ML19260D591
| ML19260D591 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 12/10/1979 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19260D510 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-348-79-35, 50-364-79-19, NUDOCS 8002110479 | |
| Download: ML19260D591 (1) | |
Text
.
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Alabama Power Company License No. CPPR-86 Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 Based on the NRC inspection November 7-8, 1979, certain of your activities were appatently not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements as indicated below. These items have been categorized as described in correspondence to you dated December 31, 1974.
As required by Section 21.21(a) of 10 CFR 21, each entity subject to these regulations shall adopt appropriate procedures for evaluation of deviations and assure that a director or responsible officer is informed if the con-struction or operation of a facility, or activity, or a basic component supplied for such a facility or activity fails to comply with the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended or any applicable rule, regulation, order, or license of the Commission relating to a substantial safety hazard or contains a defect.
Section 21.21(b)(3) delineates the information to be included in the written report.
Section 21.51 delineates the maintenance of records requirements. Alabama Power Company Policy Statement No. 402, Management Procedure 001-005, Management Procedure 364-001, applicable Quality Assurance besign and Construction and Construction Department pro-cedures have been developed to comply with Part 21 reporting requirements.
Contrary to the above, Alabama Power Company has not been performing evalu-ations of identified significant items to determine reportability in accord-ance with 10 CFR Part 21.
This situation is primarily attributed to not having fully developed and implemented appropriate construction procedures to provide the guidance necessary to assure that defects and noncompliances are properly reviewed and identified for Part 21 evaluations and corporate Quality Assurance Design and Construction personnel not requesting that Southern Company Services perform Part 21 evaluations for items identified as significant. Additionally, Southern Company Services Procedure 4-21 and 4-22 do not provide assurance that all items identified as sigaificant will receive the required Part 21 evaluation.
This is an infraction.
O, g
us 8002110 &