ML19210E783

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards QA Program Insp Rept 99900279/79-01 on 790904-07 & Notice of Deviation
ML19210E783
Person / Time
Issue date: 10/31/1979
From: Potapovs U
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Long W
GOULD, INC.
Shared Package
ML19210E776 List:
References
REF-QA-99900279 NUDOCS 7912120281
Download: ML19210E783 (2)


Text

UNITED STATES

  • ('

p#ma arco,%

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

.~

Os

  1. ,^

REGloN IV

$ l Jg i o 611 RYAN PLAZA oRIVE. SUITE 1000 g g\\. 4 / g j ARUNGToN, TEXAS 76012 h

/ ** /

310CT 1979 Docket No.

99900279/79-01 Gould, Inc.

Distribution & Controls Division ATIN: Mr. W. Long Operations Manager 2002 Bethel Road Finksburg, Maryland 21048 Gentlemen:

This refers to the QA Program inspection conducted by Mr. J. R. Agee of this office on September 4-7, 1979, of your facility at Finksburg, Maryland, associ-ated with the manufacture of electrical control products and to the discussions of our findings with you and members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

This inspection was cadc. to confirm that, in the areas inspected, your QA Program is being effectively implemented. The inspection effort is not designed to assure that unique quality requirements imposed by a customer are being implemented; nor to assure that a specific product, component or service provided by you to your customers, is of acceptable quality. As you know, the NRC requires each of its licensees to assume full responsibility for the quality of specific products, components or services procured from others.

You should therefore not conclude that the NRC's inspection exempts you from inspectioas by an NRC. licensee or his agents nor from taking effective cor-rective action in response to their findings.

Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.

During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA Program failed to meet certain KRC requirements. The specific findings and references to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter.

Please provide us within thirty (30) days of your receipt of this report a written statement containing, (1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items, (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence, and (3) the date your corrective actions and preventive measures were or will be completed.

1534 a4 8912120c)$1

Could, Inc.

2 In accordance with Section 2.790 of the Co=aission's 9 Rules of Practice,"

Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter with enclosure. and your reply, together with the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the Commission's Public Document Room. If this report contains any infor=ation that you believe to be proprietary, it is necessary that you make

~'

a written application within thirty (30) days to this office to withhold such information from public disclosure. Any such application must include a full statement of the reasons on the basis of which it is claimed that the informa-tion is proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary information identified in the application is contained in a separate part of the document.

If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified period, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we vill be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerelv, S) 32.454' Uldis otapovs, Chief Vendor Inspection Branch

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Deviation 2.

Inspection Report No.

99900279/79-01 1534 2$5