ML19261E883
| ML19261E883 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee, Crane  |
| Issue date: | 08/16/1973 |
| From: | Thornburg H US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Reinmuth G US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19261E884 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910170941 | |
| Download: ML19261E883 (2) | |
Text
C. W. Rein =uti ^110 h<
FS6E3 ACTION CC?~7DL FORh i
F0#144 A.
Acti,on Code Na=c of Licensee and Facility Three Mila Island 1 5022S9 Docket No.,or License No.
Title Core Flood Tank Ston Valve Failuro Origin Region I Date Rec'd clic/79 B.
FS&EB Branch Coordinator:
Bryan Dreher X
I Ellis Paulus Co=pletion Requested by
[
C.
Action Requested of:
f ADREMP M&PPOB EPB RPB ADC0 X
OB CB TAB X OCE negien Date Requested 8/22/73 Co=pletion Requested by 9/15/73 Reference Daily Report 8/16/73.
D.
Action Requested
, Y,#
4 Aeview the generic possabilities of the Core Flood Tank Stop Valva Failure at TMI-1.
I L
l E.
Date Action Co=pleted Close-out (Date & Method)
Coc=ents: If co=pletion date is not consistent with your work schedule, please let us knew.
~
/
f/;,4j)(d.C?u1h%-
/
Haro d D. Thornburg, Chief Field Support 5 Enforce =ent 3rench Regulatory Operations r
1483 10.,
cc:
J. G. Davis, Ro i
79101709p
}
a
, Met Ed G. Bierman, Project Manager, TMI 1 and 2 T. G. Hreczuch, Construction Engineer MPR Associates N. M. Cole GPU B. G. Avers, Manager, QA B.
Introduction Mr. Heishman stated the purpose of the meeting was to review the observa-tiona made by CO during the re-audit of the B&W program.* C0 stated that the re-audit sought objective information on the establishment and implementation of a QA program to determine how the B&W QA effort compares to commitments in the FSAR, as amended, and 10 CFR 50, Appendix B.
The specific observations were discussed with B&W and Met Ed to verify that the CO understanding of the B&W QA program was correct and to assure that no misunderstandings of CO comments occurred.
S&W and Met Ed were encouraged to participate in the discussion. Areas that require followup were identified.
C.
Discussion of Criteria 1.
Criterion I - Organization The re-inspection indicated that the B&W organization met the commit-ments in the application and the intent of this criterion.
Since the re-inspection, B&W has prepared a document that delineates the respon-sibilities for the N P G D Quality Assurance, a line organization, and the Engineering Technology Department, a staff organization. This documentation defines the responsibilities of the QA-QC groups in the area of establishing policy and guidelines related to the reliability and quality of products. The definition and delineation of authorities contained in the documentation appears adequate to assure that con-flicting policy and guidelines are not promulgated.
2.
Criterion II - QA Program B&W indicated that the procedures for training and qualification of QA-QC personnel were being prepared and in some cases, particularly NDT, implemented.
1483 106
- C0 Report Nos. 289/70-3 and 320/70-3
e
. C0 stated that verification of the adecuacy of these procedures and instructicas would be accomplished during subsequent inspections.
3.
Criterion III - Desien B&W indicated that the program for development and implementation of instructions pertaining to the scope and depth of review to be per-formed on systems and components has not been completed.
B&W re-stated their position that completion of the remaining procedures would be accomplished on or about August 1, 1970.
C0 stated that verification of the adequacy of these procedures and instructions would be accomplished during subsequent inspections.
4 Criterion VI - Document Control B&W corporate management has not reached - decision concerning obsolete document control and long term record retention.
Long term record re-tention has and is being given attention on the corporate level, and at this point in time, neither the form (microfilm r actual document) nor location has been decided.
C0 stated that verification of the adequacy of these procedures and control and retention of obsolete documents and long term records would be accomplished during subsequent inspections.
5.
Criterion XVIII - Audits B&W has not prepared instructions delineating.the depth and scope cf internal and vendor audits.
B&W had completed an initial internal audit in accordance witu 4 prev-ious commitment.*
D) bhh I
O suuuW }
o cNA 1483 107 200 Report Nos. 289/70-3 and 320/70-3, Criterion XVIII.