ML19247D542
| ML19247D542 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach |
| Issue date: | 01/15/1981 |
| From: | Chaplin M ABB COMBUSTION ENGINEERING NUCLEAR FUEL (FORMERLY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19247D543 | List: |
| References | |
| TR-ESE-411, NUDOCS 8103090384 | |
| Download: ML19247D542 (78) | |
Text
lg d
I STEAM GENERATOR CREVICE FLOW TEST n%
I
<J 6
B I
i V
v for Wisconsin Electric Power Company L
LJ c Test Report TR-ES E-411 E
SYSTEMS POWER COMBUSTION ENGINEEAiNG INC 81030903N
6 I
I E
LEGAL NOTICE THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED AS AN ACCOUNT OF WORK SPONSORED DY COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. NEITHER COMBUSTION ENGINEERING NOR ANY PERSON ACTING ON ITS BEHALF:
A.
MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR ME R CH ANTABI LITY, WITH RESPECT TO THE ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, OR USEFULNESS OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT, OR THAT THE USE OF ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD, OR PROCESS DISCLOSED IN THIS REPORT MAY NOT INFRINGE PRIVATELY g
OWNED RIGHTS;OR g
B. ASSUMES ANY LIABILITIES WITH RESPECT TO THE USE OF, OR FOR DAMAGES RESULTING FROM THE USE OF, ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD OR PROCESS DISCLOSED IN THIS REPORT.
I E
B 5
I I
I I
I
E E
CObBUSTIO!! E:CitEERING DEVEID15!ENT DEPARDIENT E
STERt CENERAIDR TUBESlEET CREVICE FIDW TEST FOR WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY I
C0ffrRACT NDBER 14980 APPROVED BY: ( //7 ((/m W
'\\\\,h bwn PREPARED BY:
T M. P. Chapl m REVIEWED BY:
L!.O t c<4ofM/
E DOCR!EtTr NO.
TR-ESE-411 DATE OF ISSUE:
/ - /3'- / 9 F/
< ' '~~ l TFe !n's necn er
o,
F3S bC Sn rek'0C ')
J' i
0 ',,' 2 3 b l ' ' ' ' ~' s ~ ^ . " C J
, l 8
!;a. 2 > f ;, s
'.l.
7; U..U. Ecure' l
- de c3
% u E
I 5
8 E
I The information contained in this report No. IR-ESE-411 is certified to be an accurate account of information obtained by performance of the tests, inspections or other objectives described herein.
I Certified by: [L f k/(,<.J&
Date: / - /.r'-'a'/
Ulboratory Manager E
E 5
8 B
B E
8 i
IR-E3E-411 5
8 8
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTTON TITIL PAGE NO.
1.0 Introduction 1
2.0 Su:ra ry 1
3.0 Details of Test Hardware 2
3.1 Test Setup 2
3.2 Instrumentation 2
3.2.1 Pressure Cages 4
3.2.2 Themocouples 4
3.2.3 Flow 4
3.3 Test Section 5
3.4 Test Specimens 5
4.0 Discussion 5
4.1 Testing 5
4.2 Observa tions 7
5.0 Conclusions 11 APPENDIX A Test Procedure Al APPENDIX B Instrumentation Error Analysis B1 APPENDIX C Ca1culations C1 APPENDIX U Comparison of Flow Rates D1 APPENDIX E Data Sheets El 5
5 i
TR-ESE-411
8 5
LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE t'O.
ITTLE PAGE NO.
1 Test racility Setura 3
2 Test Section Instrumentation 6
3 Test Facility Photo 10 4
Test Section Photo 12 5
Flew Curve Tube 2A 14 8
6 Flow Curve Tube 3A 15 7
Flow Curve Tube 4A 16 8
Flow Curve Tube SA 17 9
Flow Curve Tube 6A 18 10 Flow Curve Tube 7A 19 11 Flow Curve Tube 8A 20 12 Flow Curve Tube 9A 21 13 Flow vs. Defect location 22 14 Discharge Pressure vs. Flow Rate 23 15 Defect Area vs. Flew Rate 24 16 Defect Area Tube 2A 25 17 Defect Area Tube 3A 25 18 Defect Area Tube 4A 25 19 Defect Area Tube SA 25 20 Defect Area Tube 6\\
26 21 Defect Area Tube 7A 26 22 Defect Area Tube 8A 26 5
23 oerect ^ree rmee e^
2e I
ii TR-ESE-411
I E
LIST OF TABLES TABLE NO.
TITLE PACE.O.
1 Steam Gemerator Crevice Leak Test 13 Test Data Sumnry 8
8 E
h 3
3 8
R E
8 8
9 iii TR-ESE-411
5 8
1.0 IhTRODUCTION i
h Point Beach Nuclear Plant Unit I steam generators have experienced g
intergranular attack of the tubes in the tubesheet crevice area. A test program was undertaken to evaluate the potential rate of secondarv a
leakage through simulated defective stexn generator tubes in the tube-sheet crevice.
This report details the te: sting which was perfomed to detemine the seccodarj to primary leakage rate through tubes with simulated defects at various locations within the tubesheet crevice. All tests were g
U perfomed with a naninal secondarv side pressure of 1000 psig.
2.0 SlFARY The following strrarizes the results of tests ccapleted to detemine ilew characteristics through defective steam generator tubes durine a postulated loss of primary pressure accident.
1.
Nineteen tests were ccapleted on samplec having defects rancing k
frce a.01 inch diameter hole to a.01" by 3 inch long slit.
2.
The maximum steady state secondary to primar/ flew of 1460 lb/hr.
was obtained with the.01 inch by 1/2 inch defect.
3.
Defects greater than 1/2 inch long were found to reduce in size during test due to external pressure which caused defomatien of the tabe.
4.
Flow is affected by prirary side back pressure.
Increasing the back pressure close to the saturation pressure resulted in a max =um flew that was almost twice as large as that obtained under maximum differential pressure.
8 il 1
TR-ESE-411 8
I I
I 5.
Small defects yielded the maximum flow per unit area. Values ranged from 930,000 lbs. per hour per square inch for the.01 inch diameter hole to 46,000 lbs, per, hour per square inch for the largest defect area tested.
I 6.
An instrunent error analysis showed that all tests were run with the test water entering the simulated tubesheet crevice in the liquid subcooled state.
7.
Defects located 12 inches to 18 inches below the top of the tubesheet have leakage rates approximately 30% less than those located 5/8 inches below the top of the tubesheet.
I 3.0 DETARS OF TEST HARIEARE 3.1 Test Facility Setup The test facility is shown in Figure 1 and was assembled utilizing a 70 gallon autoclave w.ch a nitrogen overpressure to provide a source of demineralized water at 550 F and a pressure of 1065 psig.
The system piping was 3/4 inch stainless steel tubing. Connectors and valves were 3/4 in:h Swagelok. The discharge valve was a 1 1/2 inch fast-acting valve connected to an atcmospheric drain line.
3.2 Instrumentation All instrum.'ntation was calibrated prior to and at the ccxnpletion of the test.
Instrumentation error analysis and calibration data are included as Appendi:: B.
8 8
8 2
F FX
=
3 (F
s
=
h.
k a
r C
ae 8
a m
t L
J t
g
>=
e I-d h5 1
.r e:
~
gI
,YA b
_~
=
2.
gea e
L J
>E=
a m=o C
muu e
E b
N E
O a
n
't 6
~
~
<1 w lll! A ca f
d 5J gg
[
/
5 2
O v*
agI l
m E s H2) >~
m C_
m C:
l *
.~ a $
t.
g E44 l
"db FE=
Sa#
^
8 u
e w
W S$8 a"
c-
=.
-Cx3-
=
n I
I 3.2.1 Pressure Gaceo I
Pressure gages were installed in the aucoclave (P ),
t tubesheet inlet (P2) and upstream of the discharge I-valve (P3).
3.2.2 Thermocounles I
Thermocouples were installed in the autoclave (Ti),
tubesheet inlet (T ), tubesheet I.D. (T3), and inside th tube adja ent t the defect (T ).
The thennocouples BD were connected to a digital readout.
3.2.3 Flow A Meriam AP gage was connected to a Flow-Dyne venturi flow renter with a 0.1985 inch throat diameter. Connected in parallel to the venturi was a Rosemont AP Transmitter g
WP and a Honeywell 1508A visicorder. This system provided both a visual and permanent record of flow.
For backup flow data, the autoclave level was monitored.
The level was measured using a Rosemont SP transmitter connected to a meter. Using a stonwatch and the level indicat on, the ficw per unit time could be established.
i As the level instrumentation had been calibrated at 68 F, the calculation in Appendix C was used to detennine the 550 F flow rate. Flow rates for the 0.010 inch hole defect were obtained solely by the autoclave level vs. time method.
I 11 4
TR-ESE-411 I
8 I
I 3.3 Test Sectis i
A 21/2 inch diameter carbon steel round was gun drilled to 0.892
.001 inches I.D. to simulate the tubesheet (Figure 2).
Instru-I ment taps and a vent tap were drilled perpendicular to the I.D.
In addition, a tube deflection device was installed to deflect the test tube against the tubesheet I.D. to provide the maximum clearance area at the tube defect.
I Eight strip heaters (of 250 watts each) were utilized to provide heat to the test section and inlet plenun. The test section tem-g 5
perature was stabilized at 600 F prior to initiation of the blowdown.
3.4 Test Specimens B
The simulated steam genera tor tubes (Figures 15 through 22) were fabricated from 7/8 inch 0.D. 316 stainless steel welded seam tubing. The tubes were cut to 24" in length and a plug welded into one end; they were then centerless ground to 0.872 :.001 inches. Tube defects, with the exception et the 0.040 inch hole (3A) and the 0.010 X.500 inch slit (2A), were installed using Electron Discharge machining.
The tube were installed in the test section (tubesheet) usine 8
Swagelok fitti.gs. Defect positioning within the tubesheet crevice was meucured to 1/16 inches.
4.0 DISCUSSION 8
4.1 Testing The test tubes were installed in the simulated tubesheet and I
5 TR-ESE-411
I h
Jx
=
/
E 8
M s
=
I I
N
=
/"
5
!E ze
- l d U5 C
Uw 5$
a e
m$e e
o Edd a4*
e R
-mo I e@
s A-1=
da 8
f=
u&
t; t; ~
C s
3 O
}
s
=
,(i
~
g PR 9
8 I
8 8
E
I E
the defect location fixed. The tube was deflected to contact g
the tubesheet opposite the defect to allow maximum flow area E
at the defect. The system was heated and pressurized frca the autoclave through the specunen tube up to the discharge valve.
