ML19221A754
| ML19221A754 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/28/1979 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUREG-0555, NUREG-0555-02.5.1, NUREG-555, NUREG-555-2.5.1, SRP-02.05.01, SRP-2.05.01, NUDOCS 7907090044 | |
| Download: ML19221A754 (7) | |
Text
Section 2.5.1 February 1979 EN\\'IRONMENTAL STANDARD REVIEW PLAN FOR ES SECTION 2.5.1 SOCI0 ECONOMICS:
DEMOGRAPHY REVIE'/ INPUTS Environmental Report Sections 2.1.2 Geography and Demography:
Population Distribution Environmental Reviews None Standards and Guides None Other The site visit Responses to requests for additional information Consultation with local, State, and Federal agencies REVIEW OUTPUTS Environmental Statement Sections
2.5.1 Socioeconomics
Demography Other Environmental Reviews
2.5.2 Socioeconomics
Community Characteristics 4.4 Socioeconomic Impacts (Construction) 5.4.1 Exposure Pathways 5.8 Socioeconomic Impacts (Operation) 7.1 Environmental Impacts of Postulated Accidents Involving Radio-active Materials: Plant Accidents I.
PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of this environmental standard review plan is to direct the staff's analysis of population distribution within an 80-km radius of the proposed site in sufficient detail to provide input to analyses of radiological impacts and accident impacts and to provide support for socioeconomic analysis.
107 207 7 9 07 0 900+
2.5.1-1
February 1979 The scope of the review directed by this plan will include verification of current population distributions, population distributions predicted at the time of plant startup, and for the year 2000.
Both permanent and transient populations will be identified.
II.
REQUIRED DATA AND INFORMATION The kinds of data and information required will be affected by site-and station-speci fic f actors and the degree of detail will be modified according to the anticipated magnitude of the potential impact.
Population data presented should be based on the current decade census data and, where available, more recent census data.
The following data or information will usually be required:
A.
Population Within 20 Kilometres.
On a map of suitatle scale that identifies places of significant population grouping, such as cities and towns within a 20-km radius, concentric circles should be drawn (with the reactor at the center point) at distances of 2, 4,
6, 8, 10, and 20 km.
The circles should be divided into 22-1/2-degree sectors with each sector centered on one of the 16 compass points (with reference to true north, e.g.,
north-northeast, northeast, etc.).
A table appropriately keyed to the map should provide the current residential and transient populations within each area of the map formed by the concentric circles and radial lines. The same table or separate tables should provide the projected resident and transiand oopulations within each area for (1) the expected first year of station operation :~i 'z) for the year 2000.
The tables should provide population totals for each sector and annular ring and a total f or the 0-to-20 km enclosed population.
The basis for population projections should be described (f rom the ER).
B Population Between 20 and 80 Kilometres.
A map of suitable scale and appropriately keyed tables should be used in the same manner as described alave to present the population and its distribution at 20-km intervals between the 20 and 80 km radii from the reactor (from the ER).
2.5.1-2
February 1979 III.
ANALYSIS PROCEDURES The reviewer will prepare population distribution charts that provida population data for both permanent and transient populations as they presently exist and as predicted at the time of plant startup and for the year 2000.
The data will be presented as shown in Table 2.5.1-1.
The reviewer't, analysis of the data will consist of the following:
A.
A determination that the data are based on the appropriate geographical coordinates.
B.
A review of all data used to update the basic decade census data.
C.
A review of the methrds used to establish population data within 80 km of the site.
D.
A review of the applicant's methods for population projections.
IV.
EVALUATION The reviewer will establish that the population distribution data is adequate to assess the radiological impacts of station operation and to support the assessment of socioeconomic f actors and impacts.
V.
INPUT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT The environmental statement input will include the following:
A.
A sector chart superimposed on a man extending to a 20-km radius
( s ee Figure '2. 5.1-1).
B.
A sector chart superimposed on a map extending to an 80-km radius (see Figure 2. 5.1-2).
107 209
- 2. 5.1-3
February 1979 C.
A table appropriately keyed to the above figures that provides the projected populations within each sector of the chart (see Table 2.5.1-1).
D.
A summary description of the staff's population distribution review, including extrapolation techniques and descriptions of any unique populatica factors such as high transient population (daily or seasonal) or new communities.
The reviewer will provide inputs or ensure that inputs are made to the following ES Sections:
Section 2.5.2.
The reviewer will provide population forecast data to the reviewer for ES Section 2.5.2.
Sections 4.4 and 5.8.
The reviewer will provide community distribution and population forecast data to the reviewers for these two ES Sections.
Sections 5.4.1 and 7.1.
The reviewer will provide population forecast data to the reviewers for these two ES Sections.
VI.
REFERENCES None 107 210 g
2.5.1-4
TABLE 2.5.1-1 SAMPLE POPULATION DISTRIBUTION TABLE Sector Sectors / Distances (km) 0-2 2-4 4-6 6-8 8-10 10-20 20-40 40-60 60-80 Total North (Present date)
(Startup date) 2000 I$.E (Present date)
(Startup date) 2000 m
i.
7 m
II i.
Annulus Totg CD Present N
Startup 2000 m
m N
?
Cumulative Total g
,w (Present date) m (Startup date) 2000 e
February 1979 N
Y 4
%lp U
+b
+
%;p pod'
@E o+#
osos s
4 RADlus 5O e
w e
e,
+
S kmg 1,
j
}
2 4
9 to 20 30 40 5
A A iO 4
20 mi Figure 2.5.1-1 Example of 0-to 20 Km Sector Chart to be Superimposed Over an Appropriate Vicinity Map 107 212 2.5.1-0
February 1979 N
h.,-
k.
&p+f~
s S
os0
/
/
- us sh tymIV t
e p otus 4
?
Spg PL4g W
g E
qMI Esg h
Sg A
s km 0 5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 f1 4 A
10
/0 s'O mi 5O Figure 2.5.1-2 Example of 20-to-80 Km Sector Chart to be Superimposed Over an Appropriate Vicinity Map 107 213
- 2. 5.1 - 7