ML19220A360

Applicants Opposition to Intervenors Petition for Review of ALAB-486.Matters Sought to Be Reviewed Are Not Matters Upon Which Petition May Be Based.Certificate of Svc Encl

ML19220A360
Person / Time
Site:	Crane
Issue date:	08/21/1978
From:	Trowbridge G SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
To:
References
NUDOCS 7904170468
Download: ML19220A360 (14)

Text

4 Aum,.s.

• 1

.' O

• y.

,P, / ".T v

=. ( l r N"1

.N ga

.. N e.5, *.s.t=.es q

s

,b

. = e n w.

ep

.se e-=

.A (b

. w.d w. 4... a g,*,

, g

.s.e.p.**.: w w a, g,p

...epj e... a a. a,s.I E7 " * -...

p,#' '

e.

..w ws y,,.

Q A

~

r..

m'

%..*t'e..* ?s*.7

".: T* *u* =. e. p.V.

ee..W....t..., *... s *

• U ) /*

SfTr..0 7..

9.*U"*.

w s

cr *e 4

o Coo.. 9.N N

g m.

/

f.

v/

Y

/

... e.v.a....

.e

)

n,,

.w

)

.v:.

Cfc.,-

.i.,.-.J CC. h..r.,,

... A

)

.u.- 0

. e c...

..c.

.s

..v

.e 4

)

(~hree Mile sland Nuclear

)

c-J e, e,.a. 4 c b,a.4 n,

n.

4.

.. J f

i

.. 3 o..

M.f. 7

• F

• g e3e

= 3

.m.**3 y */..

a,

• s ws.e. =,, s,.

c= e d'.e=..,.-=.e, e s.e.

"b

..e..

% v. ev.%3

e. F. %:.., op

.-. 2.v

.s ac.:-4 e o.

• Q*c, e,

A,,.3J,.

Q,

..a....,,......a

a. 4 5 eA g u -..,..., e 44.

3-.o

.a..

..#v 4

.e ora.

4 s.4

.,r.

.w 7.%.s v.s

,,t.

.o 3 C 4.,. a

,.e,.es.

s

....4,.

.....-. a a.. e 2.V,. ew a

a

... a

.'. e e..' a.' ~.. '. ' ".e A ~.~.'..*a.'.= ~..r 1..'.' '..=. s..., n' :. e s.'.' c a..,

s..= ^.~..-]

y 19 3 ( A* A3-48 6 ). T::r the reascns stated herein Applicants ppcse the ;e:1-

. 4. n n...,7.,,,<.

4 nter7eners seek review of AIA3-486 en three issues:

v 3.4..... a.

'a n'.c e a.' ' card - s" s e...d.

~ ". e - :. e..-"..'..g s

e

- e..se

.s i4

,m..... M.41.

1.a.. A s,1.,.c.t.a e... 4,. a.a 4

.4 w

4..

t, A.-

~)

cn w.e.4 -... - 1.a

.,., s.w.

..wa.w.4.

4a.s.

e y.

aaw.

3 A.,.a.4_ a e

,y.w.e Aerea.t.=ca a.

,e

.w w

.e

4

m..,...t e

'.icensing Scard in " aver c' the adequac/ and verkabili'/

Of OC 2 emergenef and evac.u. icn plans.

J'.

S ai.'. a. 'v,

'. I,.C

., " '.ar.c e...=.~ra...c. a ' y ar -...d a '.-..i..

d y

o k..t3 y.ca f.4 e,.

a. t.4..37.

3 ge ou.e

,g.4..

a,. y4. a.,4 4.

a. a. a.4

.. 4 e.,,. n a.

..a...

yy.

y7 y.. -..

..,. w...e.

g.a

.3

._we

....g....a a w t.,,

wy

......*".A...C.*-

~. ^. '. e.- *.'I *

• We'.'. '.* v. #...e y..

a 7 9 0117 0 e/6 S' W e gg C6

c -4 3 a. 4

,7.

a..,.e. 23.. c. s " rs~... wi'.5 a

,e~.'

4.

- a". '. ew =a'/,- -. e..' y '.e based.

. w.,

n a..

se

.a..,,es.1.4 ed "v.

.. *.=..-v a..r.. a '

d-

e - '... -=. "..v....'

--a.

a.

a

.' s sues -

(.' ) u k e, ".e.-

~ ".e,.~.."ah.'.' ' ~. 7.." 1.. a s.". ~.' 1 '..=. a',~.r a.t.~ ~.~ 1 ".. '....

~c.,,.m.9

.4 ge. go n,

..a s a.4 -

a

.a.u..,

1.i,e..,

..ye s 1.

. u... c a.

4 s s" "..'..' e n ~..' 'f.' ~a

~.0 -e =. ~ ". e.-..".ab.'.'. ' J

..'. =..'.1

. '. ' ~. =. -- ^"v. ' c a ". - * = -

• icen ing and Appeal 3 cards and (2) whether e=ergency and evaeustien plans

'er -"C 2 are adequate and wc: Macle. Cn de first factual issue a majcri y of de Appeal Scard, and en de second issue the entire Appeal Scard, agreed

.,4..

.e.".'..d.d.., a-.."

".e

==.s.'.., 'ca d.

.ee...'...'. i 3 o' ( ' ) (.* ) ( ' ',..' ". e 4.

4 n..

,,,es o.,

sa.

a... -

r.,.ac a e a...

.s.

m

" A e.d. ~ '.~. 2 ".r.ev'.ew c.'

a..=.-s

.'sC*. w.

..c t " e

3. a..~..= d y

- ~

"n.' e s s.' ~. a~::' e ars ~ ".a ~., ".e

% ~.~~ ' - = a.' e ~.7 d . '

.=.~.- _ - =.. s...g.s ~rea'

'e

.~~ -

Scard has resolv=d a factual issue necessar/ for decis:.:n in a clearly errenecus =anner centrary to the resolutien of that same issue by the At==ic Safaty and *.icensing Scard".

"'hus a petition for review based en Intervencrs' first two issues is e.:cpressly r~~,..a su

.u.e +==.;a..a.n..

,g',at4 ns.

e e-y a.

a.-..

2ntervencrs' third issue dees raise policy and legal questi:ns,

.'.u.

