ML19225B827
| ML19225B827 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/29/1979 |
| From: | Hunter V, Whitesell D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19225B763 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900266 99900266-79-1, NUDOCS 7907260090 | |
| Download: ML19225B827 (5) | |
Text
U. S. NUCLEAR REGUI.ATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV Report No.
99900266/79-01 Program No.
51300 Company:
Roclcsell International Corporation Energy Systems Group 8900 De Soto Avenue Canoga Parh, California 91304 Inspection Conducted:
April 30 - May 2, 1979 Inspector: 9/
/wO N 29-7f V. R. Hunt'er, Contractor Inspector, Vendor Date Inspection Branch Approved b f
I
~
8-8f'-F D. E. '4hitesell, Chief, Components I, Vendor Date Inspection Branch Summary Inspection on April 30 - May 2, 1979 (99900266/79-01)
Areas Inspected:
Implementation of Appendi:: B to 10 CFR 50 and applicable Codes and standards, including manufacturing process control, inspections and tests, and calibration control. The inspection involved twenty-three (23) inspector hours on site.
Results:
In the three (3) areas inspected, no apparent deviations or unres o lve,. items were identified in two (2) areas. The following was identifie.J :.1 the remaining area.
Deviation: Manufacturing Process Control: Welder was not welding within the specified amperage range.
(See Enclosure No. 1).
7 907 26 ceto 454 nac4
2
/
DETAILS A.
Principal Persons Contacted
- A.
C. Crawford, Director, Operations
- R.
J. McDermott, Director, Quality Assurance
- E.
J. Haddon, Senior Safety Engineer
- G.
Janis, Director, Manufacturing
- C. N. Glass, Manager, QA Audits and Contrals
- E.
K. Martin, Safety Engineer G. M. Webb, QA Welding Engineer R. D. Fanderlik, Assistant Manager, Inspection and Test F. Vetzel, Calibration Inspector W. C. Linde, Assistant Manager, Inspection and Test B.
Special Process Control 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that the vendor's special processes are performed under a controlled system which meets the NRC regulations, ASME Code requirements, and contract requirements, and is effective in assuring product quality.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The objectives of this area of the inspection were accomplished by:
a.
Review of the ASME accepted QA Manual,.1 vision 3:
(1) Section 5, titled " Inspections, Procedures and Drawings",
and (2) Section 9, titled " Control of Construction Process",
to verify that procedures had been established that prescribe a control system of the manufacturing processes.
b.
Review of these selective procedures:
(1)
WP-001-140-073,
.A C t TJy 325
3
/
(2) MW-2-01005-000, and (3) WP-001-140-068, to verify the control system requires saop travelers or process centrol check list be prepared containing document numbers and revisions to which the process must conform and requires all processes and tests to be performed by quali-fied personnel using qualified procedures.
c.
Review of the shop traveler or process control check list to verify it has spaces for reporting results of specific operations or reference to other documents where results are maintained, it includes provisions for sign-off by the vendor indicating the date on which the operation or test was performed, and it provides for sign-off by the authorized nuclear inspector for those activities which he witnesses including the date of witnessing.
d.
Observed in process welding in the following:
(1) Hydrogen recombiner, Part No. N139000001, and (2) Frame assembly Part No. N113000014-01, to verify the.: complicace with the above referenced procedures, and the overall QA program documentation requirements including establishment of mandatory hold points by the authorized nuclear inspector.
Interviews with persornel to verify they were knowledgeable in e.
the procedures applicable to special process control.
3.
Inspection Findings a.
Deviation From Commitment Refer to Enclosure No. 1.
b.
Uuresolved Items None were identified.
C.
Calibration 1.
Objectives
.h s
<4:6
L The objectives of this inspection were to:
a.
Ascertain that a system has been established and is maintained to assure that tools, gages, instruments and oth r measuring devices used in activities affecting quality are properly controlled, calibrated and adjusted at specified periods to maintain accuracy within specified limits.
b.
Verify that the system described in (a) above, has been adequately documented with approved procedures and that these procedures are being implemented.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The objectives of this area of the inspection were accomplished by:
a.
Review of Section 12, of the ASME accepted QA Manual to verify that procedures had been established to assure that tools, gages, instruments and other measuring devices used in activities affecting quali:t are properly controlled, calibrated and adjusted at specific periods.
b.
Review c: these selected procedures:
(1) 2103, Revision A, (2) 2071, Revision A, and (3) 2079, Revision A, to verify that the calibration control system has been adegaately documented with approved procedures and that these procedures are being implemented.
3.
Findings No apparent deviations or unresolved items were identified.
D.
Inspections and Tests 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that the nondestructive examination proceduren (NDE), used by the 454 3 c, /
5
/
vencor, meets the ASME Code requirements, applicable NRC regu-lations, and contract commitment:.
Also, to verify that NDE was being performed by qualified persoanel in accordance with approved and qualified procedures as described by the vendor's quality assurance program.
2.
Method of Acccmplishment The objectives of this area of the inspection.were accomplished by:
a.
Review of Section 10 of the ASME accepted QA Manual titled
" Examinations, Tests, and Inspections."
b.
Review of the following NDE procedures to verify that significant variables are defined and controlled within the lirits specified by the ASME Code and contract requirements:
(1) N010NDT-02.
(2) N105NDT-00.
c.
Observed the following nondestructive examination:
Radiography of a Coil Chamber identified as Part No. 711C0060-23-905.
d.
Leview of personnel qualifications.
3.
Findings No apparent deviations or unresclved itema were identified.
E.
Exit Interview The inspector met with management representatives (denoted in para-graph A) at the conclusion of the inspection May 2, 1979. Tne inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection. The management representatives had no comment in response to each item discussed by the inspector.
454 328
.