ML19255E965
| ML19255E965 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07201004 |
| Issue date: | 09/03/2019 |
| From: | Orano USA |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19255E934 | List: |
| References | |
| E-54825 | |
| Download: ML19255E965 (44) | |
Text
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page1of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.1(Form#55)Revision3(changesmadeandtracked)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.1:Procedures CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations No AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation (LCOs)*and Surveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section4 AdministrativeControls Yes,forthefirstparagraph,althoughthebulleted itemsarenotnecessary,pertheEvaluation Summaryattheendofthisform.
RiskInsight**:
Willremovingthis requirementfrom theCoC/TSresult in Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
No Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcompared tothosepreviously evaluatedintheFSAR?
No ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
No
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page2of44 Requirement TS5.1:Procedures EvaluationSummary Proceduresarerequiredby§72.150,Instructions, procedures,anddrawings,asfollows:
§72.150Instructions,procedures,anddrawings.
Thelicensee,applicantforalicense,certificate holder,andapplicantforaCoCshallprescribe activitiesaffectingqualitybydocumented instructions,procedures,ordrawingsofatype appropriatetothecircumstancesandshallrequire thattheseinstructions,procedures,anddrawings befollowed.Theinstructions,procedures,and drawingsmustincludeappropriatequantitativeor qualitativeacceptancecriteriafordeterminingthat importantactivitieshavebeensatisfactorily accomplished.
Thefirstparagraphprovidesanoverarching requirementthatproceduresofthenature describedshallbegenerated.Thisparagraphwill remainandwillbeinTSSection4Administrative Controls.
ThebulletitemslistedinthisTSaremostly specificallyrequiredtobepartoftheSubpartG QualityAssuranceProgram,orarerequiredby otherregulations,orarerequiredbyotherTS.
Thereforethesebulletsservenosafetypurpose, areredundanttoothermoredirectrequirements, andthereforetheyshouldberemovedfromTSand notrelocatedtoanywhere.
Thetwoparagraphsfollowingthebullets, regardingthefuelremovalprocedure,arecovered ingenerallythesamelanguageanddetailsinthe OperatingSystemschaptersoftheUFSARforeach respectiveDSC.However,toensureclarity,the languagefromtheseparagraphswhichisnot currentlyintheUFSARisbeingaddedtoeach operatingprocedurechapter.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page3of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.1.1 (Form#56)Revision0(noNRCquestions-nochanges made)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.1.1:DSCLoading,Unloadingand PreparationProgram CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations No AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation(LCOs)*
andSurveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section4 AdministrativeControls No RiskInsight**:
Willremovingthis requirementfrom theCoC/TSresult in Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
No Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcomparedto thosepreviouslyevaluated intheFSAR?
No ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
No
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page4of44 Requirement TS5.1.1:DSCLoading,Unloadingand PreparationProgram EvaluationSummary AlloftheseprovisionsarecoveredbyotherTSor byregulation.
Theprogramdescribedinthefirstparagraphis generallyrequiredby§72.150,Instructions, procedures,anddrawings.Thefirstparagraph referstoseveralTSandtheUFSARcommitments.
TheUFSARoperationschapterscallouttheTS relatedtooperationalsteps.TheTSthemselves mustbeaccountedforinproceduresand compliedwith.ThereforethisTSparagraphdoes notserveanysafetypurposeandcanbe removedfromthelicensingbasis.
ThesecondparagraphisredundanttoTS3.1.1.
TheclearintentofTS3.1.1istolimitthe oxidationofthefuel.TheUFSARoperations chapterscalloutTS3.1.1foranywaterremoval fromtheDSCs.ThereforethisTSparagraphdoes notserveanysafetypurposeandcanbe removedfromthelicensingbasis.
Theactivitiesthatwouldbecoveredbythethird paragraphareLCOs,whichhaveasstandard formattheACTIONSandCOMPLETIONTIMES.
ThereforethisTSparagraphdoesnotserveany safetypurposeandcanberemovedfromthe licensingbasis.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page5of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.1.2 (Form#57)Revision3(changesmadeandtracked)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.1.2:ISFSIOperationsProgram CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations No AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation(LCOs)*
andSurveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section4 AdministrativeControls YesforTS5.1.2#2 RiskInsight**:
Willremovingthis requirementfrom theCoC/TSresult in Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
No Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcomparedto thosepreviouslyevaluated intheFSAR?
No ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
No
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page6of44 Requirement TS5.1.2:ISFSIOperationsProgram EvaluationSummary
Item1isnotreallyrelatedtoUFSARISFSI operations,butratherisaverificationthatTS 4.3.1ismet.TS4.3.1willbeverifiedasanitemin theAppendixAinspections,tests,and evaluations,andthereforeTS5.1.2Item1serves nopurposeandcanberemovedentirelyfromthe licensingbasis.
Item2isaverificationthatthattheconcrete storagepadparametersareconsistentwiththe UFSARanalysis.Thisverificationwillbejoined withthecurrentTS5.3.1TC/DSCliftingand handlingrequirementsinthenewTSSection4 AdministrativeControls.
Item3isalsonotreallyrelatedtoUFSARISFSI operations,butratherisaverificationthatthe maximumliftingheightsforthecasksystemmeet TechnicalSpecification5.3.1requirements.TS 5.3.1willbeverifiedasaniteminCoCAppendixA inspections,tests,andevaluations,andtherefore TS5.1.2Item3servesnopurposeandcanbe removedentirelyfromthelicensingbasis.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page7of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.2ProgramsIntroduction (Form#58)Revision0(noNRC questions-nochangesmade)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.2ProgramsIntroduction
EachuseroftheNUHOMSSystemwill implementthefollowingprograms:
- 10CFR72.48EvaluationProgram
- TrainingProgram
- RadiologicalEnvironmentalMonitoringProgram
- RadiationProtectionProgram
- HSMThermalMonitoringProgram CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations No AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation (LCOs)*and Surveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section4 AdministrativeControls Yes,sinceitintroducestheprograms RiskInsight**:
Willremoving thisrequirement fromtheCoC/TS resultin Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
No Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcompared tothosepreviously evaluatedintheFSAR?
No
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page8of44 Requirement TS5.2ProgramsIntroduction
EachuseroftheNUHOMSSystemwill implementthefollowingprograms:
- 10CFR72.48EvaluationProgram
- TrainingProgram
- RadiologicalEnvironmentalMonitoringProgram
- RadiationProtectionProgram
- HSMThermalMonitoringProgram ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
No EvaluationSummary ThisintroductorysectionwillberetainedinTS andwilllisttheprogramswhichremaininthis section.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page9of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.2.1 (Form#59)Revision0(noNRCquestions-nochanges made)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.2.1:10CFR72.48EvaluationProgram CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations No AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation(LCOs)*
andSurveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section4 AdministrativeControls No RiskInsight**:
Willremovingthis requirementfrom theCoC/TSresult in Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
No Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcompared tothosepreviously evaluatedintheFSAR?
No ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
No
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page10of44 Requirement TS5.2.1:10CFR72.48EvaluationProgram EvaluationSummary TheprovisionsofthisTSareentirelyredundantto 10CFR72.48andhavingthemreiteratedintheTS isnotnecessarytoassuresafecaskorISFSI operation.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page11of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.2.2 (Form#60)Revision1(changesmadeandtracked)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.2.2:TrainingProgram CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations No AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation(LCOs)*
andSurveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section4 AdministrativeControls No RiskInsight**:
Willremovingthis requirementfrom theCoC/TSresult in Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
No Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcompared tothosepreviously evaluatedintheFSAR?
No ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
No
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page12of44 Requirement TS5.2.2:TrainingProgram EvaluationSummary
AstheTSstates,trainingisrequiredbyPart72.
TheUFSARhassectionsaddressingtraining.The detailsofthespecifictrainingrequiredrepresent theaspectsforwhichlicenseesmustdevelop proceduresandthereforemusttrainon.That detailmoreappropriatelyshouldbeincludedin theUFSAR.Nopurposeisservedbyhavingthat detailintheTS.Therefore,thisTScanbe removed.
