ML19220A358

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Response to 780317 Memo.Does Not Feel Any Plant Operating Limitations Would Be Appropriate,Pending Submittal of Addl Info or Completion of Generic Task.Forwards Draft SER Suppl
ML19220A358
Person / Time
Site: Crane 
Issue date: 03/21/1978
From: Vassallo D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Tedesco R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7904170464
Download: ML19220A358 (4)


Text

ri s trib uti;n.//en'.i c s a re:

C s

a rite L.o 6

,,,n 6..a n,, 1...eUs3

_.. r.

,, P1ie P. Service

.;...,o

o
q. 370

...w C".' Dri FO't:

R. L. Terf:sco, f. :ist:nt Di. ::ctor Icr Pl. nt Sy:trs Division of Systr's Safety

...t-.c',A '.',L.-.. = ., - i.u.

?

.... e. 4.. L.., A...~...t.....as..

.,,,.,, l T. 3,

-- a.s.

D. et.

u n.

u n :,,1,s. :,. 3 0 ;. p..

a.

...~..,6

.6 s.,

.~

..o,-.w c.,e...,.,.-.....

. -( -.t g, eg... -,

L.

.s a

mm.s

...w_

.A s

.s.

e

--p

'. iL3 3

..P..,....v,.,... OT....S l 7
v. o t.3

,s.a

,..a,

t. "1

.....,. 3.:

t~n s

..s.

u....

.4 ea,

u.

.. g..':.s.,3 i

..,.,.....w..

.,. j g.. ; ',.,.c... : 3

.3

. us... >....,...,..g

. - 3.,.. u,s.s 6 r,.,

.... +

.. I

., s.

.../. a l _,.,. n.......J al m, a, e,..S 15,

-y o,.,.,,,,so p

i.e.

c v., -. m.._ ;.._.. u. 3,, e...u..,...

.:.p

,l 04-

... ;., al

,,p o

- ?.

.1

, p,.....,,a,,

  • 7J i.., u..,.

t

..i3

... s a

i.;T ' cat:ca ca this st bject ce cc-plation of tha ;E.' ric t.sk.

a..ill ' c::scit to tha lica 22 by letter a ra,rs t Tor.lii tM.;21

.~),.,,,,

-..1. g j ] ]

M.. -. f...g -..., ;...,2

.u sa. t.a

.n.,,,,. 3 1., 3 j >.

t r,.

t.-

s 2,..

5...... ] g a p s..,..

.r. 3... y u, 3 ] s

., c,,

Ls

..s-..

.., e,..f,.... s

.r.d " ' c " R l'.+ '. cS ' d to,"~. r "s..r 'n 17, 1.r. 3 - -. -.., '.o

. ~

.. s.. 'i.. s 'J,

.,. *1.. a c...-.

a.'..'- -a '..-. i. l' '.9 r' f t'. '

  • a Pw' 1'w 'a m..

.'.1. ". v _- a' s

o.

ar.d ha'ta ravic:cd it briefly with &s Lainas, Jho cancurr2d.

'.,'a t ra

. CC:2di,i] Uitil a licL.sa a;'.03'lr.2nt b200<l CD t.50 Oncl0Ced POV!SiO.%

Cr?fr:I st..:-1 ' y

3. 3.,ZS2. 0 r

r.). o.

?..- s,. ] 1. 0,,

e. r.

. s u.

~ 2...,. u. r

... u... ~

s a

e..,r L4..,4

. r t,,. ~..

.,,.a

.,i. c s., a

,a_- i.- s.:c +e._.._a_s_....,w

~ -

3..

i u

cc:

S. A. Varga D. B. hssallo

?.. J. atts on

c.. S.,. v.,.,d n

G. Lainas

11. Silver J. S'lapaker J. Glynn P. 'aranci: sly

-. R. DeYou.ng

~-

-, 1

'coclosure: 'fEStated DF'1:L'.1R

.p' D P : L'.N._A......

CP...M. :.L:.MD

.... _\\.\\._

c,,ic t

S A.d. d.. a 0.3..'.'a s s a l.l_o...... _

HSilveM,f,N,

,u,o,>

03/ M 78 0_3/.17//73 03/

'_ /78

)_

'.,3--....

= m,.

