

. l

'!!; - il

. = ".

- + - -

'N n

- r.- :-..-

,,a m, p ! h, m,.

17 !y;' y! j,H: gy l!!

c.

o a

1.

a-

.u u

..__ p__

2 ! __

y. 4 K Wj j.l ji' h..,,,

..3c.

p b_.

..i n.

..- 0 m.

n i :n

_P.

..c_, m i

.i,; ;.

_i l,.

m

_. n..

+ '

2 m'

.i._...

?

d i

a.

l u

iH n.

"y n:u...

!L:..1.a ah:. u

. ;t: an

.a_.

u__...a..

i:.:

.u

. u - _ E_3 l

u au.u w,u.a y:i

e t

.c io nj ;; ; h,. pt. p-

u :n
.1

-a

~

!.!.i'n &

!a a: n:

1 n;.J..

t a-a:l ;;p in n

n

--m.r nH n;

o,: N..

p n,.

u

-- o m

i; i.l

li

t

~ l'I;

~ !: P

- r+ -t

!:llt ll l1.

i I I.! lq,il.

-~ -

% h:'I !!i{' g l

f

_g;e..

i u,_

j ;gj {pljt yq.. }]

!i:. 5"{ ;hy fi;l sil II.;

_a t_

7_

P

. ~f

.u 4-mig i}t7 ;t:4 *it!

.t pl.

o,f.

~

..n 22

.T

~1 Up, HF s s.%

v

,d "1!

[ u,X...

, h..;

s;; :

q i

n T

i i$q.u.,im.

u

.h" l

' I Y li 4

.y' ' d N 1

" 1 l!

j i

M,.M %h 1..

I!!! !!H ':

e i.

'q

.S

.r

.5 -..

~W m-I l

l I

\\

. O z: n.:.L1:2z a

,d:l.

ih N @

. hkhkf liW N( o) DO W Od fhi i1i! i ni im ii i}i 4

E.

i L

I G

- J m..

'I O

H' w

i i

+l

-l:

n

,.n 3

.i 4..

u...

i u' n

-.i.

l W

it.

ii,: :l Hi 4.

f.

h

.l

.l.

-l-

.t

.l:

i

' l:

-l:

!E f

=

i

li 8

~

1 4

. l.-

j [.

_.:.4

.l_

.nl : _-__,. a _.....i....

_u-

.j...

a. : p:_...

. an..

. h.._..

.. - ~ _.

m.

- l,4:

k--

q

.p

._n..

.g 300i

+

60Y 180 r

450 j +/

Hl:

_P

i. Tr W 'I

+

. _ii!_.

H

!Ii..

ili, "IE umr[ /" "

._-t=

1:

r-
(--

7b__....a P _n -c..._

..f.

^l

r- = p :- _a r

'n y =.

. t...

.l.

.. t..2..

f.~

-, a r -- * =

---=~f=: T7* mt

. c'} =

_i n,n b.r. !: n ---

r:- ~:r r --

t.-.:.a.

4

..f_

.. _f =,. =. _ r -

4 "._-~=

. t _...-.' -.y.

r_

rn:

1.: r I

..._.q._.[.

.. 4....

.g.

. r -_

... [.

,.}...

...h.

..m

_- _7..

' ~

50

._1:.'

'.:. ' M :u\\ :. h.~ 9:.

.. :l=. 0

._.y^=.~..

... ^..

. _.4 0

. =5.:=.

. p =l..

/

a..=

u

=_.. T. =-. f

.=u..:..

...=_=

r --

=_. a.

[ ~.. _9. -... _ _

._t.=_ r.c.. r_ -

I

. =. _.

t

=

=

I._

,.fn..i.i..

.- ~ 's.

.. [_=...

....h..=.. -

mt 1.:

. =_.

_:.g._... - :J..

s

-a=--

nt._.. F. _,. _

m g

=_: =:_dr=,==E~2 = t /e :.. p..=4 --,p: :._.t-a\\:.: p

1....;. = -==j= -

1.;

r

=

x

.an -

.. a.

.n

_ _. - -p= :=

,. -, H-. _ _. p' "-=:~ - - ~ -. ! =..

_u.

===7

~--

-:=

.2.

a_ n.= = f...

.r-

.9_._

~p~ ~~ ~ r ~ ~

, = ; =.,:

u

-- 3

~=:r

=

==

40' -

i"_; =.___T_:q=_50

--;~~=~~ ~E. /iE_ij - _'. p_.. =._-i.,E_- ~.

. =_ p. __: } _.-=. E U._d..._E'~.~_._ -i,_E_E_i._2:im. i =...d _:- ___ _

= r== t.== t _: = =1 --~ -- t _=u = = = r.

a

r rr h_
\\:==-== =._=..===:_..-

- - - + =

=. t=f:---= + - - :) r ' :-- o t=== r r:= 1 m-::_. :-

I:~

._ n T

'. _ :r.- : : "!2 t = : __.

.- ; =.1 T..

l.._.!Z:~MC-';1_.II=:___ t ___. _.. lL_ _ t a n l =..:.-

_U___d@w' 3:

. !Z /}:L:

4=:

_r t= =:=:=:=

-=j5.=

= %m..

U =

'*yI-C L.

/ : a
- f. _ =_ r. _. __ _ p -. _ _. _.,

h.

}=t;

- t = =n n n } -- * -

  • nr 0,. _ _: 1. -.___._.....'

~ - ~ ~ g :..:_.= g- ' - ~~

~

~ - - -

30

'c

'~300 -"-"M E!=h=:! E555!E:!5fM@Id~d T - 5f E:55-5 =r?'S.c.

i 55EE hE ':=

t =::=.. :2 =:= : _ 9

^

- _\\ = J J_ : ! r - I... ~~

_1. - d: =.. =._===* r=r_

V r :-

s
tr u n_
n t:-[

t=1 :.:.rn j _.= "

__O=

= \\n Itr _ ns c rt /_

_r"-

ZZ:

r+ T %

_7_ -

m

.._.___; c. =_..

L.