Upon reaching test conditions, the system was rapidly depres-surized by opening the discharge valve. Temperature, flow and pressure were recorded before, during, and af ter b1culown.
g An instrument error analysis (Appendix B) showed that all tests 5
were run with the test water entering the simulated tubesheet crevice in the liquid subcooled state.
The testing was pe formed in accordance with Test Procedure 00000-ESE-298, "Wiscansin Electric Power SteLn Generator Tubesheet Crevice Test", (Appendix A).
I 4.2 Observations A total of 19 blowdown tests were perfonned using 9 tubes with various defects. Tests 1 through 12 and 17 through 19 were per-formed with the defect located 5/8 in, frcm the top of the tube-sheet. Tests 13 through 16 were perfonned with the defect located 12 and 18 inches into the tubesheet. Flows with the defect lo-cated at these levels were, respectively, 590 and 500 lbs. per hour less than those with the defect located 5/8 in, into the tubesheet. See Figure 12. Flow rates for the other defects are displayed in Figures 5 through 11.
I The flow rates during the initial ten seconds of each test were higher than those after test stabilization although significantly I
higher (50-100% higher) culy for the first two (2) seconds. This ccrresponded to a freely discharging submerced flow ccudition as 8
7 TR-ESE-411
I I
E the valve was being epened and the back pressure in the test section was being reduced to atmospheric pressure. As the in-ternal tube back pressure decreased and vaporization across the defect w: s established, flew rates stabilized at signifi-I cantly lewer values.
Tube deferrution at the simulated defect uns noted in most of the tubes after test. Tube S/N 4A defect was measured prior to installation at.010 x 1.00 inches. Die tube was then installed and brought to test canditions (550 F 1075 psig) and stabilized for 30 minutes. The 1.D. of the tube was not depressurized,
-I thus no differential pressure was established. The tube was cooled and reinspected. No change in tube diameter or defect area was noted. The tube was then tested normally, af ter wi ich test measurements disclosed a reduction in the defect area of about.005 in: due to tube defornution durins; flow testing.
It was thus verified that the defect reduction was due to the external pressure caused by the depressuriz.ation rather than I
thercul effects.
Figure 15 and Table 1 provide a correlation of the stabilized flow per unit area versus defect area af ter test. A trend seems to be established that the larger defects have lower flow per unit area than the small defects.
The measured flow rates and the defect size effect can be cor-related by equations for critical f1sw through orifices. These correlations are provided in Apyndix D.
For initially subcooled water, Zaloudek (Ref. 1) found that a choking condition occurs at the orifice throat corresponding to the situation when the local pressure reaches the saturation pressure. This is referred to as upstream choking which is characterized by flow consisting I
8 E-ES E-411
E 8
of a liquid core surrcunded by a vapor annulus. The flow through the orifice remains constant even with further decreases in 'he I
bamk pressure.
This critical flow, Gt, is given by q2 ge c1 (P
~ sat.)
()
Gi Ct
=
upstream where Ci is a coefficient of discharge, c i is saturated water density, P is pr ssure upstream of crifice, and P is upstream sa, saturation pressure at subcooled liquid tm perature.
For highly metastable flow, the superheated liquid dces not have time to flash and establish themedynamic equilibrium.
In this instance, the liquid flashes dos 1 stream of the orifice leadirg to a second critical flow situatien. The vale of this critical flow is determined frtu the data of Burnell as, sat)
G: = d2gc ci {P
- (1-C:) P ups.
where C2 is a unction of the surface tension.
I Cceparison of '
me.asured flow rates with the predicted values by Eqs. 1 and 1 (n, pmo d: D) showed that the flew rates ter t:x smaller size defects corresponded to G: and those of the large It is thus apparent that with the defects corresponded to Gt smaller flow areas (0.010" hole up to 0.10" x 0.50" slit), surface tension has a strong effect in suppressing flashing and metastable conditions are more apt to occur. Conversely, thermodynamic I
equilibritn is reached with the larger ; low areas. The agreement between predicted and measured values it close (: 15 to 27 percent)
I except for the 0.010" hole and the longest slits.
H 9
TR-ES E-411 I
I I
I Increasing the upstream pressure for Tube 2A (bas 3 $ 5) created only a small increase in flow (< 1% increase). This trend is 8
also predicted by Eq. 2; a much larger increase is predicted by Eq. 1.
This supports the conclusion of downstream cheking for this tube.
Figure 13 shows the effect of back pressure on flow for Tube 5A.
In this test, stabilized flow conditions were first established with the back pressure set at atmospheric conditions. The g
5 isolation valve was then slowly closed to increase the back pres-khen the back pressure reached a value in the vicinity of sure.
the saturation pressure (1003 psia), the ficw reached a maximum, a factor 1.8 greater than stabilized ficv rate, af ter which, with further increase in back pressure, the flow decreased to zero corresponding to a decreasing differential pressure as in single phase flow. Due to the difficulty of obtaining steady values of I
flow under high back pressures, the flow versus back pressure data of Figure 13 represent qu.wi-steady state values. Hcuever, the maximum ficv reached can be compared to the maximum theo-retically possible. Since Eq.1 applies for Tube 5A, increasing the back pressure would propagate this pressure increase back towards the orifice and cause the local static pressure to exceed the saturation pressure. Consequently, the choking conditim I
would be recoved, and the flow would be increased by the increase of the discharge coefficient to the single phase value (i.e.,
o.62 to 1.0 or a factor of 1.6).
This provides an explanation of the increase in flev rate.
Two test runs were made to assess the effect of tube clearance within the simulated tubes 5eet. Runs 18 and 19, using the.01 I
by.5 inch long c'efect located 5/8 inches frcra the top, were placed undefle:te" in the test section.
Leakage rates were I
10 TR-ESE-411 I
I B
I generally lower than those obtainea with the maxunum clearance runs but only by a small percentage, approximately 3%. Since other parameters, such as inlet temperature 'nd pressure have a much larger effect, it is concluded that tube ucentricity within the clearances tested does not significannly affect the leakage rates reported.
The test simulated a single tube and the adjacent tubesheet material.
In an operational situation, unless adjacent tubes were also leaking, a larger heat source would be available thus maintaining a higher discharge /tubesheet temperature. This would tend to decrease the tube leak rate.
I
5.0 CONCLUSION
S Based on the test data, it can be seen that the smaller defects yield larger leak rates per unit area. The maximum leak rate per unit area was obtained with the.01 inch diameter hole which yielded about 930,000 lbs. per hour per square inch. The measured leak rates can be correlated to previous data for critical ficw in orifices based on I
upstream choking for the larger defect areas and downstream choking for the smaller defect areas.
An increased leak rate was observed when the simulated steam generator tube was internally pressuri;:ed to near saturation pressure of the wa te r.
The magnitude of this increase for large defects was twice that found while discharging at maximum 6P.
With large defects,12 inches to 18 inch-frcm the top of the tube-sheet, leak rates were reduced as much as 30%. Concentricity of the I
tube within the tubesheet crevice had minimal effect.
8 5
11 3R-ESE-411 I
l 0
r-I p,.g yno r,e mov,n m yn 3, ; v,m... ec m m, m ~aen,fe,ry~,-
w -rw > r; - w m*
g
<, ;y ; n p n a
1
_ q a
c
.(
.j p'
,p. i y 4, ', t
']
l
) g(V r
4...,
q
,y s
.n.
v A k.:'s'
, g,p'
- },
l#
'.y S
l 3
t' i,
g)<
Q:(L g.,,' S 2 ),c h, <. A '- :'
)
b
'o
.4 j.,t.
o
.e
- o L
i.1 lt,
.' ' v */ '
- ^
p1' p i!
c41
.j, i
h, f]
- I j
s,
',\\'
',Y
?^
.s.
,,j, g
' ') \\1'l
. ](.*
J.,
e t
7-ns ps r,u s e r-g l
0 g: m 'i J
-}
w h.
Ari p v.,5-
,,, ' pl h o #
-f s
t
.a., 6 :-
y n.
s
\\
.ur u
La i
, p y ' 9,m.
@ y }q.
n
.j v..
(
s s
g < h,-
h)
,,a.
p,
(
?
i
}.
6
/3
- y j k ' 1. ), ~ 4 sm y js e
F y,
,c
,py p : (,
... N1) e 4,4 y-g ge
, 9 9
I e
r gj d * [] h,, I J
. 4
'.Y >
}.4 M
eb ' E i.
- gig g d, A f L %gy &p;gg. g 6, m
c y
s.:,3 _,$ ~f j,.
y" al}
qQ s<
w,).f.
h[ L 'L[; } fj y j f y j:
fl pf s7 m>em[U.
l p
N m s ' <e.; n, n g >wr.v.f y, 3
n.%
i f
4.
i
%-,g,
m, ! -
- d. t :;
f,, ;e'f.s O
&3 :.
t. g,3 9
m; e;
y I
a3
- q.
' i, y0- -
f.
,n eo f 2,M.
,70 o
l e
m, {d%y)h ]n w( c/g y
o t;
9 4
,f l I
u. " ',,p ', ]a'
,g/
S M '
,j n
, A;,.
L, 9
. 5 e
,e
- pyl, 44 wy f,
s ' l ig,,.. f]n)Y gg,, r a
sv.
).
J, j
f
(?.Y:llh; Y, Y $
b O
I 1:w i l j. 3,,,y;M%
' >$ ?,..r., ls M% r.g m.l J
l 0,
m c %,,.s le ,,
C i
[ [ ( l' 1
4 *2
[.l e
g 3 -. _
4 v.,
"h iy 'k'j,)CA)N... j i
p2 m' hug,4 p
y m,m g::,
j,g l
.,m c
.f, 'j [g NN d o' N f,
'**" W d b
p$.
I
_. - y ~ D
~ $ ^ ';
' @L _hm:Jjd]aadb#l (' l' ( g,M);A 43m: fD%
l y
mmEEh mcw c,a stueron cuc e th mG mm mm F i t) V M t. tj0 h Q,.
l
--.-.4 n g ~mypyncy vw em pp y w ry-myyg 8
i u%
, g+, 7 ; " p;,,
yy, j f
- C Q.
