ML19246A563

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Addl Comments by Applicants & Consultants Re Des
ML19246A563
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 06/25/1979
From: Van Brunt E
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR
To: Gilbert R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
PVNGS-309-JRM-J, NUDOCS 7907030370
Download: ML19246A563 (3)


Text

%

A*

f

( g> '

-zum wuac mwm oms-m x

P. Q. B O X 21666 PH O E NI X, A RIZC N A,8 5 0 3 6 June 25, 1979 PVNGS-309-JRM/JMA Dr. Robert A. Gilbert Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.

a of fice of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation

% shington, D. C.

20555

Subject:

Docket Nos. STN 50-592/593, Draft Environmental Statement (DES), Related to Construction of Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 4 and 5 File:

FF-79-054-026

Dear Dr. Gilbert:

Enclosed, are Joint Applicants' and their Consultan".s' additional cor=ents on the subject DES, pursuant to 10CFR51 and NRC Notice Number 7590-01, dated April 19, 1979.

Very trul yor

( Q af c,L.

Qt.A O ntJ).

E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.

APS Vice President Nuclear Project.s ANPP Project Director EEVBJr/JRM:ske Enclosure 7907030370 S

BMv4tB i)

ADDITIONAL C0} DENTS ON DES FOR PVNGS UNITS 4 AND 5 DOCKETS STN 50-592/593 Page 8-1:

Section 8.1.1, Sixth Line in Table:

Change "LADPW" to "LADWP".

Pace 3-2:

Table 8-1:

Area served for LADWP should be 465 mi2, not A/10,000.

Page S-5:

Table 8-4:

The data for APS and SDGE are in error based upon the data submitted in ER-CP, PVNGS Units 4 & 5, Table 1.2-8, Sheets 3 and 4 of 17.

The data for APS should be changed as follows:

Combined Cycle Oil Comb. Turbine 1978 1992 1978 1992 1978 1992 225 225 576 576 511 861 The data for SDGE should ae changed as follows:

Nuclear Comb. Turbine Hydro 1978 1992 1978 1992 1978 1992 0

659 368 368 0

0 Pace 9-4:

Section 9.1.2.1, Second Paraaraph:

Change 500 KW to 283 IG.

Page 9-5:

Section 9.1.2.3, Second Paraerach, First Line:

Add "down-hole" between "with" and " fluid".

Pace 9-11:

Table 9-4:

Fercent increase per year for coal and uranium is shown to be 5 and 9, respectively. The applicant's "in-L,use" studies indicate these estimat2d price increases to be 6 and 5, respectively, the significance of which is a reversal of the projected cost escalation difference q9 favoring nuclear versus coal.

/-

h

e

- Page

'-11:

Section 9.1.2.7, Paragraoh 17-It is stated that the coal price FOB western mines (surface) is about 60.25 per million Stu.

Thia figure appears to be icw.

For example, the following is a list of several coal prices, FOB mine:

Four Corners Savajo Mine

$0.37/mm3tu Navajo Black Mesa Mine

$0.50/mnBtu Cholla McKinley Mine

$0.70/m= Btu e

i.

_s h

.