ML19257B968

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Proposed Tech Specs,Making Sampling Requirements on Diesel Fuel from Storage Tanks Identical,For Both Units
ML19257B968
Person / Time
Site: Hatch Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 01/16/1980
From: Kelly R
GEORGIA POWER CO.
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19257B969 List:
References
NUDOCS 8001220456
Download: ML19257B968 (2)


Text

. Georgia Power Corrpany 230 Peachtree S9eet Post Of tce Box 4545 Attanta. Georg'a 30302 Telephone 404 522-6060 January 16, 1980

  • U v cf Pre dent and Generat Manager @h Power Generation g g,_,,,, ,,,7,7 , g g,n U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Washington, D. C. 20555 NRC DOCKET 50-321 OPERATING LICENSE DPR-57 EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL SAMPLING REQUIRDIENTS Gentlemen:

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90 as required by 10 CFR 50.59(c)(1), Georgia Power Company hereby proposes an amendment to the Technical Specifications (Appendix A to the Operating License). The proposed change wo .d make the sampling requirements of diesel fuel from the fuel storage tank idertical for both units.

The change defines what tests are to be performed on diesel fuel oil.

This request will provide uniformity in analysis requirements for diesel fuel oil used in the emergency diesel generator serving both units. The existing Unit 1 Technical Specifications require ten analyses on fuel oil while Unit 2 requires three. The three analyses (water, sediment and viscosity) are sufficient to assure quality fuel oil for the diesel generators.

The Plant Review Board and Safety Review Board have reviewed this proposed change to the Unit 1 Technical Specifications, and have determined that an unreviewed safety question is not involved. The possibility of a new accident or malfunction not previously considered has not been created because no actual system modifications are involved. Similarly, the consequences of previously analyzed accidents or malfunctions are unchanged since the require-ments to test the diesel fuel oil still exists. Margins of safety are maintained by this surveillance requirement, which is the same as Unit 2. Also,the performance of the diesel remains unchanged.

Very truly yours, R. J. Kelly MRD/mb Attachment Sworn to subscribed before me this 16th day of January, 1980.

A Notar Publi Notary Public, Georgia, State at Large My Commission Dptres July 28,1980 xc: Ruble A. Thomas George F. Trowbridge, Esquire R. F. Rogers, III

}fh) 8oo122o q s g

ATTACHMENT 1 NRC DOCKET 50-321 OPERATING LICENSE DPR-57 EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF AMENDMENT CLASS Pursuant to 10 CFR 170.12 (c), Georgia Power Company has evaluated the attached proposed amendment to Operating License DPR-57 and has determined that:

a) The proposed amendment does not require the evaluation of a new Safety Analysis Report or rewrite of the facility license; b) The proposed amendment does not contain several complex issues, does not involve ACRS review, or does not require an environmental impact statement; c) The proposed amendment does not involve a complex issue, an environ-mental issue or more than one safety issue; d) The proposed amendment does involve a single issue; namely, the changing of diesel fuel sampling requirements in the Unit 1 Technical Specifications to be identical to the Unit 2 requirements.

e) The proposed amendment is therefore a Class III amendment.

(

1783 318 bA - S8 Y O Du