'.e 't a - = 1" es. ~.. s a_-=.=.d7 e.' ' ed.'.v. ~".e C-_

4 s.'-..

".d..a.. '.' ' As a.4 -.-

d a

a anca t: Part ipants in C--"'ssicn Preceedings, 41 T.R.

5C829 (Ncve her 13, 13 6).

We de net read Section 7. 786 as meaning t: ence.~ pass such questiens, hcwever i=pertant, when dey have already been decided by de C--

'ssien in a peneri: rule ca.k.ing preceeding.

A 3 4 a. s

.. u.e

~.e s e

.s..e

.e 4. 2,.n.,.,,

m _. ew...

e,... L.. a ry -

.rr r -. - -

. hat de Appeal Scar:i's deci.sien nct te suspend de ""C 2 cperating license and its adfir=ance Of its emergency and evacuati:n plans were clearly ::rrect and de net warrant C--

'_ssien review.

S a w n: o Q fs u.)

e d.

9 a.4

, s...

u gy 4. ;

..y a

4.

.=. e,

3,.,., e s. h.e,, ys.,4

/,..e

.e..g;. 4.- wuy.,. 3_. _, C.- *..* "< a.

.w u

s.'.e,

~'.e vd ".' s

-w-."-=s c.# "- ' hav e '.e a.n d e s.',..e d.. w.d "..- '.d v.4 '.~..

loss of structural integrity -he i= pact of a crash of a design basis air-

-./

craft weighing 200,0C0 pcunds and traveling at 200 kncts.

• he Li:ensing a.

.-- a-wec.4s.4,n (-)._. w.a

.w.e ev.ae c. 4

.w ca-.

3. e d.4.,. 4.s

,44

=

.e y

.c. s4 g establishes that de crash nto N 2 cf larger aircraf t using the Harris-

-7 2.u;, g4 ",c-". has a ve v,

.' c w,".- " &."..'.'.'.Y, c#. CC " ~e..C*

(.'.* s 3

- ' ' ' "-... C f *. -

v. a.a.-),

a..d

(') * ".a. 4.. vd.ew

".e.' w

.-."ab.i..'.f c.'.c "~.=....a.

-".a.

-..se-y quences of a strike by such largar air: raft need not be :ensidered. As ncted by the Appeal 3 card (Slip Op. 36), ce Licensing Scard also accepted

~_" e a' n.' *.=cs_

r.,

.- "e.'..~..,c a

=A.

.'.a.

".e.=.c."'..~.'...re"_'_'.'..1..'....s."...-

de T 2 Operating li:ense, that the Staff wculd again revtew air::ssh

.a_.e. 4. 4 e s

.4_,

w,

.w ya e

.3 a_..,.e a.4. a.s.. s.e _,4. a

.ae.a.arr_4. w...,. a_4_-e

.ccu.ia a-r

.a increase fr== its cresent level cf ae.rexi=ately 600 cperations.:er v. ear ::

c 2400 cpera icns.ter year.

A najcrit/ cf the Appeal 3 card agreed that, based en present a.,.,.4

.e,re.3. a

.w. e

.a.a.. 4. _w,.., a 4

,c.....e

.,. a a

4.,i..]

4.e 1 s

,.4.<e

..f a

w a

a u.

7 la.:ge aircraf t en "M* 2 was less than 10-per year and that dis pr:babili 7 was sufficiently Icw to support a finding cf reasenable assurance as := ce public health and safety withcut inquiring into the censequences of a large air: raft crash.

"'he najcritf aisc cencluded, hcwever, cat "the record is sufficiently sarred by inadequacies, incensistencies and ambiguities as =

',/ he Appeal 3 card f:end that intervencrs had nade ac serious clain that

._..e

_,a c.4 _, 4 /.ac t,,.a c4w4.s.a a...w.e ae s 4,., a s.4.

a.

.d w.a

.i..

w

.a a..

review of the rec:rd :n dis =atter pave the 3 card nc reasen to believe

.g3t 4-

., 4 3 _,.., g ;_-

( 3,.4,

3,)

... e.g-ea_' Oca.'. a'ao.'.ur.d.

_".a.

r.

ae.

., er.

ey ntervencrs had not ra sed bef:re the *icensing 3 card the issue Of whether

._. e

.e3..44 -----J ula 3.. w 3_,,,37.s

. w 4.

s

.-'.e..d

.2..d

".a.... = ~ a.a. a-

.e

,.e s

-.t '.as.' a-w..a d..-

4

.w..

._w.e.J.

,.e

.,4.e

.h.e

.a.s,e.e n a~ e3.,.

(..a..,

.s J7 4

.a

.3 f.

w,e '.s a

• d '* #a C*..*"*/ #'."

a s.' a ". *a.'.1'..".'y*

• " a.

.i..C."a..a s e d.' av a..t

-

• a.#.#.i ".^. ' '. ".. '. *. *.

a.

.. 5g

.w.

y. w. ag.4 4 4

, WC C.' ' b e a.x.* e e..'.e d . (.'a.'.' "

', f' ) '.".**. * *./

• b. e.'" a..#.". a. ^'*".a.'"*d.

.j y

.y.

, - e..

4 -

...- y 1 ac ee.4 e,

.k.e ee..-A 2..

2 u.a.

eye.a.e.a.

.u.e.*a....

oes.i..

w.

%. g A.4 s s e.".* *.".g "e."' e.*

C.#

• ". e A,',". " e a.'."c a. d

.d

". " *. -"a.***-'a'*".

w y

v

"".e na ', C ".' *."*f ' M

.#.i..dd.".", * ".a *. a.' a.*"'s' e a _' * **..** 1.# *.

", '* a s.'".

g" " *. " ~* ".'.'.i ". ]

^s.#

.' e s a * ". ' ".

~

13 t va s s* *.#.#.#..' 8.'".*.*.'y.' "w *.* '.",' s u*r',C C.** * ". e.'.'.* e.*.s.'."."y

'.'N..'

2. e ' ' ',

k..".w-eve.',

C#." C.' "d e *".a*

.a.c-

-.1 '".e g"'. ~. " e a. d.'.~.g wa s

.*.C '. 1^ e",'.'a '. e

~.3 a"

C'..

y' g r...w.. ab.'.'.'."

