ML19260D211
| ML19260D211 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek, Callaway, Sterling, 05000481 |
| Issue date: | 01/22/1980 |
| From: | Haass W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Petrick N STANDARDIZED NUCLEAR UNIT POWER PLANT SYSTEM |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8002080119 | |
| Download: ML19260D211 (3) | |
Text
/Vfd t Dn p a rc,,,
-(($ '.s, y j UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION w O y.
C WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
'*l=
^ ^
JAN 2 21950
'w'et :os.:
50-482, 50-483 50-485, 50-486 Mr. N. A. Petrick, Executive Director S!;tPPS 5 Choke Cherry Road
%ckville, MD 20850
Dear Mr. Patrick:
9?? JECT: SNLPPS QA PROGRAM FOR DESIG:! A*iD CCNSTRUCTI0il TPe QA Scanch has reviev.ed the Si;UPPS standard plant QA program for design ind ccnstruction enclosed with your letter to Mr. Denton of December 20, 1979.
'le have not yet reviewed the asscciated site addenda.
The forward of the QA program indicates updating through Revision 15 of the PSAR. We have contacted the LPM and cur Docket Room and have been unable to locate Revision 15.
Revision-14 appears' to be the last revision received.
Our review, therefore, ccmpared the D2ce:cber 20, 1979 submittal to what had bcan found acceptable thecugh Revision 14.
A request for additicnal informa-tien based on our review is attached.
Also, we note the inclusicn of a separate QA pecgram in Part 17C.0 for "Non-Category I Seismic Ccepcr.ents," in a fornat for ccmparison to the QA program for fire protection.
While accepting the concept of a " graded approach" to QA, we request that you meet with us to discuss hcw this part of the SNUPPS QA program meets the pertinent QA requirements of Appendix B.
We suggest that this teeting also be used to discuss your proposed response to the enciesed Request for Additional Information.
Please call Mr. Jack Spraul of my staff to arrange for the meeting or if you have any questions on the above.
He can be reached at 492-7741.
Sincerely, N
.,l): :~..l, % )
x.
',' alter P. Haass, Chie'f i Quality Assurance Branch Division of Project Management
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Inferration cc:
e.
Seiken, SMUPPS 1942 238 soouewy
SNUPPS Request for Additional Information 1.
The ccmai tment to ANSI N45.2.5-1974 on page 17.1-15 must include a ccmitment to supple entary NRC guidance.
Revise the cenmit:ent to recognize Regulatory Guide 1.94 of April 1976 or revert to the earlier (Revision 3) commitment to draf t 3, revision 1 of N45.2.5 including Regulatory staff ccaments and supplementary guidance from Section 0 of the " Green Book."
2.
The additicn of the hcrds "by the design organization" to the fcurth sentence of the first full paragraph cn page 17.1-22 and to item g on page 17.1-24 implies that changes and revisions that affect the quality requir. N:nts of procurement dccuments nay not be revir..ed by the quality assurance organizaticn. Clarify whether or not this icplication is true in practice and, if it is true, provide justification.
3.
The last two paragraphs on page 17.1-32 each reflect the concept of selective review and approval of bidders lists.
Identify who (by posi-
~~~ticn titfe) selects which bidders lists are revi?.;ed and the bases of the selec ian.
c 4
Rainstate or justify the deletion of, " Certification of conformance or quality verificatica recceds will be transmitt?d to the plant site prior to cc within sixty (60) days of shipcant for ss.fety-related prclucts,"
fro:n t',e,iddle of page 17.1-33.
5.
Delete cr justify the additica of " inadvertent"
~.c the last sentence on page 17.1-35 ahich states : " Identification and cuatrol c:asures shall be provided to prevent the inadvertant use of installation of incorrect or defective material, parts, or components."
6.
Reinstate cr justify the deleticn of: "Such persons shall not report directly to the i. nediate supcrvisors who are responsible for the work being inspected" from item a en page 17.1-39.
7.
Discuss the use of an " equivalent or,ganization" to dispositicn noncon-ferr.ing items as "use-as-is" or "rapair" as allc.,ed by the second paracrach cn page 17.1-49.
~'
8.
Item f cr pace 17.1-50 introduces the ccacept of significant nonconfor-nances. Idantify who (by position title) determines which nonconformances are not significant and the bases of the determination. Also describe hcw
,cnccnfermances shich are not significant are handled.
9.
Replace or justify the deletien of the sixth paragraph, eigth paragraph, and nost of the ninth paragraph from Section 17.1.15 cn pages 17.1-50 and 17.1-51.
1942 239
--.- ~..- -.. - -
s *
- 10. Replace or justify the deletion of " approvals of suppliers' QA programs and shop inspection reports" from the list of records delivered to tha site at the middle of page 17.1-57.
- 11. Discuss the significance of deleting "irdependent" and "all" from the paragraph starting at abcut the middle of page 17.1-61. Also discuss the significance of adding "or assesstrants" to part a of the same para-graph.
- 12. Discuss the significance of daleting the first paragraph from part 17A. l.2.4, " Personnel" cn page 17A.1-18.
13.
A waiver of audits has been added to part 17A.l.7.4 in the middle of the last paragraph on page 17A.1-26. Provide a ccmmitment that when such waivers are made, the involved supplier will be audited at least coce every three years. A sioilar cer.mitment is required in the para-graph startir.g on page 17A.1-31 and concludir:g on page 17A.1-32.
- 14. Page 17A.1-26a i.hich cc.itains cost of part 17A.l.8 is missing.
- 15. Discuss the significance of changing the solid line on F' jure 17A.1-8 between the Snapps Procurc.cnt "inager and the Project Inspection Supervisor to a becken lir.e.
'6.
Replace or justify tha deletian of receiving inspection from fire pro-tection i b as 3 and 4 on sheet 3 of Table 17C.0-1.
17.
State..'.U.ar or not the SMisPPS' nenconfermnce control progra, and corrective actica pregesm for fire protecticn, described in the A/E's Project &gineering Procedures, meet sections 17A.l. i5 and 17A.l.16 of
.he S.%' FPS' QA pecgram description.
If not, list and justify the d2Via-tiens.
- 13. Explain hat is int by: "The 5:.JPPS/ Utility QA organizational audit provisicas satisfy the rcquirc ?nts of Paragraph d of Saction 10.0, except that audit fraquency may vary depending cn the time span of the activity being audited." This is fcund in item 10 on Sheet 2 of Table 17C.0-2.
1942 240
.