ML19253C564

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Repts 50-456/79-12 & 50-457/79-12 on 790925-28. Noncompliance Noted:Failure to Have Procedures for Control of safety-related Activities During Extended Shutdown
ML19253C564
Person / Time
Site: Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/23/1979
From: Clint Jones, Schweibinz E, Williams C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML19253C554 List:
References
50-456-79-12, 50-457-79-12, NUDOCS 7912060063
Download: ML19253C564 (7)


See also: IR 05000456/1979012

Text

.

.

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

-

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

.

REGION III

4C7

Report No. 50-456/79-12; 50- % 9/79-12

yn

9I7

,

Docket No. 50-SCb"', 50-547

Lice.. e No. CPPR-132; CPPR-133

Licenste:

Commonwealth Edison Company

P. O. Box 767

Chicago, IL 60690

Facility Name:

Braidwood Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2

Inspection At: Braidwoon Site, Braidwood, IL

Inspection Conducted:

September 25-28, 1979

f. [ ' < ': , ( c

,u u

Inspectors:f

'E. R. Schweibinz

// !2 ~~'/ k,

i

,

( ' . -),

x ,_

7.---

-

C. E. Jones

11 h :,' / ~' ')

/

p,Q ' ;, r

. --

Approved By:

C. C Williams, Chief

// N .T'/)

Projects Section 2

'

Inspection Summary

W7

Inspection on September 25-28, 1979 (Report No. 50-456/79-12; 50- % 7/79-12)

Areas Inspected:

Quality assurance plans and procedures for extended

shutdown; storage of equipment; site staffing considerations; extended

shutdown QA implementing procedures; extended shutdown work activities;

and storage of steam generators.

The inspection involved 54' inspector-

hours by two hTC inspectors.

Results: Of the four areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or

deviations were identified in three areas.

One apparent item of noncom-

pliance was identified in one area (Infraction - failure to have procedures

for the control of safety related activities during the extended shutdown -

Section I, Paragraph 1).

1509

298

29 ao co OO

.

.

.

.

DETAILS

Persons Contacted

Commonwealth Edison Company (CECO)

R. Cosaro, Project Superintendent

,

  • J. T. Merwin, Lead Mechanical Engineer
  • J. W. Schlunz, Lead Structural Engineer
  • R. J. Parr, QA Engineer
  • J. A. Homoly, QA Supervisor
  • H. T. Cobbs, QA Engineer
  • S. L. Gaconis, QA Engineer
  • W. Carlsen, Construction Supervisor
  • R.

C. Schleiter, Administrative Assistant

  • N. P. Tomis, QA Engineer

W. Casillo, Engineer, Station Construction

Napoleon Steel

C. Zaveda

Westinghouse Electric Corporation (W)

R. E. Shoults, W Site Manager

L. K. Comstock and Company Inc.

M. R. Williams, QA/QC Manager

'

  • Denotes those present at the exit meeting.

The inspectors also contacted and interviewed other licensee and contractor

personnel including craftsmen, QA/QC, technical and engineering staff

members.

Functional or Program Areas Inspected

Details of functional or program areas inspected are documented in Sections

I and lI as follows.

-2-

1509

799

.

.

.

Section I

Prepared by E. R. Schweibiuz

Reviewed by C. C. Williams, Chief

Projects Section 2

s

1.

Quality Assurance Plans and Procedures for Extended Shutdown

The RIII inspector inquired if an overall QA plan and implementing

procedures had been developed for this extended shutdown. The

licensee stated that they had not yet developed a plan or procedures

for these activities but that it was under consideration. The

inspector inquired if quality related records of the piping contractor

had been turned over to Commonwealth Edison Company (CECO) since a

large number of the people have left the site.

(Construction workers

on site on September 13, 1979 - 1750, September 17, 1979 - 46L,

September 21, 1979 - 342 people). The licensee stated that the

piping contractor had not turned over any of these records as yet.

When asked if any of the contractors had turned over quality related

records, the licensee stated that the electrical contractor,

L. K. Comstock and Company, Inc., had turned over a portion of their

quality related records.