.#.'.".d.'.*.g c n "".e

'_ a s.' a-

,.^#

• • '##.'~..

a. 4 * ". e.'" f

a. s e "..,.^ '" i.".C.* *.a s ed-

~*

... A.

1 4.,. a. e,..tiew,

.e f w. a. 4..f

.4 4 d.4 r, ry*

a

... a,sC4/

.w w;*

.e

.w,

.s w.4 w

.3..-

..ese..*

a.##.'.-

.' a.v a. ' a waa-.""..'.' f

.4 ".s *, ' # ' s d.

Since bcth the naderity and dissentina. nenter of he Appeal s

Scard have accepted Secticn 3.5.1.6 cf the :G.C Standard Review Plan as a e

ugg.4g e c.' '..'.., 1* wha *- :.. *.ah.*.'.' ~.f

' a.ve.' s

~..".e

~~ r.s ec.~.'.e.-=. s ~- #

a.

a a.d.-.. as..e s..e a.d ' e.-.a..s.i d.e. ed..i ~. de s,...d..c, a.u"' ea* c.' ar.a.s ( ' '.' e' N.e..' S, s c. ),

we a: ach a : py of this secti:n.

'4e aise attac: 1 ::py cf Section 2.2.3 of the Standard Review Plan c which Secti n 3.5...5 refers and which pr:-

vides general guidance #cr designing nuclear pcwer plants against 1:w pret-abilir/ external events.

"No aspects 0 5ecti:ns 2.2.3 and 3.5.1.6 need :: be e=phasized.

1 0 <. e., a.,.an.4._x.

. c t.w. se,.

4..s

.,..:e 4s

- -~a-4.,.4..f e

2.4 st,

..e

...w w

f.

the probabilitI. hat a hazardens ac ivitf in the vicinirl of the plant would result in radiolegical censequences greater *han 10 "FR Part 1C cuidelines.

':'hus the =ajoritf cf the Appeal Scard was en*irelf correct 4.1 : c _i t * '.".g u* ~ ".a *. w.".a *..' s.s *- ' s s e.'.. " i

..-. c a. a.d. '...g

.4 -

a a

-.c 4 "s

'.e abi.'.'.v.

".a *. a.' ar, e a.4.-.-a.# ~. w ".'.' s.'.% e

~.N..'

.7 bu.

• ~*..e ".e - ". e a-

.".k a.

.se u;.a. 2,m ge a a ad e*~,

.-e.' a.=.d. #aa..-* o.#.'..e

.# a

.d.'.' *./

~-""..=..ex..=...

that nere wculd be a release cf radicac.ive natarials resulting in d=se m-b

,3-f.,.

s.,

r

,s L.

=d 4

• 9

9,/

' a.v a..' s.'.. ex.- a s.-

".c s e s r...d.^. ad.

. '...' O CN. 3.*.-.

.' '. O.

(.. ' '

^ r. 3').

a

,o Secend, Secti:n 2.2.3 expressly recogni:es that because of de

.sw 33.4.,.4..

a.ve...- " a.d e..-,r.s.' ' e. a d.n, v a.'.' ' s ta ' a-..# s.'

d.a ta.=.* a.

w v.#. a.

z.

not available :: permit accurate quantitative calculatir.4ns.

Ac:=rdingly, a censervative calculati n shewing de pr:bability of cc:urrence of.:ctential

-n expcsures in excess of Part '.0C guidelines t= be apprev' tely 10 ' per year is acceptable if, when ::=bined with reasonable.. itative argu=ents ce e a.1 4. 4.

y.

w. a. 4 1 4..f w s s.t.Cwn.: w_e *.we

.,..6.e 33e 4 3 w*

9,

..?

w a.

t

.-sry.

mar. *.a-

",.ava.

a.l.* *. ad v, s.".cw".. "Y. a -.a.s e ' la ' ve 3 * '...* a-

• d." a.'

. 3.' -"..' a *..d a...

• b.a *. ". a y

t.gw.414

/ e.s g. egg.e a.4

.,e.

a 4.< a.

4s.es3

.w,,

• g fe yegy.

5

..a a" 4

.k.n 3

c. gaggg.ar7, n' e y.T.i. a ". *.s *, -"-.' ". d.#*'f

• .e

'.'.#.#.=.- S. *..d.a.' ' e ".w a. a.".

"'".a.

a g

y..

.,, e

.g kgu.t.14

/

3 3.

4.Qa.

g;. A.

.w

.g

..ygy.4 9 4.

ne

. 37. n.e _

a.e.e.n ag a.a.a.at

~

2.33

.s 1 "w O *,*a.' " e s.

.3 s.-...g,na.'.4ta i..a.

ar 3 e..

a w a..- =,. eve.- ".a.' t s s.. - a. s e..~..=d.

~..'." s

.1

• la.1.ia C... s 4 44 ed.6.a.

.a.

a.4.

a.e..

a.

4 < S s v.n

• w.e..u-7 3a,. 4.*. 4..

wcu'd..c *..li. v d.ta' s --".c

-a.s c,

.d.' '. a.

'.d d, vc u.' d

.c ~. ",..'.,ar a~..'

.a.

7..p.

a..

.c.__.as vi,4 w.*cu.' d e.i..".a..-

-as"'..'..s.d.,..'.'.'...'...

4..

a..'aase c' -adi -

a:.:. <

in disabling cre can ene of the redundant a.d spatially separ-ated systems needed for safe shutdewn. Tur cer, sc=e s,.ri%es wculd. be at a

"..'e sa'c.*.'.", w-es

r. ~. s a *..=

.d...... =...fr

",.cw ev e.",

".a. s' er..' ar..s

".a d 1.

assu=ed that any air: raft crash involving de facility necessarily veuld occasien censequences greater than Par. 100, ci ing page of Mr. val'ance's prepared testi=cny.

'"he =ajoritf =isreads the tes"'eny.

Mr. 7all

.ce's stata=ent dat "all hits were censidered '=" ging strikes" referred := ce probahility analysis presented to licensing beards in cennection wi d cen-s _ _c._'..

e.:=. ii a ry l.'.a _' r.s.'...- "...' ar.d "- ',

..c

". a..-avd. sed.--b-ability analyses.: resented by Mr. 7allance in this preceeding. Tureer, Mr. Vallance explained that ce term "da= aging strike

• as sed in ecse proceedings =eant a s rike which causes release of significant radicactiv-4 w

.:.s.e

../..,..r e.,,

.e...a i., 4 u_w4.s

.w.e a.ee s.i.... a...c.en,.e

.e..

