ML19256A032

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Inspec on 780404-07,780517-19, 780627-30,780720-21 & 780727-28
ML19256A032
Person / Time
Site: Crane, Davis Besse  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/23/1978
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML19256A031 List:
References
TASK-TF, TASK-TMR 50-346-78-17, NUDOCS 7809260188
Download: ML19256A032 (2)


Text

.-

4 Appendix A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Docket No. 50-346 Toledo Edison Company

~

Based on the inspection conducted on June 27-30, 1978, it appears that certain of your activities were in noncompliance with NRC requirements, as noted below. The two items are Infractions.

10 CFR 20.201(b) -requires a licensee to make or cause to be 1.

made such surveys as may be necessary for him to comply with the regulations in 10 CFR Fart 20.

Section 20.203(b) requires radiation areas be conspicuously posted.

Contrary to the above, surveys were not performed at the per-imeter fence of the Rad Waste Storage Pad after additional drums of compacted radioactive waste caterial were placed on the pad and existing dru=s rearranged on June 27, 1978.

Con-sequently, a 13 mr/Hr radiation area exterior to the fence which resulted from the placement and rearrangement of the

(

drums was not posted as a radiation area.

Technical Specification 6.8.1 requires that written procedures 2.

be established, implemented and maintained covering the activ-ities referenced below:

The applicable procedures recommended in Appendix "A" of Regulatory Guide 1.3 3, November, 1972.

Surveillance and test activities of safety-related equipment.

Contrary to the above, Emergency Procedure EP 1202.03, a.

Step 3.2, was not implemented in that the Auxiliary Transformer Breaker to 13.8 KV Bus A was not opened prior to transferring unit leads to Startup Transformers when "A" bus transfer was first atte=pted on November 29, 1977.

Contrary to the above, Test Procedure 800.00, Section b.

5.10 was not implemented in that the capability of the i

incore detectors for determining worst case thermal conditions was not verified prior to escalating power above 75% of rated power on January 20, 1978.

-u O O i rs u o # f

Appendix A Contrary to the above, as of June 29, 1978, procedure c.

AD 1801, Section 2.2.11, was not implemented in that the Company Nuclear Review Board had not reviewed any conpleted test results and reported its findings and recommendations to the Vice President Facilities Development and the Station Superintendent.

e

=~

f917 248

%