The document that was used for this turnover, dated September 17,

1979, was reviewed by the RIII inspector.

Subject:

L. K. Comstock

and Company, Inc. and E. C. Ernst, Documentation.

The cover letter

reads as follows, "The attached inventory of L. K. Comstock and

Company, Inc. and E. C. Ernst documentation lists documents turned

over to Commonwealth Edison Company; except for drawings and equipment

storage surveillances." It was prepared and accepted by a Quality

Assurance Engineer for CECO and was accepted by the Quality Assurance

and Quality Control Manager for L. K. Comstock.

A handwritten note

on the cover page to the inventory stated, "This documentation is to

be kept in locked file cabinets maintained in the L. K. Comstock

Office Building." The RIII inspector did a random verification of

some of the documents in this inventory.

Results of this verification

indicated that not all of the documentation listed in September 17,

1979, was located in the file cabinets maintained in the L. K. Comstock

Office Building. Seven documents listed on the inventory had been

turned over to the Station Construction Department after the completion

of the inventory and without knowledge of the quality assurance

department.

In addition, at least four other documents were not

located in the file cabinets, but were in the general vicinity,

although they were listed on the inventory. This lack of control of

these documents further indicates that procedures are needed for the

control of these activities.

-

-

1509

500

.

.

.

This failure to have plans and procetires to control these safety

related activities is an item of noncompliance with 10 CFR 50,

Appendix B, Criterion V.

(456/79-12-01; 457/79-12-01)

2.

Storage of Equipment

The RIII inspectors took an extensive tour of the site to observe

storage of equipment in place.

A problem was identifi:J during this

,

tour in that the storage of the reactor coolant pump motors was

-

inadequate.

Several motors did not have their motor winding heaters

energized and they had not been rotated on a weekly basis as required

by the manufacturer's instructions. These problems were corrected

in a timely manner by the licensee.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

3.

Site Staffing Considerations

The ultimate size of the site staff during the extended shutdown has

not been clearly established. NRC is concerned relative to the

ad2quacy of the size of the surveillance staff, and will pursue this

issue during subsequent inspection. This matter is unresolved.

(456/79-12-02; 457/79-12-02)

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

.

-4-

1509

301

.

.

"

Section II

Prepared by C. E. Jones

Reviewed by C. C. Williams, Chief

Projects Section 2

s

1.

Extended Construction Delay - Review of Quality Assurance Implementing

Procedures

The inspector reviewed a general procedure, " Commonwealth Edison

Company - Phillips, Getchow Company Quality Assurance Interface for

Requisitioning, Purchasing and Receiving Material", BM-101, Revision 2,

dated April 18, 1979. The stated purpose of the procedure was to

clarify responsibilities for the purchase, receipt and storage of

ASME,Section III materials, parts, components, and the control of

the associated documentation as required by Section III.

The licensee was informed that the lack of such an approved QA

Program was considered to be an element of noncompliance as identified

in Section I of this report.

2.

Extended Construction Delay - Observation of Work and Work Activities

The inspector reviewed the storage of Category I heat exchangers and

compared storage conditions with those recommended by y in their

Instruction Manual for Auxiliary Heat Exchanges.

In addition, the

storage recommendations were revieved for the steam generators. The

licensee stated QA Procedures were being reviewed and revised to

meet manufacturer's recommendations and owner's requirements.

The

licensee agreed to document these instances where manufacturer's

recommendations were not followed.

In general, storage condition for the heat exchangers, met y recommenda-

tions. The majority of the heat exchangers have been mounted on

pe rmanent foundations and piping connections completed. The heat

exchangers observed by the inspector are listed below.

The licensee stated that present plans include closing the turbine

building and temporary openings in the containment and auxiliary

buildings prior to cold weather.

The heating boiler is being installed

and should be available to supply heat for the turbine and auxiliary

buildings.

Electric heaters are to be installed in the containment

buildings to maintain temperatures of 40 F or higher.

The Category I Heat Exchangers were listed in the y Instruction

Manual Auxiliary Heat Exchangers. This manual included nine general

instructions with "Special Instructions" for specific heat exchangers.