.._.. :. c_. = _ _. _.r.:q.. _- ;.._._.1. _:.__. :;n__..

=_ __:=___ }.x._ =. _=__

r__n_. :{'._.t,._ M..1.. =_. :: r.___.;

z. ___r_; =__
        • _~_ es a

- ; \\t -

t-

=

:=:-<:-

t:= ::= t r =

A ::'

5,. 2 p-

1. :_. 7 x _\\.... '. j r.._ z_

M

. _= i. ! :=="=r:l =.:::--==:=.1r* rrj :=r. : :: IN:

-- : -- P._:2_

_/-

t; r *--

n'J.:H

_ :___7. _5 =_ I _=__._

r

..r..

._. f.-i# : ~ ~n.1. __.F... '

. __i.l.."i__

.M._1:_2fli--~d _. '..i. __ '

I F - if. __~_=. _!_1 '3.U=__.-.

~C 2I I!

I...,

t.

_.p._.

~ _.. {n :.{r n z r : [ r. T n.

. ___ r. r

:

__. j_ n

j== r/ '

=f /.

L. l t: 7
n-

= : r....__.

._ t - :! _N:

-l.

101 n- _= nr r rr

=.

T= =

r: =

. = =... g:4-

...c t= tr4 = r_. t =;.= =t ar 71 : r p._. =. ! _. _i.A-l... _ _

.r =

... _ =

1

=

. _ : ;r. -!:.._ J_ :l:: = r- = 't = g_,y'g nt _.!:_. r:N.=

- i n-- '= t rr'n==

._. f.:. * =_ __:

.;
r.,

r__

l.: : I r._

_r__3_

. j.u t

.=._

7.;g.r '.._. :!.: 7. j.._ _ ;_. j* : : c4 =.

_. 7.. g _..;.

,g q._

.::~.:

g._.

.g g

2SE _di-dim-il: ; * "ote a"-~- - i Y - ir i=- ' iHIF2-~

d=(i=E2 5-5==E

=. ~ _. _=...

=. ~:=_ c u. =.

x::.nl:

n. =_.-.. ;, =_

. 21. :. ]:...:,.. c. h. :;. j:..,r.

--- : i. n.. r_2.-

=.

t a.

.:._:'.:!: :l. 2t r :

= 1L.

~

.).

.c t'r-r-

1:

l'

:t.
.J.

.f'

. 'r

}:

cr. j

.1:

=

- :t: -

' _.1 : :
  • n-31 I

! it h:

U f :!!

I

-j-

-![i-l.'

i.

NI

150,

.10~' ~

1:bTime(secs) f i i Ani:!!:. l o

_,,__,} i b

@aj

-0 y.

.1000 i.

4 So

. i j.: : r..

.100.!

. 10 a

di:

.j Hi -

r

m. _.

.. _... 1. _. !. 21 : 3: i..:t: c t :__nL; L uu u_ innt:_& ___t:

)..i.
n LNote a

Initial 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> containment spray solution of 2500 ppm boron with 0.24% Na0H.

i

@! W T

r r i e

e 1
l:

-l: _... _ ~. ~

.f::

l:

t-n

!: t :
l:

,p__y..__ _t:.

)-

t i

1 j

j t

}

e i i

i e

i i

i i

i-

.- i T

Containment Environmental Design Conditions l.._p._ _.!,. _.

n t.. L _..

.n

. Figure p.

i E-Main Steam Line Break and feedline Break -

Y

'l

OPEPATIfG DECK ELEVATI0f1 - GE?EPAL TEST EhVELDPE

--f 7,0 -

i l

I I

o I

I 7

(.

52 DAMPING l

n s'

I i

2.5 -

l

\\

e

(

,e 2.0 -- -

. - c..

-f - - - - -

m i - - I'i 8

l' I

' l.

l (I

l.

I l

1.0 I

i

'. 1.0 2.5 22.0 25.0 35.0

~~

Frequency (bz)

Figure 1:

Required Response Specturm (RRS) for Safe Shutdoun Earthquake (SSE)

(Not.c: OBE Required Response Spectrum = 0.5 SSE RRS)

s.

~~

20.0 t

' 10'. 0 8.0 6.0

~

14. 0 T

E

~ 2.0 4

5 d

I.0 g

ss o m ixo 08 0.6 s

0.4 CONTROL ROOM R FVATION - GENEPAL TEST ENVEl.0PE 0.2

!'!II!I I

I I I I III i

I I I I!!!

0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.81.0 2.0 4.0 6.08.010.0 20.0 40.0 60.80.100.0 FREQUENCY (Hz)

V A '<d

?,,s'4

,(,,e..

Required Response Spectrum (RRS) for Safe Shutdown Earthquake (SSE)

~

C Fi d 17m f.ure s,;b ys,. :.

+c eyp c

(Note: 0BE Required Response Spectrum = 0.5 SSE RRS) 0

..4 4

1 100. 0-

_..g_t.j-

..g.,

i

.J

.l.

8 '..

i...

..g..

..j.......

4 7..,.]...j.,q..

.y F

. l.

h:.

CGUR0L BOARD MOUiUED EQUIPIM

~

= h~.# i

-r:-rri a

E

!"ih.. -

..r _

.i

~~

C E ~

  • _'. -

_._..t.__

~_

.., -.. - [_

4,_.,, _ _,

._ f

_.y,....

- : l =.. [... ):. y.:

- :. :..::. ; ::.::. __n. :.;

2..:-...

i- -. 7 "._.....- -. t:r

..3..

.3

-.f1

---== mm > :: =.. = p----l-.-(.r pt (r ty.

1

..:1...

L:/*/ f:r

..r-n=_.,_.,____,.

:; r ::.
2 =r: 2. :=
.::. =.. /.1 = l-r. nm 1 :,- =

t

- ~.

.a -.

_. r--

_.y.-

...'.f~1. -_ -.

y..

..L

.._.L 3 __

y_ _

.(....

~

q g.

%,,,-.u..._....

m,

+v_4

~~6 - *-

s.