UFSARSection9.3,TrainingProgram,shouldbe revisedtoincorporateapplicableinformation fromthisTS.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page13of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.2.3 (Form#61)Revision3(changesmadeandtracked)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.2.3:RadiologicalEnvironmentalMonitoring Program CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations No AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation(LCOs)*
andSurveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section4 AdministrativeControls Yes RiskInsight**:
Willremovingthis requirementfrom theCoC/TSresult in Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
No Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcompared tothosepreviously evaluatedintheFSAR?
No ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
No
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page14of44 Requirement TS5.2.3:RadiologicalEnvironmentalMonitoring Program EvaluationSummary ThisTSestablishesaprogramessentiallythe sameasthatrequiredby72.44(d)(2)forspecific licenses.ThisTSshallberetainedandmovedto TSSection4AdministrativeControls.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page15of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.2.4(introductoryparagraph)
(Form#62)Revision0(noNRC questions-nochangesmade)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.2.4:RadiationProtectionProgram (introductoryparagraph)
TheRadiationProtectionProgramshallestablish administrativecontrolstolimitpersonnel exposuretoAsLowAsReasonablyAchievable (ALARA)levelsin accordancewith10CFRPart20andPart72.
CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations No AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation (LCOs)*and Surveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section4 AdministrativeControls No RiskInsight**:
Willremoving thisrequirement fromtheCoC/TS resultin Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
No Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcompared tothosepreviously evaluatedintheFSAR?
No
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page16of44 Requirement TS5.2.4:RadiationProtectionProgram (introductoryparagraph)
TheRadiationProtectionProgramshallestablish administrativecontrolstolimitpersonnel exposuretoAsLowAsReasonablyAchievable (ALARA)levelsin accordancewith10CFRPart20andPart72.
ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
No EvaluationSummary Theintroductoryparagraphistotallyredundantto Part20andPart72,bothofwhichdefineALARA andrequireALARA.ThereforethisTSsentenceis notneededandcanberemoved.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page17of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.2.4.a (Form#63)Revision0(noNRCquestions-nochanges made)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.2.4Itema):RadiationProtectionProgram-topicsdealingwithremotehandlingdevices,situations involvingtheOS197Ltransfercaskmodel,andliquid neutronshielddraining.
CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations No AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation (LCOs)*and Surveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section4 AdministrativeControls Yes RiskInsight**:
Willremovingthis requirementfrom theCoC/TSresult in Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
No Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcompared tothosepreviously evaluatedintheFSAR?
No ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
Yes,basedontheimportanceofradiationsafety andtheuniquenatureoftheOS197Ldesign,ifthe requirementsinthisTSwerenotmetasignificant reductioninmarginwouldpotentiallyoccur.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page18of44 Requirement TS5.2.4Itema):RadiationProtectionProgram-topicsdealingwithremotehandlingdevices,situations involvingtheOS197Ltransfercaskmodel,andliquid neutronshielddraining.
EvaluationSummary Basedonriskinsights,theseTSrequirements shouldremainintheCoCAppendixBTSSection4 AdministrativeControlsundertheRadiation ProtectionProgram.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page19of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.2.4.b (Form#64)Revision4(changesmadeandtracked)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.2.4Itemb):RadiationProtectionProgram-DSCClosureWeldNDE CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations Yes AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation(LCOs)*
andSurveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section4 AdministrativeControls No RiskInsight**:
Willremovingthis requirementfrom theCoC/TSresult in Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
Yes,potentially.ThisTSisonlyaverificationofthe confinementboundarymultilayeredwelds,butif theconfinementboundary,whichisafission productbarrier,isnotensured,consequencesofa dropaccidentcouldpotentiallyincrease.
Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcomparedto thosepreviouslyevaluated intheFSAR?
No ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
No
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page20of44 Requirement TS5.2.4Itemb):RadiationProtectionProgram-DSCClosureWeldNDE EvaluationSummary Thisitem,regardingDSCclosureweldNDE,is relatedtotheconfinementdesignfunction.
Ifthesestepsarenotperformed,theworst possibleconsequenceswouldbethatallofthe multipleweldswereflawed,theflawslineup tocreatealeakpath,andthereforethe multipleaccidentsinvolvingtheconfinement boundarywouldinvolveapotentialbreachand apotentialreleaseofradionuclides,which wouldresultincontaminationandincreased doserates.