3y ; g g
i p
m.m,
s, q
I sl p a]gn. n wl,l u y%
y i;
g; _
p [m f
f.
p M. ;,.. a;p u~. t,,
8 i
e "I r, 3 m-mmmm
. ;c.
f os. t '
< 3" -
,Ah h E; d (3N.
W %? r ?
34 g%V
- q ' > - m. w r3 3
l b,[ '
.,A i, n.c w'.,..s, i.
\\\\
,,1 b g,a (]-
l 3, j ' i j) h y
e 1
M-j
.y,
, J f.
" Eg p !
N,
[
- M
,I
'I k
'c[._
L;.Ep,.. _
.<o 9
c,
-- g
>1 3,. a., < o aa a
i N
I g
- % 'd gjc \\g g
. j p'm F, /'
.g myy ]
l 1
y 8
a q',"'$,v'-
g J.
o
,s in we 3:p a ( q
- 'k,r,p p ;e a.
r' y
ut, N,;
Qb (;,
1
+
+9 p> p O: h. 4%a,Ai
'12
+
,n e 4
,,1.
s 4 n wp n%. :.'. in
+
$C,
hl >
r, s
l b-W ' f,' ; g. L[,kl W, [a[Of / f py 7'-
7,
, r p,.
g { '[
' di:
- ,.h
.,.m
',t
[l } '
, ' ' L 1,3 6
3
.i l]f,Rq
?>J q$
g
[; a
<g Qy*rg yf.,
n.
- c n,m q;
p, 1
w te, o
3e g
y L}., %.
[ ru
, a
}
1
- o e,
4.J 4
gsyx m;pa A. ~t,n, m
g
- 7. a.
.d
,r>
e s
j l
c.r
<,2
.Y o.m g y r. - r1 r,e at m.
s,,
>,s
<1 s
g 'g r
s 4
0
.,3, 4
r
-.1
,i n
c..
/, v;
{
i
'n
' hp y[e ' '
1
?
/N.,
, ! ' f "o.
)
10 c
ip.
...2, 737 e..
y
,q-y
<?
l 3
A
.!? TS G
9 N$,...
N,w, hl..aLQ $b as wha.
iS s.e: s. l.w;.N a,d a.shnb, b;
ar.~c wcw wx n ca wn J
'r^ \\ h t. ? D.
d.1 0,.
-k k
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M Gus G!ss Table 1 MifJIfCM
' LUBE DEFECT PRESSURE
'IUfPERNIURE 1.Et# RATE hIi 1)EFECT RUN SI3IAL SIZE AtrlDCI AVE t CAIEUlKIFD tt AFlHI AREA 2
10.
fK).
(IN)
IfX'ATION Pi P2 T
T2 Git!
13/liR Gitt Fi 12/IIR
'IFST (IN )
i 1
2A
.010 x.500 5/8" 1075 1050 541 219 3.5 1300 3.8 1390
.0115"
.00595 2
2A
.010 x.500 5/8" 1050 1025 534 222 3.8 1400 3.9 1420
.0115"
.00595 3
2A
.010 x. ' JO 5/8" 1160 1125 546 217 3.6 1325 4.1 1500
.0115"
.00595 4
2A
.010 x.500 5/8" 1080 1050 M1 242 3.3 1225 3.7 1370
.0115"
.00595 5
2A
.010 x.500 5/8" 1075 1(40 547 241 4.0 1475 3.7 1370
.0115"
.00595 6
2A
.010 x.500 5/8" 1050 1025 545 242 4.0 1475 3.5 1280
.0115"
.(d595 7
3A
.040 Dia.
1/2" 1100 1060 541 214
.9 325 1.0 360
.040" 00133 8
4A
.010 x 1.00 5/8" 1125 1090 543 220 1.3 475 1.6 580
.005"
.00625 9
4A
.010 x 1.00 5/8" 1100 1075 542 219 1.3 475 1.5 540
.005"
.00625 10 SA
.010 x 2.00 5/8" 1090 1050 54 6 244 1.4 525 1.8 670
.006"
.01419 11 SA
.010. 2.00 5/8" 1100 1060 547 225 1.6 600 1.7 640
.006"
.01419 12 6A
.010 x 3.00 5/8" 1080 1050 547 238 2.1 775 2.3 840
.007"
.02861 13 8A
.010 x.500 12" 1090 1050 546 241 2.9 1075 2.6 970
.008" 00486 14 8A
.010 x.500 12" 1090 1050 547 259
').6 975 2.6 970
.008" 00 '+86 15 9A
.010 x.500 18" 1090 1050 545 242 2.1 775 2.4 880
.004"
.00556 i
~
16 9A
.010 x.500 18" 1090 1070 547 241 2.2 825 2.3 840
.009"
.00556 17 7A
.010 Dia.
5/8" 1100 1070 520 214
.1 37
.010" 3.96 x 10 '
181-2A
.010 x.500 5/8" 1100 1040 547 250 3.3 1225 3.6 1330
.0115"
.00595 19 ?'
2A
.010 x.500 5/8" 1090 1050 548 248 3.4 1250 3.6 1330
.0115"
.00595
' lube not deflected within tubesheet t Rmnded to nearest 25-lb. incrunents (Run #17 actual no.)
tt Rounded to nearest 10-lb. increwnts 13
'ik-IS E-41 1
8 m.
-8
\\\\
e S 3
~
si
)
?,
g c
I lq
-2
-2 9
2 I
/
/
/
~*
/
i I
3 1
_o 6
113..o!
I y
5 j oOdo
~#
I 1
i g
{
N/
\\
g i
=
i gi a,
a i
g
]
g
8 e
-3 k
o
-8 h
s
-2 I
1 8
,1
\\
a 1
z E
l.
s 4
g e
i e
I y
I
-~
I g
<N p-8 7
0 3
/
i
.J.
g e
-a
~
lG 1
i o.l
-s
?
=
1 8'
l
>w l
h
-s I
q
-a G
@!/
I
/
e 5
?
//
s de c
31 s E
//
-e l
35 u
N Gd d a a
I hO O $
@I y
- g
//
F I
8 g
//
fli e
\\
I M
i I
!i_
E x
Na
~
%)
.h I
~
a 3
0 8
5 3
8
I a2 -8 a
g f
U o n s
=
S E
o a -2 I
-a g
B
.8
-e
~
a u
f 3
e g
y 9: i
$ 8}lh
/
3 5;
/
..i-x
/
I
/
_ m
/
I d
8
/
g 8
E
=
g N
I I
g (ws/s7) sivu M71.s
3 1,L:
e s
g E
,f [
i i
2 j
8 i
I Le l
d
/
/
H9
'g l
^
8 s
a
/
\\
41 7
i, 3
si r
B J-S
/
l 0-y 1
+
fh$
/
h e
5 2
l t'
C
/
E
/,
l I
=N I
ar'/
g
)x c
s 8
b N
.b I
o 5
g i
e a
9 s
-,,,>>m-
I
-s l
r O
_g y
)
-8 I
-S I
e
-2 I
u "9
s i
a o
g h 5I E
l d
a a i
~e i
5 l
-m I
B i
\\
s N
i e
o a
l e-m um ~u
8 g
g a
h, I,
._ s x
3 o
'\\
h
-a 5
-a i
1 g
,/
u s
g a a.
z l
]
E oO u
e E
s i
/
i E
N I
'N 7 I
o
/
h er
=
x" i
i i
a s
g sin,- - s
a o
a i
I 2
Y
-8 g,
I l'
E g
-s 3
-2 2
W
'T l
4 S
8
! l![f
~*
? oo$
w B
/
~*
[
OJ
//<
l I
FN b
I
~ ~
8 N,
m B
/
i l
e 8
{
0 g
e
-nm,,2mm -
8 Ls a
c g
c:
au m F-T T I
@WW I
W to l
88 Sc 5
@ ???
s m
&=z i
[]
c0
-g j :g :,
s j
$ 0bb I
o e
a I
2 9
5 I
5 8
0 3
1 c
-S3 3o 0
5 a
a
[
m E
=
I o
-Q 3
I c
_s I
o c
_e g
I g
a s
3 l
CdH/T1) 31'06 tA013 8
8 h
a aw e, I
s p-
[.I
).. ' D s
/
1 i
--,...-. " " " $$l s s I
M"*I
',. ass-es o
y
%N (J
t-*
.. 's,.. j
'I,
. Se.,
-(
f
.%-s y
7 ";
d*
1 d
'6 l
s o.
-1 y
3 n
r I
B
, 1).
i t;r i
ue
((
r f
a e
'A' es-pc -
5)
- W 4
t y;t g
l 4-gj j
i 1.
' \\,
I'i
- i e,.
44 6
I
j
-i ls j
jJ 6
6 e
i l
'j'
-.I
-+
- 1 i
}
}
.l jj
.g.
.t u-t f
- t *.a i
i I
'\\
! &,... k.,
\\
s
.r...
q
\\.
i&
.d..
l i
s.
.o t
i
-\\'
.. L
.L' 9 E
,y..,
't '
If j
i
~ h {' y ~ -
I 6
,4 I h, h ' '
!I g
.ut, i,
i t
lD
- I g
4..
' y. '
+
t
- a d
l',9' l-I
. G').
.\\
i;]
. G, -
+
9 i
0 l
n
.4.,
q,.
s N,
I
[
r 1
. j,,
}
.n 9,
.v,.
n, e,
1v B
r
'T
(,11-* [9 'O i t'3 w~
h I
l
- .0 I
W 4
~4 S
i
- 8-u.
o2 C*
4 w
to 4
CD d
" mI 4
g 9
h W
i A
l I
I W
f T.
/
d l
I
',/
e4
- 4 k
4 W
0
,/
F 1'/
0 W
u.
. 4 o
/
g I
/
/
l
\\
m i
< 0
'J
)
. A 8
I
,s s#
/
s
'p s'
?9 g
s'
. 4 }
G.
en m
~
I O 2 2O W 4 c0 W D 0
" 4 l
I I
I I
i 8
8 8
3
?
8 o
g
(,0\\ %,NI/bH/% 1) 3 LVE TAO 7s g
I r.
>:1
I s
P
{
,t t
W I
.'(
,'t y
4l.# ). ' * -'
t
.ux
.,(
- 4..y; o
.c j
l l
/
m, 4
.,4 g
,+
I h',
f.'?.
