ML19256A279
| ML19256A279 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07002623 |
| Issue date: | 11/07/1978 |
| From: | Spitalny B NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19256A277 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7811280019 | |
| Download: ML19256A279 (2) | |
Text
/
' /[
%,*g UNITED STATES
/
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION p
g WASHINGTON, D. C. 20556
~
Docket 70-2623 NOV 7 1978 NOTE T0: Files FROM:
B. S. Spitalny Fuel Reprocessing and Recycle Branch
SUBJECT:
DOCUMENTATION OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION BETWEEN MYSELF AND GREG POLLAK (DUKE POWER COMPANY) WITH RESPECT TO COST AND EXPOSURE ESTIMATES OF SHIPPING SPENT FUEL FROM OCONEE TO McGUIRE BACKGROUND:
As a result of reviewing the Environmental Impact Appraisal (EIA) for the proposed licensing action, inconsistencies in estimates of cost and exposure values for transshipment were uncovered.
At a meeting held on June 2,1978 at NRC, the applicant furnished a study pertaining to the subject estimates. This study, in brief, estimated the cost and exposure relative to the shipment of fuel (through 1982) to be approximately $3,000,000 and 240 man-rem respectively. Present values for the sanie two considerations are
$600,000 and 120 man-rem. The sources for these revised numbers are:
- 1) verbal ormiunication between the applicant (Greg Pollak) and myself on 10/18/78,2) letter from the applicant dated 10/18/78 discussing alternative of reracking Oconee 1 and 2, and 3) letter from applicant dated 10/20/78 discussing numerous topics for additional information. The substantial discrepancy in these numbers was the rcason for this phone call.
DISCUSSION:
On 11/3/78, I called Greg Pollak to alert him of these inconsistencies.
His response was that he agreed there was quite a difference, however, there were a number of factors that were being considered, e'id he felt that the change could be justified.
I told him that I would like to see a justification in writing to clarify the inconsistencies in docu-ments furnished by the applicant. He said he would contact the appropriate people on Monday (11/6) and resolve this issue.
78112800d'
i NOV 7 1978 Files 2-I reiterated the fact that the staff documents are to be issued within two weeks, and that this matter must be addressed as soon as possible.
ht_ctt 6. 5%g -
- 8. S. Spitalny
\\
Fuel Reprocessing and Recycle Branch Division of Fuel Cycle and Material Safety cc:
W. Parker, Duke Power Co.
\\