ML19259A799
| ML19259A799 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000516, 05000517 |
| Issue date: | 01/04/1979 |
| From: | Boyd R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19259A798 | List: |
| References | |
| CPPR-176, NUDOCS 7901110003 | |
| Download: ML19259A799 (20) | |
Text
'
f h
UNITED STATES t
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3;.
- l W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
%J
+....
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY NEW YORK STATE ELECTRIC & GAS CORPORATION DOCKET N0. STN 50-516 JAMESPORT NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 1 CONSTRUCTION FERMIT Construction Permit No. CPPR-175 1.
The Nuclear Regulatory Comission (the Comission) having found that:
A.
The application for a construction permit complies with the requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the rules and regulations of the Comission; there is reasonable assurance that the activities authorized by the permit will be conducted in compliance with the rules and regulations of the Comission; and all required notifications to other agencies or bodies have been duly made; B.
The Long Island Lighting Company and the New York State Electric and Gas Corporation (the applicants) have described the proposed design of the Jamesport Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 (the facility), including, but not limited to, the principal architectural and engineering criteria for the design and have identified the major features or components incorporated therein for the protection of the health and safety of the public; C.
Such further technical or design information as may be required to complete the safety analysis, and which can reasonably be left for later consideration, will be supplied in the Final Safety Analysis Report; D.
Safety features or components, if any, which require research and development have been described by the applicants and the applicants have identified, and there will be conducted, a research and development program reasonably designed to resolve any safety questions associated with such features or components; 7901110003
. E.
On the basis of the foregoing, there is reasonable assurance that (1) such safety questions will be satisfactorily resolved at or before the latest date stated in the application for completion of construction of the proposed facility and (ii) taking into consideration the site criteria contained in 10 CFR Part 100, the proposed facility can be constructed and operated at the proposed location without undue risk to the
. health and safety of the public; F.
The Long Island Lighting Company is technically qualified to design and construct the proposed facility; G.
The applicants are financially qualified to design and construct the proposed facility; H.
The issuance of a permit for the construction of the facility will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and I.
After weighing the environmental, economic, technical a.,d other benefits of the facility against envircnmental and other costs and considering available alternatives, the issuance of a construction permit subject to the conditions for protection of the environment set forth herein is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
2.
Pursuant to Section 103 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and Title 10, Chapter I, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50,
" Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities," and pursuant to the eartial Initial Decision, dated May 9,1978 and the Initial Decision, dated December 26, 1978, of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, the Nuclear Regulatory Comission (the Comission) hereby issues a construction permit to the applicants for a utilization facility designed to operate at 3411 megawatts thermal as described in the application and amendments thereto (the application) filed in this matter by the applicants and as more fully described in the evidence received at the public hearing upon that application. The facility, known as the Jamesport Nuclear Power Station, Unit I will be located on the applicants' site in Suffolk County, New York.
3.
This permit shall be deemed to contain and be subject to the conditions specified in Sections 50.54 and 50.55, of said regulations; is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act, and rules, regulations, and orders of the Comission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the conditions specified or incorporated below:
, A.
The earliest date for the completion of the facility is July 1,1986 and the latest date for completion is July 31, 1990.
B.
The facility shall be constructed and located at the site as described in the application, on the north shore of Long Island in the Towns of Riverhead and Southhold, New York.
C.
This construction permit authorizes the applicants to construct the facility described in the application and the hearing record, in accordance with the principal architectural and engineering criteria and commitments set forth therein.
D.
In view of the fact that the Attorney General has not recomended an antitrust hearing in this matter, that no antitrust issues have been raised by another in a manner according with the Commission's Rules of Practice, and that no finding has been made that an antitrust hearing is otherwise required (10 CFR, Part 2,82.104(d)), antitrust review of the application for this construction permit under Section 105c of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, has beer. completed and a hearing thereon determined to be unnecessary.
E.