BasedonthedirectrelationshipofthisTStothe confinementdesignfunction,whichisafission productbarrier,thisonetimeverificationTSitem shouldremain,butisbettersuitedtobecomean ITE.
Languageregardingdyepenetranttestand liquidpenetranttesthasbeenmadeconsistentin theITEtosayliquidpenetranttest.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page21of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.2.4.c (Form#65)Revision4(changesmadeandtracked)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.2.4Itemc):RadiationProtectionProgram-LeakTestofDSCInnerSealWeld CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations Yes AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation (LCOs)*and Surveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section4 AdministrativeControls No RiskInsight**:
Willremoving thisrequirement fromtheCoC/TS resultin Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
Yes,potentially.ThisTSisonlyaverificationof theconfinementboundarymultilayeredwelds, butiftheconfinementboundary,whichisa fissionproductbarrier,isnotensured, consequencesofadropaccidentcouldpotentially increase.
Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcompared tothosepreviously evaluatedintheFSAR?
No ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
No
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page22of44 Requirement TS5.2.4Itemc):RadiationProtectionProgram-LeakTestofDSCInnerSealWeld EvaluationSummary Thisitem,regardingleaktestingoftheDSCinner sealweld,isrelatedtotheconfinementdesign function.
Ifthisleaktestisnotperformed,theworst possibleconsequenceswouldbethatallof themultipleweldswereflawed,theflawsline uptocreatealeakpath,theNDEofthewelds wassomehownotperformed,andtherefore themultipleaccidentsinvolvingthe confinementboundarywouldinvolvea potentialbreachandapotentialreleaseof radionuclides,whichwouldresultin contaminationandincreaseddoserates.
Regardlessoftheverylowrisk,basedonthe directrelationshipofthisTStotheconfinement designfunction,whichisafissionproductbarrier, thisonetimeTSitemshouldremain,butisbetter suitedtobecomeanITE.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page23of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.2.4.d (Form#66)Revision4(changesmadeandtracked)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.2.4Itemd):RadiationProtectionProgram-TC/DSCContamination CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations No AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation(LCOs)*
andSurveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 Yes;thisitemisrelatedtoensuringthat radioactivecontaminationdoesnotexceedlimits priortoDSCstorageintheHSM.
Section4 AdministrativeControls No RiskInsight**:
Willremovingthis requirementfrom theCoC/TSresult in Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
Noincreaseintheprobabilityofanyaccident.
SlightIncreaseinconsequencesduetoincreased dosefromcontamination,butnotasignificant increase.
Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcompared tothosepreviously evaluatedintheFSAR?
No ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
No
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page24of44 Requirement TS5.2.4Itemd):RadiationProtectionProgram-TC/DSCContamination EvaluationSummary Inordertoensurethatradioactivecontamination doesnotexceedlimitspriortoDSCstorageinthe HSM,thisitemwillbemovedtoTSSection3as anLCO.TheTSBasesinUFSARChapter10willbe updatedaswell.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page25of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.2.4.e (Form#67)Revision4(changesmadeandtracked)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.2.4Iteme):RadiationProtectionProgram-TCDoseRateMeasurements CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations Yes AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation(LCOs)*
andSurveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section4 AdministrativeControls No RiskInsight**:
Willremovingthis requirementfrom theCoC/TSresult in Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
Noincreaseintheprobabilityofanyaccident.
Increaseinconsequencesofallaccidents,dueto increaseddosefromtheTC,onlyiftherewasan areawithreducedshielding.ThisTSisa verificationandnotanovertactioninvolvingan SSCthatprovidesshielding.
Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcompared tothosepreviously evaluatedintheFSAR?
No ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
No Therewouldbeaslightreductioninthemarginof safetyfortheshieldingdesignfunction,butonly ifanareaofreducedshieldingexists.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page26of44 Requirement TS5.2.4Iteme):RadiationProtectionProgram-TCDoseRateMeasurements EvaluationSummary Basedontheimportanceofthisdoserate informationinassessingworkerdoseand potentiallyidentifyingamisload,thisitemshould beretainedandisbestsuitedtobecomeanITE.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page27of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.2.5 (Form#68)Revision6(changesmadeandtracked)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.2.5:HSMorHSMHThermalMonitoring Program CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations No AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation (LCOs)*and Surveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section4 AdministrativeControls Yes RiskInsight**:
Willremovingthis requirementfrom theCoC/TSresult in Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
Yes Theprobabilityofablockedventeventmaygo undetectedifnotdetectedbyinspectionofthe HSMinletandoutletventsormonitoringofthe DSC/HSMtemperatures.
