ML19254E082
| ML19254E082 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 08/17/1979 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19254E071 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-277-79-12, 50-278-79-14, NUDOCS 7910310054 | |
| Download: ML19254E082 (3) | |
Text
.
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Philao< 'phia Electric Company Docket Nos. 50-277 50-278 Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted on May 21-24, 1979, it appears 1. hat certain of your activities were not conducted in full compli-ance with conditions of your NRC license.
Items A, B, and C are infractions.
A.
Technical Specification Tables 4.2. A, 4.2.B, 4.2.C, and 4.2.D specify that a Logic System Functional Test is required every six months for Containment Isolation System Components.
Technical Specificetions 1.0 " Surveillance Frequency" states, in part, the " Periodic surveillance tests, checks, calibrations, and examinations shall be performed within the specified surveillance intervals.
These intervals may be adjusted plus or minus 25%..."
Contrary to the above, surveillance for the Primary Containment Iso-lation Systems Logic Systems Functional Test for Unit 3 was not per-formed within the required six months interval.
ST l.3 (Unit 3),
which implements tne above functional test, was last performed on August 11, 1978 and appears not to have been subsequently performed as required.
B.
Technical Specification 6.8.1 states in part " Written procedures and administrative policies shall be established, implemented and main-tained that meet the requirements of Sections 5.1 and 5.3 of ANSI N18.7 - 1972 and Appeadix "A" of USAEC Regulatory Guide (R.G.) 1.33 (November 1972)..."
Paragraph 5.3.6 of ANSI N18.7 - 1972 states in part " Procedures shall be provided for periodic calibrations and testing of safety related plant instrumentations..."
Paragraph H.1 of Appendix "A" to R.G. 1.33 - 1972 states in part
" Procedures of a type appropriate to the curcumstances should be provided to assure that tools, gauges, instruments, controls, and other measuring and testing devices are properly controlled, cali-brated, and adjusted at specified periods to maintain accuracy..."
1235 028 oW 7910310 t
Appendix A 2
Contrary to the above, it appears that the above calibration program has not been adequately implementcd in that for three (3) calibrations previously identified and, for which procedures had been wr1tten, the calibrations had not been performed; that, for two (2) calibrations previously identified, no procedures have been written and/or issued; and, that for four (4) areas identified during the inspection as needing calibration, the need to calibrate associated instruments had not been identified.
C.
Technical Specification 6.8.1 states in part, " Written procedures and administrative policies shall be established, implemented and maintained that meet the requirements of Section 5.! and 5.3 of ANSI N18.7 - 1972 and Appendix "A" of USAEC Regulatory Guide 1.33..."
Administrative Procedure A-26, Procedure for Corrective Maintenancc, specifies, among other requirements, the following:
Shift supervision shall indicate the Tech. Spec. status of Maintenance Request Forms (MRF's) on the MRF and should indicate the Tech. Spec.
status in the Control Room MRF Log Book.
Contrary to the above eight MRF's initiated during the period January 4,1978 through May 1,1979 were identified during the inspection in which Section 2 of the MRF was identified as a Tech. Spec. item with no Tech. Spec. status indicated in the MRF Log Book.
The prescribed flow path for the original of a MRF from its initiation to final disposition, including close out in the MRF Log Book.
Contrary to this specified flow path for a MRF original, the original for six MRF's issued during th period April 29, 1978 through October 27, 1978, identified as open in the MRF Log Book on May 22, 1979 could not be located.
Shift supervision approval in Section 4 of the MRF, and control oper-ators equipment turnover in Section 5 of the MRF, be completed before actual work on equipment is undertaken.
Contrary to this requirement, MRF's in the Control Room awaiting the completion of Section 7, operator verification, on May 24, 1979 had their work performed without shift supervision approval in Section 4, and three of these MRF's had their work performed without Section 5 equipment turnover completed.
1235 029
Appendix A 3
The inspection and clean up of a work area, by the lead craftsman, upon completion of work.
This inspection to include the cleanup of the work area and proper housekeeping practices involving the tools, equipment and materials used in performance of the work.
Contrary to this requirement, an area in the base of the plant stack was noted where previous maintenance had obviously been performed in which stack flow transmitter water tight covers had been let adrift, a junction box cover left off, and a general lack of cleanliness and housekeeping was evident.
1235 030