ML19269B895
| ML19269B895 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07002623 |
| Issue date: | 12/18/1978 |
| From: | Blum S, Jeffrey Riley CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY GROUP |
| To: | Porter W DUKE POWER CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19269B897 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7901190004 | |
| Download: ML19269B895 (3) | |
Text
.
T ?E CGOLIN4 E% ROFYErf)ll R )Y GROJP p
q December 18, 1978
- g NRC P!mur nnnMENT ROOM Mr. William L. Porter p[b MLuu;uo2g""dMca 7
Duke Power Co.
q
,9 Charlotte, NC g<e, 4 e
Dear Mr. Porter; Harewith discovery qusstions re Docket No. 70-2623:
9f hh-a. Further to your respcnne of Dec. 8 State in detail the reasons for performing a PE on fuel assemb37 2Bh0 Why was fuel rod from corner of assembly 1Dh0 examined?
State in detail the reasons for performing a PE on fuel assably Ic66 h5-a. The answer to this question was not responsivo. Please respond to the individual questions as askod. Bo sure that your anorer gives the negative salvage value of an individual fuel assembly; whether this negative salvage value 4111 reduce Dukets property tax obligation in Mecklenburg Cot;nty; whether rmoval ofspent fuel assmblies from Oconee county will affect tax obligations in South Carn 1h, and if so the dollar amount.
h6-a. The amrJer to this question was not responsivo. Please answer occh of. tho quectionsas asked.
h7-a. The answer to this question is unsatisfactory in that, in part, the attachments provMed were inreadable. Re h7A, the plant and mrr4114ng buidings should be shown on the same sheet and the fuel pools, including modos of access 3 clearly indicated. Scale should be at least twice as largo. The revision should be the latest avni7nble and represent the current situation. Define "P.H. Drd".
Ro h7B, a single sheet, conpletely rerrbhla, showing the plant position including fence locations is requested.
h9-a. Please answer the questions actually asked. What are the differences between a ende. prepared for offsite shipment and on-site movement?
What information do you have on the radiation levels of a cask prgared for offsite shipment? Ro " intact transportation vnhicle" in 107 51-a. Does the $29,500 cost estimate assume one time use of a new fuel pool?
Provide the itemized costs of constructing Oconee fuel pools 1/2 and 3.
52-a. Did Duke receive hillhgs for epent fuel shinments paid for by ben If so, provide the $nformation en the billings.
57-a. Please provide the materdal specifications and detail drawings for the tiro-types of cask, 854 HENLEY PLACE CHARLOTTE NORTH CAROLINA 98907 - (704) 375 4349 790119 N O9'
- 58-c. In regud to " Duke has no infomation with regard to the cost of the casks ussd in the DOS orash tests", expInin the answer given to question 20, "For econcrdo reasons the casks used in the recent crash tests ucro nas presencly c: ployed for shipping spent fuel."
$9-a. If the rupture discs on tho borated water tanks rupture, where will the borated water dischargo?
63-a. Who will exercise the judgment in driver assignment? Will this be a one-the judgm.cnt? Will thoro be semo checking or monitoring procedure befare cach individual haul?
6h-a. Stato the Catawba fuel pool costs which can be broken out and provido an estimate for a free standing extorral structure. This includos equipment costs, pool, cr:.nos, racks, pumps, heat exchangers (if used), ventilation equdpment, air filters (if used),
etc.
65-a. Not responsivo. What means of corstunication will be provMod? CB7 Two-6my? Ccntinuous?
66-a. Should the answer bo 0.28% leakers?
67-a. Not recponsivo. Is ::hielding provided for the drivor? If so, what is it? What is the attenuation factor for the g m spectrum? For the neutrons c:titted?
68-a. Will the hn-nMous materini training provided the drivers include rnA4wtivo materials? If so, provide the instructional materials.
F/-c.
Is the nmm1 main cavity test at 1200 or at "200" psig? Is the annual 0-ring tost to 1000 pai perfomod with the cask or on separato test equi M ?
71-a. Distinguish the notification of high=ay patrol trocps D, E, and H which acec=panied the ship =ents referenced in hh from surveillaree.
78-a. Are we to read Dukets response to this question as signifying that only the dollar values of construction and trancporting enter the cost /benefitweighingandthatradiationdosesandriskshavenot entered the weighing?
83-a. Provido in full all authorities to the effect that the Prico-Anderson protection applies to spent fuel outside the generating station boundary a) in regard to the station of origin, b) in regard to other than the station of origin.
85-a. A visit to the Oconee station in, as I recall, June,1972, found fuel pool 1/2 a cct:pleted structure on the exterior.
Construction on fuel pool 3 had not, I was told, begun. Provide the date of initial primary excavation for fuel pool 3.
4 87. Provide Dulmts response to the May 19,1978 Ictter from Starostocki to Parker.
- 88. Provide response to Loysenta request described on p. 2 of letter frcn Loysen to Starostecki dated Juno 16, 1978
- 89. Provide responso to the request from Starostocki to Parker dated July 21, 1978 90 Provide copy of the mergency plan referred to in the " Request for Additiomi Ihformtion" acoccoanying the letter referenced in 89 above.
91 Provido a copy of nTopical Report, Quality Assuranco Program, Duko-1" referenced as in 89 and 90 foregohg.
92 Prc,dde Dakota responso to letter frcm Starostocki to Parker dated October 12, 1978
- 93. 3h Dukets presentation to the 120 dated 6-2-1978 reference is mada to a changeover to an 18 month cycle at Oconce. W47' the 18 month cycle change the rating of a generating unit? If so, to that 57 Will the 18 month cycle change the source terms of a spent fuel *7 assembly?
If'so, provide the calculated values.
9h. Please provido copies of letters from Duke to IEC dated Oct.18 and 20, 1978, discusshg reracking and providing Edditional information.
Please send your remonses to both of the undersigned.
. tu f J /,
L dass Riley Snolley Blum