ML19256D599
| ML19256D599 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane |
| Issue date: | 08/18/1975 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19256D594 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-289-75-14, NUDOCS 7910190563 | |
| Download: ML19256D599 (2) | |
Text
.,
N APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Metropolitan Edison Conpany P. O. Box 542 Reading, Pennsylvania 19603 License Number DPR-50 Based on the results of the NRC inspection conducted on July 21-25 and 28, 1975, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in full compliance with conditions of your NRC Facility. License Nu=ber DPR-50 as indicated below.
A.
Contrary to 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, Section 10 of the Operational Quality Assurance Plan and Section 5.3 of ANSI N45.2.9:
the licensee did not have a procedure for the storage /receipc/
control of Quality Assurance Audit Records and the required record custodian had not been designated.
This is a Deficiency.
B.
Contrary to Technical Specification 6.1.B and the referenced Figure 15.6-1, the Operational-Quality Assurance Plan Sections 1 and 6.7 and the referenced Figure 1A-1: since June 16, 1975 when the Station Superintendent was promoted to Manager-Generation Operationa-Nuclear, the position of Station Superintendent had not been filled, nor had a Technical Specification change in organi-zation covering this item been submitted to the Commission as of this inspection.
7 This is a Deficiency.
C.
Contrary to 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XV and the Operational Quality Assurance Plan Section 20, the control of nonconfoymances has not been fully defined and implemented, in that:
1.
a nonconformance report was not vritten for out-of-specification conditions described in OQA Surveillance Report 75-133; 2.
procedures do not define controls or e thods for obtaining concurrence from the Manager-Generatica Engineering for "use-as-is" dispositions; and 3.
procedures do not define the controls required for the idanti-fication and/or se5regation of nonconforming items to prevent their inadvertent use.
1452 040 This is a Deficiency.
E(';3 7910190 D.
Contrary to 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, criterion VI, Section 11 of the Operational Quality Assurance Plan, and TMI Procedure GP 1015:
a lack of control was demonstrated for three of the twenty engineering
=-
drawings sampled during this inspection.
This is Deficiency.
E.
Contrary to 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, Section 12 of the Operational QJality Assurance Plan, and TMI Procedure GP 1009: two safety-related items were purchased from vendors not on the licensee's approved vendor's list.
=
This is a Deficiency.
F.
Contrary to Technical Specification Section 6.2.3 and IMI Admin-istrative Procedure AP 1012: abnormal occurrence for the Emergency Diesel Generator lA was not recorded in the Control Room Log Book or the Shift Foreman Log Book.
This is a Deficiency.
G.
Contrary to 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII and TMI Administrative
~
Procedure AP 1012: review of the Control Room Log Book by the Super-visor of Operations for the period of July 13, 2300 through July 22, 2300, 1975, was not documented.
This is a Deficiency.
H.
Contrary to 10 CFR 50, Appendi:: B, Criterion V, Technical Specification Section 6.2.3, and TMI Administrative Procedure AP 1013: three entries in the " Jumpers Liftcd Leads - Mechanical Modifications Log Books 37,"
were not initialed by the Shift Foreman.
~
This is a Deficiency.
Other Infractions and Deficiencies identified through your internal audit program which were documented and reported in a timely manner, when required, and for which corrective actions have been prescribed and initiated
- com-pleted are set out in the attached inspection report.
No,additiont
- or-mation is required for these items at this time.
1452 041 M-