ML19220B550
| ML19220B550 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 06/23/1975 |
| From: | Durr J, Heishmon R, Narrow L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19220B535 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-320-75-07, 50-320-75-7, NUDOCS 7904270017 | |
| Download: ML19220B550 (13) | |
See also: IR 05000320/1975007
Text
.
IF:1 Tom 12
(Jan 75) (Rev)
.
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY CC:0!ISSIO!;
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCDIErr
.
REGIO:i I
IE Inspec tion Report No:
50-320/75-07
_
Docket No:
50-320
Licensec:
Metropolitan Edisen Company
License No:
CPPR-66
_
Box 542
Priority:
--
Reading, Pennsylvania
19603
Category:
A
l
Safeguards
Location:
Middletown, Pennsylvania (Ti. e Mile Island 2)
"E
-
_
f
Type of Licensee:
PWR 871 m'e ('
,
T-
or Inspec tion:
Routine - Unannounced
Dates of Inspection: _
June 10-13, 1975
Dates of Frevious Inspection: _ May 12-13, 1975
__
Ecporting Inspector: ,
A
II
L. Narrow, Reactor Inspector
'
BATE
-
panying Inspectors:
MM//
// h A._/
J. P/ Durr, Reactor Inspector
b d VM(
_
DATE
'
DATE
_.
DATE
Other Accompanying Personnel:
NONE
_
_
.,
,
DATE
Reviewed By:
/
,
[
1A
[.F.HeiMn,Seni
[f
[
Re
r Inspector
/
DidE
,
-
l
.
-
eo-Or3
7 9 0 4 2 7 0 Or{
.
'
S1'MM.iRY OF FINDI!;CS
Enf orcer.cnt Action
A.
Itecs of Monccenliance
1.
Infractions
Contrary to 10 CFR 50, Appendix 3, Criterien IX:
Welding of safety related piping was not in accordance
a.
with Specification No. 2555-72 in'that the welder made
nu=erous are starts and stops without grinding.
,
i
b.
Control of filler cetal was not
sceordance with
Specification 2555-72 in that the selder was observed
_
to have more than one type of filler =etal in his
possession while working on safety-related piping.
(Details, Paragraph 3)
t
2.
Deficiencies
Contrary to 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V:
Docu=entation for the ore flooding tanks was approved by QA
as teeting the requirements of Enginering and Manufacturing
Instructions (IEMI) 6M02 and was released for construction
although the documentation furnished did not provide evidence
of charpy tests as required by 6M02.
(Details Paragraph 2)
_
B.
Deviations
Mone
Licensee Action on Previous 1v Identified Enforcement Matters
The following yreviously identified items of noncompliance have
-
A.
been resolved:
1.
Intdequate drawing control.
(Details, Paragraph 4)
_
e
1
~
.
-
_2_
2.
Inco=plete records of welding caterial release.
(Details,
Paragraph 5)
Desien Changes
1;one
Unusual Occurrences
1;ene
Other Significant Findings
A.
Current Findines
1.
The follcuing itecs are considered to be acceptable:
.
The licensce's, A-E's and Constructor's manuals and pro-
a.
cedures.concerning velding.
(Details, Paragraph 6)
b.
Babcock and Wilcox (B5W) field velding practices, pipe
f abrication shop and velding material storage and issue
I
facilities and practices.
(Details, Paragraph 7)
United Engineers & Constructors velder qualification
c.
program, and welding material storage and issue facili-
ties and practices.
(Details, ?aragraph 8)
.
3.
Status of Previousiv Reported Unresolved Items
1.
The following items have been resolved:
.
a.
Containment doce liner flatness.
(Details, Paragraph 10)
b.
Reinstruction of Stressteel Company personnel in requira-
ments of field installation procedure.
(Details, Para-
graph 9)
2.
The following item was reviewed but re=ains unresolved:
a.
Tendon grouting voids.
(Details, Paragraph 11)
_
Q(}--A rr)
{ L.
s.