4.._

a not a strike resul.ing in releases and deses greater than Part 100 deses.

n's s '..ad

' e.' -w,

.. 7a.'.'an.ca

=s

.'ed .a. ". e :--.." an.'.'.'. I.' ' ' - = c. a.

waa-w

=uch lever nan the pr:bability of a strike and it is Applicant's,0cs:. tion ca:

.~.is

'act:r shculd be taken int ac: unt in any, r:babili y analys:.3.

QGn a, n g:..r>

'J

1/

_./

shallcw angle :s de surface struck and wculd not cause ser:.:us dar. age.

7a.'.' =..c e ' s

..a s - d "../ ~ a s ".as ed.... a..-

. a s.. :.. a.b.'..'.'."i

.v studies prepared by his firm f:r Other AIC/NF.C preceedings and en a :cdel w.k..d.". " ' s.'.'.:1 h. ad dev=.1 eA a.d

- =..'.'.. e d v a..- a

,e..4 d...'

'.~a..'..

.a-

.r dicting air crash pr:babilities.

( '"r. 363-64) he =cdel uses as input data al.--..aa*". sad-'.

. ". - -. a.'.' r..a. Air ".ar d.. e.

a.d..... a.d, a.". w..~. y-

".e a

w a c..d ' e..

.-a w e.'c. s uc.h a.d -.. a.'~. wd "..'.. '.' v e ' '.' e s c.' a. a.i. : c -. r.d. -"e h.is

.'.s.'

ya...=...

..#. a ~.,. 4.'. e.. *. " 4..' ca 3

..s -=..'a dva.

". e a.d. y c.-..-". -

way.".e.i..y

".s ed.

'..". e a c..'.d e...-".,=. s a a- '. a.-.v a..- r. e.' ^y...- v. a..= - y e...- d,

.t o. g c~. s =, a d a.C.e Sm

. a.1.*.4. n a4...,s...e a.e..

w

.y

-...a.

n%.. 4 9

.a.ese s.a...

4.

a a -.a

.w a..

y w,. ar.

.'de....a a.s de.. a..a.s e d.

d".'..,

".e a..i."..- v a. a. : e..' - d... 7 a.' ' r..=

used -he average accident rate f:r all eight years.

(Valir.ce, ' ahle 1)

"...e s e s a ' a- '.a.' data a.-a

_".e.. a r y.'.' a.d.

'.e 2, e r..'.'.' - a.'." a d

. a. '.',

3.K.4 g 4.,.o a,~t

...e Icl. e

,,.e

.a.e a.4.,.,,..,.,

e.,.4.

.w a. a.e a._,. 4

.u, 3

ad

e., - ". e.'. c s..'.~.. c.' ".....' w d '..- a. s e.-. ~. ~.

"..e a.i.,e -

...way s.= ~. ' _". e a,

y plant i= pact area.

(7allance. at 2-10)

.v... va.'.' r. e ' s r s ' -".a.

..e..-."=".'.'.'~.

..' a ' a., e _= _'...'.'.

strike en 'MI was 3 x if'9.cer v. ear.

• he redel used in arriving at -his 3f 7allance prepared tes '- ny at page 3.

As indicated in de dissen...g ceinien (Slie-Cc.. 104-5) A.c.clicants have act perfer=ed a fail.:.re analysis

.e.,.

.w.e

.3e.444.y 4n."e eve.~.~...' a s

'ie."v. a.'a.,e a -

.a.'.,

1..d m

Mr. 7allr.ce was certainly not offered as an exper in this area. Expert evidence is net necessary to enable the Appeal Scard, as de =ajority d:.d,

<e

.4

, a, t.,...

.w w

4,

..a

...e c v. u,s,a.. a. a_4

.,.a.e..

s

.<es

.a

,,c

... ces

. ~...

involving ccesequences in excess of Par. l~0 deses are net syneny=cus.

Sec '.c.1

. '., 4 3 (.' )..d

".e

-cala.s..d o a- '.e at

"~-r.'..as.'.' e..s'.c. 'ca.d-

.a take judicial netice of any ="" ' 21 fact vi.hin de kncwledge Of -he C--"'ssion as an exper. bcdv.

.duc,: as de dissen in, =er.icer veuld have his

....' a ag' e s tajc e >~ ' -=."

'.e.'a

,. " ' '...',- -a s e...s a 3. a a. a_- ". a.. " '-

..' s

.k 'v. a ',. e a*77 ai.-. a.' ~

w.". e...'. 3 - cye..'. '..c,

".w=. =+e...'..'.a a..".

a a.. yn..

(.e..4 -.n..

c.s)

.e c.,3 7

-.e g e3.7 =.Ca.'*'.-."..y"'.'.y..'".'*7

..C *.". a.

".a -

m 4t

.w A

y ey

..- t l.'.'

s.."~~." as w'

'_3.- a-,."..' a. ar.' r..

a.- a. v'. ta.'

c.

.~-. _-as a.d

".a.

".a.

f 11%e11hecd cf =ater radicac.ive releases is reduced because safety systens needed for safe shutfcvn are bcch redundant and spa.ially separa:ed.

n, r-m,9

'i ##

, LJ

9 estinate included in angular :=rrelati:n facter which takes int: account

• ". e."a c. ha. a c.' ' e..ts w'.."..'.i.'.' ~. e ~ '.' a. a-

.' a.. a.d. :.~. c_--"-~~~.-a.'. e r" e.. -

.' v...'.s e

~.c *.e a x.a...d ed. a... =..'.'..e ^." ". e a.d. c.~..~~ ~..way

".a. a. '.~.' ' ~... s w"...de."., a s.'.a.

~".e.a s e. "

• ..w.-.'

a.- a. a t a - r.s.' ' e..'."..' e.*.. :.' a."- s ~.e

=...=.-

line. For purposes of c =parisen, hewever, Mr. 'lallance also =ade a pr:ba-

". '. '. '...~y uta..'.~ n w " * -"..' ~3..c.- a. d ". e a..g'.'.'.*.-..~. a.' a ' ~...

