ML19261B057
| ML19261B057 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 08/29/1978 |
| From: | Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Rogers J KERITE CO. (SUBS. OF HARVEY HUBBELL, INC.) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19261B055 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900228 NUDOCS 7902090265 | |
| Download: ML19261B057 (2) | |
Text
/h
[pa recg UNITED STATES V
o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[N N,
REGION IV 3
5..
.g 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 1000
/
2 9 AUG 1978 Docket No. 99900228/78-01 The Kerite Company A Subsidiary of Harvey Hubbell, Inc.
Attn:
Mr. J. E. Rogers Vice President & General Manager 49 Day Street Seymour, Connecticut 06483 Gentlemen:
This refers to the QA Program inspection conducted by Mr. W. E. Foster of this office on August 8-10, 1978, of your facility at Seymour, Connecticut, associated with the manufacture of insulated wire and cable and to the discussions of our findings with Mr. A. H. Hvizd, Jr., and rembers of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
This inspection was made to confirm that, in the areas inspected, your QA Program is being effectively implemented. The inspection effort is not designed to assure that unique quality requirements imposed by a customer are being implemented; nor to assure that a specific product, component or service provided by you to your customers, s of acceptable quality. As you know, the NRC requires each of its licensees to assume full responsibil-ity for the quality of specific products, components or services procured from others. You should therefore not conclude that the MRC's inspection exempts you frera inspections by an HRC licensee or nis agents nor from taking effective corrective action in response to their findings.
Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.
During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA Program failed to meet certain NRC requirements. The specific findings and referer" > to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter.
Please provide u., within thirty (30) days of your receipt of this report a written statement containing, (1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items, (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence, and (3) the date your correc-tive actions and preventive measures were or will be completed.
7902090A46
The Kerite Company In accordance with Section 2.790 of the Commission's " Rules of Practice,"
Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter with enclosure and your reply, together with the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the Commission's Public Document Room.
If this report contains any information that you believe to be proprietary, it is necessary that you make a written application within thirty (30) days to this office to withhold such information from public disclosure. Any such application must include a full statement of the reasons on the basis of which it is clained that the information is proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary infonnation identified in the application is contained in a separate part of the document.
If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified period, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely, O
AlcLL di p
Uldis Potapovs, C ef Vendor Inspection Branch
Enclosures:
1.
Notice of Deviation 2.
Inspection Report No. 99900228/78-01 i
,