Theconsequencesofablockedundetectedvent couldcausethecladdingtemperaturesintheDSC toexceedthe752degreesFtemperaturelimit (lossofconfinementsafetyfunction)orcause degradationofthestructuralpropertiesofthe concreteHSM.
Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcompared tothosepreviously evaluatedintheFSAR?
No
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page28of44 Requirement TS5.2.5:HSMorHSMHThermalMonitoring Program ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
No EvaluationSummary Thesafetypurposeofthisprogramistoprovide thelicenseewithapositivemeanstoidentify conditionswhichthreatentoapproach temperaturecriteriaforproperHSMorHSMH operationandallowforthecorrectionofoff normalthermalconditionsthatcouldleadto exceedingtheconcreteandfuelcladtemperature criteria.
AlthoughthedetailsofthisTSinclude surveillances,requirements,conditions,and actions,whichmakeitwellsuitedtobeanLCO, thecompletiontimesfortheactionshavenot beencalculatedandthereforethisgraded approachlicensingactioncannotmakethis change.Futurelicensingactionsshouldconsider changingtheadministrativecontrolTSanLCO.
ThisTSshouldthereforeremainanadministrative control,movingtoTSSection4.
ThefollowingaspectsoftheexistingTScanbe movedtotheTSBaseschapteroftheUFSAR:
Thisprogramshallmonitorthethermal performanceofeachHSMdaily,eitherbydirect visualinspectionorremotetemperature measurement.
Theprogramshallbeofsufficientscopeto providethelicenseewithapositivemeansto identifyconditionswhichthreatentoapproach temperaturecriteriaforproperHSMorHSMH operationandallowforthecorrectionofoff normalthermalconditionsthatcouldleadto exceedingtheconcreteandfuelcladtemperature criteria.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page29of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.2.6 (Form#69)Revision4(changesmadeandtracked)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.2.6:HydrogenGasMonitoringfor24P,52B, 24PHB,61BT,32PT,24PTH,61BTH,32PTH1, 69BTH,and37PTHDSCs CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations No AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation(LCOs)*
andSurveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section4 AdministrativeControls Yes RiskInsight**:
Willremovingthis requirementfrom theCoC/TSresult in Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
No Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcompared tothosepreviously evaluatedintheFSAR?
Yes Ahydrogenexplosioncouldresultfroma hydrogenconcentrationexceedingthe flammabilitylimit-anaccidentthreateningoccupationalworkersas wellaspossiblelossofconfinement.
ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
No
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page30of44 Requirement TS5.2.6:HydrogenGasMonitoringfor24P,52B, 24PHB,61BT,32PT,24PTH,61BTH,32PTH1, 69BTH,and37PTHDSCs EvaluationSummary ThisTSpreventsapotentialhydrogenexplosion duringestablishmentoftheconfinement boundaryorpurposefulbreachingofthe confinementboundary.Theexplosioncould affecttheshieldingfunctionandisapersonnel safetyitem.ThisTSshouldberetainedand locatedinCoCAppendixBTSSection4 AdministrativeControls.
ThisTSisapplicabletoallDSCmodelssothereis noreasontospecifymodels.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page31of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.3.1 (Form#70)Revision4(changesmadeandtracked)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.3.1:TC/DSCLifting/HandlingHeightLimits CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations No AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation(LCOs)*
andSurveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section4 AdministrativeControls Yes RiskInsight**:
Willremovingthis requirementfrom theCoC/TSresult in Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
No Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcomparedto thosepreviouslyevaluated intheFSAR?
No ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
Yes Asignificantreductioninthemarginofsafetyfor confinementispossibleiftherewerenolimiton thecaskliftingandhandlingheight(currently analyzedto80inches).
