ML19247A679
| ML19247A679 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/08/1979 |
| From: | Bickwit L, Kenneke A NRC OFFICE OF POLICY EVALUATIONS (OPE), NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19247A677 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-10CFR9.7 SECY-79-319, NUDOCS 7908010640 | |
| Download: ML19247A679 (7) | |
Text
-
'PelTEC StrTES SECY-79-319 May 8,1979 Nt lCLE AR 9 EGtJLATop y, oa.wissica EOlifY TESSION ITEN L w...a.4S S.4On
- n..
- v. u.
~n a
u
. v T. w. r,.
i a. c " a."d O.#C f. d '
- 3
">.".3 "I a.. ".." 'i ' " v u "..' a. '
o vu
- /. s. e.n. a. '[. a. 3 A.a - J.e. 3 PJ. 2 3,
+. w.
93;.-
=./
3 d.
2 u C.4, a. n...
N...r. a*.=. _'.v a40 0n*RD, p r e r p t.'
". I v'
.: a*.:.a' ' var a.t' a
.s..
u s>-t)
= =..C Cr:3 T.v an.t
( c.. '.f.
" ~
w rw-
_4c a.4v.n.
c o.n n C s e.
- m. C., w c. e a..r. *.
- 3. 7
- a, n e
.4./,S
.c e
r
.., o
~u n e. n c. 4.A a r, a 4 m., n C.c
- H a.
La,, o m one v.
vu y....
O. A Q M M.
Q M Q M. p a.
U..u _l a_
N.. a..Q. M '...e.
3 Cl-
..u.
..r a. -. a.n C a.
R.., ' a.
2,,, a.,, a S., k.. _4 -. a. d
_4
.e.,
9, 4.e,, i e d a e...
mi..o.
nw.
m a0-7 9
. o y C v..
0 - w a.
C v-..:'.l.4.e - 4a. n 4., n y,4--
-3 v
v..
ma
- a..# ' b. 'w y - A_ _' 3."..,
o" l Q *t..
T. h. e
.n o. p C ". *.,
e.
C
_a
-a
<.. ".. ' '. '. '. " a.. -.'...
-".a. ^"'3.'..'.a
., a., a..d.-'".'..a...
~
y 69 *. a.
e v*e. p o c a J r.i. $ 3 c.,,..gnJ..~. a.. c
, b a.
w.
p.
u
-,a
.f. 2.. a.. r.
.g,,4 *
- g p.
-,, o. w.. a a m 4, -
,....2.,... -
y.
-.s a
2
,e o.n. A.
Oma.T
- a S *v. 4... e.e.,..
ny.o.n.
- 4.. y -.e. o a,
m v.
y states the Sca c's reccamendat*cn on
- g. a.
.-. - c = e d.
." u
- a. 3 ond
.o...-.'
- a. s ~ a" a o
~ a v a..
a w
y y
v w.-.14 a a.. r.,1.
a,-"
-4 4 a
- r. e 4.e.4 s a J.
,wo 4
e
.a.
. 3 a u, a S
.A a- - " c. c.. ' *... a,
.k. a.
co.
". o =.
".a.
m-d
=
v mended that the proposed rule r.c
'c e adopted.
"aa. dea-
- -.", o. ' j-
' o N.... = c a.d ' a-
.= a. c....=.. d o - '
- r..*.=
v u"yc a-v '. a. w
".a...". a.' I S.. C o'..o..'.' ". a d-
.n.
u.
_'..." o " ~. v '_. r. c ".'.' _' ' _' a r...-
-. o v '. d a. d " a. c o " d
^
g
(..
s.5cw a. a. a d.
. " ^. "
.". a. "."'a
- a..
a a.r..,,. c a
,, a
. -.e-
. u.
4 n.
4-a
- a..- a a
- a a
+
c,,. _ c,-.__
CONTACTS:
a.n a e,.,,.,..4. y,,.c
- w.. a..a.4 a
s
,, a
.-,. 2. :.'..
varjorie Nordlinger 4 2
.w...,a..,..
.. a.
s.o
. w.
-w 2,
-.w,,
...,a.
a., a, ~
CGC, 634-1465
... e - a... o.. - -
y-,-..
s
=2c-e-
a.ernie Snycar OPE, 634-3276
... a. =ca d
.o.'. a. ^ ^. a.' " =.." s
". a.
