ML19263D860
| ML19263D860 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 03/21/1979 |
| From: | Hanauer S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Lasher D, Satterfield R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7904130347 | |
| Download: ML19263D860 (1) | |
Text
,
C,,
N DJSTRIBUT10:1:
N
.iEtlTRAL FILE g _1 f!RR READIt!G PS READIliG fiOTE T0:
R. Satterfield D. Labher FR0i1:
S. II. Hanauer
SUBJECT:
ICSD VISIT TO SECUOYAll REF:
lleno Lasher to Satterfield dated 3/19/79 Without interferino with the proposed visit, let's use it as a test case to see how muc: shat we do is " inspecting" and how much is
" licensing review."
Please keep good notes, and give a brief analysis afterward of each agenda itera (Enclosure 1 of referenced memo).
1.
How much time was spent on them?
2.
How rcuch of the work could have teen done by a qualified inspector, inspecting according to an inspection module?
- 3. WWhat sort of " inspection report" would have resulted?
4.
How much review effort would an ICSB reviewer houu had to spend on the " inspection report?"
/ {=
S'. H. Hanauer, Assistant Director for Plant Systems, DSS cc:
. flattson H. Thornburg 7PO4130377
,,,,...bSS:AoPS SHHanauer:sl 1/21/79 CATEN
. nCM 0243
$ w s
- ve * **"* eas m rom o se nic s ; i e r e a o s. : s e
'.CC FORM 313 (9 76)