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page32of44 Requirement TS5.3.1:TC/DSCLifting/HandlingHeightLimits EvaluationSummary ThisTSisassociatedwithensuringthe confinementfunction.TheTScontains evaluationsoftemperatureswithresultant restrictions(impactingtheductility/brittlenessof thecaskmaterials)necessarytoprovide reasonableassurancethatthecasksafety functionofconfinementwillbeperformed.
Therefore,thisTSshouldberetainedin(Section4 ofrevisedTS)AdministrativeControls.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page33of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.3.2 (Form#71)Revision0(noNRCquestions-nochanges made)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.3.2:CaskDrop CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations No AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation(LCOs)*
andSurveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section4 AdministrativeControls No RiskInsight**:
Willremovingthis requirementfrom theCoC/TSresult in Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
No Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcompared tothosepreviously evaluatedintheFSAR?
No ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
No
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page34of44 Requirement TS5.3.2:CaskDrop EvaluationSummary ThisTSrequiresaninspectionofthecask/DSC afteradropheightofgreaterthan15inches.As explainedinthedetailsofthisTS,theprobability ofaconfinementbreachduetoadropis essentiallyzero.
Basedonthequalityassuranceprogramandits requiredcorrectiveactionprogram,adropofan SSCasmassiveastheTS/DSCwouldwithout doubtreceiveathoroughinvestigationand inspectionfordamage.
Therefore,thisTScanberemovedandrelocated totheUFSAR.Therequirementforinspectionifa dropoccursshouldbecomeanoperationalstepin theUFSARoperationschaptersandthe remainderofthisTSshouldbeincludedinthe Confinementchaptersiftheinformationisnot alreadyincludedinthosechapters.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page35of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.3.3 (Form#72)Revision1(changesmadeandtracked)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.3.3:TCAlignmentwithHSMorHSMH CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations No AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation(LCOs)*
andSurveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section4 AdministrativeControls No RiskInsight**:
Willremovingthis requirementfrom theCoC/TSresult in Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
No Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcompared tothosepreviously evaluatedintheFSAR?
No ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
No
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page36of44 Requirement TS5.3.3:TCAlignmentwithHSMorHSMH EvaluationSummary ThisTSprovidesthealignmenttolerancesforthe transfercaskwithrespecttothehorizontal storagemoduleandisapplicableduringthe insertionandretrievaloperations.Those operationsaredetailedinUFSARoperations chapters(e.g.,Chapter5,ChapterK.8,Chapter M.8).ThisTSshouldbemovedtothosechapters oftheUFSAR,includingtheactionstoensure properalignment.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page37of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.3.4 (Form#73)Revision3(changesmadeandtracked)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.3.4:TrailerShieldingDropontoOS197LTC
TheDSCandtheOS197LTCandthetrailer shieldingshallbeinspectedfordamage andevaluatedforfurtheruseaftertheaccident dropofthetrailershieldingontothe OS197LTC.
Theliftingofoutertoptrailershieldingis restrictedsuchthatthebottommostpartofthe bodyoftheoutertoptrailershieldingislessthan 4inchesabovetheinnertoptrailershielding.
CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations No AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation(LCOs)*
andSurveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section4 AdministrativeControls Yes RiskInsight**:
Willremovingthis requirementfrom theCoC/TSresult in Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
No
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page38of44 Requirement TS5.3.4:TrailerShieldingDropontoOS197LTC
TheDSCandtheOS197LTCandthetrailer shieldingshallbeinspectedfordamage andevaluatedforfurtheruseaftertheaccident dropofthetrailershieldingontothe OS197LTC.
Theliftingofoutertoptrailershieldingis restrictedsuchthatthebottommostpartofthe bodyoftheoutertoptrailershieldingislessthan 4inchesabovetheinnertoptrailershielding.
Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcomparedto thosepreviouslyevaluated intheFSAR?
No ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
Yes Adropoftheoutertoptrailershieldingcould damagetheTC.Inaddition,forradiation shieldingpurposes,tomaintaindosetothe occupationalworkerswithinacceptablelevels, thetoptrailershieldingshouldbemaintained justabovetheinnertoptrailershielding.