10J

.....,____.'.3._p_.,_,..,-

~~

~-

g,.

q s.....;_..,_..4.g_..,_______,.__...g__.L._.._

. 4_,..,_ _. p. 7..

_.p.f.p } g, ___

y 8

-g_

,..j K.- p__.4_

9 v._,.j.

=

4

- p, } f. 9_ }_ qi 1

t

_ _ _ _ Jar _-' - -r l :- g./..r::q;_r.r : r.: H:._---'-.2 :-1

_ p:= p.i- _'_- :;. -- :: ".

.e. t-

,a u : : :.--

l=t,

.e -- :.:._a* - - - r..,.,,.,,.t= [1 j :

. =_ t _. 1_:: =. =__._ :_

t _

_g_,,,,,,,,,,,,

,,4,.,

g,,,,,_4, tn

=_=:-*.,.__~.

.__.r_{__.,,,

r

{

..~

.,_..i....

5% DAttPlilG...

c: 4

-r-4_.

1

-) _ -. f--

4-O 2

7,

'N'ND.)-h--h$did :

_)552-I. S h l~b N h l

-t - --(... t 1

'_._1 : ; 4 -~Y J---1 2 ;l;-

-- t - t p t

- -- :n -i. __._ t --_-t :-,=.:!: t-

.. _ _ _1._..

1~ _.

.._4

_tri ::

. _ r. _,..,_..

1

- _1,. -

_ <. 4,._h_.

g

b. __..._i-_-

9-o, 4 -

1

_.g 1

O

.._ m 4

.t. _--

7 e

.3

~,

4,_ +.

gp

.r._ } _

4.

...._ _ # _ g 4

. _.. ~._

-6..._,...,_

9

_.9.,.,_

__..p _,_. _.,._._,_

___.f 8

- p_, -

.y _ t. g

_.y._.

...j. _.

i 1

s

_.-. ;.--.--.-=_=__.=..=..).=

= _.=_ =_ =__.=t

=.

. r. =~. m.. - :.p. =.._ =.!p

~ _... -

-~

l t:

,'~,' ~ }

~~2 ~ ' Q.. Qj=

'~

~

3 ;

," ;fh fr.: ~-

%i

"~

1 4

r,

_ _.p,.. _.

.....l:.

t, n..

.- ;_.. l... ]

3.

_. _.. t.:..=:.. -

.n-*_=..- _._:::.. -E. (.. --

. _r

=:

  • s

=h.. p:.l :

.~-..: : '

.. =

__. _=::: :1:_..:

..u:

=,m

.== : := p - - : c.

r

_ _ _. _. _ _ t = - : - = :..

-.a..

=

m :.-

.. r.

s.._,.. _

2..

_L-_

t m.

.4 u

4. p.2 q,

n,

., H 2

3 4

5 5 * *

  • 400.0 r. $30.0 It0 a:

4 s s Frequency (Hz)

Required Response Spectrum (RRS) for Safe Figure Shutdown Earthquake (SSE)

OBE Required Response Spectrum = 0.5 SSE RRS)

(Note:

QUALIFICATION TETHODS - OVERALL APPPDA01 CHOIE OF QUAL'FICATI0fl TEllDD EMPLDYED PASED 00 P#N FACTORS e

PRACTICABILITY CmPLEXITY OF Er0IPfEIT RIGIDORFLEXIBLE EOTTJilC FEASIBILITY AVAILABE PPEVIOUS QUALI/ICATION ETC.

e WESTIfGiOUSE LIMITS CHOICES TO:

, ANALYSIS EXPERIBICE TEST OR NW CCIBINATION OF TFiESF ~~THODS.

QUALIFICATI0t1 BY N BLYSIS IN GBIEPAL QUALIFICATI0fl BY NMLYSIS LIMITED T0:

SIfPLY ESIGilG/ EASILY F0 DELED EQUIREfR TIRT IS f0T REQUIP e

PERFOR1 SAFETY FlWION IN HEB BNIRRER OPEPATI0fML TESTS IEDNSTPATE CAPABILITY TO PERFORi SAFEIY FUNCTION Uf0ER f0R1AL N0 ABf0Pl?L ENVIR0ffENTS AGING ADDRESSED BY SEPARATE TESTING N 0/0R ANALYSIS GESTINGHOUSE MIf1G EVALUATION PRnGPAM)

OUALIFICATION MAINST SEISMIC EVBE MILY DBE TO BE ADDRESSED) BY N MLYSIS EQUIPENT GUALIFICATION BY DB10fSTRATING SIMILARITY TO OTER e

TESTEDEQUIREE e

EX#PLES:

EDIlll AfD LARGE fDTORS CABIfETS/ BOARDS 6

QUALIFICATION BY EXRRIB4E NOT CURRBITLY USED AS PRIt'ARY QUALIFICATI0i1 fEH e

EXPERIB4E PAY BE BPLOYED TO SUPPORT 00ALIFICATI0 e

AND/0R. TEST DIFFICULTY IN IDENTIFYllS IN-SERVIE BNIR0isEIT e

ItMDEQUATE RECORDS CN PAINTBECE/REPLACBEIT NO 'EXPERIENE' AVAILABLE 10 DEUSTRATE CAPABILIE Ut0ER SEISMIC OR HELB m'0ITIONS.

O 8

e

QUALIFICATI0ft BY TEST e

IN GBEPAL QUALIFICATI0i1 BY TEST BPLOYED FOR EQUIRETT REQUIED TO PERFORi SAFELY FUflCTION Ill FELB BNIR0iFEIT OR CQPEX E0'JIREiT e

TEST SEQUENCE FOR CURRBill.Y SCEDLi.ED TESTS: FOLLQIS323-7tl ECGi80ED SEQUBlCE PEOPERATIONAL CEOS FUNCTI0fML TESTS BURN-IN TEST OPERATI0iML TESTS (t0WAL AND ABNOPFAL C0iDITIONS)

AGIfG (INSEQUENCE OR BY SEPERATE TEST AFD/0R NMLYSIS)

SEISMIC TESTS

[LB NO POST ELB SIf1JLATION (IF APPLICABLE)

DISASSEBLYANDINSPECTION O

e e

e TEST REQUIRBBITS ACEPTRIE CRITERIA TESTS SHALL IDU1STPATE, WIE PARGlil, EAT EQUIREIT IS CAPABLE OF C@PLETIf1G EE SPECIFIED SAFELY RELATED PEPFORW'E REQUIPBETTS APPLICABLE BNIROTBITAL CO.0ITIONS (SECTION 1 E0DP).

