ML19247B874

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 790508-11
ML19247B874
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 06/15/1979
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML19247B870 List:
References
50-329-79-12, 50-330-79-12, NUDOCS 7908150457
Download: ML19247B874 (3)


Text

.

Appendix A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Consumers Power Company Docket No. 50-329 Docket No. 50-330 Based on the inspection conducted on May 8-11, 1979, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements as noted below.

Items 1 and 3 are infractions, Item 2 is a deficiency.

1.

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, requires in part, that significant condicions adverse to quality, shall have measures to assure that the cause of the condition is determined and corrective action is taken to preclude repetition.

Consumers Power Company Topical Report CPC-1-A, Policy 16, Rev. 7, requires in part that co_rective action be taken to correct and preclude recurrence of significant conditions adverse to the quality of items or operations.

Bechtel Topical Report BQ-TOP-1, Rev. 1A, Section 16, requires in part, that procedures will provide for identification and correction of conditions adverse to quality which may require corrective action.

Contrary to the above, on May 8,1979, one of twenty-five (25) drawings which were being utilized as " Work Prints" was found not to be the most current revision. Also, two of the 25 randomly seiected drawings were found not to reference all of the applicable FCR's in their " Outstanding DCN/FSR/FCN Blo 4t" nor were all of the applicable FCR's attached to these two drawings.

Similar conditions were identified by Bechtel QA personnel in Bechtel Quality Assurance Finding SA-39 (9-2-6) dated March 13, 1978; SA-39 (9-2-6) was closed on June 7, 1978.

Therefore, the corrective action taken for closing Bechtel Quality Assurance Finding SA-39 (9-2-6) has failed to preclude recurrence of adverse conditions.

2.

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Cri erion IX requires, in part, that measures shall be established to assure that special processes, including welding, are controlled.

7908150957 E.76024

Appendix A Paragraph 5.2 of procedure 9-1 of the Consumers Power Company Quality Assurance Program Topical Report (CPC QA PTR) CPC-1 states, in part, "Special processes are accomplished with written process sheets, orocedures, checklists or equivalent which describe parameters to be met during the performance of the special process..

Contrary to the above, it was determined the vari' s levels cf reviers failed to identify that Zack Welding Procedure Specification M-3-QCP22, Revision 1, dated January 21, 1978, prequalified to American Welding Society DI.1-75, inaccurately stated that it was qualified to Paragraph 5B (relates to proce-dures by qualification cests) instead of SA (relates to prequalified procedures).

3.

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion VII, requires measures to be established to assure that purchased material, equipment and services, whether purchased directly or through contractors and subcontractors conform to procurement documents. These measures shall include provisions such as objective evidence of quality furnished by the contractor or subcontractors and examinatien of products upon delivery.

Paragraph 3.4 of CPC QA Program for Nuclear Power Plants, Volume 1 - Policies, Policy 7, states in part, " Receipt inspec-tions are made to verify that the items are undamaged, that they conform

. available.

Documented evidence that

.e items meet requirements.

use of the items."

The inspector identified the following examples which are contrary tc the above:

Shop inspections and receipt inspections failed to verify a.

that documentation on the wall chickness measurements, as specified in Paragrarh 9.6.1 of Specification M-129B, was included in the Valve Documentation Package supplied by Borg Waruer, the vendor.

b.

Engineering review and documentation review failed to identify that the seismic analysis was computed assuming the yoke to be ASME SA 105 (forging) material whereas the yoke actually supplied to Midland was fabricated from ASTM A216 (casting).

G78025

Appendix A c.

Receipt inspection failed to verify whether accessories such as Flexitallic Gasket, 9 studs and 18 bolts conforming to.'.STM A-461, Grade 630 H 150 specified in Paragrapb 2.14a and b of B&W specification 08-102500006-003 was supplied with the Pressurizer Safety Valve.

45",~l$O,26