ML19210D286
| ML19210D286 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 11/08/1979 |
| From: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Crouse R TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7911260234 | |
| Download: ML19210D286 (1) | |
Text
Y
[ve n a,#'o u
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3,,
o f'
E REGION 111
- h"^r /
799 ROOS 2VELT ROAD o,
g e
GLEN ELLYN. ILLINOIS 60137 t, u, <
aa Docket No. 50-346 Toledo Edison Company ATTN:
Mr. Richard P. Crouse Vice President Energy Supply Edison Plaza 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, OH 43652 Gentlemen:
Enclosed is IE Bulletin No. 79-02, Revision No. 2 which requires action by you with regard to your power reactor facility with an operating license or a construction permit.
Should you have any questions regarding this Bulletin Revision or the actions required by you, please contact this office.
Sincerely, b
wQ lbgf *u J James G. Keppler Director
Enclosure:
IE Bulletin No. 79-02, Revision No. 2 cc w/ enc 1:
Mr. T. Murray, Station Superintendent Central Files Director, NRR/DPM Director, NRR/ DOR PDR Local PDR NSIC TIC Harold W. Kohn, Power Siting Commission Helen W. Evans, Statt of Ohio 1
435
- 3V E
7911260 b
UNITED STATES SSINS No.:
6820 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Accession No.:
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT 7908220136 WASHINGTON, D.C.
20555 November 8, 1979 IE Bulletin No. 79-02 (Revision 2)
PIPE SUPPORT BASE PLATE DESIGNS USING CONCRETE EXPANSION ANCHOR BOLTS Description of Circumstances:
Inspection experiences and the review of licensee response have identified several R2 areas where the Bulletin intent has not been adequately addressed by licensees.
R2 Revision No. 2 of the Bulletin is intended to clarify the intent of the Bulletin R2 and establish the NRC positions on minimum factors of safety, anchor bolt preload, R2 and the expected date of completion for certain Bulletin actions.
R2 Since the issuance of IE Bulletin No. 79-02 on March 8, 1979, IE inspection R1 experience and many inquiries from licensees indicate that additional informa-R1 tion and clarification is needed.
This revision is intended to serve that R1 purpose.
None of the requirements of the original Bulletin have been deleted, R1 and the due date for completion of the requested actions (July 6, 1979) has R1 not been changed.
The following text supersedes the text of Bulletin No. 79-02.
R1 Changes from the original text are identified by R1, R2 in the margin. The purpose R1 of this revision is to identify acceptable ways of satisfying the Bulletin R1 requirements.
R1 While performing inservice inspections during a March-April 1978 refueling outage at Millstone Unit 1, structural failures of piping supports for safety equipment were observed by the licensee.
Subsequent licensee inspections of undamaged supports showed a large percentage of the concrete anchor bolts were not tightened properly.
Deficiency reports, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55(e), filed by Long Island
'ighting Company on Shoreham Unit 1, indicate that design of base plates using rigid plate assumptions has resulted in underestimation of loads on some anchor bolts.
Initial investigation indicated that nearly fifty percent of the base plates could not be assumed to behave as rigid plates.
In addition, licensee inspection of anchor bolt installations at Shorehtn has shown over fifty percent of the bolt installations to be deficient.
Vendor Inspection Audits by NRC at Architect Engineering firms have shown a wide range of design practices and installation procedures which have been employed for the use of concrete expansion anchors.
The current trends in the inaustry are toward more rigorous controls and verification of the installation of the bolts.
The data available on dynamic testing fatigue failures can occur at loads su DUPLICATE DOCUMENT El and R2 - Identifies those additions Entire document previously entered into system under:
ANO 1N1 336 no. or pages:
Y