ML19210A729
| ML19210A729 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Three Mile Island  |
| Issue date: | 06/13/1975 |
| From: | Arnold R METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19210A724 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910310544 | |
| Download: ML19210A729 (11) | |
Text
METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AND PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY IHREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 1 Operating License No. DPR-50 Docket No. 50-289 Technical Specification Change Request No. 5, Amendment 2 This Technical Specification Change Request is submitted in support of Licensee's request to change Appendix A to Operating License No. DPR-50 for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 1. As a part of this request, proposed replacement pages for Appendix A are also included.
METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY By E Vice P(esident-Generation Sworn and subscribed to me this [3 day of , 1975 v
/ Notary P blic RICHARD 1. RUTH Mctarf Nic, t.Nh:en; erg Twp., Eerks Co.
t/y Cc:::m.ss:ca Expires Septem:er 23.1973 1493 302 4onn r,u m>
7910810 S f
% -w--
/
j Hn7M i a- .~ /
mu a maam j METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY 2 s cuw eg cc,em %,c m, y; 7 yoym .
POST OFFICE BOX 542 READING, PENNSYLVANI A 19603 TELEPHONE 215 - 929-3601 June 13, 1975 GQL 11h5 Mr. Charles P. Hoy, Chairman Board of County Commissioners of Dauphin County P.O. Box 1295 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Dear Mr. Ho; .
Enclosed please find one ccpy of Technical Specification Change Request No. 5, Amendment 2, to Appendix A of the Operating License for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 1.
This request was filed with the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on June 13, 1975.
Very truly yours,
/s/ R. C. Arnold R. C. Arnold Vice President RCA:JFV:tas File: 20.1.1 / 7.7.4.3.3.1 1493 303
-+tt0 3 b 6 ~
WHMM
^
' =t I h K*e l
, - -m
, METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY nss:cunv o av.cnmguc ununu c=:wcoa n/. ,
POST OFFICE BOX 542 READING, PtiNNSYLVANI A 19603 TELEPHONE 215 - 929-3601 June 13, 1975 GQL llhh Mr. Weldon B. Arehart, Chairman Board of Supervisors of Londonderry Township R.D. #1 Geyers Church Road Middletown, Pa. 17057
Dear Mr. Arehart:
Enclosed please find one copy of Technical Specification Change Request No. 5, Amendment 2, to Appendix A of the Operating License for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 1.
This request was filed with the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on June 13, 1975.
Very truly yours,
/s/ R. C. Arnold R. C. Arnold Vice President RCA:JFV:tas File: 20.1.1 / 7.7.4.3.3.1 1493 304 4$57
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF DOCKET NO. 50-289 OPERATING LICENSF NO. DPR-50 METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY This is to certify that a copy of Technical Specification Change Request No. 5, Amendment 2 to Appendix A fo the Operating License for Ihree Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 1, dated Jt.ne 13, 1975, and filed with the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on June 13, 1975, has this 13th day of June,1975 been served on the chief executives of Londonderry Township, Dauphin County, Peansylvania, and of Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, by deposit in the United States Mail, addressed as follows:
Mr. Weldon B . Arehart, Chairman Mr. Charles P. Hoy, Chairman Board of Supervisors of Board of County Commissioners of Londorxlerry Township Dauphin County R. D. #1, Geyers Church Road Dauphin County Courthouse Middlotown, Pennsylvania 17057 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY By /s/ R. C. Arnold Vice President-Generation 1493 305 M9yu HB
ENCLOSURE (i)
Metropolitan Edison Company Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (TMI-1)
Docket No. 50-289 Operating License No. DPR-50 Technical Specification Change Request No. 5, Amendment 2 Licensee requests that the enclosed pages be substituted for the existing pages comprising Technical Specification Change Request No. 5, Amendment 1 (submitted December 23, 1974).
Reasons for Change Request This change is being requested to incorporate into Change Request No. 5, Amendment 1, the NRC's review comments as expressed at the February 24, 1975, meeting in Bethesda, Maryland, between representatives of the NRC and Metropolitan Edison Company.
Safety Analysis Justifying Change The requested change does not involve any unreviewed safety questiona, in that it does not represent a change to Licensee's requirements, as expressed in our previous submittal in this cubject area, but only serves to bring the proposed "Administratite Controls" section of the existing Technical Specifications ir'.o closer conformance with the Standardized Technical Specifications.
1493 306 iAGO 'FA '
. ,,v JJ/'
? -
Engineering, .usnager-Generation Maintenance, hanager-Operational
. Quality Assurance and their staff. The Corporate Technical Support Staff shall collectively have the competence required by ANSI-N18.7-1972, Standard for Administrative Controls for Nuclece Power Plants, Section 4.2.2 or the Manager-Generation Division shall insure that l deficiencies can be readily compensated for through the use of outside groups such as GPU Service Corporation staff, consultants, or vendors.
