ML19247B214

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notifies That 790713 Application for Radiological Effluent Tech Spec Changes Is Not Exempt from 10CFR170.22 Fee Requirements.Class III Amend Fee Should Be Forwarded to NRC
ML19247B214
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 07/30/1979
From: Miller W
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To: Mattimoe J
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
References
NUDOCS 7908080189
Download: ML19247B214 (1)


Text

k p anec

?,

UNITED STATES

+

[._yp 'v.qf( h NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION "4y,{gl/.y WASHING TON, D. C. 20555 R. ? + A JUL J0 19 7,

DOCKET NO.

50-312 Sacramento Municipal Utility District ATTN:

&. J. J. Ma tti moe Assistant General t.ianager and Chief Engineer 6201 "S" Street P.O. Box 15830 Sacramento, California 95313 Gentlemen:

This office has received a copy of your July 13, 1979 Proposed Amendment Ns. 62 which you filed with the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (CNRR) for review and approval.

The application proposed radiological effluent Technical Specificaciens (TS) for Rancho Seco Unit No.1 (License No. DPR-54) as required by Appendix i of '.0 CFR Part 50.

Fees pursuant to 10 CFR 170.22 were not forwarded with your application because you considered the application to be exempt under the provision of Footnote 2 to 10 CFR 170.22. Although Footnote 2 permits certain Commission requested applications for amendments to be exemot from fees if issued for the Con:nission's convenience to clarify or simplify tne license or TS, this exemption is not intended to apply to a licensee's application filed to comply with Comission regulatio.1s and guides.

Therefore, your applicaticn is not exempt from the fee requiremer.ts of Section 170.22.

Based en guidance from the ONRR staff as a result of their preliminary review of your application, it has been determined that the previously ind.icated Class III amendment fee is appropriate for your July 13 request.

The $4,000 fee should be forwarded tc this office.

If final review of your application by the ONRR staff reveals that this fee is incorrect, you will be refunded any overpayment or billed for any additional amount due.

Sincerely, t

\\

af' V)

'\\

Q U s, t

i i hA, William 0. Miller, Chief License Fee Management Branch Office of Administration c.

,}'},

.)

59 7908080 0/

.