ML19259C324

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violation Noted in IE Insp Rept 70-0820/79-04.Corrective Actions:Alarms Immediately Reset to Proper Setpoint When Criticality Conditions Discovered
ML19259C324
Person / Time
Site: Wood River Junction
Issue date: 04/06/1979
From: Bowers C
UNITED NUCLEAR CORP. (SUBS. OF UNC, INC.)
To: Galen Smith
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML19259C315 List:
References
NUDOCS 7906140587
Download: ML19259C324 (2)


Text

UnC RECOVERY SYSTEMS Division of United Nuclear Corporation One Narragansett Tra,I Te'echor e 401 364-7701 g

A Unc RESOURCES Cecany Wood River Junction. Rhode Island 02894 April 6, 1979 CEB 79-71 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission George H.

Smith, Chief Fuel Facility and Materials Safety Branch Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406

Subject:

USNRC Inspection 70-820/79-04

Reference:

Letter on Subject, George H.

Smith to C.

E. Bowers dated March 19, 1979 Gentlemen:

Attached is United Nuclear Corporation's response to the subject inspection report, which was transmitted to us via the referenced letter.

We trust that this response will satisfactorily resolve the item delineated in Appendix A of your letter.

If further amplification is needed, we will of course be happy to discuss the matter with you.

Very truly yours,

.7 w

-y w 2282 210 C.

E.

Bowers General Manager CEB:RJG:cag Attachment 79061405 7 7i

v UllC ATTACHMENT TO LETTER CEB: 79-71 C.

E.

Bowers to George H.

Smith Dated April 6, 1979 USNRC INSPECTION 70-820/79-04 USNRC COMMENT Contrary to the requirements of 10CFR70.24 (a) (2), on February 12, 1979, three monitoring devices in the criticality monitoring system had a preset alarm point of 30 millirem per hour (10CFR limit is 20 millirem per hour).

UNC RESPONSE The alarms in question were immediately reset to the proper set point when the condition was discovered.

The NIS technician who set these alarms was aware of the correct numerical setting.

However, he was not experienced in working with log scales, and as a result, misread the scale.

The technician who made the error was promptly reinstracted on the proper reading and setting of these meters.

In addition, a review was made of other aspects of his work to determine if any other such problems existed.

None were found.

Finally, the importance of adequate training and training overchecks was stressed with all personnel who were involved in the training of this individual.

2282 211