05000271/LER-1980-006-01, /01T-0:on 800122,received Low Flow Alarm on Off Gas Sampling Sys.Flow Disturbance Rendered Both Radiation Monitors 17-150A & B Inoperable.Apparently Caused by Flow Blockage.Flow Increased,Clearing Blockage

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML19262C274)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
/01T-0:on 800122,received Low Flow Alarm on Off Gas Sampling Sys.Flow Disturbance Rendered Both Radiation Monitors 17-150A & B Inoperable.Apparently Caused by Flow Blockage.Flow Increased,Clearing Blockage
ML19262C274
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png
Issue date: 02/04/1980
From: Conway W
VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORP.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML19262C271 List:
References
LER-80-006-01T, LER-80-6-1T, NUDOCS 8002080525
Download: ML19262C274 (2)


LER-1980-006, /01T-0:on 800122,received Low Flow Alarm on Off Gas Sampling Sys.Flow Disturbance Rendered Both Radiation Monitors 17-150A & B Inoperable.Apparently Caused by Flow Blockage.Flow Increased,Clearing Blockage
Event date:
Report date:
2711980006R01 - NRC Website

text

NRC FORM 366 w.

...w w r.an n ww

-.w...

ww (7.TP) y, LICENSEE EVENT REPORT LER 80-6/lT CONTROL BLOCK: l l

l 1

l I lh (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIREO INFORMATION) i e

o11 VITlVIYIS 1l@l01Ol-lOi010 0 l 0 } - l 0 l 0 l@l 4 l l l 1 ! 1 1l@l l

l@

7 8 9 1.iCENSEE CODE 14

S LICENSE NUMdER 25 26 LICENSE TYPE JO 5 7 CA T 58 CON T 011

$03"CE I L @ 0 15 10 10 }0 12 17 Il @l 01 il 212l 810 @ 012l 0141810 l@

3 60 61 DOCKET NUMBER 68 69 EVENT D ATE 74 75 REPORT OATE 30 EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES h i

o 2 l o

3 i

See attached sheet o

4 1

l to s l

.j O is l l

1017 l l

o a I 80 7

8 a SYSTEM

CAUSE

CAUSE COMP.

VA LV E CODE COOE SUSCOOE COMPONENT CODE SU8CCOE SUSCCCE l x i s l@ LLJ@ I z l@ l z i z i z l z l z i z l@ LzJ@ LZJ @

O 9

19 20 7

8 9

10 11 12 13 SEQUENTI AL OCCURPrNCE REPORT REVISION

,,,,,EVENTYEAR REPORT NO.

CODE TYPE N O.

@ ;tgg Ro la 10 I l-l 10 10 16 I l/l 10111 ITI l-l lol eg 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 T

N AC ON ON P NT MET HOURS S8 i POR b 8.

5 PPL ER MANUPAC RER LtJ@L7J@

L2J@

tzJ@

l 01 01 01 01

! vi@

LJO I zi@

lzi919191@

33 34 35 36 37 40 di 42 43 44 47 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRTCTIVE ACTIONS i

o l 1

iI 400 1e*1ched chape d

t 2

l 1

3 l I

i i

A 80 7

s 3 SA S

% POWER OTHER STATUS DIS Q RY DISCOVERY OESCRIPTION NA IA l@l Ooerator Observation l

El @ 10 19 l3 l@ l i

5 A DVITY CO TENT RELEASEO CP RELEASE AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY LOCATION OF RELEASE NA l

l NA l

IzI@lzl@l i

s 7

8 9 to ti 4A 45 80 PERSONNEL EXPOSURES g

NUMBER TYPE OESCRIPTION l

1010101@lzl@l NA i

PER$0N~EL%ubs NUMBER

DESCRIPTION

1 1010I01@l NA i

4 80 7

8 9 11 12 LOSS OF OR DAMAGE TO PACittTv Q TYPE DESCRIPTIO**

v l

1 9

z NA Qnnmn-

V 4 W Q G 30 7

8 9 to PU 8 L t CI TV NRC USE CNLY ISSUED

DESCRIPTION

NA l

llllIIIIlllIIl 2io lNlhl 68 69 80,

7 a 3 to 802-257-7711 2,

W.

COnway PHONE:

NAME OF PREPARER

VTVYS1 05000271 LER 80-6/lT EVETT DESCRIPTION AND PROBABLE CONSEQUDICES At approximately 0830, January 22, 1980, Operations personnel re-ceived a low flow alarm on the Off Gas Sampling System.

Immediate in-vestigation by cognizant plant personnel determined that a flow distur-bance had occurred in the Sampling System rendering both AEOG Radiation Monitors 17-150A&B inoperable.

This condition wcs contrary to the re-quirements of Tech. Spec. Table 3.2.4.

The necessity to perform the action specified in Note 2 of Tech. Spec. Table 3.2.4 was precluded by restoring operation of the AEOG Radiation Monitors 17-150A&B within ap-proximately twenty minutes from event initiation.

Based upon a review of Off Gas System sa=ples obtained directly following this event, it was concluded that no abnormal activity at the SJAEs occurred and that there were no adverse consequences fo the public health or safety as a result of this event. A similar occurrence was reported as RO 79-02.

CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS The investigation into the low flow of the SJAE's Off Gas Sampling System resulted in the determination that the apparent cause of the event was due to a flow blockage. The ic=ediate corrective action con-sisted of increasing flow through the sampling system's components and clearing the blockage.

The metering valve was then adjusted for normal flow and satisfactory operction of the AEOG Radiation Monitoring System was verified. No additional corrective action is envisioned at this time.

17944 5S4'