RESPONSIBILITY 6.5.2.A.2 In its concern with the more detailed issues (rather than the broad issues) 2 of nuclear safety, it shall be the responsibility of the Met-Ed Corporate Technical Support Staff to:
- a. . Review evaluations of proposed cht.nges to procedures, equipment or systems and tests and experiments (including their results) which were accomplished pursuant to 6.1.1.a.2 and 6.1.1.a.3 to verify that an unreviewed safety question was not involved.
- b. Control of design changes to equipment or systers having nuclear safety significance as defined in Section 2.2.19 of ANSI-N18.7-1972, including verifying that such proposed changes do not constitute unreviewed safety questions or Technical Specification changes.
- c. Specifying tests that must be performed following a design change to demonstrate that safety related structures, components, and systems meet Technical Specification requirements,
- d. Review of proposed changes to these Technical Specifications and Operating License DPR-50.
- e. Review of violations of applicable federal statutes, codes, regulations, orders, and internal station procedures and instructions havin , nuclear safety significance,
- f. Review of abnormal occurrences and violations of these Technical Specifications and Operating License DPR-50.
- g. Review of station perfor=:nce records of significant operating abnormalities or deviations from normal and expected performance of plant equipment.
- h. Review of indications of an unanticipated dr.ficiency in some aspect of design or operation of nuclear eafety related structures, components or systems, incluf.ing confirmation of determinations regarding whether they involve unreviewed safety questions or an abnormal occurrence.
- 1. Review of events covered under 6.5.2.A.2.d, e, f, and g shall include reporting to the Manager-Generation Division, Station Superintendent, and other appropriate members of management on the results of investigations and recommendations to prevent or reduce the probability of recurrence.
- j. Development, direction and overall coordination of Operational Quality Assurance activities.
6-6 307
- k. Periodically audit the areas listed below to verify compitance wich the Three Mile Island Operating Quality Assurance Plan, internal rules and procedures, federal regulations, and operating license provisions:
- 1) The 18 Criteria of 10CFR50, Appendix B
- 2) Normal Station Operation
- 3) Inservice Inspection
- 4) Refueling
- 5) Radiological Controls 2,
- 6) Station Maintenance
- 7) Technical Specifications
- 8) Training and Qualifications of Station Staff
- 10) Industrial Security Program In performing these audits, written procedures and/or checklists shall be used. As a minimum, each area shall be audited at least once every two years.
1493 308 6-6a
AUDITS 6.5'.2.A.3 Audits shall perir '4cally be conducted under the direction of the Manager-Operation _. Quality Assurance to verify compliance of plant operations with aspects of the Three Mile Island Operating Quality Assurance Plan, including verification of compliance with applicable internal rules and procedures; federal regulations and operating license provisions; training qualifications and performanca of operating staff. Audits of the Industrial Security Program and the Emergency Plan shall also be conducted at periodic intervals not to c ceed two years. In performing these audits , written procedures and/or check lists shall b6 used and written reports of such audits shall be issued.
AUIHORITY 6.5.2.A.4 The Met-Ed Corporate Technical S tpport Staff was approved by the Company President. The Company President has assigned to the Manager-Generation Division responsibility for the overall effectiveness l of the corporate technical support and plant organizations and the Three Mile Island Operating Quality Assurance Plan. The Manager-Generation Division fulfills this responsibility by delegating the appropriate authority to the Met-Ed Corporate Technical Support l2 Staff. The Manager-Generation Division shall issue instructions and procedures which delineate the responsibilities and authority of the various managers who report to him.
REPORTS TO MANAGEMENT AND THE GENERAL OFFICE REVIEW BOARD 6.5.2.A.5 Reports nhall be made to management and the General Office Review Board as follows:
- a. The Manager-Generation Division shall report to the Company l President any problems identified by the Generation Divf Sion staff which require the President's administrative corr 2ctise action, together with appropriate recommendations.
- b. Any abnormal occurrence or item inni ring an unreviewed nuclear safety question which is identified by the Corporate Te.:hnical Support Staff review shall be brought to the attention af the Manager-Generation Diviaion, and the General Office Review Board l if it has not been previously riported by the Plant 0parations Review Committee or Station Superintendent. l
- c. Written reports of audits performed pursuant to 6.5.2.t.3 shall be submitted to the Manager-Generation Division and the l Chairman, General Office Review Board.
6.5.2.B GENERAL OFFICE REVIEW BOAP3 FUNCTION 6.5.2.B.1 In its concern with tne broader issues (rather than the catailed issues) 2 of nuclear safety, it shall be the prirary responsibility of the General Office Review Board to:
- a. Foresee potentially significant nuclear and radiation safety problems -
and to recommend to the President of Met-Ed how they may be avoided.
1493 509 6-7
1 i] I
!- ol 1 }I I 2
i.
1,-}1 i-i 111
!- ! ..,}
I I
I I
l l
! : i
!!"i 1
'l {
j, .{ 1{1 3.3 ja("l i l
I
. = =, . I,l l1 , 1 p---
,g )5 2 I I
hh - h bb ab l
; " 21 }!1 i
}3j. i, -j J _
i
.r ,I If ti
*2 ji jl
.r l(}
~
l l'}i . .
