ML19247A843

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Util Clarifying Reasons for Use of 91-day Compressive Strength Concrete Instead of 28-day Compressive Strength Concrete.Nrc Has No Further Concerns Re Concrete Placement
ML19247A843
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 06/20/1979
From: Murphy C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Ehrensperger W
GEORGIA POWER CO.
References
NUDOCS 7908020553
Download: ML19247A843 (1)


Text

-,k*1 v

pn REcu e

o UNITED STATES i

8' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION a,%,'{\\

2,[hli!'s.[',8, 1,..

c.c c

REGION 11 101 M ARIETT A ST., N.W., SUIT E 3100 o,

g '.%,:

j' AT L ANT A, G EoPGI A 30303 M EO In Reply Refer To RII:FSC 50-424/79-07 50-425/79-07 Georgia Power Company ATTN:

W.

E.

Ehrensperger Senior Vice President Power Supply P.

O.

Box 4545 Atlanta, Georgia 30302 C e n t.' e me n :

We have reviewed the clarification for the Vogtle Nuclear Plant that you submitted to the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, May 11 1979, concerning the use of 91-day compressive strength concrete specified in the construction specifications, versus the 28-day compressive strength concrete referenced in the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report for concrete design.

In that you '

ee brought the matter to the attention of that office, we have no further concerns with your placement of concrate to these design specifications at this tite.

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, we will be glad to discuss them with you.

Sincerely, Charles E.

Murphy, Chief Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch cc:

K.

M.

Gillespie Construction Projec. Manager P.

O.

Box 282 Waynesboro, Georgia 30830 E.

D.

Groover QA Site Supervisor P.

O.

Pax 282 Waynesboro, Georgia 30830 423 35/;S 7 908020 pf3