ML19255E954
| ML19255E954 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07201004 |
| Issue date: | 09/03/2019 |
| From: | Orano USA |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19255E934 | List: |
| References | |
| E-54825 | |
| Download: ML19255E954 (5) | |
Text
E-54825 Enclosure 5 Evaluation Forms for CoC 1004 TS Section 1 Items Page 1 of 5 CoC Condition/TS Identifier: TS-1.1 (Form #13) Revision 4 (changes made and tracked)
- All LCOs also require an Applicability, Condition(s), Required Action(s), Completion Time(s), Surveillance Requirement(s), and Frequency(ies).
Refer to NUREG-1745 for additional guidance.
- In performing the risk insight evaluation above, the evaluator should think about subsequent changes to a relocated CoC requirement.
Specifically, ask the question what is the likelihood and worst possible consequences of a future change to this requirement in the less-conservative direction?
Requirement TS 1.1: Definitions CoC Body Certified Design Section I. Technology No Section II. Design Features No Appendix A - Inspections, Tests, and Evaluations No Appendix B.
Technical Specifications Section 1 Definitions, Use and Application Yes Section 2 Approved Contents (Selection Criteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section 3 Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs)*
and Surveillance Requirements (SRs)
(Selection Criteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section 4 Administrative Controls No Risk Insight**:
Will removing this requirement from the CoC/TS result in A significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated in the cask FSAR?
No The possibility of a new or different kind of accident being created compared to those previously evaluated in the FSAR?
No A Significant reduction in the margin of safety for ISFSI or cask operation?
No
E-54825 Enclosure 5 Evaluation Forms for CoC 1004 TS Section 1 Items Page 2 of 5 Evaluation Summary Retain in CoC Appendix B, TS Section 1 since it meets the criterion for inclusion in the new TS format.
No change except potentially to the List of Definitions later to reflect final TS reorganization (some definitions may no longer be needed and others added).
Based on NRC staff feedback at the public meeting on 02/28/18, the definition for Operability has been added per the example provided in NUREG-1745.
E-54825 Enclosure 5 Evaluation Forms for CoC 1004 TS Section 1 Items Page 3 of 5 CoC Condition/TS Identifier: TS-1.2 (Form #14) Revision 0 (no NRC questions - no changes made)
- All LCOs also require an Applicability, Condition(s), Required Action(s), Completion Time(s), Surveillance Requirement(s), and Frequency(ies).
Refer to NUREG-1745 for additional guidance.
- In performing the risk insight evaluation above, the evaluator should think about subsequent changes to a relocated CoC requirement.
Specifically, ask the question what is the likelihood and worst possible consequences of a future change to this requirement in the less-conservative direction?
Requirement TS 1.2: Logical Connectors CoC Body Certified Design Section I. Technology No Section II. Design Features No Appendix A - Inspections, Tests, and Evaluations No Appendix B.
Technical Specifications Section 1 Definitions, Use and Application Yes Section 2 Approved Contents (Selection Criteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section 3 Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs)*
and Surveillance Requirements (SRs)
(Selection Criteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section 4 Administrative Controls No Risk Insight**:
Will removing this requirement from the CoC/TS result in A significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated in the cask FSAR?
No The possibility of a new or different kind of accident being created compared to those previously evaluated in the FSAR?
No A Significant reduction in the margin of safety for ISFSI or cask operation?
No Evaluation Summary Retain in TS Appendix B Section 1 since it meets the criterion for inclusion in the new TS format (Use and Application).
No change - Existing Purpose, Background, and Examples are helpful to understand the TS Use and Application.
E-54825 Enclosure 5 Evaluation Forms for CoC 1004 TS Section 1 Items Page 4 of 5 CoC Condition/TS Identifier: TS-1.3 (Form #15) Revision 0 (no NRC questions - no changes made)
- All LCOs also require an Applicability, Condition(s), Required Action(s), Completion Time(s), Surveillance Requirement(s), and Frequency(ies).
Refer to NUREG-1745 for additional guidance.
- In performing the risk insight evaluation above, the evaluator should think about subsequent changes to a relocated CoC requirement.
Specifically, ask the question what is the likelihood and worst possible consequences of a future change to this requirement in the less-conservative direction?
Requirement TS 1.3: Completion Times CoC Body Certified Design Section I. Technology No Section II. Design Features No Appendix A - Inspections, Tests, and Evaluations No Appendix B.
Technical Specifications Section 1 Definitions, Use and Application Yes Section 2 Approved Contents (Selection Criteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section 3 Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs)* and Surveillance Requirements (SRs)
(Selection Criteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section 4 Administrative Controls No Risk Insight**:
Will removing this requirement from the CoC/TS result in A significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated in the cask FSAR?
No The possibility of a new or different kind of accident being created compared to those previously evaluated in the FSAR?
No A Significant reduction in the margin of safety for ISFSI or cask operation?
No Evaluation Summary Retain in TS Appendix B Section 1 since it meets the criterion for inclusion in the new TS format (Use and Application).
No change - Existing Purpose, Background, Description, Examples and Immediate Completion Time are helpful to provide guidance on Completion Times use in the TS.
E-54825 Enclosure 5 Evaluation Forms for CoC 1004 TS Section 1 Items Page 5 of 5 CoC Condition/TS Identifier: TS-1.4 (Form #16) Revision 0 (no NRC questions - no changes made)
- All LCOs also require an Applicability, Condition(s), Required Action(s), Completion Time(s), Surveillance Requirement(s), and Frequency(ies).
Refer to NUREG-1745 for additional guidance.
- In performing the risk insight evaluation above, the evaluator should think about subsequent changes to a relocated CoC requirement.
Specifically, ask the question what is the likelihood and worst possible consequences of a future change to this requirement in the less-conservative direction?
Requirement TS 1.4: Frequency CoC Body Certified Design Section I. Technology No Section II. Design Features No Appendix A - Inspections, Tests, and Evaluations No Appendix B.
Technical Specifications Section 1 Definitions, Use and Application Yes Section 2 Approved Contents (Selection Criteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section 3 Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs)* and Surveillance Requirements (SRs)
(Selection Criteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section 4 Administrative Controls No Risk Insight**: Will removing this requirement from the CoC/TS result in A significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated in the cask FSAR?
No The possibility of a new or different kind of accident being created compared to those previously evaluated in the FSAR?
No A Significant reduction in the margin of safety for ISFSI or cask operation?
No Evaluation Summary Retain in TS Appendix B Section 1 since it meets the criterion for inclusion in the new TS format (Use and Application).
No change - Existing Purpose, Description, and Examples are helpful to provide guidance on the proper use and application of Frequency requirements in TS.