ML19257C107

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 790522-25
ML19257C107
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 08/20/1979
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML19257C104 List:
References
50-322-79-07, 50-322-79-7, NUDOCS 8001240396
Download: ML19257C107 (2)


Text

.

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Long Island Lighting Company Docket No. 50-322 This refers to the inspection conducted by representatives of the Region I (Philadelphia) office at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Shoreham, New York, of activities authorized by NRC Construction Permit CPPR-95.

During this inspection conducted on May 22-25, 1979, the following apparent items of noncompliance were identified:

A.

Criterion V of Appendix B of 10 CFR 50 requires that " Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions...

and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions...

(which) shall include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria...". The Shoreham Nuclear Power Station FSAR Section 17.1.5A requires that suppliers of safety related materials and services are responsible for imposing the above requirements on their internal operations.

Reactor Controls Incorporated Detailed Welding Specification SW-104 Revision 0 prescribes fillet welds of CRD Beam Support Brackets to the RPV Pedestal Wall with apparent contact fitup of the pieces with no criteria allowing fitup gaps.

Contrary to the above, beam support welds numbered 17 cnd 17A were accepted by RCI quality control on November 15, 1978 although fitup gaps of 3/16 inch existed in the completed welds.

Similar fitup gaps exist in three or more other similar beam supports.

This item is an infraction.

B.

Criterion XVI of Appendix B of 10 CFR 50 requires that " measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as... deviations...and nonconformances are promptly identified and corrected". The Shoreham Nuclear Power Station FSAR Section 17.1.16B describes that the S&W quality assurance program requires that major and recurring conditions adverse to quality, such as...

deficiencies...and nonconformances be identified, the main causes determined, and corrective action taken to prevent repetition.

The FSAR Section 3.12 defines minimum separation for enclosed raceways.

1796 034 8001240 3 %

Contrary to the above, as of May 25, 1979 S&W specification SH-1-159 and associated change EDCR-F19039 permit installation of raceway which do not conform to the minimum separation criteria, and permit subsequent installation of cables in the nonconforming raceways.

Documentation of each nonconformance is provided by specification SH1-159, and future disposition of the condition is controlled by the E&DCR control system.

However, corrective action to prevenc repetition has not been taken and additional nonconforming installations are being made.

This item is an infraction.

C.

Criterion V of Appendix B of 10 CFR 50 requires that " Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions...

and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions...

The Shorenam Nuclear power Station F5AR Section 17.1.5A requires that suppliers of safety related materials and services are responsible for imposing the above recuirements on their internal operations.

The FSAR Section 3.12.2.2.3 states " Mechanical equipment... including control safety conduit and tubing for ECC and other Safety Related systems are separated so that no single credible event, e.g. LOCA, is capable of disabling sufficient equipment to prevent reactor shutdown...".

The S&W specification SH1-343 requires that "In areas where no physical barriers are provided to protect instruments and lines fron, damage by a credible common cause....shall be separated by as great a distance as practical.

In no case shall there be less than a minimum distance of 4 ft. in all directions and barriers shall be routed so as to s.ecrease the possibility of crossing impulse lines of different redundant channels."

Contrary to the above, on May 24, 1979, installed and inspected RCIC system instrument tubing was separated by less than one foot and was not provided with physical barriers at the connection to pipe spool 1"-SLP-9-151-2-1.

This item is an infraction.

1796 035