. {-
y 0
J t
\\
vf 3
< l*3 '.
g W
g i
-/'
G l
A r
c w I a
,/
e I
O l
3, '.$'
p f
-)
., Qi <
g i
g y
.. i < t y, -
g
' [
e fU.,',l,.
y.@
p l m
.. v'l.
4
~
o N,
,,., rf.
i i
I e.
s d-h.f(- [ Y-)
tb J-! ?., g 9
g g, o'm.r se
.2
['
N o
g$
g U.j 4 J.
.O,
.1'
=
e a
., wn p
w.
,i
+
'P y
Q "j
' ' '., +,..
J,, "i 7 s
')
b.,*
- .,,. 3 9.
a m
1 W
-s.
... d W
,6
.i
." h*
l' s
- ,.,i c, f, '
- y <
N, i,
< tv Y
,'v s,
,'l.,.'
a.
s
~e i
t
'.f;,
J
,e W
~,. j.
.1 -
,.e.
p 4
g t
+
r'n.
e s
-t e,3 m.e. p, p t..
l t
i 4 +
'.A;s g
\\
% i t',' j g
Y
?
I.
i,"
g f,
.1c p -
- 1,? '
, /. I,s g
-o i
3
,.'. 4 l
1 g:.
C fy
i ik*,
l
<3 et ir
')
>s i
" n)f
+)~
1 9
.e;j.Ol1l
'/
g
,<>1 lc
,'a...., m I
e,,
,, ; 3.3 s
g
- f..E,
+
q,'
I I
'. s ),
i
'g,
q;-
o
.;)
l
.utak,
,. a,2 e
,$p c.mMWsh m
.x
. h e.,.
unei
.4, i
I I
_J t
, S "T Y $, '
0&.4 pq < ope--p g
y 8
f ' y'). N}e.
s' s
.n,,
A i
.g
.l ' [w ',4
~c 4
l 15 1
r,4 W
st' "a.
(Q; r
y s
' p'-
W 2
.g.t..
a a
I
.s' rr g
w u
1
,.g...
. s-O p
, = +
{
s i
a O
i.'
f 7
[.
j P
~
I*
r4 ef I
s(
0 3
a 4
ed 4
2
,S l
o
~
n..
- p:
o
- O, C
S I
t..
'I 2,4 y
~
4.
'1 j
r N4 l,
' m[
y Q
'l t
i.
O a
.'4 Ul W
(
?.li 1,
Q
-.s
.4 M W.
s a
g t.L l
(
l y,o l
W L
S t)
-}
I J
i w
'e' g
O
-O j
g O
g
\\
~
E OO f
r
- j g
s J.
S 4'
}"
Q b
s O
u I
t s yg d
e u4.',$-l h d5W.
na s
l
-r
. n. x,,
\\.
n q+ w.o
,qv; syn. c
.,n n, '
__ c^
9
[
f lI
', 4,'k j, :
' 4. p >, mg 'k l
7
, a y.
- dgi t,r f.
4 7
g +" < L O, J, '.-
l x+
l
,l
.,;,..g' ;9
y'i n.
t
,,y
. [, 7~. >
w, 4 {$n..y.'
,3
,, /q
.. [P~u -
'9
'4' G 2 l W' e
.,. :q.
h s
- p.o.
' ~,;:
.a e. y)
'Ji
- ,% l
,l 1
3
+. -
,a.
a
~
n ' >
p[,1 p6 '- p,7 i
i
,f
> J m
a.
+
x<
+
,.g NI h dl h lm U
- h..id
'$hh,h.1[
e t
c, a'
.4;
.t c:g)'. r.
j
\\
b
.,ff,
()
I C,
l
- .cc,1_4.n, y, 6 "k e
r y
9
- l
_ :s 2.
3 v_ '
+
.o,
>~-.u
+
s a
'Y" Y
. '.h A
'Tl -
m
&g
, ??
y! W A-k<','N, R%r.jy }fh}
y Q
'n EIN fb..a u,,
f-l m* ';e':.m. a. 4 f
-, r, y a
+
y
{L, ' u,
{ Il n
u 1
U
.)
(b J
I
' s,
~
e q
- <%e. e.2 A.o m
J m
a i
'J
[a
- wp.,, m f s +
l J. :...,., Q,,
_1 2
~T
- e. g
,/
- {
s s :v' -s t-
~
n p 3. ;'4! '
a w
~
8
,% s.m a<,
.., (.
W j
ii g*
, gi.w g.g 'p.
f 4
5 t
1 g 9
..A ':
,a.
v r n,4 i
, p 'a
>J1-3 )
N. '
g O
/
c
'2
,y
,f,e
,i
>9
,g4b g
g
/
- a O
7-f' Os, ff,9, f 1 f 1'j.n..
t t
i i
m O
-c w.,,.
(
j c,
g, 3
l
' ?;,.,
' V
' v;Q u\\
t4 n
y i
,.n.s....
3
',k&,
cf
^
' c.
~
l
-c Tv
, g%g% v, *9 v
t
., @%Q ',
we mtj l l
qf '
t, s1 e
.c x,
a v
8
.<,a n.
m'. ) '
.Mdd d.2:
ardd L'M ; 4 f
a
. m e,-
g l.
i lye.
ryse mey'v yt, p+w p p.<
e r,'
x2 g-
,,a
,e
.7 3(,
f
}w + if'rr ;<4,. ( ;
- k.,
i-.
i 4
s 4
- wrs,
.m
.)
i h', a,.,-
\\p r
h.'p
',,'N & l A
\\
t f
1-4 :.'I
s p
4
}h< ??e i,.
t a
?;.
- p:
t) a p m'. a,.
-o
,e.
l, o
- y 1
- i
,.a ;g
.m s
h.... l U
U
.V.
l
'(1,. :,,,
n h
r'?
'a e
't
+
,.o
. yj,,
.t. i 2
o.
p3 3
a p
q A : w;,
.:, s a
n.f a
b rJ
+
w J
v;,. m pz o
r c
4 c1 g.
! ra c.
.' )p 4
1
- t',.
.. f,,
, 3.,
g--
o i
d.f 9 i
)
o$.C a
j O.
l
- o e
3 w
r\\ - <
k,-
?m z
Y
[,[,f g
)
r ',
!a m
!m Dy; 8
4-(-)
l Ji
,j
<r-+
1 n.~
f a.,0
, s C %,
l&
s p'; '
o' s
?
v 4
g 4
M
[
y
- j-($ji g
e w
4-g 3
s,
t,L)
}
w i
.x P
Q e
O j '
t W
w g
J g
s f,..
.14 b
( +:
pY Ib._3 1.,.q. 3 Y O
W u.
4 I
.c r
'Y
,,9 v
IeA..,.
,o y,.,
8
'r s
t.9
,.,y. h p
g
<-(e s.+
."o
- ('
1 i
)
)'.l _
W u;;
,n s
- p r.,.
y;
. t :t,
, ' h.,
l,.
A'
,,C
??'V?,
M r.
i 3-
..i.-
.d[
r,,
j,,-
T
.h ac.
g -:.><
e 4
t 5% >.rj,.
/
t n, ;f unuw' !.
. w a,2 s
r tf.
),,
i
I E
l i
I STEMI GENERNIDR CREVICE MM MT R
l l
I E
I APPENDLX A TEST PROCEDL*RE I
I I
E 4
h Al IR-ESE-411
B B
COMBUSTION ENGINEERI!K; DEVEIDPMENT DEPAlm!ENT I
TEST PROCEDURE E
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER STEMI GENERATOR TUBESIIEET CREVICE FLGJ TEST Po #593
E E
E PREPARED BY: 41 h tttn REVIEWED BY:
/((
(f-/. _. -
F. P. Chaplin l~
SUperviso'r APPROVED BY: h.f8
[fIe,'
'APPROVEDBJ:2
,7
//y Manager Gary Frieling e/zc/ec, g
doc <mEst No.:
ooooo-ESE-2eS nATE or 1SsuE:
/
/
I
E I
1.0 OIL'ECTIVE Ihis procedure details tests to evaluate the potential rate of secon-dary leakage throuch s tmulated defective steam generator tubes in the I
event of a 1DCA. The test section reflects the Point Beach Steam Gen-erator Design in the support plate region.
2.0 TEST HARIL'ARE DESCRIPTION 1hc tests will be performed using a 70 gal. autocalve to provide fluid at the pressure and temperature required.
The test section, Figure 1, will be connected to the autoclave with insulated 3/4 tubing. A venturi will be located upstream of the test section for flow measurement, in addition, a fluid level indicator will be connected to the autoclave for volumetric cceparison.
2.1 Test Section h
The test section will consist of a 2" diameter carbon steel round, with a 0.892
.002 hole through the center to simulate the tube-sheet. Attached to the tubesheet is a 4" section of 1 1/2" sch:
80 pipe which will provide a test fluid reservoir having pressure and temperature measurement capability adjacent to the tube being I
tested.
Strip heaters and a fluid bleed are provided to maintain a test section temperature of 600 10 F prior to testing.*
Pressure gages and thermocouples will be provided at the tube sheet inlet and upstream of the 1 1/2" discharge valve. An addi-I tional TC will be lo ated in the tubesheet adjacent to the test tube.
To be adjusted per cognizant engineer.
E
'1 00000-ESE-298 I
i 8
8 2.2 Test Specimens The test specimens will be fabricated from 7/8 0.D. x.049 wall welded tubing type 316.
The tubes will be secured to the test section with swagelok fittings. Maximum tube to tubesheet excen-tricity will be maintained during testing using a rod against the tube downstream of the tube defect (except for bot-tan defect). Eight 24" long tube sections will be fabricated with the top end plugged containing the following defects.
Incation Defee t 1.
1" from plug
.010 diameter hole 2.
1" frcm plug
.010 x.250 Lg slit (.040 dia. hole) 3.
1" fran plug
.010 x.500 Lg slit 4.
1" frcm plug
.010 x 1.00 Lg slit 5.
1" frcm plug
.010 x 2.00 Lg slit 6,
1" frcm plug
.010 x 3.00 Lg slit 7.
Center of tubesheet To be detemined later 8.
Bottcm of tubesheet To be determined later 2.3 Test conditions Ideal test conditions at the entrance to the tubesheet are 550 F at 1025 psia. By overcharging the autoclave by approximately 10 100 psi and using a Nitrogen overpressure a pressure of 1100 psig at 550 YF should be Assibic. However, tests will be per-formed to determine the correct autoclave pressure that yields the closest possible test tubesheet inlet temperature 550 and pres-I sure 1065 10 psig.
