ML19254A664
| ML19254A664 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 05/31/1979 |
| From: | Seyfrit K NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Pilant J NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7907200360 | |
| Download: ML19254A664 (1) | |
Text
'o UNITED STATES CENTRAL FILES
!V
/n NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION PDR:HQ y,
E REGION IV R'
o, 8
G11 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 1000 g
N o
AH LINGTON, TE XAS 76012 M$1C May 31, 1979 Docket No. 50-298 Nebraska Public Power District ATTN:
J. M. Pilant, Director Licensing & Quality Assurance Post Office Box 499 Columbus, Nebraska 68601 Gentlemen:
The enclosed IE Bulletin 79-12 is forwarded to you for action.
A written response is required.
If you desire additional information regarding this matter, please contact this office.
Sincerely, 5
Karl V. Seyfrit Director
Enclosures:
1.
IE Circular No. 77-07 3.
List of IE Bulletins Issued in Last Twelve Months cc:
L. C. Lessor, Superintendent Cooper Nuclear Station Post Office Box 98 Brownville, Nebraska 68321
'I907200760'
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COTIISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND EhTORCEMEhT WASHItiGTON, D.C.
20555 IE Bulletin No. 79-12 Date: May 31, 1979 Page 1 of 3 SHORT PERIOD SCRAMS AT BWR FACILITIES Summary:
Reactor scrams, resulting from periods of less than 5 seconds, have occurred recently at three BWR facilities.
In each case the scram was caused by high flux detected by the IRM neutron monitors during an approach to critical.
These events are similar in most respects to events which were previously described by IE Circular 77-07 (copy enclosed). The recent recurrences of this event indicate an apparent loss of effectiveness of the earlier Circular.
Issuance of this Bulletin is considered appropriate to further reduce the number of challenges to the reactor protective system high IRM flux scram.
Description of Circumstances:
The following is a brief account of each event.
1.
Oyster Creek - On December 14, 1978, the reactor experienced a scram as control rods were being withdrawn for approach to critical, following a scram from full power which had occurred about 15 hours1.736111e-4 days <br />0.00417 hours <br />2.480159e-5 weeks <br />5.7075e-6 months <br /> earlier. The moderator temperature was 380 degrees F and the reactor pressure was 190 psig.
Because of the high xenon concentration, the operators had not made an accurate estimate of the critical rod pattern. The operator at the controls was using the SRM count rate, which had changed only slightly, (425 to 450 cps) to guide the approach.
Control rod 10-43 (first rod in Group 9) was being withdrawn in " notch override" to notch position 10, when the reactor became critical on an estimated 2.8 second period. The operator was attempting to reinsert the rod when the scram occurred.
Failure of the
" emergency rod in" switch to maintain contact, due to a bent switch stop, apparently contributed to the problem.
2.
Browns Ferry bait 1 - On January 18, 1979, the reactor experienced a scram during the initial approach to critical following refueling. The operator vas continuously withdrawing in " notch override" the first control rod in Group 3 (a high worth rod) because the SRM count rate had :ed him to believe that the reactor was very subtritical. A short res.
r period, estimated at S seconds, was experienced. The operator was at empting to reinsert control rods wm the scram occurred.
DUPLICATE DOCUMENT Entire document previously entered into system under:
ANO _f7 0 (f"f 8 / f ?
N o.
of pages:
/6