EvaluationSummary Theserequirementsarenecessaryforradiation protectionandshouldremaininTSas AdministrativeControls.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page39of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.4(Form#74)Revision1(changesmadeandtracked)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.4:HSMorHSMHDoseRateEvaluation Program CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations Yes AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation(LCOs)*
andSurveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section4 AdministrativeControls No RiskInsight**:
Willremovingthis requirementfrom theCoC/TSresult in Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
No Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcomparedto thosepreviouslyevaluated intheFSAR?
No ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
Yes FailureofthisSSCtoprovideadequateshielding couldresultinasignificantreductioninthe marginofsafetyforradiationshielding effectivenessandimpactonworkerandpublic dose.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page40of44 Requirement TS5.4:HSMorHSMHDoseRateEvaluation Program EvaluationSummary ThisTSisaonetimemeasurementtakenat locationsontheexterioroftheHSMorHSMH thatcontributestoensuringthattheshielding designfunctionhasbeenestablishedcorrectly.
FailureoftheHSMtoprovideshieldingcould haveasignificantimpactonworkerandpublic healthandsafety.
Therefore,thisTSshouldberetained.However, basedonitsonetimeevaluationnature,it belongsintheCoCAppendixAITEsection.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page41of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.5(Form#75)Revision0(noNRCquestions-nochangesmade)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.5:ConcreteTestingforHSMH CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations Yes,performedbytheCoCholder AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation (LCOs)*and Surveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section4 AdministrativeControls No RiskInsight**:
Willremoving thisrequirement fromtheCoC/TS resultin Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
Yes TheconsequencesoftheBlockageofAirInletand OutletOpeningscouldbesignificantlyincreasedif theconcretefailsatelevatedtemperatures.
Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcompared tothosepreviously evaluatedintheFSAR?
No ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
No
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page42of44 Requirement TS5.5:ConcreteTestingforHSMH EvaluationSummary ThisTSrequiresteststhatarenecessaryto providereasonableassurancethatHSMshave beenmanufacturedandwilloperatein conformancewiththecertifieddesignandthat thesafetyfunctionofshieldingwillbeperformed.
ThisTSshouldremainbutshouldberelocatedto CoCAppendixA,Inspections,Tests,and Evaluations,tobeperformedbytheCoCholder duringfabrication.
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page43of44 CoCCondition/TSIdentifier: TS5.6(Form#76)Revision6(changesmadeandtracked)
- AllLCOsalsorequireanApplicability,Condition(s),RequiredAction(s),CompletionTime(s),SurveillanceRequirement(s),
andFrequency(ies).RefertoNUREG1745foradditionalguidance.
- Inperformingtheriskinsightevaluationabove,theevaluatorshouldthinkaboutsubsequentchangestoarelocatedCoC requirement.Specifically,askthequestionwhatisthelikelihoodandworstpossibleconsequencesofafuturechangeto thisrequirementinthelessconservativedirection?
Requirement TS5.6:HSMHConfigurationChanges CoCBody CertifiedDesign SectionI.Technology No SectionII.DesignFeatures No AppendixAInspections,Tests,and Evaluations No AppendixB.
Technical Specifications Section1 Definitions,Useand Application No Section2 ApprovedContents (SelectionCriteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section3 LimitingConditions forOperation(LCOs)*
andSurveillance Requirements(SRs)
(SelectionCriteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section4 AdministrativeControls Yes RiskInsight**:
Willremovingthis requirementfrom theCoC/TSresult in Asignificantincreasein theprobabilityor consequencesofan accidentpreviously evaluatedinthecask FSAR?
No
Thepossibilityofanewor differentkindofaccident beingcreatedcompared tothosepreviously evaluatedintheFSAR?
No ASignificantreductionin themarginofsafetyfor ISFSIorcaskoperation?
No
E54825Enclosure9 EvaluationFormsforCoC1004TSSection5Items Page44of44 Requirement TS5.6:HSMHConfigurationChanges EvaluationSummary The8%limitationinTS5.6forconfiguration changeswasaconditionforacceptanceofthe analysisinaprioramendment.Thereforeitmust remainintheTS.ItwillbemovedtonewTS Section4forAdministrativeControls.
Additionally,anobvioustypographicalerroris correctedinthatHSMMischangedtoHSM HintheverymiddleofthisonesentenceTS.