-
c. e ~,
_
1
.-
_
M
- 3-
Exit Interview
An exit interview was held at the site on June 13, 1975 with the
following attendees:
General Public Utilities Service Corneration
R. F. Fenti, Quality Assurance Auditor
W. T. Gunn, Site Manager
.i . Levin , P r oj e ct Engin ee r
3. L. Roshy, Quality Assurance Engineer
M. J. Stronberg, 3ite Quality Assurance Auditor
J. E. Wright, Resident Civil Engineer
United Encineers and Ccnstructors
,
V. E. Cichoki, Coordinating Superintendent, QA/QC
C. W. Hunttr, Electrical Supervisor
D. C. lanbe rt , Field Supervisor, Quality Control
D. E . S=ith, Welding Superintendent
J. C- Spinak, QA Engineer
Burns & Roe
G. T. Harper, Jr. , Site Project Engineer
Babcock and Wilcox
R. J. Kun , Quality Control Supervisor
B. E. Treadway, Project Manager
The itens discussed are sirrmarized below.
_
acknculedged the information.
In each case the licensee
A.
Scoce of the Inspection
The inspector stated that this was an unannounced . inspection to
reviaw the QC program for pis ing and the status of previously
identified findings.
B.
Itens af Noncompliance
The inspector stated that two itens of ncncompliance had been
_
identified.
~
i
l
k
g P--y ('.1
-
.
_
-S-
2.
The inspector stated that regrouting to fill the voids which
had developed following grouting of the vertical tendcas was
corsidered to be acceptabic. However, this item re=ains un-
resolved until final grouting procedure has been developed.
(Details, Paragraph 11)
.
e
ao
e
Or a r z.>,
.
.u
_
W
-
DETAILS _
Persons contacte_d
l.
General Public Utilities Service Cornoration
__
R. F. Fenti, Quality Assurance Auditor
W. T. Gunn, Site Manager
S. Levin, Project Engineer
D. Perry, QA Engineer
G. L. Roshy, Quality Assurance Engineer
M. J. Strc= berg, Site Quality Assurance Auditor
J. E. Wright, Quality Assurance Manager
Resident Civil Engineer
J. H. Wright,
United Encineers and Constructors
_
J. Carrabba, Field Construction /QC Supervisor
A. Carrera, Assistant Field Construction /QC Supervisor
QA/QC
V. E. Cichocki, Coordinator Superintendent,
L. Dick, QC Engineer
P. Hunter, Electrical Supervisor
F. Kovalik, Office Engineer
Field Supervisor, QC
D. C. La=bert,
F. F. Long, Assistant Field Supervisor, QC
D. Smith, Welding Superintendent
W. Tinlin, Structural Engineer
R. Udorich, riping Engineer
Babcock and Wilcox
.
G. Brotton, QC Technician
J. Jeffers, QC Technician
R. Kunz, QC Supervisor
D. Montcasle, Welding Technician
M. Shultz, Construction Supervisor, Pipe Shop
F. Skrzypice, Field Engineer
R. E. Treadway, Project Manager
Core Flooding Tanks
2.
The inspector examined the following documents:
_
=
_
S
a-_.
_
4
.
-7-
Procedure QC 2-2 which requires that the QA group will review
a.
documentation for completeness, accuracy and cocpliance with
applicable specifications and that this review will be ccc-
to construction.
pleted prior to release of equipment
Engineering and 15nuf acturing Instruction
Interdepartzent
b.
(IEMI) 6M02 f or f abrication of the core flooding tcnks.
The documentation package for those tanks including Attach-
c.
cent A of QC 2-2 stating that the documentation package had
been reviewed and accepted by QA as teeting the require ents
'
of 6M32 and the tanks were released to construction.
The inspector observed that although IEMI 6M02 requires that
'
charpy tests be performed, records were not available to
confirm such tests for all of the material used in fabrication
-
of the tanks.
The material had been furnished by Lukens Steel
Company from Heat Mos. which were identified in the package.
However, documentation was not available to confirm performance
of charpy tests on soce of the caterial.
