ML19263A632

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests That Program to Be Established Will Not Cause Basemat Issue to Become Pacing Item.Permits Use of All Available Means to Effect Objective
ML19263A632
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/31/1984
From: Knight J
NRC
To: Lear G
NRC
Shared Package
ML19263A633 List:
References
FOIA-84-455, FOIA-84-A-56 NUDOCS 8505300256
Download: ML19263A632 (1)


Text

.

l I

?JCnifeb Sinfer, Senale July 19, 1983 Respectfully referred to:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Congressional Affairs Washington, D.C.

20555 Because of the desire of this office to be responsive to all inquiries and cc==unications, your con.;ideration of the attached is requested.

Your findings and views, in i

duplice.te form, along with return of the enclosure, will be eppreciated by

/

k I

.S.S.

Form p2 1

8308180641 830812 CF ADOCK 05000382 CF

.ww4 f.

J. DENN(*W JOHNSTON LOUILI Ah A

?JCnif eb Enf afco.Sencie W ASHINGTON, D.C.

2CS 10 July 19, 1983 Mr. and Mrs. Ronald H.

Burch 7308 Windsor Drive Harahan, Louisiana 70123

Dear Mr. and Mrs. Burch:

Thank you very much for letting me hear from you concerning the cracked slab at the Waterford 3 nuclear plant.

I will certainly be pleased to look into this matter for you, and have taken the liberty of contacting the appro-priate officials here in Washington to request a report.

I will be back in touch with you just as soon as I have any additional information.

I appreciate your bringing this to my attention, and send every good wish.

Sincerely, J. Bennett Johnston United States Senator JBJ:esb

g.,

3 I

Dear Concerned Public Officer:

Would you want a nuclear power plant with a cracked slab in your neighborhood?

We don't and we don't think you would either.

Waterford 3 has a cracked slab!

Will the slab crack and result in a Louisiana disaster?

Even a low probability is too high a possibility.

Once Waterford 3 is fueled, the consumer will be assigned the responsibility for pa;'ing for Waterford 3, cracked slab and all.

They could be paying for their own destruction.

If the crack in the slab propaga1:2, the plant will have to be shut down.

Then the customers of LP&L will have to pay not only for the construction, but also for the discantling of Waterford 3 Why should the customer have to pay for the mistakes of LP&L canagement?

STOP WATERFORD 3 NOW, before it is fueled.

Avert the physical or financial disaster that is sure to follow.

Let LP&L pay for its canage-cent cistakes.

Sincerely,

,/,

' N bM g

y pfl

. h!4/ t I

I