)

e e

O e

TYPICAL CPEPATIONAL TEST FOR NORMAL AND ABN0WAL CONDITION J

HAXIHUH +10%, -0%

i I

i TEMPERATURE /HUMIDIT

-MINIMUM + 0, -l o%

io5g VOLTAGE

-95%

-loss FREQUENCY 975

+- 12 ++-12 + +12 ++ 12 +

HOURS

= = *.

r

i CAUSTIC SPRAY STEAM 320 -

C.

a m

220 -

I E

m g

3 s

i m m n

r-s.

s e.

o, s

aa m

a 8

I i

m Post BELB

.HELB i

o Transient for y

8 O

Margin b

=

f f

f f

f f

h

.I 4

6

)

6

=

-4 24 15 0

3 20 HOURS DAYS SEC-MIN.

Time Et

PREVIOUS TESTifE NFLOYED' AS PART OF 'SUPPIDERAL QUALIFICATI0tl PROG s

T0 IEEE 323-197L hESTilTiDJSE DBiONSTPATED SEIS CONSERVATIVE WITH RESPECT TO IEEE 341-75 FOR SUCH EQUIRBIT LERE HELB Bf/IR0iEflT IS IDT e

TESTilS WILL IDT BE REPEATED. f610E TO BE ADDPESSED BY TESTIfS #0/0R N1ALYSIS.

QUALIFICATIONSEQUENCEEMPLOYED:

e PRE 0PERATIONALCHECKS FUNCTIONAL TESTS BURibillTESTS OPERATIONAL TESTS (!!0 VAL #0 fE!0RML CUSITIONS)

~

DISASSBELY N0 If1SPECT10N e

EXN1PLES:

NUCLEAR INSTRLIElTATION SYSTBi (NIS)

PROCESS PROTECTIO'1 SYSTEi (7300)

SOLID STATE PROTECTIOi! SYSTUi (2-TRAlf0 STATIC llNERTER (7.5 WA)

INSTRlfBIT BUS DISTRIBUTION PN:EL (7.5 WA)

O

ESTitlGil0USE APPROACH TO AGliT3 IN-SEQUBlCE AGItB WILL BE BPLOYED FOR EQUIFEilT REQUIRED T e

OPEPATE Ifl A EW BNIRGFEff (I.E., TIMNSMITTERS, VALVE OPERATORS, LIMIT SWITOES, ETc.)

TER'AL AGIIE TO BE BASED Oil C&PGSff HAVlfS LARGEST TBPE Half-LIFE FOR EQUIPMBlT t10T REQUIPED TO OPERATE lil A EW BNIR0iPBir.

e FalfE illLL BE ADDRESSED BY SEPAPATE TESTIIS AWOR NIALYSIS GESTINGHOUSE AGli6 EVAUJATI0il PROGP#D.

a e

e

ADVNUMES FOR ADDRESSITE MIt0 BY SEPARATE COMP 0iEIT TEST N0/0R NRLYSIS AVOIDNIE OF WASTEFUL PETESTItE OF EQUIREf6 ALREADY e

SEISMICA11Y TESTED BPLOYlfE IEEE-3%-75 IEIHODOLOGY, SEISMIC MO BNIR0ilERAL TESTItG OF EWIRBIT CNl BE e

C01PLETED ON SCHEDUE FOR LFAD PLNIT - IO DELAYS DUE TO LACK OF ADEWATE MItG IflF0PTATIDil COPLETE REESTING DlE TO FUTllRE DEVEL0 ruffs Ifl AGIfG e

TECR40 LOGY AVOIDED - CGMBff REQUALIFICATIG1 POSSIBLE.

FAMILIES OF SIMllAR COMP 0EITS MAY BE ritALIFIED BY TEST e

OF EPRESBITATIVE SAMPLE.

DUPLICATE MitG #9 TESTI!E OF IDBRICAL CGMBITS e

DPLOYED IN DIFFERBIT EWIRETT IS AVOIDED, CUP 0fBff WALIFICATI0tl IS VALID FOR FUlllRE EQUIREIT o

DESIGIIS.

UtMVAllABILITY 0F SPAPE PARTS IN FlffUPE PECTIFIED BY e

QlMLIFICATI0fl CF TE1 COMPffERS, lHIS APPROACH IrlTPDDUCES POSSIBILIT/ OF CPTlfilZI!E IfDUSTR e

WIDE RES0llRCES - DATA P#!K OF QUALIFIED CGMEffS,

WESTifSIDJSE AGif6 EVALUATIGl PR03PA4 e

QUECTIVE TO PROVIDE It:CPEASED ASSUPMICE THAT f 0 EXISTS THAT COULD ifAD TO CG110il MODE FAIU EVBU CGIDITIGlS.

(FOR EQUIRETT 10T SURJECT TO HElB BNIR0'sEllL CQlSIDEREDISSEISiilCEVEH).

OVEPALLPROGPKiAPPPMCH e

USE ' STATE OF THE ART' TECHilI0UES TO BlSURE LillK' EXISTS Ill THE EQUIREH AS A PESULT OF AGE EOMISiS.

b i

PEPMiPlR1 C0fDJCT LITEPAlllE SEAPDI TO ASSB1BLE AVAllABLE If1FOR% T e

Gl MifE CHAPACTERISTICS OF WESTifG0USE SUPPLIED EQUIRE AND C0f m S US SYSTEPATICALLY N% LYZE EOUIRBIT TO IDEfflFY COMPG!BffS e

EQUIPED TO PEPFORi SECIFIED SAFETY ELATED FUflCTIG!(S),

IfNESTIGATE SAFETY PELATED CamE!TS T0 IDefTIFY NO e

ELIMIfMTE T10SE HAVIIE TO AGE ELATED FAILUE MECHAillSMS.