.-, c a. a. d.'.. s~
mw y
-. a..P.P, - 7 2,d
~. %..p.
4.
=d c a.
Q.
2
.P '.3.d a. y
], %.. a.
a
".cu..d
.o ca^a
'.,CO'e
^ 1 a o." o.. ~- a. "".'a.
--e
<< t.y.. J0 i. :
c.ef : Recort or the Hearing Board, "In tne Matter of Authority for Access to or Control over Scecial Nuclear Material (RM 50-7),"
April 1979 7 9 08010, C O
C n 4
- e n 4 _a p-n qw*pn
,c.t' 7 _m.x.
P.hp Q c a.n A
_a u... _.._.
m finds that due to the constraints under n a_ 3 -. A
.- as
- 4. n
+v u.4 -
~.
w a..e ocen c
-,n
.. h.A n.n e.n.e v
o a
A o
m.. e.m..e *
- o m..aa i_ a.na.psvnpA S 6 a.P.P H A.4 a n o, +v m
qw*
p g.
e v
m u
evaluation of r ether the existing DCE "e
_a." ~. ".' "..
."..a_
c *m ".a ".
o_. '
- e ". ".. o -
^ " c g ". o_...
- 4. o-a g.
e p m.n
- 4.. a.d e _n.e. *. ~. n.
- 4 Ia_ s n n a_ o-a_n.
- a. A
..b. a.
wo a
. r m
es e.
g.
this proceeding."
Ecard Recort at pp.
,w 4, _ n 3,
v, 4. 4.r.e-
. n.
c a, t.
_ s c.n 4 2-
,u
.y.
me s
2 c m,.n A oea~e_d.
a Cvi.m...tas.4cu
.T e 4 s c n i s a.4 _o 7 9 c is
- b. a.
am a
e
- 6
.v e
v understand that the staff apparently adopted a full-field background
~. u. U
,a
.-4 4.n.,/ C o e = g d 4 n.
.-c.4~,~
, A o..g
~
y. n ~.n =.m..
wb.
.V wa CFR Part 10 criteria only because 4 ~.
.d a s
.n A..; s e e u _,. a s a
.n.., ~. ~. e n n.f a
u v
law the NRC was probably recui"ed so to do.
Ecard's Recort at 43.
Other comments in the report reflect the s m o u,, a.
w a,4 e.. a.
_ e a.c.c w
.= c a n.A,s v4a_,a wh2e
-w presented more ecmplete testimony.
See e.g.,
p.
56, lines 11-15; p.
31, lines 12-13.
T.n 1.4 ~ w t nr
- .ue=a_,,* e.ns,.se v
,.4a,a.
-wv.eno_
w wy.
eu V
-._.e are four basic alternatives that the Com-m..* s s.i o.n
'..4 ~ "
- c o.". o.* m _." 4.". d a. a_."~...'.n.d.. e~
h.o w da eue n,n, a..,u e,s~.
- c p.noca3d
.d e..
..w. 4 -
4 w
no v
a o
First, the Ccamission could proceed directl" s
to its decision on the Clearance Rule,
- w' cad ^ ^. 0, *4.' a_ d b y"
.ha.
- u.. t.." '.". $
u "w
- 1' *4 ~.4 "4 5 *ha_
so.
~
"a
~
v s
v v.
u.
v.
C a_ y C.,, *,,
.a 4 b.C u..-
a_ a, 1 4.e. 3
.O n n nwoa.nA nA **~
r n
amu
..o u
.6 v
s.
s u,b e..4 ~ ~.4 e n e
.P n e.m..
- h a.
D" 6 c_..P.P
-.n n. h.a n
- S n e h. e n e.
m e.
co v.to eu v
. ua enn*4. 2_o.
-..r.
V u.n - ' ' a 'd
%%'C ".
3.".
a' "p "p
- v 6'
"^ '" --
m W
- w 3
w..
pw.
3 n e a_ va.n 4.e. 3m
- o o.P.P a. n 6.k.e 9 u.l e~ n " o ~ a_
e.P pp m4 e
". %.C us 8.%.
g
- a. (n g A 4 *
- m n..