We We N2 will be applied just prior to initiation of the test.
autoclave will be degassified prior to each additional test.
E 2
00000-ESE-298 I
I B
3.0 QUALITY CotifROL Testing shall be perfomed and controlled in accordance with the applicable sections of the C-E Quality Assurance of Design Manual.
3.1 Instrumentation 3.1.1 Temperature Thermocouples and readout instrumentation shall be calibrated prior to the test program and upon canpletion of the test program.
3.1.2 Pressure - All pressure gages und a pressure transmit-ters shall be calibrated prior to the test program and upon completion of the test program.
3.1.3 All instrumentation shall be calibrated per the procedure for Control of Measuring and Tect Equipcent Procedure No.
0000 NLE-070.
H 3.1.4 Pressure gages, thermocouples, level indicators, flow meters and valves will be identified per Table 1.
3.2 Error Analysis
'he test report will provide an error cnalysis based on instru-i ment calibration.
3.3 Records h
The original dr'.a sheets and copies of the procedure and report will be filed in the Nuclear laboratories Building 2 Records Roan.
E E
00000-ESE-298 3
E I
4.0 TEST S N P 4.1 Log S/N and tube defect on data sheet.
4.2 tog defect location fran top of the tt:besheet on data sheet.
4.3 Utilizing the push rod deflect the tube against the tubesheet opposite the defect.
Log on data shcat.
E 4.4 Tighten the swagelok fitting on the tubesheet.
4.5 Install the discharge test section and tighten the smgelok fitting.
I E
E a
B I
i B
I g
4 ooooo-sss-2es
E 8
5.0 TEST PROCEDLilE h
5.1 Fill the autoclave to the 72" level with decineralized water.
5.2 start autoclave and stabilize at 550 F 1065.asig.
Utilize the tubesheet vent for venting operations as required.
5.3 Energize tubesheet heaters.
5.4 By venting through the tubesheet vent and using the tubesheet heaters, stabilize the tubesheet at 600 + 10 F at T-31065 psig at P2 5.5 Set N2 regulator at 1150 psig. Based on initial results the regulator pressure.
test engineer may change the N 2 charge valve.
5.6 Open N2 L, Ti, T2, T, Tw.
5.7 Read and log the following; P, P2, P3, i
i 5.8 Open discharge valve.
5.9 Read and log the following whi'e discharging; P, T, P, Tw, L,,
2 2
3 Flow F2 and a change in autoclave lerel versus time.
5.10 Close discharge valve V.
3 5.11 Close N charge valve V.
2 P.,L,Ti,T,T3, Ta, Li.
5.12 Read and log the following; P, P2, i
2 i
5.13 Degasify autoclave for existing operating procedures.
8 I
I E
I 5
00000-ESE-298
8 8
5.14 open charging Pump Valve v.
s 5.15 log Callons required to return to the autoclave level recorded in step 5.9.
5.16 If another test is scheduled, restabilize per step 5.4.
5.17 Sign data sheet.
I I
I E
8 8
8 I
I E
~
I 6
00000-ESE-298
I 8
8 8
5 i
B R
i IRIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BL\\hK I
e 8
E I
I 5
8
~
8 7
00000-ESE-298
I Table 1 8
Pressure Gages Pi Autoclave panel P2 Test section inlet P3 Test section dischar;;e f
Flow F
APressure of venturi Irvel f
Li Autoclave level, o pressure transmitter Temperature Ti Panel mounted autoclave tm.perature T2 Test section inlet T3 Tubesheet metal T.
Test section discharge h
Valves V.
Upstream of venturi 3/4 swagelok Downstream of venturi 3/4 swagelok V2 Discharge test section 2" gate V3 V,.
N2 regulator discharge Vs Test section bleed Vs Charge pump discharge I
E I
8 00000-ESE-298
I Tubesheet Crevice Irak Rate Test Data Sheet Step No.
4.1 Tube S/N Defect Size 4.2 Defect location 4.3 Tube deflected 5.5 Stabilized conditions in H 0 T.
F psig Li 3
Pi P2 psig T2 F
P, psig T3 F
Tu
_F 5.9 Blowdown Readings g
PJ Pi psig Tz F
Fi in H O 2
P2 psig T.,
F Li in H O 2
P3 psig Blowdown time
>- Time min sec.
5.13 Stabilized Readings P
psig T.
F Li in H O 2
i T_
F P2 psig 2
P3 psig T3 F
T, F
5.14 Recharge autoclave gal.
Technicians date Engineer date Time between step 5.9 Li and 5.13 L.
t
~
I E
m C>
C 3
$p$[II-30 r
0 5
HN:
,rr-2 'i,
r 9
r W
.4) 5 4 7
I l
oc w5 oe
-~d h*i O
4 3 ad
=i 't
$$dji je I a&
e
>-=
y3 1,.sc=-4' I
mu u
J
'N 5
i i,<-
f N*]i
)
I g
- r 5
'Il D
h W
.er i
6)
!n g
i 6
I 5
i 8
1 7
I E
E I
STEAM GENERNIOR CREVICE FIDW TEST I
a E
i I
E I
E APPENDIX B INSEUMENTATIoN g
.so essoa iNstxS1S I
E B1 TR-ESE-411
Ri2 M
M M
M M
QEliB SEiB MiED E!!!S M
M M
M M
M M
BBS M
LIST OF ItEIKl?IDITS IriSTRLS1H4T IWlUFACTURER IDDEL #
SERIAL #
CE #
I W K;E ACCURALY Visicorder licneywell 1508A 15-4641 FL90 0-10 in/see 1%
0-80 in/sec 4%
Flcu Meriam ll24GR15991 EL45' 0-600 in 1120 i.5%
A Press Press Gage Acco 2487 N/A E1470 0-3000 psi 1%
P3 Press Gage Acco 2487 ti/A E1469 0-3000 psi 1%
P2 Press Gage U.S. Cage 11/A EIA68 0-3000 psi 1%
Pi Temp lioneywell 504 ti/A 0-1000 psi. F (J) 1%
Ti Chart Recorder lioneyw ll 902827 ED134 0-4000 psi 1%
Pi Level Rosmont llP6E22t-IB L
N/A 150" 1%
Li Tunp Recorder Ircen 1398 EIA32
-30 + 1600 F 1%
1R-ES E-411 B2
I APPENDIX B ERROR ANALYSIS OF MEASURED Ol%NTITIES 1.)
PRESSURE READINGS (P2)
SOURCE UNCERTAINTY a.)
Calibra tion:
- 0.25% F.S. (3000 psig)
- 7.5 psig (Standard gage)
R b.)
Readability & Repeatability.
1/2 of 1 scale division
- 12.5 psia O
' Repeatability or random error is usually much less than Readability.
Total pressure uncertainty by the second power law (See No. 4 this Appendix) d(7.5)2 + (12.5)2
=
14.5 psig (2 c limits)
=
or 95% confidence interval E
The above uncertainty can be considered to be within 2 c limits since 5
these are provided by the manufacturer.
For a higher confidence, 3 a limits (99.7% confidence interval) may be chosen, h
Total pressure uncertainty = fx14.5=22psig(3c) 2.)
TEMPERATURE READINGS (T2)
SOURCE UNCERTAIN 1Y a.)
Calibration Reference Temperature
- 0.18 F Readout (0.015% of Readings) 0.080F b.)
Readout (IRCON)
Electronics ( 0.05% T 1.0 F) 1.3 F Digital Indicator (least significant digit) 1.0 F Total Temperature uncertainty =
d(0.18' ' + (.08) 2
+ (1.3)
+ (1.0)2 1.65 F (2 c)
=
I E
1
APPE':DD, B I
3.) CHECK FOR SUBC001ED STATE OF UPSTREMI CCGDITIO!;S To ensure that subccoled ccnditions existed at the upstream conditions and 5
thus, that flashing did not occur at the venturi flowmeter, the uncertain-ties in the measured upstream pressure and in the saturatien pressure as e
detemined by ttq>erature measurement will be determined. The indicated sat.) should be larger than the alge-5 pressure difference (P: upstream - 2 braic sum of the absolute values of the uncertainties lSP2 upstream l+f2 sa t.l.
From (l'
'P,
=!
22 psig (3 :)
upstream Frm (2) 1.65 F x 8 psi / F SP2
= :
- 33t, 13.2 psi (2 :)
=
or ! 20 psi (3 c) 8 psi / F where at 540 F iP
=
sat./ F b
Thus
!dP2 22 + 20 SP2 42 psi
+
=
=
5 l
upstream sat.
g Run T;co r,'.
P:s t. (Psia) h (ups)
Diff (P:ups. - P: sat.)
based on T Psla Psi (oF) co m 2
1 540 963 1065 102 2
533 908 1040 132 3
545 1003 1140 137 4
540 963 1065 102 3
5 546 1012 1055 43 g
6 344 995 1040 45 7
540 963 1075 112 8
542 979 1105 12e I
9 341 971 1035 114 10 545 1003 1065 62 11 546 1012 1075 63 g
12 546 1012 1065 53 g
13 545 1003 1065 62 14 546 1012 1065 53 15 544 995 1065 70 16 346 1012 1085 73 17 519 606 1085 279 18 546 1012 1055 43 19 547 1020 1065 45
- T: corr. is the indicated temperature T corrected frca calibration curve of the thermocouple. At ~ 540C'F (T true - T:indi) = -0.So?
I 2
APPENDIX B E
Since (P2
- P2 sat.) > 42 psi in all runs, we can safely say that subcooled upstream conditions occurred upstream of the crevice.
- 4) FIDW MEASUREME!If (VEffIURI)
Venturi Equation:
Q = 5.573d ce fa
{2g 1/2 2
A_1 or simplifying, Q=C ~2g oP ~
II 8
p _
where Q - flow rate C - a calibration constant a
g gravitational constant oP - flowmeter reading (psi) a - density of water The Kline 6 McClintock Method of combining uncertainties using the second power law equation is the following:
If R is a function of n independent variables R = R ("t, V2,... V )
n Then the uncertainty in R is (h W)_
(
6Vt)2 A-2 W
+
=
g 3
n n
Applying Eq. A-2 to A-1 h, {gU-):
1 66P 1 S 1/2 6C (7 oP )2 (7 p_c) 2 ]
Q a.)