010N-AGERS) PELATIVE TO APPLICABLE DBE'S.

WHEE UfMVAILABLE, ESTABLISH AGlfE OMPAClERISTICS OF e

CQiP0f0fTS BY TEST.

ME P9%IlllfE ' CRITICAL' COMP 0 FELTS AfD DBiGlSTPAlE DBE e

CAPABILITY BY SEISMIC OR CEifTRIFLEE TESTliE.

FlmjRE LICB1SIfE STRATEGY e

SBilTTALS TO NRC SBillTAL T SUPPLDBIT HAS KT NRC REQUIPBBE FOR ADDITIURL IfF0Pf1ATION FOR C0ffflNUED REVIEW 0F IGP 8587 EVISE LOP 8587 TO BE CONSISTBE WITH SUPPlHBlT s

WCAP WILL PPD /IDE BASIS FOR IfF0WATIG1

~

SPECIFIEDINE0DP'S e

WILL BE DIECTLY CROSS RrftFB1CED TO E@P'S e

GBERIC REVIEW BY NRC

@TAIN NRC GBERIC PEVIEN #0 SIGfl-TF T WCAP 8587 (ET10D0 LOGY)

NO SUPPlRU(T 1 (QUALIFICATIM PLANS, PROCEDURES, ETC.) AS S00N ASPOSSIBLE

~

e PLAfE SPECIFIC APPLICATIWS CalTINUE TO REFERBlE IN PLAfff SAR'S:

e FIfML APPROVED VERSION OF WCAP 8587 AS PROVIDING ETHW0 LOGY FOR QUALIFICATION PLANS ESCRIBED IN SLPPlHDIT '

s APPLIC#LE EDIP.'S FOR PL#ff SCOPE NRC TO CUPLETE PLA'fT SECIFIC PEVIEW FOR APPLICABILilY OF FUNCTIGML REQUIPBB(TS #0 ENVIRGiBITS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 1 & EQDR'S.

O

ENCIDSURE 4 COMANCHE PEAK BALANCE OF PLANT CLASS IE EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION

CLASS IE BOP EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION Total number of Qualification Plans - 60 List Attached Brief outline of 11 ty,pical individual plans included herein.

Six of these plans were sent previously to NRC.

Romaining ei4J t,c h s Y h

delivered December 18, 1978.

Thirty additional plans being released or in final stage of review.

Vendor develops Qualification Plan with support and review by TUSI and G&H.

Considerable support ef fort by TUSI and G&H has been required to produce viable plans consistent with state of the art technology.

Due to large number of vendors involved, individual plans vary in approach depending on experience, equipment design, resources and philosophy.

This is a new area with no past precedents.

All vendors must comply with IEEE 323-1974 and 344-1975 qualification requirements and documentation.

[

  • L u c...s.> c.

Y&vo s' ' ^ 4 L o ~ - O ' ' ** L l^^'-

L '

hc ; 4,L c h H e c o-s '

EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATION TOR BOP CLASS IE EQUIPMENT Normal Operating and Abnormal / Accident Environment defined.

Equipment Location Loss of Ventilntion Temperature Chemical Pre ssure Seismic Humidity Equipment not subject to LOCA or HELB environment, the single DBE is the seismic event.

Electrical Rating / Maximum-Minimum Range Voltage Frequency Qualification Requirements / Documentation IEEE 323-1974 IEEE 344-1975 Plus applicable " daughter" documents IEEE 317-1976 IEEE 383-1974 IEEE 334-1974 IEEE 387-1977 IEEE 382-1972 Also guidance from latest state of art documents such as:

IEEE P 650, Draft 9,

1977 IEEE P 535, Draft 13, 1976 IEEE P 649, Draft 10, 1978 IEEE 381-1977 and other NEMA, ANSI, MIL documents.

Vendor Qualification Plan and Report must contain auditable link for Comanche Peak.

Generic plans must envelope Comanche Pcak requirements.

Qualified Life must be determined.

QUALIFICATION METHODS FOR BOP CLASS I ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT Environmental Type Testing - Preferred method used in majority of cases Analysis Operating Experience Combination of Above Ongoing Qualification - Used in very few instances Aging Natural aging Thermal acceleration Mechanical cycling Radiation exposure Analysis Seismic Testing Analysis Combination of above Acceptance Criteria Qualification program must demonstrate, with margin, that equipment is capable of meeting specified safety related performance require-ments under specified environmental conditions for the qualified life.

(SHEET,1 OF 5)

EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION TITLE / NUMBER IDENTIFICATION for a Qual. Test Plan /Results 1.

Valve Motor Operators Pneumatic - Hyd. Oper. P/N 38991 1736 Rev. A, Borg Warner Report No.

November 21, 1978 WCAP-8754 2.

CCW, AFW, C Spray Pump Motors Siemens-Allis Equip. Qualif. -

3.

SW Pump Motor Form Wound Motors. Issue 2 WCAP-9112, Rev. of May 1, 1978 4.

Control Rm Air Cond Drive Motors Reliance Document No. NUC-1 5.

Traveling Screen Motors Reliance Document No. NUC-9 of 6.

Strainer Motors 7/1/78 and Reliance Seismic Analysis #77-A-4A.

Reliance Document No. NUC-4 7.

Emergency Fan Coil Unit Motors and Wyle Labs Document #545/

6189-1/ES Reliance Document No. NUC-9, 8.

Fan Motors Seismic Analysis Procedure C-1 and Seismic Analyses S-145 and F-146 Qual. Report Vitro Solid-State 9.

Solid State Sequencer Safeguards Sys. Sequencer CPSES 1&2 and Vitro Seismic Qual.

Report No. 2462-1 Gould Document No. GB-34 54 Rev.

10.

Batteries and Accessories 8/10/78 - Test Procedures 3,

for C'. ass IE Qualif. of 5 Types of Ba. Cells Power Conversion Products Qualif.