N..

"is "as.'s

'>.e a..'ved 4~. a.-.." ab.'.'.'.f a.'

.T ' re.* vea.

.e ~. r.s.' w' e.- a.d. "..' s..'. s. y- -o " a -

u d

w

- z

.~

u. 4.,.4

.a.*

.,a.4C..

3

.A

,C.... a. 4.. e.

. u (v+a.1., an 0,

1.

7.,. ~.

u.. v a+* )

v a

w m.u..e g e d., cCa a s_a.a...e.

.aa.,,.

.n.

ng.'.s

.g y. k.gb.4.'.4 n

.s g.'.

a La.

a v

yy

7. 3.4 s

ac..,

as

.4.

an e c ar.

.J.,. e s a-y.e g., u.cwe yo..e, g.

.. o a

o "e.- *.#

.- =.#.d.".e -

..eg.

a 7

~

e..a,.'.~...'"... gad..'.~..a.'

.~g~..

'...1, d"...'..".

". a

.3 c a.'. "e.'.' eve s wcu.' ' ~:. ~ ~

v.i d.e a -~- e.-..' e *.= ar.d y e s s.i.'...' f... a.

~

. ear _i..g'" ' e --".ab.i.'.d.f e s i m.=.

.".. e Scard =ay well be correct.

"he fact re=ains, hcwever, that based en present traffi levels Mr. 'Jallance's analysis of de pr:bability of a heavy aircraf t crash n OC 2 (3 x 10-3) shcws a 30 "cid =argin ever the pr:bability accepted t.,f o u.e.Ca a.

( *,0 e ).

.v..,

u.e A

14...

s.. u. 4.. L.a. e.

o o

e ey.

..a a

.as s

4 saes a.

above

.".a na"., c..4.~; was c..=c.

.i.a...c~..g a "._-

.a.,

a _" e.d. ".s.ar. '.'.de',

=argin between.'dr. '7allance's pr:bability value and de pr:bability of an accident with :ensequences in excess Of Part 100.

.Tc:.u 4 n.i a.u.e.ee.

a. su,g es...,at a

..a

._u.e 1s.a4 4

.a.,.aa..

3

.a

~

.a which the Scard has asked be meed and included in de probability analysis u.4.,.,. s c.. age.ue f.e. u.,ay.a. 4.,.

y

g..s. u.f

.,a

,71.,., g n w.a a

..e.ry, 4/

1.4..g.a..

u str.ke en MI 1.

"he =a4critf Of de Acceal Scard was en irelv..ius ified in a

_,,4/.'..e A~rea.' '. car' w' e r.' a.'.. 'ces s" n es.

'.a..=d

4 r.

".e.0':e' a..,

_2'.-

2..

e crash data to de 1966-75 data base used in Mr. Jallance's tes '--ny night

.'..c.-a a s e,-...an.d.'.'. r va.' ".e s.

.?.'.--.,

".e.". car'.'.'..da-

.a..'..c.- a as e. '..

_".a.

a

..a

.d n.a.'

.a e a.f ac.d'e...a-in

".e v'.'._'..r ad.'.'e.'.'s 'ased _r. a.

a.-

isen of the 1956-65 data, resented in de F5AR and de 1968-75 data pre-sented in Mr. 7allance's testi=cny.

(5 lip Cp. 48-50)

'"he ::=parisen, hcw-ever, ever10cks de fact ta: -he 1956-65 data en accident r.a.tes-n:'hded (C:ntinued. ext, age)

w C.1,.24 g

u.a. sL.ssa 4.--.e. a 4

,, X.4. 3 4.

.v r.

e,a.'.1

~. e

. w we*;.

g.

a., - - -.,

-3..

.a v

.... a

.3.3 3.34.7.3.., 4,.,3 4 _,y w.e.<.4..a 4 g e s.=aa-..=.".'= as s" r.. e

".a.

".e

"..a a.'

and sa'e~.I "e :ub

'a-ad '-

- e c ---

~~ =-.n.

a--

a v a-a a.

".e Harrisburg airpcrt.

- e

,e.._, 3 2 3

4.....21. 3 -

In this section we address seriati= Intervencrs' :: plaints as

de.M peal Scard's find'.ngs On the adequacy r.d verkability of e=ergency and evacuatien plans.

..... 7e.e.

ay a.,a... 'f 'onse

".a.i-

-~~-.'a.'...-.6

". a. ~ ~-.".d a

y

---a.

y 3

~ 6,3 *.. b.e 4

.s 3.4..c. g.a. A-*: e a '

C ard s 3C - *y- *.'.*.d. " '. ' '.. ' ' r.#

2 awa a r.'..g as a"..'...- a s

. w 3

r

, ".a. a.va. tc.e.i..ve ' v a.d.'.*. *~ e. '..,

• b.e,-"".i.4.

w

.'.a ".'a-.- ^ ar.d

-,.."cdv.

.s ' ' ' 'ai '. ".

..*..=.'va-.....-."a.-.

...i d e..*..d " r

".e

• ass" '.. a.s"

. whi ^ -"e'/

a refer. Thus Intervencrs have provided no basis upcn which the C

'ssien 4/ (C:nt'd) ae ' d e..

a

.' se :

".e a_',e-

.aav. ( '.n'.'.. -

s'....

) wb.4 ' a

".e

.i o6 a e., a c

a.a

,.i..a_s a.43 ac 42..

.a2.

u 4

,4..,.

.,,, s A,

w 4

4

.e a-c.,

....a includin, accidents en de airport runway.

Applicants' ::unsel specif-4 a.s.i./

s,

.L..w....w e -,

.w 3

.a act.

.e arye.3-a.

.m,ca-s a...

_4 n../ a _...,-

cation to de Sca-d dated Mar:h 31, 1973. The 1968-75 runwa'f accide..ts accounted f:r ne c ly 1/3 cf the accidents in this peri d.

(Vallance, Figure

)

When :: ashes en de airpcrt rtnway for de 1968-75.eriod are excluded, the trend in air cr sh rates a:= between de 1956-65 and 1968-7* rerieds is en ce down path.

