ML19249D860

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Supplemental Info Re Verona & Las Positas Faults Which Should Be Added to USGS 790905 Status Review of GE Test Reactor
ML19249D860
Person / Time
Site: Vallecitos File:GEH Hitachi icon.png
Issue date: 09/19/1979
From: Menard H
INTERIOR, DEPT. OF, GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7909250473
Download: ML19249D860 (2)


Text

,

c,

\\

f

({" g# _t 5)United States Department of the Interior GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Ni "*

RESTON. VA. 22092 In Reply Refer To:

Mail Stop 908 U.* 1 :

  • 9 Mr. Harold Denton Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555

Dear Mr. Denton:

The enclosed supplement should be added to the U.S. Geological Survey status review dated September 5, 1979, of the General Electric Test Reactor Facility Docket No. 50-70.

Sincerely yours, f.4/ _t; a'

LI

/[y H. William Menard Director Enclosure O

N O

4

\\

Q. g q*i a

One Hundred Years otlarth Science in the Public Service b j \\ n)

%;;;?

1020 236 7 909250 D3

Genera.; Electric Test Reactor Vallecitos Nuclear Center Vallecitos, California Docket Number 50-70 Supplement to Status Review The letter from R. W. Darmitzel, General Electric Company, to C. Nelson, NRC, dated July 12, 1979, raises t he point that USGS Professional Paper 943 does not show either the Verona nor the Las Positas faults and that this point should be considered along with the applicant's data regarding the geology of the Livermore area.

Professional Paper No. 943 " Flatland Deposits -- Their Geology and Engineering Properties and the Im7 ortance to Comprehensive Planning" was published in 1979, and therefore post-dates the publication of Open File Map 77-689 (1977) in which the Verena and Las Positas f aults are shown. Although PP 943 was published in 1979, the authors manuscript was submitted in 1976 and received approval March 2,1977. Data in the raport thus pre-date Open File Map 77-689 and omission of the Verona and Las Posit.> faults as described by Herd becomes understandable.

Furthermore PP 943 is principally a study of Pleistocene and younger stretigraphic units and the accompanying maps plates 1, 2 and 3 were not inteeded to show all faults in the areas depict 2d.

For instance the Hillside fault, Miller Creek fault, Cull Creek fault and Bolinger fault are extmples of the many others not shown.

Tha apparent omission of the Verona and Las Positas faults from maps in PP 943 therefore provides no basis for emphasis, pro or con, in the review of geologic data pertinent to the Vallecitos GETR site.

1021) 237