ML19249E492

Notifies That All Reviewing Branches Recommend FSAR Be Accepted for Docketing.Rept Is Presently 90-95% Complete

ML19249E492
Person / Time
Site:	Grand Gulf
Issue date:	06/27/1978
From:	Vassallo D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Boyd R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7910010591
Download: ML19249E492 (2)

Text

'

D 1 s t r ibu t i_o_n, <,

octet file fiRC PDR J U.1 1 7 E 'h local POR 7

LWR 1 File R. C. DeYoung Q

l ND T

I (Jhg [{t D. B. Vassallo f

r;i, F. J. Williams J

. Of J. Stolz Doctet Hos. 50-116' C. Thomas and 50-417 E. Hylton P.cger S. Coy *i, Director, Division of Project f*anagc:ent i:EiKRALDU:t f 04:

i D. B. Vassallo, Assistant Director fer Light Uater i

FRO:1:

Reectors, UP:4 RESblTS OF ACCEPTA!:CE REVIE!1 CF Tl!E GRAND GULF

$U3 JECT:

!,UCLEAR STAT 10!! OPERATING LICENSE APTLICAT10tl (GiMND LULF !!UCLEAR STAfl0H, UNIT !.GS.1 A'.D 2) l.

BAcr. GROUND Mississi-pi Pater A Light,Ccorany tendered for Ca April 23, 1978, l

accel ar.cc review its application for operating licenses for its t

Crtnd Culf ::uclear Station, Unit 1:os. I atid 2.

The Grand Gulf i;uclear Station is lecetcd on the east 'cank of the Mississippi River in Claiborr,e County, Ilississippi, approxir:ately 25 ailes

..$.-e t pf.

FM unit utilius a Cencral

1..o : e' r.. e'. cm ~uii n.,. a i 1 a. 's r c.d o, wk I M. y ar

~

su[pression containnent. Each unit is designed for rated therval and net electrical outputs of 3833 an-11250 regawatts, respectively.

Unit I fuel leading is scheduled for Octcher 1NO and Unit 2 fuel loading is sci.eduled for July 1933. The Crand Gulf Euclear Station is the lead ILIR/6, Ikrk 111 ccntalmeat plant.

P.EVIEli C0t:CLOSIONS The staff has ccnpleted its acceptance revicu of the Final Safety Analysis P.eport and all the reviewing brancres have concludc4 that it should 1:e accepted for decLctir.g. Acceptance revicu questions A total were received from all but six of the.reviching tranches.

i Overall, the of 132 acceptance review questions were received.

Final Safety Analysis Peport is judged to t>e beween 90 and 95 percent conplete.

t Environnental Projects has conf eted its prelininary review of the l

Envirercental Report and has cor.cluded that the Envirorcental Report, as subr.itted, is adequate to cueble tha staff to comnce its evaluation i

of the environ-ental inrect of the prorased opration of the plant, to cialtate alternatives to the proposed actions, cod to prepare detailed Accordingly, cnvironacntal statenents setting forth the evaluations.

Envirom.cntal Projccts recc: neMs that the tendered Envirorneatal Report be doctetcd.

.-.-4...

o r r w e )=

g

]A' suwAus >

l t

1 D At t h h u...

r m r,~

cr m a i.,. _ m m nc tonx 3ts m6) not ono 79100;069 /

4 J

- u '

~

P00R 010EL

~ f,

?c3er S. Boyd I

Based on the chove f t:41r.]s, sie recm.end that tle Gra#81 Culf !!uclear Station, Unit P,os. I a,d 2 epratirig liccnte applicetion be accepted for decLetirig.

.kn f l[

(

1. 1. 1$. B. Vassallo, Assistant Director for I.ight Uater Reactors Givision of Project l'anage:c.at t

t i

i i

1 I

I i

i i

i

--p(1)/ b'j, y LWR C LWR 1 l.WR,1 c,,i a,

~q 7

<mg

_($Ih.,o_ r 3.'s /jyr....)_SIj ol z.,,_j_..

DBVassalIo' i sua%===*

}

7 fT) o.n >

. 6/Ul18-..

60 418 6(L',D8...

{

SECtoRM 318 (9 76) NRCM 02+0 O u. s. c.ove nsu s.% r rai%riw a or ri:< n era - c as. 24 1032

v3