This permit is subject to the following conditions:
(1) The applicants shall place all Category I fill and backfill in thin lifts not to exceed eight inches loose thickness where compaction will be achieved by using conventional pneumatic or vibratory roller equipment and not more than four inches loose thickness in confined areas P e compaction by hand operated powered tampers are.equired. The moisture content shall be maintained to within plus or minus two percent of optinum moisture as determined by the
, American Society for Testing and Material Standard D1557. Each lift of fill and backfill shall be compacted by a minimum of four roller passes er coverages of compaction equipment. This minimum coverage shall be increased as necessary such that the field dry density achieved is not less than ninety-five percent of the maximum dry density --
ninety percent for backfill which does not support structures -- as determined by the American Society for Testing and Material Standard D1557 or eighty-five percent relative density -- seventy-five percent for backfill which does not support structures.
The fill and backfill material specifications shall be supplied to the staff at least ninety days prior to placement of any fill or backfill.
(2) The applicants shall provide erosion protection in the area around the circulating and service water pumphouse structure and over the buried piping behind the pumphouse up to the maximum wave runup elevation.
The applicants shall submit to the staff for review and approval the design of this protection prior ~o its installation.
(3) The applicants shall redesign the non-Seismic Category I portions of fuel building (designated as such in the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report) to Seismic Category I requirements.
In doing so, the applicants shall assure that all portions of the fuel building structure and systems which serve as a low leakage barrier to provide atmospheric isolation of the spent fuel storage pool ano associated fuel handling area are designed to Seismic Category I.
F.
This permit is subject to the following conditions for the protection of the environment:
% (1) In accordance with the Order Granting Certification Under Section 401 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (FWPCA) issued June 15, 1977 by the State of New York Board on Electric Generation Siting and the Environment, and as required by Section 401(d) of the FWPCA, the applicants shall comply with all Section 402 permit conditions (including any effluent limitations finally established for the facility) and all applicable provisions of New York State law, rules and regulations.
(2) The applicants shall take the necessary mitigating actions, including those sumarized in Section 4.7 of the Final Environmental Statement during construction of the facility and associated transmission lines to avoid unnecessary adverse environmental impacts from construction activities.
(3) The applicants shall establish a control program which shall include written procedures and instructions to control all construction activities as prescribed herein and shall provide for periodic management audits to determine the adequacy of implementation of environmental conditions. The applicants shall maintain sufficient records to furnish evidence of compliance with all the environmental conditions herein.
(4) Before engaging in a construction activity not evaluated by the Commission, the applicants will prepare and record an environmental evaluation of such activity. When the evaluation indicates that such activity may result in a significant adverse environmental impact that was not evaluated, or that is significantly greater than that evaluated in the Final Environmental Statement, the applicants shall provide a written evaluation of such activities and obtain prior approval of the Director of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis for the activities.
4 (5) If unexpected harmful effects or evidence of serious damage are detected during facility construction, the applicants shall provide to the staff an acceptable analysis of the problem and 2 plan of action to eliminate or significantly reduce the harmful effects or damage.
(6)
In addition to the preoperational monitoring programs described in Section 6.1 of the Environmental Report, with Amendments, the staff recomendations included in Section 6.1 of the Final Environmental Statement shall be followed.
(7) The applicants shall conduct a physical model study of the proposed discharge system and, on the basis of the results of that study, present a final design for the discharge system to the staff for evaluation and approval prior to commitment to a final design (see Section 5.3.1.2 of the Final Environmental Statement).
(8) The applicants shall operate the cooling water intake traveling screens continuously for one year beginning with comercial operation of Unit 1.
The staff will reevaluate this requirement at the end of this one (1) year period. Additionally, the holding pond will be used only during the sampling periods outlined in Section 6.2.3.2 of the Final Environmental Statement.
(9) The applicants shall be required to survey, prior to construction, appropriate local, State and Federal agencies to determine if the golden nematode exists along the proposed transmission corridors.
If the result of this survey indicates that the nematode does exist along the transmission corridor, then the applicants shall be required prior to commencement of const'uction of these lines to develop a plan for preventing the spread of the nematode during the construction of the Jamesport transmission lines.
. In addition, the applicants shall survey appropriate agencies to determine if the nematode will present a problem during plant construction.
If a survey indicates that the nematode would be spread as a result of plant construction, the applicants shall be required to develop a plan to control the spread of the nematode.
If either plan becomes necessary, the applicants shall develop the plans in close cooperation with appropriate local, State and Federal agencies and the plans shall be submitted to the Commission staff for approval.