Calibration Constant From the manufacturer SC
= 2%
(2 )
calibration const. uncertainty
-'C
=.02 I
E E
3
APPE2; DIX B E
b.) op readings Instrunent uncertainties (Meriam g;auge)
Calibration: 1.025% F.S. (600-in 1120) 0.15-in H2O
=
Readability & Repeatability, i 1/2 of 1 division 2.5-in 1120
=
apuncertainty 2.5-in-H2O (2 c)
=
c.)
60 uncertainty x 1.65 F (46.59 - 45.96) 16/ft3 6e for a AT = 1.65 F
=
100F 0.106 16 (2 c)
=
37 b = 0.106 0.0022 or 9.22%
=
o 46.b Sunmarizing for the different tube speciment, (except 7A) the flow uncertainties are:
Tube AP venturi ao To*.a1 Uncertainty hQ (nominal) p fg 2A 215-in-H2O 1.16%
2.3%
3A 13 19.2%
19. "
4A 35 7.2%
8%
5A 48 5.2%
5.6%
6A 75 3.3%
3.9%
SA 100 2.5%
3.2%
9A 83 3.0%
3.6%
I 8
I I
I 4
I APPE71 DIX B I
5.)
FIDW MEASUREMENT UNCERTAltfIY BY LEVEL CHANGE METHOD For Tube 7A, the flow rate was so low that
,re confidence was placed on the level change in the autoclave than on a.e venturi reading.
The flow was calculated by:
Q = (Lt -L
) Ocold x 0.4896 gal /in.
onot at (min.)
Then by Eq. A-1
+ (
') ]!
[(h)
=
E Level Monitor: Uncertainty 0.375" in-H2O Calibration :
1/4% F.S. of 150-in.
=
Reacability - Zero if scale marks are used.
0.375 - in-H2O Repeatability : 1/4% F.S.
=
E h=d(.0375):
(.375)2
+
0.53"
=
Total Flcv uncertainty for Tube 7A, Run 17 2 in.
where Li - L2
=
(.002) ]
=[(
)
+
= 0.26 or 26%
I I
fi I
E
i I
E E
E STF&! CENERNIOR CREVICE FLOW TEST E
8 I
E E
E i
E APPENDIX C CALCU1ATIONS S
I C1 TR-ESE-411
I I
APPF1 DIX C 1.
Determine flow rate using autoclave level change.
Level ins trunent Lt calibrated at 68 F Autoclave 12" dia. 144" high V =.7854 d'h 2
3 V =.7854 (12 )(144) = 16286.05 in 1 gal = 231 in' Machinerys Handbook 16286.05 in' 70.5 cal
=
i 231'in
.4896 eal/in.
70.5 cal
=
144 in.
Autoclave Level =.4896 cal /in.
I Determine Flow rate in GPM using Autoclave Level change Level - Li La stand - Lt ston (.4896 cal /in), SPU Test Time (sec)/b0 sec.
Example: Tube 1A Run 8 Lt start = 79 in.
Li stop = 74 in.
Test time 150 sec.
79 - 74 (.4896)
.979 cal / min 150/6u Convert gpn @ 68 F to gpn @ 550 F Crane Tech 3
3 Lb/Ft (3 68 F 62.32 Lb/Ft
= 1.36 Paper #410 3
Lb/Ft* g 550vF 45.96 Lb/Ft 1.36 x gpn @ 68 F = gpn @ 550 F 1.36(.979) = 1.33 crra @ 550 F I
I E
I E
APPENDIX C Convert gpn to Lb/llr.
gpn x 60 x ft'/ gal x Lb/ft 3
Lb/Ur
=
gpn x 60 x.134 f t'/ gal x 45.96 Lb/f t 3
Lb/Hr Crane Tech
=
Paper #410 1.33(60)(.134)(45.96) = 491. 5 Lb/Hr Venturi Flow Meter Mfg. Flowdyne g
Throat =.1985 in.
0 5
Temp. = 550 F Pressure = 1050 psi I
Ref (1) Flow dyne Engineering Manual (2) Annubar Flow Hdbk Dietrich Std.
1/2
_, op (1) Q = 5.573 d e efa _' o C = Coefficient of Discharge (2)
E = Velocity of Approach (1) f = Thermal Expansion Factor (2) a p = Density Lb/Ft' 550 F g = Gravitation Constant ft/sec 4P = Differential Press. in H2O C = for line size.195 to 2.5" dia 1.0 f, = Thermal Expansion factor 5360F to 584 F 1.010 Example (32 17)130'63 -
2 Q = 5.57s (.1985)2 (1.0)(1,010) 45.935 E
_ 2(32.17)l30.63 _
1/2 q,
'"3,' 18 45.935 Q = 3.0 gpn i
I I
I STEAM CENERAIDR CREVICE ETIM 'IEST I
I 8
I I
E R
I i
APPENDIX 3 COMPARISON OF FIDW RATES i
I I
D1 TR-ESE-411
I APPI1' DIX D E
COMPARISON OF MEASURED AND PREDICTED FILh' RATES Several investigators have observed two distinct types of critical flow of flashin{; water through orifices. The first type occurs with flashing at the orifice throat, termed upstrean choking.
Zaloudek gives o relation for this critical flow (reported in L. S. Tong, Boiling Heat Transfer and Two-Phase Flow, J. Wiley,1965 pp.108-110.
1 Cid2gc(P
~E (critical flew for G
=
1 ups ueam sat.
upstream choking) 2 where Gi = critical mass flux in 1bm/hr-f t Ci = empirical constant, 0.61 - 0.64 gc = gr vit ti n 1 const.
p = saturated water density 1
P
= Pressure upstream of orifice upstream saturation pressure at subcooled liquid temperature P
=
sat I
A second type of critical flow occurs when the water in a netastable state exits the orifice and only then flashes. This is downstream choking. The equation of Barne11 or Kinderman & Wales (Also reported by Tong).
9 o
P
- (1-C2) P G2
=
& "Ec 1
upstream sa t.ups t,
where C2 = 0.284 a for osat. upstream o tor psat. = 2UU psia o - surface tension at psat = 1000 psia, j
C2 = 0.20 I
I E
i 1
Table D-1 l
C C
corr.
Predicted 2
2 RLH TUBE LB/HR-FT LB/HR-FT Equation used 5
1 2A 336 x 10 407 x 10' G2 2
2A 344 421 G 2 3
2A 363 434 G2 4
2A 332 406 G
g 2
W 5
2A 332 39 G2 6
2A 310 368 G2 7
3A 390 413 G2 8
4A 134 166 Gi 9
4A 124 158 Gt 10 SA 68 116 Gi 11 5A 65 116 Gi 12 6A 42 107 Gt 13 8A 287 382 G2 g
Effect of Long 9
14 8A 287 384 G2 L/D Before Orifice 15 9A 228 387 G2 16 9A 218 391 G2 17 7A 1346 503 G2 High Flow Rate neertainty g
18 2A 322 369 G2 0
19 2A 322 372 G2 I
measured Corrected for final flow area I
i i
I
C 0
a Li l
i i
i STEMI GENERATOR CREVICE FIDV TEST l
l l
l l
a l
l E
APPENDIX E DATA SHEETS I
El TR-ESE-411 1
B Tubecheet Crevice leak Rate Tent Data Sheet Step No.
IOU]'
4.1 Tube S/N 2N Defect Sinc < 8 /O X 2
l
'7the.3AcCC 4.2 Defect location I/I I4'%
/
4.3 Tube deflected YES 5.5 Stabilized conditions 7Y in u U Ta - /IFC F
P3
//SC psig L
2 i
[ ~7 C )
T2 _ f 96 F
P
//Sc psig T3 fFM F
P,
//SC psig Ts L/23
- F 5.9 BloWo'n Readings SY/
F Fi 2C5 in H 0 g
E P:
/ 0 7 9~
psig T2 3
.2 / 7 F
Li_
dO in H,0
/ C 90 psig T.,
P2_
P3 O
psig S Y sec.
h Blowdown time
- Time
/
min 5.13 Stabilized Readings 8 80 F
Li 89
_in H O 2
//F7'64 /C P
//SC psig T,__
3
/lItW7t?S P2 // 8C psig T
862 F
2 P3
/ /SC psig T3 4/C 7 F
T.,
3/'/
F 5.14 Recharge autoclave
. f gal.
t I/6-<-o /[,' dato 8
.2 6 -8C Technicians
/l k O /te c (7 date P-4 6-J'd Engineer 1
Time between step 5.9 L and 5.13 L,.
i g
72sr p E
I Tubesheet Crevice Ic:ik Reite Ter;t Data Sheet Step No.
IWj7 4.1 Tube S/N
.2 N Defect Size 8 /9 #
2 4.2 Defect location # / 9 " E Io 7~4 S c Sh ee t 4.3 Tube deficcted V/55 5.5 Stabilized conditions P
//C C psig Li 72 in H O T, STO F
2 P2 //CC psig hC T2 68' Y' F
P, /075 psig T3 M8 F
T5 VV7 F
h 5.9 Blowdown Readings 83Y F
F 2 / 8 in H O h
Pi_ /C SC psig T
2 2
P2 / C.2 5 _ psig T.,
- d. 2 2 F
Li 60 in H 0 7
I P3 O
psig Blowdown time
- Time
/
min M I sec.
5.13 Stabilized Readings P
// 2 6 psig T,
8YC F
Li 6 7
__in H O h
/)FT6/f f 2
. E2 /
F
- lND P2
// CC psig T2 P3 // CC psig T3 4.2 /
F T, S/6 F
o g
5.14 Recharge autoclave 8 gal.
Techniciansj_/,, b //6a 2/(' date F -2 5 ~6 C Engineer
/M M OIe, c)]E dale h-el 6-cFC d
Time between step 5.9 Li and 5.13 L..
7Est !a E
I. - __
Tubenheet Crevice Irak Itate Te;t Data She<t Step No.
e 4.1 Tube S/N WE Infc 7A Sc C/ ec h 4.2 Defect location 4.3 Tube deficcted Y' E S 5.5 Stabilized conditions M2 in !! 0 T,
66C F
Pi
/200 psig Li_
2
[l/.2)
T2 _ S 8 Y F
P2
// 76 psig T3 67Y F
P, / / 60 psig T5 M/7 F
5.9 Blowdown Readings Fi_ O 3 E in i! 0 Pi
//$C psig T2
.fMS F
3 P2 // d 6 psig T.,
M/7 F
Li 32 in 110 7
Pi C
psig Blowdown time
- Time
/ min
.f C sec.