. .f j -r .f 4 3
II I ! ! ! : I- I li-jil 1 1]"' 3 3 3g1 3 c 11 STATION ORGAHlZATION CHART Figure 6-1 1493 310
NRC_ n alBUTION FOR PART 50 DOC _K' MAfERidL - (TEMPORARY FORM) CONTROL NO:'7b U FILE: FROM: Metropolitan Edison Co DATE OF DOC DATE REC'D LTR TWX RPT OTHER f"*,d 8 7-14-75 7-28-75 XX TO: ORIG CC OTHER SENTIEC PDR *XX Mr Kniel one signed SENT LOCAL PDR *XX CLASS UNCLASS PROPINFO INPUT. NO CYS REC'D , NO: XAunXXXXX 50-
~20 3
DESCRIPTION: ENCLOSUHES: ,
. Ltr w/attchs. . requesting withholding pursu int to 10CFR2.790. . . furnishing info concerning "jd T, - ,
the Indu'itrial Security Plan...rc our ,!1(' - 4-14-75 ltr....(4 cys enci rec'd) -
*DENOFIES WITHOUT PROPRIETARY ENCLOSURE PLANT NAME: Three Mile Island 1 & 2
. FOR ACTION /INFORMATION 8-4-75 chf BUTLER (L) SCHWENCER (L) ZlEMANN (L) R EG AN (E) j, HOUSTON: THIS IS THE REG W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copics ,W/ Copies FILE CY AND IS TO BE RETURN-CLARK (L) STOLZ (L) DICKER (E) 4 LEAR (L) ED TO ED FORD, Rm 016, UPON W/ Copics W/ Copies W/ Copies / W/lCopies COMPLETION OF REVIEW PARR (L) .VASSALLO (L) KNIGHTON (E) SPIES W/ Copics W/ Copics W/ Copies W/ Copics 4 KNIEL (L) PURPLE (L) YOUNGBLOOD (E) LPM f
W/h W/ Copies .W/ Copies W/ Lopms f X INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION FILE #1 TECH REVIEW DENTON LIC ASST A/T IN_D;
*NRC SCHROEDER GRIMES R. DIGGS (L) BRAITMAN OGC, ROOM P-506A MACCARY GAMMILL H. GE ARIN (L) SALTZMAN GOSSICK/ STAFF KNIGHT KASTNER E. GOULBOURNE (L) MELTZ CASE PAWLICKI BALLARD P. KREUTZER (E)
GIAMBUSSO SHAO SPANG LER J. LEE (L) PLANS ' BOYD STELLO M.RU3HER00K(L) MCDONALD MOORE (L) HOUSTON ENVIRO S. REED (E) CHAPMAN DEYOUNG (L) NOVAK MULLER MM. SERVICE (L) DUBE (Ltr) SKOVHOLT (L) ROSS DICKF.R ~ S. SHEPPARD (L) E. COUPE GOLLER (L) (Ltr) IPPOLITO KNIGHTON M. SLATER (E) PETERSON P. CO L LINS TEDESCO YOUNGBLOOD H SMITH (L) HARTFIELD (2) DENISE J. COLLINS REGAN f f S TEETS (L) KLECKER REG _OPR #2 & #3 LAINAS PROJECT LDR G. WILLI AMS (E) EISENHUT
' FILE & REGION (2) BENAROYA V. WILSON (L) WlGGINTON HIPC VOLLMER HAR LESS R. INGRAM (L) /
' 5 H. DUNCAN (E) -C EXTERN AL DISTRIBUTION s**
1-TIC- LOCAL PD RMPM5bu :M 3(2)(10) - N ATION 1AL - PDR LABS SAN /LA/NY 1 (ABERNATHY) ( r) 1 - NSIC (BUCHANAN) 1 - W. PENNINGTON, Rm E 201 G'T 1 - BROOKHAVEN NAT LAB '- 1 - ASLB 1. - CONSU LTANTS 1 - G. ULRIKSON ORN L 1 - Newton Anderson NEWM ARK /BLUM E/AG B ABI AN
,,,1 - ACRS )Wil0);Qf//SENT TO LA ~72+5 #4 .
14'9b. 311Wl
DOCKET NO.. 50-289/320
; s. . DATE: August 4. 1975 , . . y. ,
NOTE TO 1 qc AND/OR LOCAL PUBLIC DOCUMENT ROOMS The following item submitted with Ictter dated July 14,1975 from . Metropolitan Edison company is being withhe ld from
,, public disclosure, pending review, in accordance with Section 2.790.
j _ PROPRIETARY INFORMATION 4 { Information concerning the Security Plan 1 ) . 1 .t .
.I 1
. 0 -
CN j , Regulatory File Roor.- . ]
- i. ,
1493 312 a
- e. -.ww-.-eeen==}}