11.

Battery Chargers and Test Plan - Class IE Battery Accessories Chargers for TUSI/CPSES No. QP-12442, 6/16/78 Amphenol-SAMS Design Qualif.

12.

Electrical Penetration Test Procedure No. 123-2159, Assemblies Rev.

4, 9/26/78

(SHEET 2,OF 5)

QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION TITLE / NUMBER IDENTIFICATION Okonite File No. 7465.1 13.

8kV Power Cables Qualif. of Firewall III Class 14.

600V Control Cables IE Electric Cables and Rcck-bestos Spec. No. RSS-3-021 Okonite File No. 7465.2.B 15.

600V Power and Lighting Cables Qualif. of Firewall III Class 16.

Instrumentation Cables IE Electric Cables and Rock-bestos Spec. No. RSS-3-021 Forney Qualif. Test Plan No.

Accel. Aging Test 17.

Solid State Isolation A-30 2 7 34-Ol Rev.

C Equipment Proc. A-302730-01 Rev.

Seismic Qualif. Test Procedures A-302732-01 Rev. D and No.

Structural Analysis No. A-302761-01, Rev. C.

34-2 Type Test Wyle Labs Repor* Seismic andEnvironmental 18.

Level Switches Plan for Qualification.

Generic Test Aeports, Cicss lE 19.

Air Operated Diaphram Accessories (NAMCO and ASCO)

Valves Greer Report 2872-01, Paul Monroe Qual. Report No. PMH-PA-18962, 20.

Valve Motor Operators Rev. C and NAMCO Qual. Report Gould Qualification Summary 21.

7,2kV Switchgear Report No. 33-51261-05, Rev. 2 9/27/78 and Seismic Cert. Report No. 33-51261-SS W Seismic Class IC Qual. Report 22.

480V Load Center Unit on 2000 kVA Dry Type Air Vent.

Substation Transformer ASL Power Center Transf. (Includes IEEE 323-1974 and IEEE 323A-1975 Qual.) W Document No, M7331B Attachment to the Proposal for 23.

480V Load Cer.ter Unit Qual. of Class IE Nuclear Safety and Proposal Substation Switch, ear Related Switchgear, IE for Qualification of Class Nuclear Safety Related Switch-Revised October 1978

gear,

(SHEET 3 OF 5)

QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION TITLE / NUMBER IDENTIFICATION Plan 101 MCC IEEE 323 Qual. Test 24.

Motor Control Cente rs to be conducted in accordance with IEEE 323-1974 & IEEE 344-1975, Rev.

1, 9/25/78 Test Plan / Procedure for IEEE 25.

AC & DC Panel Boards and 323 Qual. - G.E. Document No.

DC Switchboards 182-79225 and Test Plan / Pro-cedure for Category IE Seismic Qual. - G.E. Document No. 117-2323 26, RMW, Spent Fuel Pool Pump Motors (later)

Delaval Qual. Testing Procedure -

27.

Diesel Generator Set TUSI-CPSES Units 1&2 Division of Portec Qual.

E.P.

28.

D/G - Generator and Exciter Program - Class IE Motors, Gene-Regulator rators and their Accessories for Safety Related Services in Nuclear Power Generating Stations Wyle Labs Qualification Plan NES-29.

D/G - Generator Control Panel 26296-1 for RTE-Delta, TUSI CPSES 30.

D/G - Engine Control Panel Wyle Lab. Qual. Plan No. NES-26290 for Diesel Engine Control System Components Fisher Controls #STP-2 Seismic &

31.

Valve Motor Operators Environmental Test / Control Valves Wyle Labs Test Procedure Nos.

32.

Chiller Electrical Equipment 545/5081-1/CP, 545-1, 541/6700/

ES, 545/7068-2/ES, and Gould Report No. CC-323.74-3.6 33.

Emergency Fan Coil Unit Wyle Labs Qual. Plan No. 545/

6189-1/ES Thermostats Seismic and Environmental Test 34.

Valve Motor Operators Instruction for Control Valves, and Air Operators Fisher Controls 2 Rev.

F, 10/20/78.

Subvendor Procedures

- Seismic Qualification Reports -

Limitorque Valve Actuators, 4/1/75

- Qualification Type Test Report

  1. 600456 12/9/75 Limitorque Valve Actuators for PWR Service

- Automatic Switch Company, Test

(SHEET 4 OF 5)

QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION TITL_E/ NUMBER IDENTIFICATION 1978 Report No. AQS21678/TR March, 34.

(Continued)

- Qualification of NAMCO Controls Limit Switch Rev. 4/7/78 (later' 35.

Control Boards Pressure and Differential Rosemount Procedure 5783 36.

Pressure Transmitters Valcor Report No. OR 52600-5292-7/

37.

Solenoid Operated Valves 5950-1 and Appendix II to the Above Report No. QR 52600-515 Westinghouse ISD Qualification 38.

Analog Controls Plan Rev. O,11/8/78 Wyle Labs. Test procedure No.

39.

Pressure Switches 541/4494/CP 12/10/75 and Wyle Labs. letter 5/26/76 IEEE 323-74 Qualification Test 40.

Sensors (RTD Assemblies)

Procedure for RTD and Thermocouple IPS-263, Rev. 1 Assemblies CPSES No.

Dated 6/16/77 382 Limitorque IEEU 323 and IEE for 41.

Valve Motor Operators Nuclear Qualification Data Safety Related Service - NQDS-11/15/77 42.

Lighting and Misc. Transformers (later)

Qualification Procedure - Elgar Document No. 528-044-92, 10-3-78 43.

Static Uninterruptible Power Supply Systems (later) 44.

Pre f ab Cab] s and Connectors (later) 45.

Auxiliary Relay Racks (later) 46.

Containment Hatch Electrical Equip.

(later) 47.

Safeguards Sump Pump Motor Oil Storage Tank Transfer Pumo (later) 48.

Motor & Chiller Wate r Pump :totor IE Electrical Qualification of Class 49.