Secondly, de 3 card points cut that sc=e of the crashes Occurring dur-ing the 1956-65 peried were at a greater angle to the runway centerline

~".an ~- as.".e s.'..

".e

.' o6 e'- 7 5,e..".d

.=..d,.i.'.i..c.' "de.d ' n

-.e

...,u. data, veuld increase Mr. 7allance's pr:bability calculation :: tne ex.ent it is based en angular correlati ns.

(Slip Cp. 59-61)

Ma themati cal'.y,

de Scard is correct. We believe it reascnable to take into ace unt, hcwever, de ::==cn kncwledge dat de size of ::==ercial air: raft has wee

s. ads.,

.as -.

a 4.,.c.

._w.e.12=0.s.a n-4 we

-.s,

...a a--. 1e.

4.,

4.

appr: aches r.d takecffs are en a lenger path closer :: de runway : enter-

..e..

'a..' s.'a c.. r ' a- :ar ~...ar-f re.- '=.=.... vb.e a, a s.'.. ". ' a-

~..'s e,

• e

' ~ ' '

a_- =_.-. nc a....a d-. r..' v. v...*. vo. ~f a-r3e a- - a."..

d d

L.p s % a e #*f=

s.

.s

.a 3

_=/

Oculd decide :: review de Appeal 3 card.

decisi n.

.. f e... s '

s e.

.d - ~..'.=.d....i -

".a. ~ '.e.. ta..=. ar.d '. a.'..' v '.'

a defense efficials rasrensible for carrv.ing cut evacuation.c'.ans are ie.ncrant a.s

,3...,

s ~. 7.,.e..4 e.

,,24~ a. ' c. a..d

.'.d ' a ' ~... exre s" - a s... '."..a.. s.

We.

>.e a.. d.

..c

• ad' *.*

W'.a *

"_".e a' r-" e a.' 2.c a." A.i a e.'.' ".ad * ~, say.*n "_"..'.' aue.

( o '.' - ".

r r

e e o:- o e.k. e

a.,.

.gg.y..

.. 3; e

.w,3.

w.e u.s3g.

w3

.w

.w

.g a

gg.i ug3.2-ry

%.as ec.4

.A

.6.e 3.4. 3.s.. 4... e

.s,,,.

s..

w

.e

.Xp 7 3 4 %... s, w.; a.w.e s

._w 4.

..a y

aa ac ~.- =...~.. as a ad ' ".' e a ve..." ar.d

'..a

_5 e. =.'..- =. a e -, e.. ~.r

.'.=.~. s -"- a-.

take inte account the conseTeences of an air crash with censeTlences exceed-

.'..g c.ar..a.C d ses.

.'..e s ".c

. = ~.swe..' a-

_5.a. a..a',c 4.v.

_".a.

.A ea.'

a. -

"...= s ' 0..i.d. ed,

~, ".a. a. f. a s en a.'.'.'..' a va. '.s

".e.. as.".

w~.# a h.eavv. a.d... s.".. r.

.~v -

43 g.4 3...w

. toy g.

w ai

. a

.e*4 '-.f.6.a.

4..

w

,.. s ec,.,.e.,. C e s e e g

,. w.e.-, s J.

,..A

..a 3

.i.w.e 1.4. e.,,.s 4.

e. 4 a..y -

2 4.a 4 4 d

,,,C,i. a, ac a2,..

s

.e a. eg.

a

^

-.'e eve....

~'.e.

..u..d

%. _'.e '.:=1.' a s.'. n

• s. ~. 7.'.' a.. ~..

.,,. ~_ - =. -

Taire emergency and evacuation plans t= add ess cenceivahle hut incredible o.ye.. w...s,.g ex.e s..

.r.a ee," e...a. s c.' a. a...' ^ 0

.d d e....

( a.'.', Cy.

w s

..a c

' - 's

.s Fcur d, Intervencrs ::= plain 22: the A peal Scard did ne: recpen

._s.e

.c a.

n._s. 4..s,..cea.d4 g

,..,.e4ve e,r.ae,..

._s.1.

.u 4

ve

.a-4

.c.

2,/... er.e rs ' a.. = ~, t ~..~,

u~y, c.. ". e.d.-.- n e.. ' n

.a

.-ye...'.'ed

.=.sa-a ances to the !.icensing Scard (including apparently assurances of State and local efficials as well as ecse of the Applicants) cannet be believed because *there has been a series Of :harges of lax securi I and a s-ries cf actual instances of la.x security at - C".

We note at de Outse

-hat

.. 7e 2e 3 313e. s. 43 433 e

.s.o

.w.e

.e.4

3..

.4.

4.,.

.w. e.4

..,nes.."..

s..

nissien review.

""he issue was nct raised si der bef re de *i:ensing 3 card or the Appeal Scard and is derefere act pr:perly raised in 2 3

,. e 4 4. n.#..- = vd. aw.

.'a.....a. s s e a. 7a.'.' ev.Au "... '. ~._r

( *.3.ar. - ~..'.' a. '.i"~.' e ar '..'.*....

Units s, 2A, 13 and 23), A A3-4C9, - 5,.C 1291, 1396 (1977). Additi:nally,

'....er,'e..c a ' al.' ec. a d ~..s

.' ' ax. e.".'. r ar e

..c a-"., yc. = >.. a va..a.

. u.'.e d

",cn.'.'. ar./ ~~~.~' r.

'. '_.e eve-arv..- =.

ar. d _". e.- =..'.- = - u.'.'.....

,.. e..f

.:...."e 'as.4. '.. -.=,.. ' ew '. v.

".e aa.'.n.

..r p$. <,a,-eq.b.

e

.s J

Sureau cf ?.*.diclegical Health of the C cnwealth of.ennsylvania,

ha s stated publicly that a.either he nor his staff are en 24-hcur availability".

.n.u.e a.use ce c.a 4.ae 4.a.4

., 4.....

.a.u.e

.4,e, f..n..

a..>.

..i -..

.,.-.s of de alleged statement : Of the witnes; who would testify therete--and in the face of a swcrn affidavit by Mr. Gerusky denying -:at he nade any such statement--the Appeal Scard was clearly :arrect in refusing := recpen

-5.e ec.,,a.