__ d v* u.l d ". ^ *.
"va_
'a D "p " ^v "y " *4 L ". e.
y a*
.v a
v
". b. 4_ Onn.nAt-Openn*
co av,
- b. a. A c_.O ' a.da. e. v.a _ o
. s ae wv6 u
o.
_yv.
. - avs-u
. s -
C.o.iew
". %.. a_
Sa 4 P nawv.A 3.O P
.d.e
%. %. s.
.a.v pA p* _m mon A
v...
v.a.'
- e..# + n.
.e.J..e s, 7 4 m a n a_.4.r p 2 A d.4 6 4 b' v.. q... o a.sp n.
b d
-a meq
- m vM d
Y w
aw w*
- '*#..-.. C r.
m'.". d ^ d 7 ' *. *.
.#."^.~..
' " a_
c" '. u'.# #
-3 ". u" "y'."-
w 2
o V.P o u p y.' a.... p e. ~..e. g~
d
- e. 2 e
.~* p n
.e a_
e s,ne r e a
.. n.o
- 4 m
m,.we m
t y L.e.meo w.
y a.
yvww w
e 4
3~~4
~. %. a.
r ~ m. m. 4
- % e n o_ n c n A.
m o a..~:. ~ 4 e. e~
--._e..
n 2m sn voi eu m
v
-n o g e n. A 4 -
w h. a.
-,.4.n. e~
+g h. a = b. a..n s_.. g7t.t an en*
o=
v.
. v.
4
-o e.
q,d.#.#.Jw. a.r...
e g
w w
421 323
s u s e.n.n.a s. eLp d A u1, M h_vp
.'-M
. h. g a _ w7AnM qlk J
9 M g n
e e
m C 4 A. ~.. 4 " D *4 m n O " a_'3' "4. s *.
u' d d.' ~. # n. n m'.
4 n.' O." -
^~
c J
w um
.n..a ~. 4 o n e - n..
u m,.c.c 2
,, a
- v. n... e.e -.o
.c. c...
- m. a other participants price to consideri:d;
- hp
.c U,.,.,
.n o_ c o n a nd who
,on.4 o-c.c
- n_
o w _
s p w e n c s e d
.y,, m,, a.
- m. w.o. S _ ^ y.m o c s_ a a 4 r. e, e
2 my
,, c. 4 d _ s,
,,o. C o,,. v m r a. C o_ a e n..
.e 4 r.,i.
4.c.
4 n,
p.
y a
O. C '." A ' o"
" a." "v.4C.' " a."." a* ' c o "..~..e."1",, s O ri h
's. mA m
e e
.n no
~v.
My Unda..-
~hm-o a., ~. a.n e., r..e,I o._,..u. a_
C v-.,.. 4 c c.4, n 4
ov
,a c u., M M.4.m o. /.,..
&. h.. c_ x*= _q 9.U 4= o 99 M o t.e J. 4 a.
p ^ m.m..e e.M. o-
^
m m
y.
on the Ecard's "eport within 21 days.
The Staff could be requested to address specific issues, such as whethe", in 34-he oc..w. o.
= c u,. a f -a
.n. o n o.,..w.
ma_n.o.d 3
m y.
m suppo"ts a decision on the proposed rule.
.e, c c n m u,., u 2.,.e n a
4-oL,.oa h *, m. 4 a.
~
o e
ew.*
vv sv
- w u
vv w a
- w
~he
,a3,.
c n
.4u. d..n
.a..
a_a 4
,4 u,.c _a. s o.4 -
i o
.e, -.- u. e -. n e o c 4.. n u.,. n=c
..,c n,
.e
.. n.n v.
e y
u.s.
... ~
as v
the standards regarding access to S:!M
- " c mu.' 3 ' ~. e d.
h v *.".a.
S e c " a_
a." ", c.'.:.. a " e~ s".
~_
r.
o Cther participants could 'oe provided an opportunity to connent on both the a.ca-af-
.- o :La n c - -
_a, a ~.u o.
.m e. a.c.c o v-n..a.e.. s.
g.
s
.m n.s.. p e,I a4._.e~
.c. a.i 4 n 4.
.42, S., o.o v v.... o.n.
4 m.
