ML19253A175

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Info Requested by Atty General for Antitrust Review, Submitted by Southern CA Edison Co on Behalf of Cities of Anaheim & Riverside,Ca.Discusses Proposed Transfer of Ownership
ML19253A175
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 08/03/1979
From: Shapar H
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To: Bell G, Kaplan D
JUSTICE, DEPT. OF, JUSTICE, DEPT. OF, ATTORNEY GENERAL, OFFICE OF
References
NUDOCS 7908200021
Download: ML19253A175 (1)


Text

-

ps Asco UNITED STATES S 'Y ^r.q [9.h NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

.E WASHIN ^,TO N, D. C. 20555

%..o')l/

b.

an 3

.se The Honorable Griffin B. Bell Attorney General Washington, D.C.

Attention:

Donald A. Kaplan, Chief Energy Section Antitrust Division Department of Justice Re:

Southern California Edison Company San Diego Gas & Electric Company San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.

Units 2 & 3, Docket Nos. 50-361A & 50-362A

Dear Mr. Attorney Generat:

In accordance with Section 105(c) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, we are transmitting herewith two copies of the "Information Requested by the Attorney General for Antitrust Review" submitted by the Southern California Edison Company on behalf of the Cities of Anaheim an6 Riverside California.

This information appears as Appendix E (Riverside) and Appendix H (Anaheim) to Southern California Edison Company's " Application for Permission to Transfer an Ownership Interest to the Cities of Anaheim and Riverside, California and for Amendment to Construction Permits Nos. CPPR-97 and CPPR-98."

Under the proposed transfer of ownership, the City of Anaheim would acquire a 1.66% interest in each of the two 1100 MW(e) units, for a total of 36.52 MW(e),

and the City of Riverside would acquire a 1.79% interest in each of the two units, for a total of 39.38 MW(e). Under the "de minimis" rule, therefore, each city is required to submit only the information requested in item 9 of Appendix L to 10 CFR-Part 50. Notwithstanding the "de minimis" rule, however, both cities chose to submit all of the information requested in Appendix L.

The information has now been accepted for the purpose of initiating the anti-trust review. The material is being transmitted to afford you an opportunity to render such advice to the Commission as you deternine to be appropriate in regard to the finding to be made by the Commission pursuant to Section 105(c)

(5) of the /ct.

Sincerely, l/

[S rw, Howard K. Shapar

-q Executive Legal Director

Enclosures:

As stated 7908200 O 2 /

/%

803 326

s Southern California Edison Company

[E

  • O. SC M 8 0 0 2244 WA LN UT G ROVE AV E N U E RCSEMEAD, CAUFORNIA 98770

,gtg, eng y g, g,y g ma.,n aaa e July 17, 1979 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:

Mr. Robert L. Baer, Chief LWR Branch 2, DPM U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Gentlemen:

Subject:

Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 1 Enclosed are three (3) signed originals and nineteen (19) copies of the " Appl _ cation for Permission to Transfer an Ownership Interest to the Cities of Anaheim and Riverside, California and for Amendment to Construction Permits Nos. CPPR-97 and CPPR-98," pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 50.90.

Also please find enclosed a check for $1,600, payable to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Cccmission, as payment for the amendment fees.

Please contact me if you have any quertions concerning the enclosed material, fee payment, or require additional information.

Sinzer ly,g g[

W. /sah o

,e

/

/J o

/C%fp9 g 3

Enclosures p

3

/

P 2-

\\

S a $ ~c' D

u\\

u n o,su ni o

A O

/

3 327

_