(Reat Nos. C5749-61
and 62, C5790-69 and C6588-72).
This is censidered to be a deficiency with respect to 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V which states, in part, " Activities
'
affecting quality shall be prescribed by docu=ented instruc-
l
tions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the
circu= stances and shall be acco=plished in accordance with
these instructions, procedures, or drawings."
,
!
3.
UELC Field Welding
The inspectot observed field welding of the following joints:
-
l
No. DH-V107B (10 inch) on the decay Ecat Removal System.
a.
.
I
b.
Nos.143-A5 and 148-Al (1 inch) on the Makeup and Purifica-
tion System.
,
No.148A-1 (1 inch) on the Makeup and Purification System.
c.
g
The inspector found that the filler metal container of the welder
working on Item b above contained both bare filler metal, 308L
-
stainless steel and E7018 covered electrodes.
.
-
.
k
'
g -..
-
.. .
e
-B-
The inspector also observed that the welder working on item c above
made numerous " stops and starts" of the arc without grinding.
The
inspecter questioned the welder concerning the grinding require-
ments for this type of joint and was informed that grinding is not
norcally required f or socket veld joints
These actions are contrary to . . ' Specification 2555-72 Division
13, Section 13A. Paragraph 3.1.2.8 of this specification states,
in part, "Only one type of filler metal shall be issued to a welder
any one time and any previously issued but not used, shall be
atreturned f or bake-out or disposal".
And Paragraph 3.1.2.3 states,
" Arc strikes, starts and stops shall be recoved by grinding.
This is considered to be an infraction with respect to 10 CFR 50,
Appendix B, Criterion II which states, " Measures shall be estab-
lished to assure that special processes, including welding, heat
treating, and nondestructive testing, are controlled and acce=p-
-
lished by qualified personnel using qualified procedures in accord-
ance with applicable codes, standards, specifications. criteria,
and other special requirements."
4.
Drawing Control
.
Inadequate control of drawings in the field had previously been
identified as a noncompliance (Inspection Reports No. 50-320/74-04
and 74-09) .
The inspector reviewed the following:
UELC Procedure CCP l-2 " Drawing Specification and Document
a.
Control" dated April 22, 1975.
i
b.
Internal Memorandum dated April 21, 1975 which established a
~
require =ent for indoctrination of personnel in GCP 1-2.
,
GPU Service Corporation Audit Reports No. 75-01, 75-16 and
c.
75-20.
.
E
The inspector cbserved that CCP-12 required indoctrination and
training of personnel and frequent audits of drawings and other
docu=ents by each of the departments which receive and distribute
,
docu=ents.
The required indoctrination had been conducted and
'
!
-
.
$
~
i (_
4
r
k
.
4
_9-
the audits perforr.ed.
The GPU Service Corporation audits revealed
a decreasing number of deficiencies since early 1975.
Audit so.
75-20 identified only cinor discrepancies all of which were
corrected prior to co=pletion of the audit.
The site QA Auditor
stated that additicnal audits would be conducted in June and July,
1975 to observe that i= proved control of drawings was caintained.
The inspector examined the files and drawings maintained in the
UE&C Engineering Of fice and the piping and structural departtents,
spot checked the audits of the structural department and drawings
in the office of one of the piping forecen.
This item is resolved.
5.
Weldine Material Control
Failure to record the time of weld rod issue on requisition forms
'
had been identified as a nonce =pliance.
(Inspection Report 50-320/
75-03).
The inspector reviewed the appropriate velding caterial
control require =ents for B&W and UE&C.
The inspector reviewed several welding caterial issue slips and
observed that the date and time of issue of weld rod was recorded.
This item is resolved.
6.
Document Review
The inspector reviewed the following docu=ents in the areas speci-
fically related to velding of safety related piping.
Metropolitan Edison Company Quality Assurance Plan Design
.
a.
and Construction Three Mile Island, Unit #2 Revision No. 10.
b.
Burns and Roe (B&R) Specification 2555-72, Piping and Mechanical
Equipment Installation, February 14, 1975.