's ?.C i C'O! 313 ( 9.' 5)

'.-"Of C2 43

      • a s. 2:s t a w r a r r ra rm a c e s a r-. 5. : s - c r u.4 nte)~ n.'l O 41 4... s a 7
  • ,,.I'/; :lw

@~

E r ir.t r r.tain.t;t 5,.: ' s

' tne Safety "_v3:.atiu ;. ;rt of tne

u
;

~ S ee **ile ~slar Unit 2 I';ket Nos. 50-320 Environmental Oualification for Main Steam Line Break Analysis 6.2.1 "nalyses of po:t > lated rain steam line break (MSLS) accidents ed by the staf' and several applicants have predicted contairu m: ;:

te.aperatures, on the order of 000 F, than higher cal;ul?,i cc c ta i r.ren t

e e.,

roi.

ital cualificatico testing c~ safety relate:

..ere usea ir T,s a result, there is : generic c:m:cen regaraing tne ecuipment.

tne accident capability of safety related equip ent to remain operable in line areak inside envi ronm.ent

'..h :n uculd resui t f rom a main staa i

Ho.e.er, it has been recognized Dy tne staff and noted ccntainment.

i in 7,JREG-0153 th?t the nethods of analyses approved today conta n Specifically, the staff has re uired analyses significant c:"sarcatisms.

based on an instintincous double ended steam line rupture with tne tions assumptions of dry steam blewdown and using ccnservative assump i

for minimizing c;ntainment heat transfer coefficients with a conse treatment of the therrodynamics of condensate behavior.

The applicant has crcviced an analysis for a main steam line bre d in a peak accident postulated to occur inside containment which resulte For this analysis, the are temperature of c36 F.

calculated atm?',

dl applicant has used a steam generator mais and energy release ccrresponding to dry steam bicwdown for an instantaneous d the applicant has assumed that all of the liquid In addition, rupture.

forred cn the heat sinks due to condensation is transferred d t

the sump without any revapariz3 tion to the containment envircnne Orr OfiO

These conse cati.n

-, ations tend t o raxinn ze *.ne conta ir..,ent a tmos phere tr-rir+ 3 tur e calcul a ted,

r ~ monent br:a t ra ns'er calculations nerforred b:. t'e spa'. icant.ere

, sed tc justif the Wquacy of environmental g.alification te: ceratures a ngina fro-y ro at31y 290'F to c50'F.

The resul ts of "ese analyses indicate that the cerponent thermal resconse will be less than the peak t<nperature to '..hich the ecuipment has been enviror.nentally qualified.

have per#oered a best est?, ate evaluation of the containrent response

'n to an "SLB m ;ideat for this plant using a odel developed for this Our analysis included the r. ass ar.d enercy release calculated rurpose.

by the apolicart and partial recanorization of the cor.;ensate ^.rned on the contai co' heat sinks.

The use of these input data resulted in a calcula%d ceak contair. ment atmaschere tc cerature of about 4/0 F, exceedina 290*F for approxinately 80 seconds.

In addition,.ve have estirated a 25~F or " ore temnerature reduction fecm that calculated in the containr ent reaien t.nere the break is located for those ecuipment locations serarated by walls, floors, and large dictanc-- (i.e.,

diametrically err,osed locaticos).

e have aise perforred therral analyses for scme typical car.pcr.ents needed to mitiaate the consequences of a i'5LB accident. Our results the oaat environmental qualification tenceratures are very near

,,_ r r s (in

-~

-1 iovied by '

v'ic nt for :: e enui: ent.

':e have concluded tr.at the applica'.t'n

_Mivsis and the environmental cuali'ication terforned, confirm-1 E-

. v r.n aralyses. ; rtvides ecasonable a ssar ince that

" e cc: c: r.4

-'t

,,in the

  • 'r';ir-d functional ca.m bility in the ich t 3 n r. r a '.c n -'-' air -2nvi r'.rmn t a ss c i it'd, i tn a
t tuli t-i

'? inside -

m.t at:d are iccc.::ble.

Ihe use Of Cr~

rt thor"3l 3ndlyset and ssrciated Ec3t transfer coefficientr.

' > criite contain :nt inalytical odelinc, and a.ceptable i r>'Nds o' accident nnvircr ental simlaticn for equip rent al i fici t,.n w e>

d e csr.eric revin.v by 'So staff.

'lc e,5ect tha t

thin apprn<'

4 t rJ.,

<"e yrir our review of these its's will be t - pl ete, t ec ul ' : ca in the develo;. rent and irplcrentation of a consistent r,et cf e.n/irennental cualifica icn re::uirements for all plants.

If 'hese recuirements necessitate additional review of the tteam line becn eneirecrental qualificaticns for this plant, we will consider such revice-a t tha t ti a.

In the interim, te ~rn cc.rpletely docurent the analysis cerforced, we till rer;uire affitional infomation frcn the applicant recarding the

":ectrur. of bre1H analyzed to obtain ehe ';cest case and th e therr.al analysis rodels and awrotions.

This infcrration is not expected to

fect the iesults of 'he 2. plicarit's cr 31ysis or eur evaluaticn

._ n r : 0 j

e.o ' d

..