.v v
~.
to be followed by submission by other participants, the Conmission would fac-1.14 o.o 4e
.m o_ n a_.4,,4 n 6-
-'* o 2 U 4.,
.o.d,
m a - r e m e c.
v
'ab 4PUa-vu -
<a wO 6kp D.s C a.n a f m QpeCn.
e4. 6, %. iC u +o 4
- a..c. 5,q ~ 4.e. e~
~3 v ii.
u a
..p 4.
i
.R.e.
.e p s r o_ m,
.n n un.a - O.P n e m...m. a c -.iu.
Jw d v. aa V-I A ~..%.4.m A d,6e.ne.aw
,Ip
. h. p V 4
u w4 A-t A m
- m. w.i. s o _v n
.m...p /e m
e m
v.
.d 4 s. Aw v e n s.4 a._ m
.d C u,.,.a wve
- vv vm'.'
.c e
ea ev v
u.
a O. F.M..M.. U. A ". s O M.
b.e. O_
O.,O M o@
.. e p u".M M.
. M.O M..
- b. p v
. ac s
v.
a
.I.C Sba..
c.%. d **.s9. a.
eaMb.
Q_o
/% M.
Q.
Q O
- "
- 9 TN e s y. S_ _Q.
p
" Q (.33r c o m.. =...o. r. *w m a_ n d.Cd.
~'D P a C ^ d "s A..". *..' s' a_
4#
3 j
v y.
aa C t'
- - b.1.4 w p h w e a a b.
on. v v.
- C
- b. q *
'N a 1 *, 4 4a 4 +-
- e. n *-
s J
. V s
.v
.s su.w c o. n... 4, C +v. w.. a.n y a.n,. v.4 n a.n w,
, v,
..n e... a.
. w.c_.e,
4 o
y.
y
-,A'a_
4 m. v v r,. a n. e.. m..
.' e.. e. C', m.a.'.O i *:
v v..
n w-m n e w n..C.e. s J uv sG m
w v.
.[.Ja.N w; f*' b. o qn0svG.0f-b VL.
w
.d,.J..
e
.O a e m... g y, -..sO 0
e n.w - Js. a g..o.n w. g. m.. 9 4
- 4 J
2..-
v.'
- w u.g g a.,
b.g n a. y 4.v.i,-e4 aq
~w y
4 w
.C. o_ a.w.4.e ~
0.w v 4.awAf-
,nd
- 4
- b. a.
, 4 m
v.0
- h. a_
n
. v -.e.J. e.
w J
v.
.W s.
2+a w s %.O.c f n o_.v. e n n m.. w.e. n. a.
4.e.
. sw O y
- s.. a r.a. e n..
.' s 4--
w y
. s 4m o*
' e e m b.,.4'b.' U,
=Wq-R. s *3*. '
.,,t
.4
-W o.
yV Q.
s.4 s
.e...
W*J..
sv O
a...Y Q u p p.' o..r.==.
p,%. *.-
W. g. a a e.n A.
..e.
a_ 4
- h. o. w
,wq e _.
s w.
w
=*ee
- wv s.
y s
- f e n.n
.4 m_ _4 e.o.e. s Q a n ~. m..a_ e.
.2 g p g s.' A k_ a.
- m.. +a, #..
yw y
wv.
sa m.. a m a, m,. p g,, 4.m. g-P. ' **,' 'm.
" ' ~
w.
4.
. w.. v d.4.e. g.
- k. a.
q ?.*' f e s
v s..
O
-=,w4
& A.,a... Q
.,2.4
.e..
421 324
n
_..a n,e4.ta.
..4 s.b v y o.
~.m
- a_,,a o_ u.
.c 1.-. s.
.,8 c
m
- b. p O o a.e d eo ws.cmpn y.hp
.n o. n. o.n a b p.*'o n o 46 e_
u.
dd"aoo d c. ' i.
.4 _ n c ' e e
- 4. d a. n *. 4.#.4 a. d-4 n
- h.a_
a cc 9
e
.^
.. a. r r., 4e,. c, a. a."
w h a. r. he' " *he ;o'a"A p
a v
yv an v.
.- cao.s
.e,2.- r u _.n 4n ~ s..4.,
e ua
,a v,a,., a
.d.4 e
v.P venpn o h.l.4
_,
- 4 n o
. 4 - k *v GP r**
..p m.. q e. *. e.n
.i.n.
e vv e
5 i
its members.