( c,.4 -

r,.,p..,. 5,

.n.

e., )

e a e

. 4 3.9 7.f,.... 7,..r.g. 3 g

'3.4...3 y.

.w e e 4.. e..

• 3. 1 4., -... n

-2a..

o n-,r.?.4 ~...s.

4s a.4-

.,e..4

?

ad.4..a 47...

.?a.ases a..A.

.X;e3..

s

.d.

o e

.a

".c a.ve.t *. "." a. a -.d.' e..... i s a.". t..'

~. '

".e 3.

.d. a - n'.a.d a..

.'.'.w.

.'w.'.. we s

a.

,.e.a.

.et add 1.~.7

" d.."3

~. =

".a A-ea.' =ca. d ' s wn.' d.e.,ze s.' ~ '.. i v." "-

er s".e.

(Slip Cp. 23-30, as :Or ected by Me=crandu::1 dated 'uly 27, 19~3)

Conclusion e,

.w.e eaa ns s.,a

.,a. a.w.cve nyy.3 4..,....

..a:1.4..s.a..w.e ye. 4.4 n

f:r review should be denied.

Respectfully suh=itted,

.e

.J,

3..

,A.,I,

eC..,

e.r..n L..,GC, r.a

.v.

a =..

/5 suda s

%scrie f. Cr gbrit.qe Mted: August 21, 1978

,n o r o r a o

>f e

a u

o a 0

1Oe

Standard Review Plan Section 2.2.3, Part :::

An.-.

.,.ne u s.e.

a n

.y.

..u.e

.4 a.ep. 4 c.i.3 4..e.. e.s a e s.',-

'.-a s.' s a.va....a-

- a. s "... -

ing frem the presence of hacardcus naterials er a c..' v.' *.. des i.n

".e v.4..4.4.f c..'

".e -'a...

.'a-a -. a.

able if the design basis events include each postulated type of accident for which a realistic

,s s.a..

n.o

._u.e

-u,u_a.,.a..r c

-..._ n.......

..s

ctential er

csures in excess Of the 10 C R Part

,e0 3

.a

. c~

. e..a..,. s,_ x.-.a_ds

._u.e

- e 3.a _a.s u. a_ n...........s a y "y.- Xi=a *. a.l */.' O ~ '. a *. */ a. a..

• ".e e

".Cua-

..#.a.' -

d

,, a. 4..e.s.e.-ac.a..s-n 3.,

a.xpC s...a s

.-a.s-.d.*

a n

i n s

.y

.. 3

.s.m."ese a.va....a a.- a a-e tah.'a.

2.'

..".a.'f a.-a.

s.<s.en.,.s..u.

e.u.-ds.,se...

a.~

.,.,2_..a n n.

-. a. e.-

a s

accident radiological ex;csures (e. g., SRP 15. 6. 5) eer.1.,ee

.e o u. e _4.,.4 4.., 3..,., e. asa.4,.4 2

..n.4se

-a

~.

..u e.n. a.,.,a., es.-.u. y.-. a

.s..a../

n. o

n. e. -- --, - n.

a a -

of the types of pctential hacards generally cen-s.i ' e.-e.d. '. " ' a- -a.vd. a.w :-la..,

'a ".d., e..*. -"- a-. 'e used as tc the acceptability of the everall risk presented by an event.

., 7~ew c~e 4

.u 3

- e ~ w -. ab ' ' i./ eve. -a- --e~-~.-

"d

~~

~

r--

s.a.e r a. i n n,. u.e -,..u au.:.,.a. 7.:.c- -.ence

,..a

. u. e a

e.

initiating events leading to pctential ccnsequences in excess of 10 C 2 Part 100 expcsure qu' da'i as shculd be es-'~'ted tsing assu=ptiens that are as a g..s.. i n.

gg

..,c.a ay.,e.

a ga.s. s.,...

.ec.a e

a..

.a a

n..d p u.e,.-,s..m.uLu.4

.a r

a_ va.. -,.. a..o

- n

.a.a a..-.,

m

.a

.. o valid statistical data are eften net available :0 cer=1t accurate c_uantitative calcula:1:n of c_reba-h.i.'.'..' a s. A c.a.,. d '..~y.' v_. a....se.va

.'va_.a.'."..'.'...n.

shewinc that the er bability Of Occurrence of Octen-tial erecsures in exce s s o f en_e 10 ~3'R P ar. 100 Ouidelines is accrexi=ately 1J-S cer year is accect-able if. when combined with reascnable cualitative aret=ents, the realistic Orchability can be s.cw.

'.e

'.w a..*.

( a-

.".as. a-

-" e y.'.' ed )

a

-r

.*.4~

Ihf'Q L,e < i o

S e r.

4... 3..c..i. o r 3.,

,. - e s t.,... u 4..

4.1

<w 1

.s..e

-.'.*. i s nsd.d. e. a.d.

a d e ".a

=..' v_d. a s.'.. a. A.

a c_ a.'.. s *.=.'.-.. a 3 --. a..a. d.s '.. '

..".4

-_ - " al:.'.'.i.v_

h Os a.4. - a.s.. ac. a..

-.. s u.,. s n,

.e

, a _s -.. c 4_.

...a cal consecuences creater ~han 10 CTR Part 100 excesure cuidelines is ' e s s

.2".an at: cut 10-7 er year (see Standard Review Plan 2.2.3).

2.

'"he pr:ba.:ili:/ is generally censidered ac-cec. tab.' e '.-v..i s e. ia.'t

.i.#

'.e '. a v a..'..'.a.'.-

r.

a.e.. a-.4./.4 ] ea 6.e s.4..

. a.1 1 se.? 4. h.e s

a

c..'..=..' 1.',e..

i n=e...'.r..*..*..'..'.=.ec."..'.'....

Cuide 1.70 (Ref. 2) f:: analysis of hazar:is due to ::= ercial, experi= ental, and gene n'.

aviatien aircraft. Fer tilitarf airspace, a.4.4 - a.4s.,a..Ce 4 44.le 9.s

.a 3. 6. e

~.

. e a.....i ade 3,:a..a

. '.. -.'.w ' a. va..' - a.d. i..~;

a

Cutes except

• hose assCCiated wi*h usage

, este.-

"=n

.1*C0

..i,."..s e.- v.a.a.-..- a dv-ities (such as prac. ice bcr.bing) where an unusual s ress situati:n exists.

