ML19239A205
| ML19239A205 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 08/23/2019 |
| From: | Joseph Demarshall FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| To: | NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| Demarshall J | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17215A919 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML19239A205 (2) | |
Text
ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 Page 1 of 2 Tier / Group Randomly Selected K/A Reason for Rejection Tier 3 Generic G2.4.32 SRO Q6 Facility was unable to develop an operationally valid and discriminating SRO level question to test the selected Tier 3 K/A (Knowledge of operator response to loss of all annunciators). Recent changes to E-Plan EALs require both loss of annunciators and loss of Control Room indications for E-Plan entry. In addition, there are no substantive actions in the Off-Normal instruction for loss of annunciators.
5/22/18 - BASED ON DISCUSSION WITH CHIEF EXAMINER:
Randomly re-selected K/A G2.4.38 - Ability to take actions called for in the facility emergency plan, including supporting or acting as emergency coordinator if required. (IR 4.4)
Outline Question # 99 (Exam Question # SRO-06)
Tier 1 / Group 1
700000 G2.1.20 SRO Q14 Facility was unable to develop an operationally valid and discriminating SRO level question with 3 plausible distractors to test the selected K/A (Ability to interpret and execute procedure steps). There is only 1 SRO related procedure step in the Off-Normal for Grid Disturbance and it is related to Tech Specs.
5/22/18 - BASED ON DISCUSSION WITH CHIEF EXAMINER:
Randomly re-selected K/A 2.2.37 - Ability to determine operability and/or availability of safety related equipment. (IR 4.6)
Outline Question # 82 (Exam Question # SRO-14)
Tier 1 / Group 2
295002 AA2.02 SRO Q15 Facility was unable to develop an operationally valid and discriminating SRO level question with 3 plausible distractors to test the selected K/A (Ability to determine and/or interpret the following as they apply to LOSS OF MAIN CONDENSER VACUUM: Reactor power: Plant-Specific).
5/22/18 - BASED ON DISCUSSION WITH CHIEF EXAMINER:
Randomly re-selected K/A AA2.04 - Ability to determine and/or interpret the following as they apply to LOSS OF MAIN CONDENSER VACUUM: Offgas system flow. (IR 2.8)
Outline Question # 83 (Exam Question # SRO-15)
Tier 1 / Group 2
295020 AK2.11 RO Q34 Facility was unable to develop an operationally valid RO level question to test the selected K/A (Knowledge of the interrelations between INADVERTENT CONTAINMENT ISOLATION and the following: Standby gas treatment system/FRVS: Plant-Specific). With the Perry Mark III containment design, there is not an interrelation between an Inadvertent Containment Isolation and Secondary Containment Ventilation systems.
6/11/18 - BASED ON DISCUSSION WITH CHIEF EXAMINER:
Randomly re-selected K/A AK2.09 - Knowledge of the interrelations between INADVERTENT CONTAINMENT ISOLATION and the following: RHR/shutdown cooling:
Plant-Specific. (IR 3.1)
Outline Question # 24 (Exam Question # RO-34)
Tier 2 / Group 1
212000..K6.01 RO Q46 Selected K/A K6.01 (Knowledge of the effect that a loss or malfunction of the following will have on the REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM: A.C. electrical distribution) covers the same concepts and material as Exam Question #45 (212000 K2.01 - Knowledge of electrical power supplies to the following: RPS motor-generator sets). Overlap/balance of coverage concern requiring K/A re-selection.
6/11/18 - BASED ON DISCUSSION WITH CHIEF EXAMINER:
Randomly re-selected K/A K6.05 - Knowledge of the effect that a loss or malfunction of the following will have on the REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM: RPS sensor inputs. (IR 3.5)
Outline Question # 36 (Exam Question # RO-46)
Tier 2 / Group 1
261000 K4.05 RO Q56 K/A K4.05 (Knowledge of STANDBY GAS TREATMENT SYSTEM design feature(s) and/or interlocks which provide for the following: Fission product gas removal) will not be applicable by the time this exam is administered. TS Amendment 180, which deletes iodine removal requirements of the Annulus Exhaust Gas Treatment (AEGT) System, will be effective on 11/07/18.
ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 Page 2 of 2 6/11/18 - BASED ON DISCUSSION WITH CHIEF EXAMINER:
Randomly re-selected K/A K4.01 - Knowledge of STANDBY GAS TREATMENT SYSTEM design feature(s) and/or interlocks which provide for the following: Automatic system initiation. (IR 3.7)
Outline Question # 46 (Exam Question # RO-56)
Tier 2 / Group 2
204000 K1.11 RO Q65 Selected K/A K1.11 (Knowledge of the physical connections and/or cause-effect relationships between REACTOR WATER CLEANUP SYSTEM and the following:
PCIS/NSSSS) was previously covered in Outline Question RO-14 (Exam Question RO-24) by 295027 Generic K/A G2.4.46 (Ability to verify that the alarms are consistent with the plant conditions). Overlap/balance of coverage concern requiring K/A re-selection.
6/11/18 - BASED ON DISCUSSION WITH CHIEF EXAMINER:
Randomly re-selected K/A K1.06 - Knowledge of the physical connections and/or cause-effect relationships between REACTOR WATER CLEANUP SYSTEM and the following:
Main condenser. (IR 2.8)
Outline Question # 55 (Exam Question # RO-65)
Tier 2 / Group 2
295022 G2.1.25 SRO Q16 Question was determined to be unsatisfactory following 75-day exam submittal. Facility was unable to develop an operationally valid and discriminating SRO level question to test the combination of selected K/A G2.1.25 (Ability to interpret reference materials, such as graphs, curves, tables, etc.) and APE #295022, Loss of Control Rod Drive Pumps.
12/20/18 - BASED ON DISCUSSION WITH CHIEF EXAMINER:
Randomly re-selected the combination of EPE #295036, Secondary Containment High Sump/Area Water Level, and K/A G2.1.20, Ability to interpret and execute procedure steps, (IR=4.6) to maintain outline balance.
Outline Question # 84 (Exam Question # SRO-16)