Atmospheric Clean-up and 112 Purge Electrical Equipment Equipment to IEEE 323-1974, CVI B558-9908 Rev. B (10/20/78),

No.

and Seismic Qualification of Class IE Equipment to IEEE 344 CVI No.

B558-9907

(SHEET 5 OF 5)

QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION TITLE / NUMBER QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION _

Buffalo Forge /WestinghousePro.' du IDENTIFICATION Testing of a motor for Reactor Canada.

Fan Motors Cooling Fans Containment Co.

ACME-Cleveland Dev. Controls Limit 1)

NAMCO Damper & Valves Electrical Qual ofSwitch *.1odel EA-740 51.

IEEE 323 ('74) &

Equipment 344('75),

382 (' 72) Feb. 20, 1978 Seismic Qual. of Limitorque

2) Valve Actuators (ASCO)

Automatic Switch Co.No. AQS216

3) Test Report Qual. Tests of Solenoid Valves March, 1978.

Containment Isolation Electrical (later)

Valves Equipment B587-9915 Rev. B Qualifica 52.

of Class IE Equipment to IEEEand CVI No.

Control Room Air Conditioner 53 323-1974 Electrical Equipment Seismic Qualification of Class IE Equipment to IEEE 344 Primary Sampling and Monitoring (later)

System Control Panel Wyle Labs Qualification Planfor a H 54.

Monitoring NDQ-771291 323-1974 Containment H2 Electrical Equipment lyzer for IEEE 55.

(later)

Instrument Racks Westinghouse ISD Qualification 56.

Indicators and Recorders Plan Rev.

O, 11/18/78 57.

ITT Barton Qualification Plan 9999. 3083.2 Rev. 4, 7/11/78 Differential Pressure Switches 58.

(later) 59.

Conduit Seals (later)

Terminal Blocks and Teqminations 60.

OUTLINE OF QUALIFICATION PLAN

( Re fe fence 13) 8kV Power Cable - Okonite 600V Power & Lighting Cable - Okonite 8kV cables classified Class IE outside containment only.

600V cables classified Class IE inside and outside containment.

e Cable operating experience during last 25-50 years determined - natural aging approach.

Cable test samples constructed with typical insulation formulation used in older cables.

Cable test samples with EPR insulation (type furnished for Comanche Peak) were constructed.

Both types of insulation aged at 150 C for approximately 3000 hours0.0347 days <br />0.833 hours <br />0.00496 weeks <br />0.00114 months <br /> to simulate 40 years plus margin.

EPR asulation proved superior in resistance to aging compared to cable insulation which had performed success-fully with natural aging for 25-50 years.

Aged modern insulated samples type tested in accordance with IEEE 383-1974 and CPSES specific entironment plus margin.

Even 8kV cables which do not experience LOCA were so tested thus incorporating further margin.

Cables qualified for 40 years with margin.

OUTLINE OF QUALIFICATION PLAN (Reference's 14 & 16) 600V Control Cable and Instrumentation Cable Rockbestos Cables classified IE both outside and inside containment.

Arrhenius technique employed - 850 hours0.00984 days <br />0.236 hours <br />0.00141 weeks <br />3.23425e-4 months <br /> at 150 C simulate 40 years.

Cable samples aged at elevated temperature of 150 C for 1300 hours0.015 days <br />0.361 hours <br />0.00215 weeks <br />4.9465e-4 months <br /> to provide margin.

Aged samples were type tested in accordance with IEEE 383-1974 and CPSES specific environment plus margin.

Cables qt-l'Iled for 40 years with margia.

OUTLINE OF QUALIFICATION PLAN (Reference 43)

Static Uninterruptible Power Supply Systems (UPS)

ELGAR Vendor presently qualifying a substantially similar piece of equipment to IEEE 323-1974 including component aging.

Segregation of non-safety related components and a FMEA to determine that their failure will not adversely effect the UPS ability to perform.

Complete Stress Analysis of all safety-related electrical components.

Segregation of components into those with and without age-related failure mechanisms.

Analysis for similarity with components in the sample equipment tested.

Assignment of Maintenance Replacement Intervals Assembly and Functional Testing of a Prototype UPS Burn-in of a Prototype UPS Temperature Test of the Prototype UPS Seismic Test of the Prototype UPS Final Functional Test of the Prototype UPS

OUTLINE OF QUALIFICATION PLAN (Reference 17)

Solid State Isolation Equipment Forney Engineering Company A test unit will be subjected to an accelerated aging /

stress levels of 50 C and 90-95% relative humidity for 102 hours0.00118 days <br />0.0283 hours <br />1.686508e-4 weeks <br />3.8811e-5 months <br />.

The following tests are performed on the aged units:

Vibration test Input voltage and frequency variation Electrical characteristics test Temperature and humidity test Functional test under ambient conditions Aged test unit operated continuously for extended period of time under normal environmental conditions.

Reliability study and analysis conducted simultaneously witn ongoing test.

Results of ongoing test used to support analysis.

OUTLINE OF QUALIFICATION PLAN (Reference 6)

Strainers (Nuclear) - Motors Reliance Qualification program conforms to IEEE 334-1974 - motors outside containment.

Motorettes constructed and tested in accordance with IEEE 117-1974.

Seismic qualification by analysis.

Complete motor received following test Preliminary thermal aging Mechanical aging via 1200 cycles of start-stop-reverse operation under load.

8 Radiation to 2 x 10 rads.

OUTLINE OF QUALIFICATION PLAN (Reference 9)

Solid State Sequencer Vitro Labs Establishment of baseline (40 year) qualified life of the equipment by analysis, such as FEMA, MTBF, reliability analysis.

Ongoing qualification program to verify or adjust qualified life determined by analysis.

Those components exhibiting less than equipment qualified life, as determined by ongoing qualification plan, will be replaced as part of normal scheduled maintenance program.

Seismic testing of components included in ongoing qualification.

OUTLINE OF QUALIFICATION PL'11 (Reference 18)

Class lE Level Switches Magnetrol International These switches are used in various outside containment locations.

Typical functions would include safeguards sump pump start /stop control.

