ML19254A660
| ML19254A660 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | River Bend  |
| Issue date: | 05/31/1979 |
| From: | Seyfrit K NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Wiegand J GULF STATES UTILITIES CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7907200345 | |
| Download: ML19254A660 (1) | |
Text
? $C-p+ * " * %e,,
o UNITED STATES
[ (>
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION IV
- .,, } 3
. j 611 RYAN PL AZA ORIVE, SUITE 1000 2, ' f. _,
g
'b' d'
ARLINGTON, TEX AS 76012 May 31, 1979 In Reply Refer To:
RIT Docket Nos.
50-458/IE Bulletin No. 79-12 50-459/IE Bulletin No. 79-12 Gulf States Utilities Attn:
Dr. J. G. Weigand General Manager, Nuclear Projects Post Office Box 2951 Beaumont, Texas 77704 Gentlemen:
The enclosed IE Bulletin 79-12 is forwarded to you for information.
No written response is required.
If you desire additional information regarding this matter, please contact this office.
Sincerely, 8k(/ 4/-
Karl V. Seyfrit, Director
Enclosures:
1.
IE Circular No. 77-07 3.
List of IE Bulletins Issued in Last Twelve Months C
i \\\\.
7907200 yy'f
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COT!ISSION-0FFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEFIENT WASHINGTON, D.C.
20555 IE Bulletin No. 79-12 Date:
Flay 31,1979 Page 1 of 3 SHORT PERIOD SCRAriS AT BWR FACILITIES Summary:
Reactor scrams, resulting from periods of less than 5 seconds, have occurred recently at three BWR facilities.
In each case the scram was caused by high flux detected by the IRf! neutron monitors during an approach to critical. These events are similar in most respects to events which were previously described by IE Circular 77-07 (copy enclosed). The recent recurrences of this event indicate an apparent loss of effectiveness of the earlier Circular.
Issuance of this Bulletin is considered appropriate to further reduce the number of challenges to the r ctor protective system high IRt! flux scram.
Desc.;iption of Circumstances:
The following is a brief account of each event.
1.
Oyster Creek - On December 14, 1978, the reactor experienced a scram as control rodt, were being withdrawn for approach to critical, following a scram from full power which had occurred about 15 hours1.736111e-4 days <br />0.00417 hours <br />2.480159e-5 weeks <br />5.7075e-6 months <br /> earlier.
The moderator temperature was 380 degrees F and the reactor pressure was 190 psig.
Because of the high xenon concentration, the operators had not made an accurate estimate of the critical rod pattern.
The operator at the controls was using the SRtl count rate, which had changed only slightly, (425 to 450 cps) to guide the approach.
Control rod 10-43 (first rod in Group 9) was being withdrawn in " notch override" to notch position 10, when the reactor became critical on an estimated 2.8 second period. The operator was attempting to reinsert the rod when the scram occurred.
Failure of the
" emergency rod in" switch to maintain contact, due to a bent switch stop, apparently contributed to the problem.
2.
Browns 1erry Unit 1 - On January 18, 1979, the reactor experienced a scram during the initial approach to critical following refueling. The operator was continuously withdrawing in " notch override" the first control rod in Group 3 (a high worth rod) because the SRt! count rate had led him to believe that the reactor was very subcritical.
A short reactor period, estimated at 5 seconds, was experienced.
The operator was attempting to reinsert control rods when t DUPLICATE DOCUMENT Entire document previously entered into system under:
ANO 79 CfOK C ff 7 No. of pages:
/d