5.13 Stabilized Readings g
// 75 psig T,
6760 F
Li 8/
in H 0
\\
[j 9
g / 'T6 A' /
Pi P2
//IC psig T
6h/
F
( 8/NI'I 2
P3 / / L/ C psig T3 l/ 3 2 F
T, 339 F
5.14 Recharge autoclave
.[ gal.
I h
i,l/( w /U data F - 2 & - EC Tcchnicians a
11 O b tc k dato g> fr) h Engineer I
and 5.13 L..
Time between step 5.9 Li l
755t ; 3 I
Tubecheet Crevico Irak Rate Tent Data Sheet Step No.
4,1 Tube S/N 24 Defect Size.O/O X #/2 " 2 Onf 4.2 Defcct location 5/7
& Yo 7u~ b e S J2 e e.t 4.3 Tube deflected YES 5,5 stabilized conditions b
in H O T. 860 F
FT _ //OO psig Li 2
[30)
T2, 57 3 F
P2
/ 0 7 5' psig T3 4Cd>
F P3
/O70 psig Ty 55/
F S.9 Blowdown Readings P2 /ObO psig T2 54'7 F
Fi 20O in H 0 3
P
/05D psig T.
- 2. 4 R F
Li
] E in H 0 3
Ps o
psig Blcudown time
- Time l
min O
sec.
5.13 Stabilized Readings AFTey l P
/075 psig T, 580 F
Li_ 78 in H 0 3
i MiOTC P
/0 50 psig T
64/7 F
2 j
Pa
/CL/D psig T3 4 / 52. 7 F
T4 MY F
c2 d' gal.
5.14 Rccharge autoclave I/ dgm*/Cdate 6 ' 2 7-70 Technicians h
Engineer MD (Lkc,ab date P - a 9 - f-c)
Time between step 5.9 Li and 5.13 L..
- y rrst E
=
E
Tubenheet Crevico Irak Rate Tc<;t Data Sheet Step fio.
4.1 Tube S/tl
<9 M Defect Size t / 0 7 E.2 I.oj 4.2 Defect location 8/8 Z" T#
R 0' Sbe 4.3 Tube deficcted YES 5.5 Stabilized conditions Pi_ /0 7 5 psig Li
)I in H O T,
660 F
2 T2 8 73 F
P2 / O lod psig (73 T3
[oCd F
P,
/DVD psig Tu 550 F
b 5.9 B1cr.sdown Readings T
6Y '/
F Fi
/h 7 _in H 0 3
Pi_ / O 7 6 psig 2
Pr / O Y C_ psig T.,
M4/
F Li_
b) in H 0 7
P3 O
psig
- Time l
min _
O sec.
B1cudown time 5.13 Stabilized Readings 80~O F
Li b 7
_in H O 2
APT 6 8 [
P _ / O 7 5 psig T, _
i P
/ D 7 O _ psig T2_ S8d F
P3
/ D SO psig T3 l/ / 7 F
T.,
L/L/d)
F M Y2 J a1.
5.14 Recharge autoc ave Tcchnicians t,t b->$tl/dn
[date A - 2 WYO Engineer M h O_.kg d d
,date &-29-PO Time between step 5.9 Li and 5.13 L.
h
~les*f 4 5 l
-r 8
Tuber.heet Crevice Tcak Rate Tent I
ibtn Sheet Step flo.
J /O@
4.1 Tube S/fl d$
Defect Size O/o X Y 4.2 Dalect location S/V".1~nTo 7b b e Sh e <17:
4.3 Tube deficcted YES 5.5 Stabilized conditions d7 3 in H O T,
c 5'O F
Pi /O 50 psig L3 2
(lod)
T2 5 FO F
P2 / D 3 5 _psig T3 (OC L/
F P,
/O/O psig Ts S L/ 7 F 5.9 Blowlown Readings g
F Fi / 7 6~ in H 0 N
P: /OSO psig Tz _ E b/ 6 3
6b in H 0
/ O AS poig T.,
Q L/ A F
Li 3
P2 I
P3 O
psig Blowdown time
- Time l
min O
sec.
5.13 Stabilized Readings
/060_ psig T,
560 F
Li 6b
_in H O 2
M68 /
P3_
k P1TNUT&l P2 / O VO psig T2 $O6 F
P3
/030 psig T3 L/7 b F
T L/ WO F
5.14 Recharge autocl ve c2 /.2 gal.
h/A/WC date /)
.,2 7 70 Technicians Engineer Vih Qdo b date P-2 Q ko Time between step 5.9 Li and 5.13 L..
7zs r " _s g
E
Tubecheet Crevice Irak Itate Tent Data Shert Step ilo.
4.1
.~
'N 34 Defect Size.04'O 4.2 Defect 1$ cation IE TN To Tu be Sht et 4.3 Tube def1ccred YES 5.5 Stabilized conditions Pi
/ /00 psig L
87 in n O T,
560 F
h i
2 Yb T2 8 88" F
P
/C 30 psig P,
/O60 psig T3.679 F
~
r 590 F
5.9 Blowdown Readings P3
// 00 psig T,
54/
F Fi 13 in it,o o
P2_ /O60 psig T.
c1/ Y F
Li
$f in ILO P3 O
psig Blowdown time
- Time 3
min 50 sec.
h 5.13 Stabilized Readings
/090 isig T. 680 F
Li 70 in H 0 7
P3 P
/060 psic T
6S/
F l
P3
/OYO psig T3 3TY F
-T.,
WO.3 F
5.14 Recharge autoclave ol'/4 gal.
Technicians]
N s.4 M 0' date 99 - TO Engineer
'e4bO 4
l.*,
date 7-4-M Time between step 5.9 Li and 5.13 L..
g 72sT [7 E
- - _ _ _ ~ - - -. -...
Tubechnet Crevice f r ak Itate Tent Data Sheet Step No.
4
<WCM/ 2 op kA Defect Size 4.1 Tube S/N Defect locatior,[/7 I4 No E dd 6A e.e 7-4.2 4.3 Tube deficcted_ PES 5.5 stabilized conditions
//50 psig Li_
FO in 110 T. 650 F
2 P3 _
f7$
T1. SSS
- F P2 ll3 5 psig T
607 F
P, //3O psig T, 660 F
5.9 Blowdown Readings 8h3 F
Fi 35 in H O 2
Pi _ // 25 psig T2 _
P2
/ O 9 0 psig T.
220
_F Li _ ~/
in H;O P3 O
psig D1cudown time
- Time 52 min 3 o sec.
5.13 Stabilized Readings P
//60 psig T.
$~6 0 F
Li 72 in H O 2
3
// Y O psig T2 6 64/
F P__
Ps
// 3 O psig T3 33/
F T
N9C F
M YA gal.
5.14 Recharge autoclave g
_ /l/ad/dato 7 O
/
Technicions o.
Engineer
/MI<g datej 8'o
~
Time between step 5.9 Li and 5.13 L..
~
Tubenheet. Crevice Irak Rate Tert Data Sheet Step No.
YA Defect.Ec, O/o A / " /-.o nj dp f
4.1 Tube S/N__
4.2 Defect location Offf InTo fa lJe Shec 7~
4.3 Tube deficcted _ Y l~ S 5.5 Stabilized conditions b
in !! 0 T, 64) _F
//00 psig Li_
2 Pt
[9 T2 SY F-P
/O70 psig T3 dl' 7 F
P, _ / O /3 C psig Ts 563
- F U
5.9 Blowdo*.m Readings 8%
F F3_ 3O in H O 2
P3
//00 psig T2 _
/ O'7 6__ psig T.
M/7 F
Li_ FO in a o g
k P2 P3 O
psig
- Time
<2 min 3 7 sec.
Blowdown time 5.13 Stabilized Readings h
Li__80 in H O P
/090 psig T, 8// 7 F
2 P2
/ O/p 5 _psig Te 650
- F P3 /660 psig T3 373 F
T, O'J2 O F
S!.Na gal.
h 5.14 Recharge autoclave
!w
- ,2/d u/v f/ date 9 T O,
Technicionsf H D ClaaM date 9 f o Engineer I
Time betweeri step 5.9 Li and 5.' 3 L..
8I
"/est #9 E
8-Tubenheet Crevice Irah Rate Tent Data Short_
Step tio.
SS Defect Size O IO X 2 I 0'h 7 4.1 Tube S/tl 4.2 Defect location
/7 I'#o T'04 SAdCf 4.3 Tube deficcted YE3 f
5.5 Stabilized conditions 3/
in !! 0 T, 550 y
o P:
//00 psig Li_
2 (S
T2 5~50 F
P2 /076 psig T3__ [o / O F
P,_ / O [a0
_psig Ts $4l F
h 5.9 Blowdwn Readings kh in ?! 0 P _ / 0 9 0 _psig Tz_6kb F
F 7
c24Y F
Lt
~7 6
__in !!,0 P 2_ / O $ O Psig T.,
P3 O
psig Time __ d __ min ~2 6 sec.
Bicudown time 5.13 Stabilized Readings g
73 in ito P_//OO psig T 6~60 F
L_
t P /ObO psig T
6 66/
F h
P3
/0 60 psig T3 497 F
T, SW F
2 k;)
gal.
5.14 Recharge autoclave g
Ncl/GMi' date 9 fo Technicians n
C-3-<N V1/t) Odr.
C date f
Engineer Time between step 5.9 Li and 5.13 L,.
P 7e'sf /O D
8
Tubecheet Crevice f eat: Rate Tent Ibta Sheet Step No.
8N Defcet Size C'/ C X 2 20g 4.1 Tube S/N Defect location #/T I'? %
E dd S/M G'M 4.2 4.3 Tube deficcted YES 5.5 Stabilized conditions 7c2 in II,0 T. 680 F
P
//OO psig Li b
T2 5 50 F
P2
/090 psig T3 la//
F P,
/ 0 75 psig SN F
Tu 5.9 Blowdown Readings 43 in n g
sp P_ // D O psig Tz _ 647 F
Fi 2
Li__ h
_in 11.,0 P2 / O b O _ psig T.
326 F
t l
P3 O
psig
/
Blotalown time
- Time _ d min O c _sec.
h 5.13 Stabilized Readings
[1 b in H O P__ / /O O psig T, 550 F
Li_
2 P2 /O60 psig T: 552 F
P3 /O6O psig T3 k 7 5' F
T, S',2 V F
2/6t gal.