A comprehensive type test program envelopes all required CPSES requirements.

The aging program includes tempera-ture and humidity cycling, mechanical cycling and vibration cycles.

Post aging DBE tests include seismic (OBE and SSE) tests followed by high radiation testing.

The qualification levels were established to envelope a nunber of project's requirements and are being performed generically by the vendor.

The qualified life for level switches installed at Comanche Peak will be adjusted to conform to actual plant conditions where the qualification parameters significantly exceed these conditions.

f.

OUTLINE OF QUALIFICATION PLAN (Reference 36)

Class lE Pressure and Differential Pressure Transmitters Rosemount, Inc.

'n-The subject transmitters are used in various outside cont ment locations for ESF equipment control functions, and post-accident monitoring.

The qualification plan consists of a rigorous type tes-sequence, supplemented by analytical techniques for th.

acceleration models and for extending the qualification to models not type tested.

The aging program includes vibration, temperature and humidity cycling, mechanical (pressure) cycling, radiation, DBE seismic testing and HELB environmental.

This generic qualification program is designed by the vendor and an entire to envelope a number of project's requirements, model line.

The qualification report will identify Comanche Peak specific applications and their relationship to the generic tests.

OUTLINE OF QUAI,IFICATION PLANS (Reference 37)

Class lE Process Solenoid Valve Operators Valcor Engineering Corp.

These valves are used for containment isolation of small (less than 1") lines to and from the hydrogen monitoring system and the radiation monitoring system.

The valve actuators are qualified by similarity to environ-mental tests performed for a different project.

The test sequence includes thermal aging, cyclic aging, radiation, seismic and LOCA testing.

The test parameters conservatively envelope the Comanche Peak plant parameters.

This completed test report is submitted to the USNRC for review of test plans and methodology and not test results.

OUTLINE OF QUALIFICATION PLAN (Reference 58) )

Class lE Differential Pressure Switches ITT Barton, Inc.

These switches are used for such functions as standby HVAC fan star'.up and containment spray additive tank discharge valve control.

The qualification type test program consists of thermal

  • and mechanical cycling, humidity cycling, radiation and seismic effects.

The type test plan is generic to a number of vendor applications and envelopes the Comanche Peak requirements.

There are no Class lE differential pressure switches required to meet HELB requirements at Comanche Peak, and this portion of the test program is therefore not applicable.

The final qualification test report for Comanche Peak will include plant specific applications and enviroiments and the qualified life will be adjusted according'

    • j ENCLOSURE S PSB C0bfEVrS ON BOP EQUIPhBT QUALIFICATION A.

Solid-State Safeguar_ds System Sequences 1.

Page 3.10fi-1 of FSAR states that aging and environn. ental effects prior to seismic qualifications will be taken into account inaccordance with 323-1974.

Seismic qualification report tio. 2432-1 Solid-State Safeguards It is the System Sequencer does not take into account aging.

staffs position that equipment be aged to qualified life before seismic shaking. Justify not aging or provide results of retest using acceptably aged equipment.

u 2.

For each device located on the Solid-State Safeguards System Sequencer provide a listing that includes the following:

(a) type (functior.al designation or device number), (b) Manu-facturer, Ic) MarIu'f acturer's type number and model number, (d) functional description, (e) Affect on Class 1E Function, (f) Safety function, (f) Electrical schematic diagram number where device appears and, (h) identification of devices selected for monitoring during the seismic terting.

3.

Provide a general description of the Solid-State Safecuards System Sequencer and its safety functions.

4.

Justify, ttrough the documentation of applicable tes t results, that contact chatter of 2 milliseconds will have no affect on safety systems.

l

  • 5.

In reference to Action Environmental Testing Corporation Test report fio. 13601 (Appendix D to report tio. 2462-1), the con-tacts af the r(lay being tested were not monitored during seis-mic shaking in the open position or dt. ring the actual opening and closing operation.

It is the staff position that both the normally open and nonrally closed contacts be monitored in t..e energized and deenergized condition during seismic shaking.

It is also the staf f position that the relay be operated and monitored while changing position from the energized to the deenergized position and from the deenergized to the energized position during seismic shaking. Provide' results of tests that meet the above described staff positions.

6.

From the information provided in test report flo.13601 in regard

~

to the Agastat re16y (type GPB), it appears that the relay was not monitored during seismic shaking.

It is the staff position that the following items be monitored during seismic shaking:

a) open and closed contacts with the relay deenergized, b) open and closed contacts with the relay energi7ed, c) changing posi-tion from the energized to the deenergized position, d) changing position from the deenergized to the energized position, e) the time delay function, and (f) the shift of the calibrated set point.

7.

For each representative device located on the Solid-State Safeguards System Sequencer provide the qualification test plan 7 test set-up, test procedures, acceptance criteria, conclusions, and results for the monitoring of electrical safety function during seismic shaking.

B.

Solid-State Isolation Equipment 1.

Test procedure, seismic qualification (A-302732-01) does not describe electrical monitoring during the actual seis-mic shaking. Provide this description,.,

Test Procedure, Qualification test plan, fiumber A-302734-01 2.

does not address the following items, a) definition of, scryice conditions'to be simulated, b) test equipment requirements including accuracies, c) performance limits or failure definition, and d) margin Provide additional information that addresses these items.

3.

Section 5.0 of test procedure A-302734 states that the test unit will not be subjected to radiation during qualificatior.

testing. Demonstrate that the required radiation level (10 rade gamma) will produce less ef fect than the radiation 3

level that would cause loss of the equipment's Class lE func-tion.

(IEEE Standard 323 Section 6.3.2(4)).

4.

Provide the detailed description of the Functional test procedure A-302728-01 and Electrical characteristics Test procedure A-302737-01.

5.

Test procedure A-302734 implies there will be on-going quali-fication to determine qualified life. Section 4.8 indicates that only a functional test will be performed as part of this on-going qualification. Justify the non inclusion of tests outlined in sections 6.8 through 6.11 in the on-goi-g quali-fication program.

u

~

$ff ga "

%

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19269C245&oldid=4853812"