ML19263C699

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards QA Program Insp 99900265/78-01 on 781127-1201 & Notice of Deviation
ML19263C699
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/19/1978
From: Potapovs U
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Richard C
GENERAL ATOMICS (FORMERLY GA TECHNOLOGIES, INC./GENER
Shared Package
ML19263C698 List:
References
REF-QA-99900265 NUDOCS 7903010019
Download: ML19263C699 (2)


Text

.

/, -/~

C #~. '

,[.#? "%c,'o, UNITED STATES NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION IV

{ ;3y(

g s

611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 1000 3

AR LIN GTCN, TEXAS 76011 g% [..

gg ggt @

+

Docket flo. 99900265/78-01 Generri Atomic Company ATTN: Mr. C. L. Rickrd Executive Vice President Post Office Box 81608 San Diego, California 92138 Gentlemen:

This refers to the QA Program inspection conducted by Mr. J. W. Sutton of this office on November 27 - December 1,1978, of your facility at San Diego, California, associated with the manufacture of nuclear components and to the discussions of our findings with Mr. P. E. Bissonnette and members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

This inspection was made to confirm that, in the areas inspected, your QA Program is being effectively implemented. The inspection effort is not designed to assure that unique quality requirements imposed by a customer are being implemented; nor to assure that a specific product, component or service provided by you to your customers, is of acceptable quality. As you know, the NRC requires each of its licensees to assume full responsibility for the quality of specific products, components or services procured from others.

You should therefore not conclude that the NRC's inspection exempts you from inspections by an NRC licensee or his agents nor from taking effective corrective action in response to their findings.

Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report.

Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of prcce-dures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observa-tions by the inspector.

During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA Program failed to meet certain NRC requirements. The specific findings and references to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter.

Please provide us within thirty (30) days of your receipt of this report a written statement containing, (1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items, (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence, and (3) the date your corrective actions and preventive measures were or will be completed.

790 3 010 0l$

General Atomic Company In accordance with Section 2.790 of the Comission's " Rules of Practice,"

Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter with enclosure and your reply, together with the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the Commission's Public Document Room.

If this report contains any information that you believe to be proprietary, it is nec-essary that you make a written application within thirty (30) days to this office to withhold such information from public disclosure. Any such applications must include a full statement of the reasons on the basis of which it is claimed that the information is proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary information identified in the application is contained in a separate part of the document.

If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified period, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely, ALd,$'O)l Uldis Potapovs, h

~

Vendor Inspection Branch

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Deviation 2.

Inspection Report No. 99900265/78-01

.