ML19210E414

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Repts 50-440/79-07 & 50-441/79-07 on 790910-12. Noncompliance Noted:Failure to Verify Hold Points During Installation of Reactor Vessel
ML19210E414
Person / Time
Site: Perry  FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/02/1979
From: Danielson D, Erb C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML19210E409 List:
References
50-440-79-07, 50-440-79-7, 50-441-79-07, 50-441-79-7, NUDOCS 7912050011
Download: ML19210E414 (5)


See also: IR 05000440/1979007

Text

,

.

.

U.S. NUCIIAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEME.NT

REGION III

Report No. 50-440/79-07; 50-441/79-07

Docket No. 50-440; 50-441

Licecse No. CPPR-148; CPPR-149

Licensee: Cleveland Electric Illuminating

Company

P. O. Box 5000

Cleveland, OH 44101

Facility Name: Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2

Inspection At: Perry Site, Perry, Ohio

Inspection Conducted: September 10-12, 1979

/0[1!T9

Inspector:

C.

r

gw

'

'

Approved By:

D. H. Danielson, Chief

/0

7i

'

'

'

Engineering Support Section 2

.

Inspection Summary

Inspection on September 10-12, 1979 (Report No. 50-440/79-0'7; 50-441/79-07)

Areas Inspected: Observation of work for recirculation piping and reactor

vessel inlet nozzle modifications; procedure review for recirculation inlet

-

nozzle modification and for setting the reactor vessel; storage of safety

related equipment; previously identified inspection findings. The inspec-

tion involved a total of 24 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC inspector.

Results: Of the four areas inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance

were identified in three areas; one apparent item of noncompliance was

identified in one area (infraction - failure to verify hold points during

installation of the reactor vessel - Paragraph 5).

.

-

.

.

t

s

00

1912o50

1500

194

DETAILS

'

Persans Contacted

Clevelard Electric Illuminating Company (CEI)

  • W. J. Kacer, General Supervising Engineer
  • L.

E. Hartline, Supervisor

  • P. A. Fitzpatrick, Construction Manager
  • R. L. Farrell, Suparvisor, Procedures and Records
  • A. Kaplan, Supervisor Construction Section
  • R. L. Vondrasek, Supervisor
  • P.

L. Gibson, Supervisor

  • D. F. Cooper, Supervisor
  • T. J. Arney, Manager QA Program
  • B. C. Barkley, Nuclear Design

J. Mehaffey, Lead Mechanical Engineer

A. Bolesic, Warehouse Receiving

Pullman Pipe and Supports Company (Pullman)

J. Miller, Manager QA

Newport News Industrial Corporation (NNIC)

R. T. Durand, Manager NSSS

D. Dervay, Engineer NSSS

G. Hyde, Quality Assurance NSSS

  • Denotes those attending the exit interview.

Functional or Program Araas Inspected

1.

Modification and Rework of Recirculation Piping and Reactor

Vessel - Units 1 and 2

The recirculation piping (24", 22", 18", 12" diarneter) has been

returned to Pullman for machining, deposition of weld metal and

solution treatment to improve service life. The rework of the inlet

nozzles (N2) and thermal sleeves will begin the latter part of

October 1979. General Electric I. & S. E. have the contract for

this work. The quenchers for the suppression pools of both plants

have been received on site. The 38 quenchers are stainless steel

and were fabrtcated by Chicar;o Bridge and Iron -Nuclear (CBIN).

d.

Review of Licensee Audit

.

During August and September, 1979 1.ta licensee undertook an. extensive

-

audit of Newport News Industrial Corporation QA program by etting

1506

195

-2-

up several audit teams, who investigated the operation and implemen-

tation of their QA program. This audit confirmed the findings outlined

in RIII inspection Reports No. 50-440/79-03 and No. 50-441/79-03

Tne

auditors found documentation uisting in field welds for the transfer

pool, weld history records missir.g in the biological shield welds, and

completion of base metal repairs without documentation of this fact in

the biological shield.