(10) A salvage excavation of the Hallock's Por.d site will be conducted prior to the start of construction of the Jamesport Neclear Power Station. Applicants will contract to have the salvage excavation performed by a professional archaeologist. The choice of archaeo-logist and salvage excavation proposal shall be subject to the approval of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. Upon receipt of the applicants' excavation proposal, the Advisory Council shall have 30 days to notify the applicants of the acceptability of the proposal. If the Advisory Council does not respond within 30 days, the applicants' proposal shall become final.
(11) Applicants will be required to employ reasonable measures to limit further deterioration of the homes in the Northville Historic District. Limiting further deterioration shall include such steps as termite extermination, roof repair sufficient to prevent rain damage, and measures necessary to discourage vandalism.
It need not include rewiring, plastering, rebuilding, replacing fixtures, or any other measure more properly deemed restoration than prevention of further deterioration. The applicants shall consult with the New York State Historic Preservation Office with regard to the available techniques for limiting further
. deterioration of homes. At the expiration of the resident's life tenancy in the Hallock house (House #65 as identified in the " Report on an Archaeological Reconnaissance" prepared by Messrs.
Vetter and Salwen), the applicants will, at the least, apply the above condition to this home.
The applicants shall make the homes available to qualified historic preservation groups for restoration on the condition that the applicants shall retain responsibility for seeing to it that further deterioration is controlled in accordance with the above condition.
(12) Any spraying performed at the time of initial clearing of the transmission line corridors shall be done by using the following precautions:
a.
Only those preselected plants deemed undesirable should be sprayed specifically in maintaining the right-of-way.
b.
No spraying shall be pennitted within 100 ft. of a body of water or wetland area.
c.
Spray droplets shall be greater than 200 pm for ground spraying. Formulations with high volatility shall be avoided.
d.
Spraying shall not be performed when the wind is greater than 5 mph, when the temperature is gretter than 90*F, or during precipitation or when precipitation is likely.
e.
No area of intensive human use shall be sprayed.
f.
If pastures or other grazing areas are to be sprayed, the owner or lessee shall be notified in sufficient time concerning the spraying operation, the nature of the materials to be used, and the potential adverse effects to his livestock (e.g., residues in milk affecting marketability).
. g.
All herbicide use shall be in accordance with appropriate local, State, and Federal requirements; specifically, all herbicides shall be used in accordance with registra-tion.
h.
All application of herbicides will be performed by a certified professional individual or under the immediate supervision of such an individual.
(13) If, during dewatering for the base of the reactor containment structure, the chloride concentration in the water of the monitoring well exceeds 250 mg/ liter, the applicants will r.zase dewatering or take other actions, such as increasing the recharge rate until the situation is corrected. In addition to onsite monitoring, one well east of the site described as Well No. 22 or its equivalent in location shall be monitored in order to detect in a timely manner any adverse effects and to take whatever corrective action is required.
(14) Where severe traffic problems are encountered as a result of the planned construction, the applicants will take reasonable measures to minimize such adverse impacts.
(15) The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is in the process of clarifying whether or not Section 423, Subpart D (40 CFR 423, Subpart D) of EPA regulations (Area Runoff Category) applies to plants other than operating plants.
Unless and until EPA has ruled on the scope of the applicability of the area rainfall runoff subcategory-as not applying to onsite construction activities or to offsite construction activities (e.g., for construction of the proposed transmission lines and railroad spur),
the staff will require that the effluent limitations established by EPA for construction rainfall runoff or the provisions of an appropriate National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit governing the facility be met.
. 4.
This permit is subject to the limitation that a license authorizing operation of the facility will not be issued by the Commission unless (a) the applicants submit to the Comission the complete Final Safety Analysis Report, portions of which may be submitted and evaluated from time to tine; (b) the Comission finds that the final design provides reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by the operation of the facility in accordance with procedures approved by it in connection with the issuance of said licznse; (c) the Commission finds that operation of the facility *will be in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Comission's regulai. ions and all applicable requirements were satisfied; and (d) the applicants submit proof of financial protection and execute an indemnity agreement as required by Section 170 of the Act.
5.
