ML19220B658
| ML19220B658 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 10/06/1972 |
| From: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | John Miller METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19220B659 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7904270183 | |
| Download: ML19220B658 (2) | |
Text
.
t
'OCT G 1972 Docket Kos. 50-289 & 50-320 Fetropolitan Edison Cc=pany Attention: 11r. J. C. l' iller Vice ?rcsident P. O. Zor 542 Reading, Pennsylvanin 19603 Centlenen:
This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. Eovard and other renbers 14-17, 1972, of construction activities authorized j
of cy staff on August by AEC Construction Pcmits Ucs. CPPR-40 and CPPR-66 and to the discussions of our findings held by Mr. Howard with }tr. licuard and other eccbers of your staf f at the conclusien of the inspection and to th'e telephone con-vercation betvcen lir. J. C. liiller and the Director of Region 1, Regulatory Operations on October 5, 1972.
Areas exn=ined during this inspection included implerentation of the Quality Assurance and Quality Centrol Programs for centrol of construction in the areas of electrical and instrur.entation installation, reactor coolant piping, other Class I piping, reactor vessel and internals, the refueling In addition, quality water storage tank, and other Class I components.
control records were reviewed in the above areas to verify docu=entation of work co=pleted. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective exaninations of procedures and representative records, inter-views with plant personnel, and observations by our inspectors.
During this inspection, it was found that certain of your activities appeared to be in noncenformance with Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 or in noncompliance with the Final Safety Analysis Peport and site instructicus or procedures.
In addition, two itecs appeared to raise questions concerning the adequacy of construction. The ite=s and references to the pertinent require =ents are
~
listed in the enclosures to this letter. Please provide us within 30 days, in writing, with your co=nents concerning these ite=s, any steps that have been or vill be taken to correct the:n, any steps that have been or vill be taken to prevent recurrence, and the date all corrective action or preven-tive measures were or vill be completed. Your reply should c=phasize, in particular, any appropriate changes that have been or vill be cade to im-prove the effectiveness of your quality assurance program to prc/ent re -
currence.
7904270181
\\}6 WJ CRESS I I
Ecuard:dv' 0'Reilly
t i.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we vill be 3
pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely, Ja=es F. O'Ecilly Director Enc 1csures:
1.
Description of 1:enecapliance Ite=s 2.
Description of 1;cnconfor=ance Items 3.
Eescription of Safety Items bec:
A. Gia:busso, L P. Morris, RO H. Thornburg, RO R. Engelken, PD J. Reppler, PD J. Eenderson, PD RO Files 4R Central Files OCC PDR Local PDR NSIC DTIE State of Pennsylvania O
e 5
i 1
81-079 m