Those obligations were m_
m,s 4.,. ~.m o. o o.n.. 4.m. e~
ag, 4 o-
..w..
.a o _n d v -
e, c e v.- -o a
e ' *. a' p l m, s,,
.?,,n
- n' o_ n m n d m..4 4*n Ranon*
n
.a
-y a decision on the proposed rula, even were the Ecard willing to undertake the n o. e n C n.a. k 4 7 4 *...f.
ed ap v
Recommendation:
We recommend that the Commission adcpt alternative 2.
1
'dhile this procedure alters the normal m u m.e.e aas. 4-
- n. m.
c~,
p.na o. n. <. c e o.e -e.,m4..4n3 m
e
- 4 m o.
- o
.e 4 7 a.
4*a suhm.4n 4 unea, w a_ r.s -.4.,.4.n. e 3
1 m.
v
.o o
oo S v a.e c
- o v, u....e
.c.4 4...
- u, 4,
4..e -,
.v-o.
e av o e m.
."..a. a.'-
."a_o.a.'.'',--
." a_ s o n d a-
-..^." a.
y ation presented t y the Board's Report.
r...c o-.,e..
a n.mou..
e 2
.a m,.-. an e a,
.e -,
w
,me y
m
. o
_.m m
instance by the pre
- ation of new facts
-wo 4c4pm,,uvs, u, u m.... e a,
a. v-3..e.,,
.4 r om e.v.
eu_
.i.
o 1
c --m.. 4 s s d. a... cou.'d "e." ^ v 4 d a_
a'.n o c. eo ". * ) ' n. 4 * 'v]
w w ~.
amm.
4onu,l a.u,cc c o..
..o..r. v.
+d o_ w,./ _
aa4
.c,,
u.
i attached a draft order which would 4--,
n-
-w
- ,,.2
,3 4yo_.
n " m' v^ k a
- a. d A.a y. m_.m..o_ u v eu..
s
" c r
- 4 c m o-.nd.'"_'v.o
..'. a."
m. d ". a a 4^
.' o.1 * -
a a.
c u
m e
i 44,,
a.n ~. 4,4,,.. o, n n... a.. +. 0.
e, a_
e uu
.3 y
..e.
ev.
choice is to set a definite schedule, with the obvious benefit of certainty.
The other choice is to indicate that a subsequent order will establi3P the m h e ~_ u., _,, _
__,_4_.
.o r,
, _v.. h __._ e c ___.. n c.
1.s..,,. __
~.uo
,_ pe._m.4.s Lv-_._...
_d
.n.
.ws.
v.
.v..
40
_m _ a 4 4 c e..m.i a_
,,2 e. -
4 a.n..t.r.,~
.o,2_ne aw _,
o_
n
& p e.4.n _, k i s,
+ %. a.
my, +'.P 4.P k.k. _, ~
m'm nn us 1_a k_a R
A a_ ',. e 4 n. g*
p *.b. a_.n
. e. m. e. C.e.., i.n.
4 '.
- b. a.
.a.W. 4.l a n
w L
. j
_m m. m. a_ e A n e.
.s.e
> > a_
. c.. m...e
. c m. ~/
- u _,, e 4
a.4..'n,...p.
0
.m..m.. 4 -
4 - e.
. - >.. ~ ~, -
.P. < m e..k a.n
- m. e ~. a.
e.a,~
.3a T. y..p
.... = u a._a v v.... 4 -..,_
..,.._.,4_-
4 _..
._g,-.
JG..
/.
.v4 U
421 325
=
make a determination as to whether the NRC is required by law to follow the standards for access to SUM already prcaulgated by the Secretary of Energy."
Scard Repcrt at p.
43.
CGC is examining this issue, and will provide its analysis to the Ocamission after having an oppor-tunity to review whatever further submis-sions are received on this ":atter.
Schedulina:
To be scheduled for discussion at an Open Meeting.
O s.
~
t d Leonard Eickwit, Jr.
I General Counsel Albert P.
Kenneke i
Acting Director, Policy Evaluation
Attachment:
Draft order DISTRIBUTION:
Comissioners Comission Staff Offices Exec. Dir. for Opers.
ACRS Secretariat 421 326