This permit is effective as of its date of issuance and shall expire on the latest completion date indicated in paragraph 3.A above.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION W
,**)
Roger S. Boyd, DiYector N {
Division of Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Date of Issuance: January 4,1979
[8 4
UNITED STATES
\\
- t NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMisslON 3(,Tf'lf j
WASHINGTON, D. O. 20555
'o, E
,gv LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY NEW YORK STATE ELECTRIC & GAS CORPORATIOF DOCKET NO. STN 50-517 JAMESPORT NUCLEAR P03ER STATION, UNIT 2 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Construction Permit No. CPPR-176 1.
The Nuclear Regulatory Comission (the Comission) having found that:
A.
The application for a construction permit complies with the requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the rules and regulations of the Comission; there is reasonable assurance that the activities authorized by the permit will be conducted in compliance with the rules and regulations of the Comission; and all required notifications to other agencies or bodies have been 1uly made; B.
The Long Island Lighting Company and tho New York State Electric and Gas Corporation (the apFlicants)havedescribed the proposed design of the Jamesport luclear Power Station, Unit 2 (the facility), including, but not limited to, the principal architectural and engineering criteria for the design and have identified the major features or components incorporated therein for the protec.1in of the health and safety of the public; C.
Such further technical or design information as may be required to complete the safety analysis, and which can reasonably be left for later consideration, will be supplied in the Final Safety Analysis Report; D.
Safety features or components, if any, which require research and development have been described by the applicants and the applicants have identified, and there will be conducted, a research and development program reasonably designed to resolve any safety questions associated with such features or components;
. E.
On the basis of the foregoing, there is reasonable assurance that (1) such safety questions will be satisfactorily resolved at or before the latest date stated in the application for completion of construction of the proposed facility and (ii) taking into consideration the site criteria contained in 10 CFR Part 100, +%e proposed facility can be constructed and operated at the proposed location without undue risk to the health and safety of the public; F.
The Long Island Lighting Company is technically qualified to design and construct the proposed facility; G.
The applicants are financially qualified to design and construct the proposed facility; H.
The issuance of a permit for the construction of the facility will not be inimical to the comon defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and I.
After weighing the environmental, eccnomic, technical and other benefits of the facility against environmental and other costs and considering available alternatives, the issuance of a construction permit subject to the conditions for protection of the environment set forth herein is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Comission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
2.
Pursuant to Section 103 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and Title 10, Chapter I, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50,
" Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities," and pursuant to the Partial Initial Decision, dated May 9,1978 and the Initial Decision, dated December 26, 1978, of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, the Nuclear Regulatory Comission (the Comission) hereby issues a construction permit to the applicants for a utilization facility designed to operate at 3411 megawatts thermal as described in the aoplication and amendments thereto (the anplication) filed in this macter by the applicants and as more fully described in the evidence received at the public hearing upon that application. The facility, known as the Jamesport Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2 will be located on the applicants' site in Suffolk County, New York.
3.
This permit shall be deemed to contain and be subject to the conditions specified in Sections 50.54 and 50.55, of said regulations; is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act, and rules, regulations, and orders of the Comission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the conditions specified or incorporated below:
. A.
The earliest date for the completion of the facility is July 1,1988 and the latest date for completion is July 31, 1992.
B.
The facility shall be constructed and located at the site as described in the application, on the north shore of Long Island in the Towns of Riverhead and Southhold, New York.
C.
This construction permit authorizes the applicants to construct the facility described in the application and the hearing record, in accordance with the prir-f pal architectural and engineering criteria and commitments set forth tcerein.
D.
In view of the fact that the Attorney General has not recommended an antitrust hearing in this matter, that no 4,titrust issues have been raised by another in a manner according with the Comission's Rules of Practice, and that no finding has been made that an antitrust hearing is otherwise r,equired (10 CFR, Part 2,82.104(d)), antitrust review of the application for this construction permit under Section 105c of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, has been completed and a hearing thereon determined to be unnecessary.
E.
This permit is subject to the fo,llowing conditions:
(1) The applicants shall place all Category I fill and backfill in thin lifts not to exceed eight inches loose thickness where compaction will be achieved by using conventional pneumatic or vibratory rolle.
equipment and n1t more than four inches loose th>;kness in confined arees where compaction by hand operated powered tampers are required. The moisture content shall be maintained to within plus or minus two percent of optimum moisture as determined by the
. American Society for Testing and Material Standard D1557. Each lift of fill and backfill shall be compacted by a minimum of four roller passes or coverages of compaction equipnent. This minimum 1
coverage shall be increased as necessary such that the field dry density achieved is not less than ninety-five percent of the maximum dry density --
ninety percent for backfill which does not support structures -- as determined by the American Society for Testing and Material Standard D1557 or eighty-five percent relative density -- seventy-five percent for backfill which does not support structures.