B&W Construction Co=pany Quality Control Manual.
c.
.
d.
UE&C Mechanical Construction Procedures and Quality Control
Procedures.
This item is considered to be ceceptable.
_
.
e gr
n
l_
l
-
.
O
.
-10-
BLW Weldine Facilities and Practices
7.
Field Weldine
a.
The inspector observed the perf ormance of field velding on
b
Wl-16
the "incore Monitoring Piping" on veld joints nu= er
prepara-
The inspector observed the veld joint
The
and Ul-21.
tacking and f usion of the insert.
inspector examined the " Weld Lnstruction - Muclear" docuten-
tion, alignment,
l with regard
tation and interviewed welding and QC personne
and authority,
to their dutie.
=
P_ioe Fabrication Shop
b.
ion shop for storage
The inspector examined the pipe fabri-
astruction - Nuclear"
i
and handling practices f or pipe, "We*
documents, and welding practices.
_
Veldine Material Storace and Issue
c.
The inspector examined the bulk storage areas and field issue
Storage and issue of =aterial
points f or velding materials.was f ound to be in conf ormance w
i
d
the B&W Procedures.
These items are considered to be acceptable.
UELC Veldine Facilities and Practices
8.
_
Velder Qualification Program
a.
The inspector reviewed the UE&C velder qualification program
identifi-
_
in the areas of velder qualification dc:umentation,
cation of expired qualifications, and veld joint perfor=ance
identification.
Weldine Material Storace and Issue
b.
The inspector examined the bulk storage areas and field issue
Storage and issue of material
points f or velding material.-was found to be in conformance
d
UELC Procedures.
These itees are considered to be acceptable.
_
i
-.
0(1--a r c,
(
.t
-
E
'
l
_
.
-11-
9.
Installation of Tendon k'ednes
install-
The disposition of a nonconf or=ance resulting from incorrcet
ation of a split cone tendon wedge had been identified in a previous
No. 75-05) as requiring reinstruction
ins ection (Inspection Report
of stressteel Construction and QC personnel in the requirements of
the Stressteel Field Manual.
(NCR) No. 2
The inspector examined Stressteel Moncenformance Report
which had identified this proble= and which showed the disposition
cc pleted on April 23, 1975 with instructions of stressteel ceployees
in requirements of the field =anual.
This item is resolved.
I
t
7
10.
Containment Done Liner Flatness _
area in the containment deme liner had been identified pre-
_
A flat
viously and had been accepted contingent upon modification of the
Reactor Building concrete by the addition of reinforced concrete
(Inspection
stif fener hoops to the spherical section of the dome.
Reports No. 50-322/74-01 and 74-03).
The inspector examined sections of Civil Construction Procedure
(CCP) 3-2 app'2 icable to installation of the concrete stif f ener
rings and QC records for ':encrete placements RB-399 and R3-404.
Records examined included scandard inspection forms and the
CCP 3-2 checklist f or each placement.
This item is resolved.
11.
Tendon Grouting Voids
The development of voids in the top of grouted vertical tendons
had been identified as an unresolved item.
(inspection Report
50-322/75-6).
4 and 6 reporting
The incpector examined Stressteel NCR's Nos.
incomplete filling of the grout cap; the " Procedure for Regrouting
~
Top Anchorages of Vertical Tendons" dated May 9, 1975; Stressteel
29, 1975 reporting the
Supplemental Inspection Report #1 dated May
(DR) No. 0459
results of the regrouting; and UELC Leviation Report
DR No. 0459 authorized regrouting of
and Supplements 1 through 4.
the six vertical tendons which had been reported on NCR's 4 and 6
_
in accordance with the above referenced procedure and accepted the
results of the regrouting.
SI[Id.b
(
i.
_
.
_
.
-12-
Exploratory work is continuing toward development of changes to
the grouting procedure which will correct this problem.
This ite= recains unresolved.
,
e
e
We
Ow
O
( 4
L
I
-
!
-