-5-

1509

402

.

.

A

"

The status of the Category I heat exchangers observed by the inspector

is as follows:

a.

Component Cooling Heat Exchanger

W Standard Plant Item No. (S.P.I.N.) CCAHCC

Quantity Supplied 3 each

Manufacturer's Data Sheet AH-CC 654

s

All three units were positioned on permanent pads and all

piping connections had been connected. The layup of these heat

-

exchangers appeared to comply with the suppliers recommendations.

b.

Seal Water Heat Exchangers

W Standard Plant Item No (S.P.I.N.) CSAHSW

Quantity Supplied, 2 each, CCE-one, CDE-one

Manufacturer's Data Sheet AH-SW652

Purchase Order No. CCE-546-CAZ-215333

CDE-546-CAZ-215334

Piping to shell side welded to nozzles.

Flanges to tube side are

protected by plywood and plastic coverings. Exchangers have been

permanently mounted and aligned.

Storage meets manufacturer's

recommendations.

c.

Letdown Reheat Heat Exchanger

,

W Standard Plant Item No. (S.P.I.N.) TRAHLR

Quantity Supplied, 2 each, CCE-one, CDE-one

Manufacturer's Data Sheet AH-LR630

Purchase Order No. CDE-546-CAZ-214814

Heat exchanger mounted in permanent location and final piping

connections completed.

d.

Moderating Heat Exchanger

W Standard Plant Item No. (S.P.I.N.) TRAHHM

Quantity Supplied, 2 each, CCE-one, CDE-one

Manufacturer's Data Sheet AH-M629

Purchase Order No. CCE-546-CAZ-214813

CDE-546-CAZ-214814

The Unit 1 exchanger has been permanently mounted and piping

connections have been completed. The Unit 2, CDE, exchanger

has on pipe connection on the shell side completed by welding.

The remaining three pipe connections have been covered and

sealed.

e.

Residual Heat Exchanger

W Standard Plant Item No. (S.P.I.N.) RHAHRS

quantity Supplied, 4 each, CCE-two, CDE-two

-6-

1509

303

.

.

&

Manufacturer's Data Sheet aS-653

Purchase Order No. 546-CAZ-215353-(CCE)

546-CAZ-215354-(CDE)

National Board No. 840 and 841 (CCE)

842 and 843 (CDE)

All four exchangers were permanently mounted and piping connections

completed.

,

f.

Letdown Chiller Heat Exchanger

.

W Standard Plant Item No. (S.P.I.N.) TRAHLC

Quantity Supplied, 2 each, CCE-one, CDE-one

Manufacturet's Data Sheet AH-LC 631

Purchase Order No. LCE-540-CAZ-214813

CDE-546-CAZ-214814

Exchangers permanently mounted. Shell side piping connections

complete. Tube side flanges protected with plywood plate and

plastic seal one unit CDE. Piping connections complete on unit

CCE, Unit 1.

Unit covered with plastic.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

3.

Storage of Steam Generators

The four steam generators have been placed in their cells in the

Unit I containment and have been aligned. W issued a " Procedure for

Long Term Storage of Steam Generators and Pressurizers," on September 20,

1979.

The licensee indicated the W recommendations would be followed

or included in the CECO QA procedure for generator lay up.

The inspector observed No. 2 and No. 3 steam generators positioned

in place. No work was in progress on either.

Steam generator No.

1714 that was damaged during the loading operations at Savanna,

Illinois is now identified as steam generator No. I at Braidwood.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

'

Unresolved Items

Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in

order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, items of noncompliance

or deviations.

Unresolved items disclosed during the inspection are

discussed in Section II, Paragraph 3.

Exit Meeting

The inspectors met with the site staff representatives (denoted in the

Persons Contacted paragraph) at the conclusion of the inspction on

September 28, 1979. The inspectors summarized the scape and findings of

the inspection including the one apparent item of noncompliance identified

the Section I, Paragraph 1 of the Details section of this report. The

licensee acknowledged the finding.

-7-

1509

304