The fill and backfill material specifications shall be supplied to the staff at least ninety days prior to placement of any fill or backfill.
(2) The applicants shall provide erosion protection in the area around the circulating and service water pumphouse structure and over the buried piping behind the pumphouse up to the maximum wave runup elevation.
The applic. ants shall submit to the staff for review and approval the design of this protection prior to its installation.
(3) The applicants shall redesign the non-Seismic Category I portions of fuel building (designated as such in the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report) to Seismic Category I requirements.
- doing so, the applicants shall assure that all portions of the fuel building structure and systems which serve as a low leakage barrier to provide atmospheric isolation of the spent fuel storage cool and associated fuel handling 2rea are designed to Seismic Category I.
F.
This permit is subject to the following conditions for the protection of the environment:
W k
. (1)
In accordance with the Order Granting Certification Under Section 401 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (FWPCA) issued June 15, 1977 by the State of New York Board on Electric Generation Siting and the Environment, and as required by Section 401(d) of the FWPCA, the applicants shall comply with all Section 402 permit conditions (including any effluent limitations finally established for the facility) and all applicable provisions of New York State law, rules and regulations.
(2) The applicants shall take the necessary mitigating actions, including those sumarized in Section 4.7 of the Final Environmental Statement during construction of the facility and associated transmission lines to avoid unnecessary adverse environmental impacts from construction activities.
(3) The applicants shall establish a control program which shall include written procedures and instructions to control all construction activities as prescribed herein and shall provide for periodic management audits to determine the adequacy of implementation of environmental conditions. The applicants shall maintain sufficient records to furnish evidence of compliance with all the environmental conditions herein.
(4) Before engaging in a construction activity not evaluated by the Comission, the applicants will prepare and record an environmental evaluation of such activity. When the evaluation indicates that such activity may result in a significant adverse environmental impact that was not evaluated, or that is significantly greater than that evaluated in the Final Environmental Statement, the applicants shcIl provide a written evaluation of such activities and obtain prior approval of the Director of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis for the activities.
. (5)
If unexpected harmful effects or evidence of serious damage are detected during facility construction, the applicants shall provide to the staff an acceptable analysis of the problem and a plan of action to eliminate or significantly reduce the harmful effects or damage.
(6)
In addition to the preoperational monitoring programs described in Section 6.1 of the Enviroamental Report, with Amendments, the staff recommendations included in Section 6.1 of the Final Environmental Statement shall be followed.
(7) The applicants shall conduct a physical model study of the proposed discharge system and, on the basis of the results of that study, present a final design for the discharge system to the staff for evaluation and approval prior to commitment to a final design (see -
Section 5.3.1.2 of the Final Environmental Statement).
(8) The applicants shall operate the cooling water intake traveling screens continuously for one year beginning with comercial operation of Unit 1.
The staff will reevaluate this requirement at the end of this one (1) year period. Additionally, the holding pond will be used only during the sampling periods outlined in Section 6.2.3.2 of the Final Environmental Statement.
(9) The applicants shall be required to survey, prior to construction, appropriate local, State and Federal agencies to determine if the golden nematode exists along the proposed transmission corridors.
If the result of this survey indicates that the nematode does exist along the transmission corridor, then the applicants shall be required prior to commencement of construction of these lines to develop a plan for preventing the spread of the nematode during the construction of the Jamesport transmission lines.
. In addition, the applicants shall survey appropriate agencies to determine if the nematode will present a problem during plant construction.
If a survey indicates that the nematode would be spread as a result of plant construction, the applicants shall bb required to develop a plan to control the spread of the nematode.
If either plan becomes necessary, the applicants shall develop the plans in close cooperation with appropriate local, State and Federal agencies and the plans shall be submitted to the Comission staff for approval.