5.14 Rocharge autoclave
@' 3 ~ [O Ial/hdIf date Technicians t
Engineer p C[bi p b datc # - 3 18 f
Time between step 5.9 Li and 5.13 L..
Test
//
g
Tubenheet Cervice leah 1:a t e Trot.
Data Short Step flo.
[9 Defect Size < O /D X 3 Ifj 4.1 Tube S/tl
//
Sc $/ 6 d f' 4.2 Defect location kT NTO
/ A-4.3 Tube deficcted
/ES h
5.5 Stabilized conditions Pi _ //00 psig L
b2 in IL,0 T,
653 F
i
~
( OO)
T2 65/
F P, /070 psig T3 62/
F P, /O'76 psig Ts SSYF l
5.9 Blowdmen Readings P3 /070 psig Ta 6W7 F
Fi ~7 I in H;0 P2 /0 60 psig T.
.) 3 7 F
Li 7 6___in 1! 0 7
P3 O
psig
- Time
/
min 3 3 sec.
Blowdown time 5.13 Stabilized Readings g
7Y in l! 0 P__ / O 90 psig T, 553 F
L, 2
P, /t90 pois T, SSR r
P3 /070 psig T3 430 F
T, 5'00 F
dk gal.
h 5.14 Rocharge autoclave Technicians. s _Y44/6/O dato 9-Y ~ IO Engineer stA) k.k date 9 0- P C
\\
3 Time betwen step 5.9 Li and 5.13 L..
I
"/e sf
/a E
Tuber.hre t Cervice le t.Itate Te g Data Shreti Step fio.
Do[cct Sinc s O/O X Y2 On}
4.1 Tuba S/t!
$(
f 4.2 Defect locatior. /2 Ih 70 b4 /> d 6 A d c' N YES 4.3 Tube deflected _
5.5 Stabiliacd ccoditions Pi _ / / OO psig Li_
30 in H O T, 3~60_F 2
T 5 70 /
F P
/()70 psig (7I)
T3 bO2 F
P,
/ObO psig Ts SSO_F 5.9 Blowdown Readings h
M/b F
F3
/00 in u,o
/ O 7 0 _psig Tz _
Pt ti]3 in a o R V/
F Ps. / 050 psig T,
P3 _
O psig Time __[
min _ / U sec.
Blowdown time 5.13 Stabilized Readings h
P3_ /C 30 psig T. 860 F
Li 7 c2.
_in H 0 3
/ O k U psig T
SO2 F
P_
55Y F
P 3__ /030 _psig T3 T,
50/
F
.2. '/A gal.
!.14 Recharge autoclave 5,el / k & ( dacc $~ V~ SO Tcchnicians C-4-N Digineer 1/1 h khq1 date
/
I Time between step 5.9 Li and 5.13 L,
7d.
[
/3 I
p,...
i f
Tube:,hre t Crevice Irah Rat e Te.:t
-_ a Sluyet Dat 8
Step llo.
Dalect Si: c O /O X ll2 off N
4.1 Tube S/tl
/c2 ".2~7fo NAC 54 c c7~
4.2 Defect location 4.3 Tube deficcted k65 5.5 stabilized condit.icas 6IO F
//CO psig L3 7M in H O T,
2 567 [F P_
70 T2 Ps //77C psig T,
bO/
_F P., _/06O
_pcia 6Yk F
T4 5.9 BloWown Readings
/0 O in 110
/ O 9 0 __psis T2 8M7 F
F t 3
Pt 65-in n o P_/660 psig T_ M 6d
_F L,_
g P s___
O-_ PSIC Time ___ /
min _ / b cec.
liloudown time 5.13 Stabilized Readings b
_ in 1! 0 P
/ O $ 0 _ psig T.
860 F
Li_
2 I
P2 / OVO psig T2 fIc2 F
TS3 F
Ps /030 psic T,_
l' T,
490 F
c2. '/.L. _ cal.
5.14 Recharge autoclave
_ht. <' /bv/f ' da to Y ' k' [O Technicians g
Vh19 @Acuo LA dato 9 ds$r()
c e
Engineer -_
7 I
Time between ctcp 5.9 Li and 5.13 L.
~fES'1 /Y a
I
Tulx':;ltr('t CtTvict* I/': llc !!.ii< Tc't;L Datn Shcvt Step flo.
2og M
Defect Size O/O x
.2 h
4.1 Tube S/tl De[cct location / $ "3?io Tis h e.5/r eer 4.2 4.3 Tube deficcted YES 5.5 Stabilized conditions kb in 110 T,680 _e P_ //00 psig Li 2
( 7c2)
T, S59 e
l
_ /Obo psig P,
T3 soo e
P, / O s'o psig Tu 6kF 5.9 1110wdem Readings Pi / C 9 0 _psig Ta 8h/8 F
F3 3 __in H O 2
F L i __ '77 in H 0 P2 / O 6 0 psig T., MN 3
P3 O
psig
/
min 3 k sec.
- Time Blowdown time 5.13 Stabilized Readings Pi / 070 psig T, S S O F
Li 7b
__in IL,0 P,__/ O V O __psig T2 6 Slo F
Ps / 0bO psic Ts S$h F
T., 68O F
M2
_ gal.
5.14 Rccharge autoclave
_ 2 /,/d @ d' date 9 70 Technicians Engineer _MDf k
_ date 9 -f - Bo Time between step 5.9 Li and 5.13 L,
~/i s t
/ S~
Tubenheet Crevice ic:W 1: ate Te;t Data Shent Step No.
/_ - 09 b
Defect Sine e C/d X 2 4.1 Tube S/M,__
4.2 Defect location /7 Info I"dC SI6C7 4.3 Tube deficcted YES 5.5 Stabilized conditions P3
//OO pcig Li_ 77 in H O T SSD F
2 T, 56o oF P,
/ O 7 0 __psig (75) g 603 F
T3 P,
/090 psig Tu 68/
F S.9 131owdown Peadinas 6Y7 F
Fi 76 in H O 2
P3
/ O 9 0 psig T2 F
L t __ 70 in H O 2 k/
P2_ / O '/ O psig T.
P 3_ _
D psig
- Tilne
/
min 3 /
sec.
131cs'dem time S.13 Stabilized Readings l
F Li_
7()
_ in H,jo Pu/LO O psig T.[60 P:_
/070__psig T 660 F
P3_ /076 __psig T3_d~bb F
T, 530 F
M d gal.
h S.14 Itecharge auto lave
_Y. x//(u_.et/d date 7-E 7C_
Technicians Engineer - % h Ok, I~~ Ed date Time between step 5.9 Li and 5.13 Lt.
hSV l
8 Tubenbret Crevico leak I: ate Te':L Data Shert Step tio.
Defect Size O/O
- /d e
4.1 Tube S/t[_
Defect location k9 IoTO 7I4 /)( 6/1GCZ 4.2 YES 4.3 Tube deflected 5.5 St abilized condit. ions T, 66 Y F
Li_ _ 8 3 in 110 2
P3___//OO psig b1 T2 663 F
P2
/ O ~/O psig T3_8 2 0 F
Pg /ObO psig Tu $4b
- F 5.9 lilo x!own P.cadings O
in lt o I
Pi
//OO psig T2 82O F
Fi g
L3_[ O _ in 11;O
.3 /k F
P2 / O_~7J_ psig T.
P3 O
psig
- Time
/Y min d 6 sec.
Illowdown timc 5.13 Stabilized P.cadings O
_in 11 0 T_68Y F
La 3
P3_// O O psig P,_/o 70 psig T,_53 M F
l P3 /Obd psig T3 37$
F T., M60 F
5.14 Recharge autoclave gal.
y
_hd/[A%/[, date T - 7" fC Technicians Enginccr _ _ /A'/'Gb: a/N' dato P-F-Jr>
/
Time between step 5.9 Li and 5.13 Li.
I
'/est
/7
Crevico Icak I' ate Ti":t.
Tuber.hre t Data Sheeti l o/j Step 110.
c24 Defect Size _
O/C X A
4.1 Tube S/t1 _
7nto N Se'
$/t ee7 Defect location h f 4.2 4.3 Tube deficcted A/O S.5 Stabilized conditions d~6kfF 7Y in H O T.
Pi
//Op psig Li__
2 6b[ [F T2 P,_/ 6 [O psig rt A/ d F
/050_rsic P. -
Ts-SW _ F T2 577 F
F
/
O__in 11,0
. S.9 nioudown Readings g
/ O 90 _psig P3 P2 / () y C_ pcig T_ 2 60 F
Li, in 11;0 P3 O
psig Time __ /
min _
O sec.
lilowdown time 5.13 Stabilized Readings
_in H G 88Y F
Lt g
T, P_ /0 7 5__ poig P,_ _ /C 9C psig T2_ 650 F
P3
/ 62 O psig T3 kl*3 F
I T __ S/ 5_.*F J2fA. cal.
h S.14 Recharge autoclave
,,, h r4 /( m /d8ato 9-f'N Techoicfans
'M90km ct h,C date 9 h3 Engineer _
I Time between step 5.9 Li and 5.13 L,.
kSf
/?
a
lutxtr. hoe t Crevice leak Unte Tent Ibtn Sheet E
Step No.
4.1 Tube S/N 2A Defect Site 6 / U X /2 dokjr 4.2 Defect location [7 " Efo %Sc S$ c c.7~
4.3 Tube deficcted AlO 5.5 Stabilized conditions 66Y F
3 in 110 T,
Pi // OO psig L,
2 bM T2 66[
F P2 /C 7 O psig T3 [003 F
P,
/ O b O ysig T% 6YO F
l 5.9 Blowdown Readings Pi /070 poig Ta SN F
Fi [ [ 7 in H O 2
N in H O P2 / C 6 0_ psig T.., /2 Yf F
Li_
h 2
P3 O
psig B1cudown time
- Time min 6 [ sec.
5.13 Stabilized Readings g
Li _ 8S in H O
/ O [ O psig T. _ 65Y F
2 P 3 l
P2_ /MSO psig T,
.6.S7 F
P3
/OV O psig T3 Y/e6 F
T.,
Md/
F
. 1'/A gal.
~
l 5.14 Recharge autoc ave 4 /( W Q date k O
/
Technicians <
Engineer
/
h CM.pk date 7I/- N
\\
Time between step 5.9 Li and 5.13 L.
8
'/ss f
/9
'