ML19209C496
| ML19209C496 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 08/09/1979 |
| From: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Roe L TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910150713 | |
| Download: ML19209C496 (2) | |
Text
-
..Y k
DISTRIBUTIGH:
g gg AUGUST
- Wm^
I&E (3)
NRC PDR TERA KER L PDR JRBuchanan ORB #4 Rdg Gray File NRR Rdg ACRS (16)
Docket No. 50-346 DElsenhut BGrimes f
/
WGammill LShao Mr. Lowell E. Roe JRMiller F
i Vice President, Facilities TJCarter j
j I
f Development WRussell I
J j
Toledo Edison Company RVollmer Edison Plaza RReid 300 Madison Avenue ORB #4 PM i
Toledo, Ohio 43652 SRB 3X ORB #4 LA
Dear t'r. Roe:
In May 1976, we issued guidelines reflecting the NPC's policy regarding the iaplenentation of General Design Criterion 3 - Fire Protection.
Since that time, you have perfonled a fire hazards analysis for your facility and have compared its fire protection program with tne f PC i
guidelines.
In late 1976, we set October 19P.0 is the date for conpleting the inple.
nentation of all codifications assr ciated with this progra.m. This impler entation schedule recognized that such nodifications should l
be completed as soon as practical, v ith due consideration of tFe nature of the nodifications. For exar.:ple, ninor nodifications, adoption of adninistrative controls and additional portable equip-nent would be conpleted within six nonths; however, najor nodifications would require a year or nore to conplete and sone nodifications would be coordinated with refuelins outages.
By their Menorandun and Order in the natter of the Union of Concerned Scientists' Petition for Energency and Renedial Action, dated April 13, 1978, the Connission directed the staff to use their best efforts to maintain this schedule, and also directed that the Connission be advisec if any slippage is anticipated, along witt. suggested corrective actions.
We urqe you to apply your best efforts to maintain your schedules for coupletion of all of the fire protection nodifications at your facility (ies) and to suhrit, on an expedited basis, any inforr:ation that is still outstanding with regard to open iter.s and required design cetails.
1145 300 wged,,
gpumoA;@/$
r Darrell G. Eisenhut.
D. Ei ;enbut, Actinn Director I
_0
- 0. 0.R
..I.
(4 qq t..
m.
,.7 4..,.4.g. g...(.,. 9.g.,.
7..p
..D. :
I
....c f f.ic... o f.. flu c l e a r..Nactor.Ie9ul.a a.c"...
su = = = =
- 8/ /79 8/ /79 8/ /79 n*
..r.r.,.... y.,,.3. 3.y j mc comu 3:e
<,.7 3 uncu.24.
- o.....................
7 910150 7G F
je arr,q y\\) ((k UNITED STATES
[
e NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 r.
f
,,/ y August 9,1979 p
Docket No. 50-346 Mr.- Lowell E. Roe Vice President, Facilities Development Toledo Edison Company Edison Plaza 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43652
Dear Mr. Roe:
In May 1976, we issued guidelines reflecting the NRC's policy regarding the implementation of General Design Criterion 3 - Fire Protection.
Since that time, you have performed a fire hazards analysis for your facility and have compared its fire protection program with tne NRC guidelines.
In late 1976, we set October 1980 as the date for completing the imple-mentation of all modifications associated with this crogram. This implementation schedule recognized that such modifications should be completed as soon as practical, with due consideration of the nature of the modifications.
For example, minor modifications, adoption of administrative controis and additional portable equip-nent would be completed within six months; however, major modifications would require a year or more to complete and some modifications would be coordinated with refueling outages.
By their Memorandum and Order in the matter of the Union of Concerned Scientists' Petition for Emergency and Remedial Action, dated April 13, 1978, the Commission directed the staff to use their best efforts to maintain this schedule, and also directed that the Commission be advised if any slippage is anticipated, along with suggested corrective cctions.
We urge you to apply your best efforts to maintain your schedules for completion of all of the fire protection modifications at your facility (fes) and to submit, on an expedited basis, any information that is still outstanding with regard to op n items and required design details.
Si cerely, O qn ut, ActYng M4
(
D. Eise 1 rector Division of Operating Reactors Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
See next page 1145 301
4 a
Toledo Edison Company cc w/ enclosure (s):
Mr. Donald H. Hauser, Esq.
Director, Technical Assessment The Cleveland Electric Division Illuminating Company Office of Radiation Programs P. O. Box 5000 (AW-459)
Cleveland, Ohio 44101 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Crystal Mall #2 Gerald Charnoff, Esq.
Arlington, Virginia 20460 Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 1800 M Street, N.W.
Federal Activities Branch Washington, D.C.
20036 Region V Office ATTN:
EIS COORDINATOR Leslie Henry, Esq.
230 South Dearborn Street Fuller, Seney, Henry and Hodge Chicago, Illinois 60604 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43604 Mr. Robert B. Borsum Babcock & Wilcox Ohio Department of Health Nuclear Power Generation Division ATTN:
Director of Health Suite 420, 7735 Old Georgetown Road 450 East Town Street Bethesda, Maryland 20014 Columbus, Ohio 43216 Ida Rupp Public Library Mr. Rick Jagger 310 Madison Street Industrial Commission Port Clinton,0hio 43452 State of Ohio 2323 West 5th Avenue President, Board of County Columbus, Ohio 43216 Commissioners of Ottawa County Port Clinton, Ohio 43452 Attorney General Department of Attorney General 30 East Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43215 Harold Kahn, Staff Scientist Power Siting Commission 361 East Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43216 ii457,02