Numerous other exacples of lack of procedure or failure to follow

existing procedures were found. The licensee issued a Stop Work

Order on all NNIC work, except one small area of work where brackets

were being welded to the biological shield to accomodate structural

floor beams at the 630 foot level.

.

This action restricts the contractor to a few welders and their

supe rvision. The activity will be monitored to establish satis-

factory performance in the NNIC QA program before additional work

will be released. At tha time the "Stop Work" was issued, training

and indoctrination classes were initiated for the foremen, general

foreman, and superintendent so that supervision would be more knowl-

edgeable of their job and Q A requirements.

Corrective action has been started on many items, but is not complete.

Certain welds have been marked for removal and replacement.

In other

areas, personnel have been terminated or transferred. The proposed

corrective actions appear to be acceptable and should result in satis-

factory QA implementation and documentation. Licensee actions and

con.ractor performance will be examined closely during future routine

inspections.

No items of noncompliance or deviations wsre identified.

3.

Storage of Safety Related Equipment - Units 1 and 2

The warehouses for inside storage are very crowded and this necessitates

undesirable handling for withdrawal of equipment. The licensee has

secured two additional warehouses in Fairport Harbor which are heated

and should relieve this problem.

The inspector recommended that representative pieces of equipment

s;ored outside be unwrapped and examined for condition. Scme equipment

has been outside since 1976 and the effectiveness of the canvas and

plastic wrap should be evaluated. This is an unresolved item, until

some inspectiona of outside stored equipment have been completed.

(440/79-07-01; 441/79-07-01)

.i

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

.

-

.

.

-3-

1500 i96

i

4.

Procedures for Recirculation Inlet Nozzle Safe End (N2)

Modification - Units 1 ard 2

The inspector reviewed the following procedures from General Electric

I. & S. E. that were submitted to the licensee for review and approval:

RM3-IP-0010, Revision 0

Recire Inlet Thermal Sleeve Extension

and Safe End Reinstallation Procedure

WPS 8.2.3.5, Revision 3

Detailed Weld Procedure Specification -

Thermal Sleeve

WQ 8.2.3.1, Revssion 2

Welding Performance Qualification -

Thermal Sleeve

WPS 43.2.4.5, Revision 3

Detailed Weld Procedure Specification -

Safe End

WQ 43.2.4.1, Revision 1

Weld Performance Qualification -

Safe End

WPS 8.2.4.2R, Revision 1

Detailed Weld Procedure Specification -

Repair Stainless Steel

WPS 43.2.4.2R, Revision 3

Detailed Weld Procedure Specification -

Repair Inconel

RM3-NPT10-S76

Penetrant Examination Procedure

A Dimetrics Automatic Tungsten Inert Gas Welder will be used to make

the two internal welds of the thermal sleeve to the nozzle and to the

safe end. This welder will also be used to make the external weld of

the reactor vessel nozzle to the safe end. A detailed procedure for

the automatic equipment settings is available. The work will conform

to ASME Section XI and Section III 1974 Edition, Summer 1975 Addenda.

.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in this

area.

5.

Setting Procedure for the Reactor Vessel - Unit 2

The inspector reviewed procedure 1240-F-I005-2, Revision 3, which

contained tha sequence of operations for setting the vessel.

Many

blank spaces were evident in the first column where the production

people should sign; the second column also had many blank spaces

where NNIC QA/QC should sign.

Paragraph 10.1300 of the NNIC QA

,j

Manual states that, "QA will maintain the original of all manufacturing

installation and inspection sheets (MII'S), which shall be available

to QC inspectors and the ANI. Verification of each step will be

.

.

15J00

197

-4-

,

performed by QA."

This is an item of noncompliance identified in

Appendix A.

(441/79-07-02)

Unresolved Item

Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in

order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, items of noncompliance

or deviations. An unresolved item disclosed during the inspection is

identified in paragraph 3.

Exit Interview

The inspector met with site representatives (denoted in Persons Contacted

paragraph) at the conclusion of the inspection on September 12, 1979.

The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection. The

licensee acknowledged the findings.

I

f

.

-

.

5

b

-5-

1500

198