(10) A salvage excavation of the Hallock's Pond site will be conducted prior to the start of construction of the Jamesport Nuclear Power Statinn. Applicants will contract to have the salvage excavation performed by a professional archaeologist. The choice of archaeo-logist and salvage excavation proposal shall be subject to the approval of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. Upon receipt of the applicants' excavation proposal, the Advisory Council shall have 30 days to notify the applicants of the acceptability of the proposal. If the Advisory Council does not respond within 30 days, the applicants' proposal shall become final.
(11) Applicants will be required to employ reasonable measures to limit further deterioration of the homes in the Northville Historic District. Limiting further deterioration shall include such steps as termite extermination, roof repair sufficient to prevent rain damage, and measures necessary to discourage vandalism.
I' need not include rewiring, plastering, rebuilding, replacing fixtures, or any other measure more properly deemed restoration than prevention of further deterioration. The applicants shall consult with the New York State Historic Preservation Office with regard to the available techniques for limiting further
. deterioration of homes. At the expiration of the resident's life tenancy in the Hallock house (House #65 as identified ir. the " Report on an Archaeological Reconnaissance' prepared by Messrs.
Vetter and Salwen), the applicants will, at the least, apply the above condition to this home.
The applicants shall make the homes available to qualified historic preservation groups for restoration on the condition that the applicants shall retain responsibility for seeing to it that further deterioration is controlled in accordance with the above condition.
(12) Any spraying performed at the time of initial clearing of the transmission line corridors shall be done by using the following precautions:
a.
Only those preselected plants deemed undesirable should be sprayed specifically in maintaining the right-of-way.
b.
No spraying shall be permitted within 100 ft. of a body of water or wetland area.
c.
Spray droplets shall be greater than 200 pm for ground spraying. Formulations with high volatility shall be avoided.
d.
Spraying shall not be performed when the wind is greater th *, 5 mph, when the temperature is grea er than 90* F, or during precipitation or whi n precipitation is likely.
e.
No area of intensive human use shall be sprayed.
f.
If pastures or other grazing areas are to be sprayed, the owner or lessee shall be notified in sufficient time concerning the spraying operation, the nature of the materials to be used, and the potential adverse effects to his livestock (e.g., residues in milk affecting marketability).
. g.
All herbicide use shall be in accordance with appropriate local, State, and Federal' requirements; specifically, all herbicides shall be used in accordance with registra-tion.
h.
All application of herbicides will be performed by a certified professional individual or under the immediate supervision of such an individual.
(13) If, during dewatering for the base of the reactor containment structure, the chloride concentration in the water of the monitoring well exceeds 250 mg/ liter, the applicants will cease dewatering or take other actions, such as increasing the recharge rate until the situation is corrected. In addition to onsite monitoring, one well east of the site described as Well No. 22 or its equivalent in location shall be monitored in order to detect in a timely manner any adverse effects and to take whatever corrective action is required.
(14) Where severe traffic problems are encountered as a result of the planned construction, the aplicants will take reasonable measures to minimize such adverse impacts.
(15) The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is in the process of clarifying whether or not Section 423, Subpart D (40 CFR 423, Subpart D) of EPA regulations ( Area Runoff Category) applies to plants other than operating plants.
Unless and until EPA has ruled on the scope of the applicability of the area rainfall runoff subcategory as not applying to onsite construction activities or to offsite construction activities (e.g., for construction of the proposed transmission lines and railroad spur),
the staff will require that the effluent limitations established by EPA for construction rainfall runoff cr the provisions of an appropriate National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit governing the facility be met.
. 4.
This permit is subject to the limitation that a license authorizing operation of the facility will not be issued by the Commission unless (a) the applicants submit to the Commission the complete Final Safety Analysis Report, portions of which may be submitted and evaluated from time to time; (b) the Commission finds that the final design provides reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by the operation of the facility in accordance with procedures approved by it in connection with the issuance of said license; (c) the Comission finds that operation of the facility will be in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Comission's regulations and all applicable requirements were satisfied; and (d) the applicants submit proof of financial protection and execute an indemnity agreement as required by Section 170 of the Act.
5.
This permit is effective as of its date of issuance and shall expire on the latest completion date indicated in paragraph 3.A above.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION s)
(
+
, ~.,
Rohr S. Boyd, Directorq~a, s -,x'f 3 Division of Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Date of Issuance: January 4, 1979