ML19261E860
| ML19261E860 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 04/12/1977 |
| From: | Arnold R METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. |
| To: | Brunner E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19261E857 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910170901 | |
| Download: ML19261E860 (4) | |
Text
.
9
_~
i
.s
- "?fMM i
' =-
,e c,
--,-ms r
/
'- METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY suss:oiaavorcensaat pueticuritiriescoaponArion./
/
POST OFFICE BOX 542 READING, PENNSYLVANI A 19603 TELEPHONE 215 - 929-3601 April 12, 1977 GQL 0469 Mr. Eldon J. Brunner, Chief Reactor Operations & Nuclear Support Ersnch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Co=nission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406
Dear Mr. Brunner:
Docket No. 50-289 operation License No. DPR-50 Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (TMI-1)
Inspection Report No. 50-289/77-05 This letter and the enclosure are in response to yo u inspection letter of March 23, 1977, concerning Mr. A. Fasano's inspection of TMI-1 and
)
the resultant finding of the apparent deficiency.
Sincerely, I
R. C. Arnold Vice " resident RCA:DGM:eg
Enclosure:
Inspection Report Finding 1483 004 f
C/
- Y"10170 ei
g.
m e.p_-
0 Metropolitan Edison Company Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Docket No. 50-289 License No. DPR-50 Inspection No. 77-05 Apparent Violation A Unit 1 10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterion XVI states in part, " Measures shall be estab-3 lished to assure that conditions adurseto quality.... are pro =ptly identified and correeded".
The accepted Operational Quality Assurance Plan (FSAR Appendix 1A)
Section 6.7 states in part: "The Station Superintendent is directly responsible for.... insuring that conditions adverse to quality, when identified, are corrected for all activities involving operations, =aintenance, repair, refuel-ing, testing, and site engineering."
Contrary to the above, the corrective action delineated in Metropolitan Edison Company response letters to NRC:I Enforcement Correspondence dated May 28, 1976 (Inspection No. 76-11) and August 27, 1976 (Inspection No. 76-19) had not been co=pleted as of February 25, 1977 Specifically, for Inspection No. 76-11, administrative procedures vert to specify the review frequency for operational procedures and the mechanis=s to insure these reviews were to b:s in effect by November 24, 1976, and for Inspection No. 76-19, all Maintenanc a Department personnel whose work could involve lifting leads or placing ju=pers were to
^)
be trained or retrained in the requirements and responsibilities imposed by Ac=inistrative Procedure 1013 by November 1,1976.
Resnonse to Arrarent Violation A (Inspection Report No. 76-11) A change to Administrative Procedure AP 1001, Document Control, which specifies the review frequency for safety-related operational procedures, has been approved. The revised procedure vill be typed and distributed by April 15, 1977 The system to ensure periodic review of safety-related procedures as specified in the revised AP 1001, will be in effect by May 16, 1977 (Inspection Report No. 76-19) All Maintenance Department personnel,whose work could involve lifting leads or placing ju=pers, have been trained or retrained, as applicable, in the requirements and responsibilities imposed by AP 1013, Bypass of Safety Functions and Ju=per Control. Therefore, ve are nov in full co=pliance concerning this item.
The Unit Superintendent and FORC Chairman met shortly after the NRC Inspection No. 77-05 exit interview to discuss the proble= o# " -a'y corrective action.
As a result of this meeting, the PCRC Chairman revised the action ite= tracking system.
The status of a
ite=s vill be for=ay reviewed weekly.
Any ite=
approaching its due date vill receive additional attention.
If for some reascn a due date vill not be met, the NRC vill be notified and a new due date vill be
~
1483 005