ML19262A461
| ML19262A461 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 05/27/1971 |
| From: | Howard E US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Henderson J US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19262A462 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910290805 | |
| Download: ML19262A461 (3) | |
Text
.
_____1.--
UNITED STATES j is,,,
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
, f ',
t, DIVISION OF COMPWANCE 201 645 3942
(
,'l
[*
REJION I
). '
t, J
970 BROAD STREET tr e*
NEWARK. NEW JERSEY 07102 May 27, 1971 J. B. Henderson, Chief, Reactor Construction Branch, Division of Compliance, HQ 1-METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT NO. 1 CO Report No. 289/71-2 1
~
By copy of tbis memorandum, the holders of copies of the subject report l
are requested to substitute the attached page 5 and page 11, which have 1
beea cor:;ected, for those pages of the same number in the original report.
e A.Vn.
mu 1
i.
E. M. H W rd Senior Reactor Inspector i
Enclosure:
j-U Page 5 and Page 11 9
cc:
E. G. Case, DRS (3) '
i
.g P. A. Morris, DRL R. S. Boyd, DRL (2)
R. C. DeYoung, DRL (2) i D. J. Skovholt, DRL (3) l P. W. Howe, DRL (2)
A. Giambusso,.CO
,I L. Kornblith, Jr., CO R. H. Engelken, CO Regional Directors, CO REG File f t
i 1484 012 7910290 06 I
i i
J s,. -
.==-.
I 9
l
,~
n 5
U
/
i
/
,The inspector stated that no detailed assignment or responsibility for preparation lof procedures for piping system hydrostatic testings was available for review.
j Mr. Allen stated that the operations group of Met Ed had been assigned the respon-sibility for preparation of procedures and that this group would witness the hydrostatic tests.
5 The inspector stated chat rusty welds and rust along the heat affected zone on pipe spool No. SF-32 had been observed. Also, there was no indication in the 4
UE&C' Release Report or the site receiving report that this violation of UE&C procedure QC-11, Grinnell Specification No. FS-350-5 (Supplement SS-980-E) or GAI Specification No. SP-5550 had been identified. A "QC Release' for Construc-tion" tag was attached to this pipe spool to indicate its acceptance for con-struction use.
Mr. Allen stated that the problem had been identified and that 1
Met Ed had a copy of a letter from Mr. L. D. Schmer, Metallurgist, GAI, to UE&C, 1
dated 7/28/69, which atated thac the rust stain observed on the piping near velds is the result of free iron surface contamination and will cause no corrosion or 5];
other problems in drain pipe service. He said that this letter also stated that magnet tests showed weld metal to be 9 - 107. ferrite,.mcceptable for ER 308 grade 1
1 weld metal.
')
The licensee had no further comments concerning the results of the inspection and i
the meeding was concluded.
s
.m
~
DETAILS A.
Persons Contacted Met Ed i'
- Mr. J. C. Miller, Vice President, Engineering
- hr. H. I. S t ewa rt. Assistant Construction Manager
- Mr. George Bierman, Project Manager
- Mr. John L. C. Bachoffer, Jr., Assistant Project Manager for Engineering and. Construction j-
- Mr. Earl Allen, Resident QA Supervisor
- Mr. Matt J. Stromberg, Resident QA Supervisor (Replacement for Mr. Allen)-
l Mr. Vern Stuebut r, Resident Engineer, Electrical j
Mr. W. Shepard, Resident Eagineer, Mechanical
}
Mr. Gene Hreczuch, Construction Engineer Mr. L Lunstrom, Site QA Monitor for Welding and Piping
- A': tended the Management Interview in Reading, Pa., only.
- Attended the Management Interviev lin Reading, Pa., and contacted at the construction site during the inspection.
o
\\.484 013 7
Def
f s
s:
I./
. (a
~
the UE&C vendor surveillance inspector on his Release Report, nor by [the site receiving inspector. A "QC Release for Construction" tag is attached f,
to this pipe spool.
i 2
Surfact rast on a stainless steel pipe spool in the spent fuel storage system is in violation of UE&C Specification QC-11, " Cleanliness Control";
'l Grine11 Specification FS-350-5; Supplement SS-980-E, " Cleaning of Stainless i
Steel Pipe"; and Gilbert Associates, Inc. (GAI) Specification' No. SP-5550, Section 5.4.4, " Cleaning, Etc. for Stair.less Steel Piping".
-~
M.
Cables and Terminations I
The faspection effort consisted of a detailed review of the QC System as require ( by Attachment H " Instrumentation" and by Attachment I, " Electrical",
PI 380CJ., items 5205.c-
.2, c.3, f.5, f.6 and f.9 cud Receipt and Storage Proceduses for Electrim corrponents including the following:
j i:
1.
Definition of responsibility for receipt inspection and storage com-ponents at the construction site.
2.
Adequacy of information t.o guide the receipt inspection and handling operations.
p y
3.
Adequacy and appropriateness of storage space for components special W g handling.
q f4. Adequacy of provisions and instructions for periodic inspections of
- .).,,
stored components and documentation of the inspectioti.
No deficiencies or items of nonconformance were found in the above areas, j'
however, the resistance value specified for notor windingr, rates over 600 volts of R = Kv + 1 megohm appears very low and will be comr n ed on a later inspection with tihe manufacturer's recomended value.
i 1
The quality control procedures for cables were inspected which included the following items:
1.
Procurement 2.
Materials Certification I
3.
Nondestructive Tests
_ 4.
Marking and Identification 5
g']}4 5.
Protection from Contamination 6.
Packaging
^
7.
Quarantine and Disposition of, Nonconforming Material
(),
./
f s
a