ML19260D730
| ML19260D730 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek, Callaway, Sterling  |
| Issue date: | 01/22/1980 |
| From: | Haass W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Petrick N STANDARDIZED NUCLEAR UNIT POWER PLANT SYSTEM |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8002120041 | |
| Download: ML19260D730 (3) | |
Text
-
9
- ' Pi Y
4*
JAN 2 21980 DISTRIBUTION:
Central File NRC PDR QAB Projects LDPR Docket Nos.:
50-482, 50-483 QAB Chron. File NSIC 50-485, 50-486 NRR Reading File DSkovholt Mr. N. A. Petrick, Executive Director WHaass SNUPPS JSpraul S Choke Cherry Road JGilray Rockville, MD 20850 ELicitra
Dear Mr. Petrick:
SUBJECT:
SNUPPS QA PROGRAM FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION The QA Branch has reviewed the SNUPPS standard plant QA program for design and construction enclosed with your letter to W. Denton of December 20. 1979.
We have not yet reviewed the associated site addenda.
The femard of the QA program indicates updating through Revision 15 of the PSAR. We have contacted the LPM and our Docket Room and have bten unable to locate Revision 15. Revision 14 appears to be the last revision received.
Our review, therefore, compared the Decerber 20, 1979 submittal to what had been found acceptable through Revision 14. A request for additional informa-tion based on our review is attached.
Also, we note t'he inclusion of a separate QA program in Part 17C.0 for " Nan-Category I Seismic Components," in a format for comparison to the QA program for fire protection. While ace pting the concept of a " graded approach" to.
QA, we request that you meet with as to discuss how this part of the SNUPPS QA program meets the pertinent QA requirements of Appendix B.
We suggest that this meeting also be used to discuss your proposed response to the enclosed Request for Additional Information.
Pfease call Mr. Jack Spraul of my staff to arrange for the meeting or if you have any questions on the above. He can be reached at 492-7741.
Sincerely,
f.
\\Q s\\QGdu\\4J 952 293 WalterY. Haass, Chief
,QualityAssuranceBranchl i Division of Project Management v
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Infomation 800222004l cc:
S. Seiken, SEUPPS
\\\\t </
ogricE). DPM:QAB
_DPp'gAf
, v,DPM.kAB
...JSpraul ;mb..r.JGi 1rayj.
..WRaaks.
$URNAME DATE )'. 1/
/80...hNzz]80
. g.1/. pd80 Nnc Fomu sie (9 76) Nacu ::4o C v.s. cov E RNMENT PRINTING oF Ff cE: 1979 289 369
c SNUPPS Request for Additional Information 1.
The ccmaitment to ANSI N45.2.5-1974 on page 17.1-15 must include a co.witment to supplementary NRC guidance.
Revise the commitment to reccgnize Regulatory Guide 1. 94 of April 1976 or revert to the earlier (Revision 3) commitment to draft 3, revision 1 of N?5.2.5 including Regulatory staff ccrents and supplementary guidance from Section D of the " Green 3ock."
2.
The addition of the words "by the design organization" to the fcurth sentence of the first full paragraph on page 17.1-22 and to item g on page 17.1-24 implios that changes and revisions that affect the quality requirements of prucure.nent documents may not be reviewed by the quality assurance organization. Clarifv whether or not this implication is true in practice and, if it is true, provide justification.
3.
The last twa paragraphs en page 17.1-32 each reflect the concept of selective review and approval of bidders lists.
Identify who (by posi-ticn titfe) selects which bidders lists are reviewed and the bases of the selection.
4.
Reinste:te or justify the deleticn of, " Certification of conformance or quality verificaticn records will be transmitted to the plant site prior to or within sixty (60) days of shipment for safety-related products,"
.~rca the middle of page 17.1-33.
5.
Delete or justify the additicn of "inadvertont" to the last sentence on page 17.1-35 which states : " Identification and control measures shall be provided to pre,ent the inadvertent use of installatit of incorrect or defective material, parts, or ccmponents."
6.
Reinstate or justify the deleticn of: "Such perscns shall not report directly to the iro ;ediate supervisces who are responsible for the work being inspected" from item a cn page 17.1-39.
7.
Discuss the use of an " equivalent organization" to disposition noncon-fore.ing items as "use-as-is" or " repair" as alicued by the second paracraph on page 17.1-49.
8.
Item f on page 17.1-50 introduces the concept of significant nonconfor-mances.
Identify who (by position title) determines which ncnconformances are not significant and the bases of the determination. Also describe how nonccnf:rmances which are not significant are handled.
9.
Replace or justify the deletion of the sixth paragraph, eigth paragraph, and nost of the ninth paragraph from Section 17.1.15 on pages 17.1-50 and 17.1-51.
9 sD e
0 1952 294
~
..v..
2-
~
10.
Replace or justify the deletion of " approvals of suppliers' @ prcgrams and shop inspection reports" from the list of records delivered to the site at the utddle of page 17.1-57.
11.
Discuss the significance of deleting " independent" and "all" fccm the paragraph starting at about the r.;iddle of page 17.1-61.
Also discuss the significance of adding "or assessicents" to part a of the san.e para-graph.
12.
Discuss the significance of deleting the first paragraph frca part 17A. l.2.4, " Personnel" cn page 17A.1-18.
13.
A waiver of audits has been added to part 17A.I.7.4 in the middle of the last paragraph on p3ge 17A.1-26. Provide a cc.aitr.: ant that when such.aivers are made, the involved supplier will be audited at least once every three ye:es. A similar e ui? ent is equired in the para-graph starting cn page 17A.1-31 and ccacluding cn page 17A.1-32.
14 Pc]e 17A.1-26a..hich ccntains '. cst of part 17A.l.8 is iaissing.
15.
Discuss the significance of chaging the solid line en Figure 17A.1-3 betwe n the Snupps Prccur<.7nt M: nager and the Project Inspection Supervisor to a becL3n line.
16.
Replace ar just.ify fi.2 deld.icn of receiving ir.spectica from fire pro-tection items 3 and ; on shaet 3 of nhle 17C.0-1.
17.
S tate..hather or not the S' aPS' t,ac; A
..r.ca cca trol pogram and cccrective action prcgram for fire protection, described in the A/E's Project Enginearing Procciurcs,. Jet secticns 17A.I.15 and 17A.1.16 of tha S.7UPPS' QA pecgera description.
If not, list und justify the davia-tiens.
13.
$> plain.. hat is, not by:
The S:iPPS/ Utility ;A u anizational audit pravisicns satisfy the equir.. ants of Parage ;h 4 of Sacticn 10.0, c
except that audit frequency may vary depending cn the tine span of the activity being audited." This is found in item 10 cn Sheet 2 of Table 17C.0-2.
1952 295
\\
kv 2k 9
9
-