3.

4'.4..a.e.. a.

.42e.m.. -

.s._4 w.. u., a 3.ad.c ad4..

w

.a Icgical c nsequences in emeess of the expcsure guidelines of :.0 CTR Par. 100 with a pr:ba-k1.14 f wa wC

~..e..e 3 ea..

~u.a au.CL...

.sm. 1.

ye.,. 7 3 s.w.Cu.T a.u.e

- ns.e.a e.v. A.

4

.u.e es.em..

.4 a

3 the plant.

4.

.w.e eva.,,a.4.cn

,4..

wa,

aa-.s 4 3., we a.ne n

an individual case basis. 0:ncrete strue:ures are generally assu=ed to vi-hstand fire, but

.~ e r. 4 ~.. nus. 'e r.vid.ed.o...*ava-- "-a, e

smcke, or fl=~'ble =ixt".res fr:m entering safety-related ventilati:n i.,akes, such as

.w.C se

.<w,,r.wm.e -

n...,1

..C

, a.as..Cu.s.4 s.w....,..

w

.y Awwn o.m..,.4

-e..*., a!"d *.e

'*se.'

3e..e.a*...s.

. r d.

(e=phasis sur.clied) y e ) ~- Of *i i.> <. i e

L,,.II e,

d-. A e,-. _ a u F u,.,..s.,..s

• .r---4 n.e. m s..Rv. e...v.u. s-.-.*

_r_e,-n e

.u.._...

J--

.s-.--,~..,y c _ f c._ m.- _ T n_

....a.e.v,........

c.

e

)

.T"ACPCI.!*.A:I EOISC:I COMPA Tf, et al.

)

Occket ::o. 50-320

)

('Three.'4ile Island :Iuclear

)

Generating Statica, Unit 2)

)

C. n-. -

u-, e. c.e

.e en,r-.

! herahy cer.ify -hat a.r.:e and :Orrect :Opy of "Appli: ants' Reply :: Interteners' Petitica f:: Review of AIA3-486," dated Augus: 21,

1978,

'..as been served upcn each of the. ersens listed en the attached Service "ist by depcsit in.he Uni:ad States nail, pestage repaid, his 21st day Of Augus, 1973.

d

!NA/

. /WA' i/

'^V G4crgb ?.' X:wcr dge

/

Cated: August 21, 1973

.,,_ n-L,* ' 0 A

en

a

,. e.. A Q.A.

J v.,

./.~..%

Y s.**m. y e

..r.e,. a. e. e y g nyy.--.

g

.x.

......JJ..

. 6 %. '

aw.A

.erT. e.f}?

"at.?T

. v*w** ?AA

? ? e *** *.%e. T..*./

.*/.y*.a-*.*..'

.6

-Jva

.e

• m..k.e 2.,..a n.e.

)

.v.e e.CPeL.-..sI..., w.! - v.P n...,

u.. -.

.., e a.,.

.c ck.

,.c.

.u..,n

..a

)

("'hree Mile Island Nuclear

)

Generating Station, Unit 2)

)

b..,lk-.. -.

a

_a Jcseph M. Hendrie, C :=iissi ner Mr. Gus sve A. *inenberger U.S. Nuclear Regulat:rf C :=ission At==ic Safety 5 *icensing Scard Was." '..g~..~ n o '..

"a.a.

'Ius.' a. a. aa g ' 1...r ".

'. a a.d -.

a..

Washingt:n, D.C.

20535 Walter Kennedy, Cc==issioner

..u c.,,. a ser,.., a.., -'

U.. a.

. f._.. 4, n ee

.e...es a.

.e.a.e,

....es ss Washingt:n, ::.C.

20555 Fisheries Research Ins '- ~=,

WH-1.-

,, 4./,..,. 4 f, e.. was..4 g.

w.

a..

.p.-.

e4.,.4.,.ag.,,

e ~~ ~ 's~.'.-.e.-

.. e a ~.~ ' e, WA

• 8.' *

• s U.S. Nuclear Regulat:ry C==issi:n Washingt:n, D.C.

20555 Henr*r J. McGurre., Is c..

Cf fice of the Executive *.egal Peter A. 3 adf:rd, C -':11ssioner irect:r U.S. :Tuclear Regulat:ry "- 'ssion 0.3. Nuclear Regulater/ C-

'ssi:n Washingt:n, D.C.

20555 Washington, D.C.

20555 Jchn T. Ahearne, C==issioner Karin W.

Car ar, Esq.

C.3. Nuclear ?.egulatcry C==.:.ssi:n Assistant Att:rney General was.w 4 D.w.

.n.c.e.

C.,.,.4. e,..,.. r. _<,. -._. e.

w

epartment of Inv*.ren= ental Rescur:es Alan S. Rosenthal, Esq., Chairman 709 Health and 'ielfare Sullding At==ic Saferf & *icensing Appeal Harrishurg, PA 17120 Scard U.S. Nuclear Regulatory C-

'ssien At==i Safety & *icensing Appeal Scard.

.das h.4...n, e.,. a.

C c.=.=

e e.3

.a.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatery C:==issi:n Jer==e I. Sharf=an, Esq., Me=ber Washingt:n, D.C.

20555 At==ic Safety & *icensing Appeal Scard Occketing and Serrice Sec icn U.S. Nuclear Regulaterf C:==ission Office of the Secretarf Was'd..g~~n,

".C.

.C.*..*.*

C.S. Nu.'ea..Ren".'a.

s"..-

'aa.'-..

s 3

.da s.u 4 g..,.,.e...

- r.c.:. :

Cr. W. Reed Jchnsen, Me=her At =ic 3afety & *icensing Appeal At==ic Safety & *icensing 3 card Panel Scard U.S. Nuclear Regulater/ C--'ssien U.S. Nuclear Regulat:rf C

'ssten Washingt n, D.C.

20555

--aas.w 4..

.,.s..

a r.c..:.=

r.a.sar.d

.?. s.

At==i: Safet*] ; *.i:ensing Scar'.

U.S. Nuclear Rec.ulat:rt C ission a

..n,

s.w.

.- e.c. =.

d_.,,.3._ e q

..a s.w a.

.-.