ML19209A826
| ML19209A826 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 04/30/1979 |
| From: | Galen Smith NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Daltroff S PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19209A820 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910050447 | |
| Download: ML19209A826 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000277/1979007
Text
,
.
g#
%*
UNITED STA TES
4
NUCLLAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
e
f
,,l,
REGION I
- ' .
t
631 PARK AVENUE
KING OF PRUSSI A. PENNSYLVANI A 19406
APR 3 01973
Docket Nos. 50-277
50-278
Philadelphia Electric Company
ATTN: Mr. S. L. Daltroff
Vice President
Electric Production
2301 Market Street
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19101
Gentlemen:
.
Subiect:
Combined Inspection 50-277/79-07 and 50-278/79-06
7his refers to the inspection conducted by D. R. Neely of this office on
February 13-16, 1979 at the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2
and 3, Delta, Pennsylvania of activities authorized by NRC License Nos.
DPR-44 and DPR-56 and to the discussions of our findings held by Mr.
Neely with Mr. &:. T. Ullrich and other members of your staff at the
conclusion of the inspection, and to subsequent telephone discussions
between Messrs. Ullrich, Knapp, Barley, Sullivan, Gazada, and W(nzenried
of your staff and Messrs. Crocker, Neely, Serabian, and Shanbaky of our
staff on March 2 and 7,1979.
Areas examined during this inspection are described in the Office of
Inspection and Enforcement Inspection Report which is enclosed with this
letter. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective
examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with
personnel, measurements made by the inspector, and observations by the
inspector.
Our inspector also verified the steps you have taken to correct the
items of noncompliance brought to your attention in letters dated
February 8 and August 17, 1977.
We have no further questions regardir.g
your action at this time.
Based on the results of this inspection, it appears that one of your
activities was not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements,
as set forth in the Notice of Violation, enclosed herewith as Appendix
A.
This item of noncompliance has been categorized into the levels as
described in our correspondence to you dated December 31, 1974.
This
notice is sent to you pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.201 of the
NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations.
Il27 053
7 910050 Y73
.
.
.
.
Philadelphia Electric Company
2
Section 2.201 requires you to submit to this office, within twenty (20)
days of your receipt of this notice, a written statement or explanation
in reply including:
(1) corrective steps which have been taken by you
and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to
avoid further items of noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compli-
ance will be achieved.
The inspection by Mr. Neely also identified our concern regarding the
demonstration of your capability to monitor beta exposure.
In the
attached report, our inspector indicated that your beta dosimetry capability
would be further reviewed (Paragraph 10.c). As part of that review, it
has been requested that you submit to the Office of Inspection and
Enforcement, Region 1, twerity (20) Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLD's)
for the purpose of permitting the Commission to perform such test: as is
deemed appropriate. These TLD's were received in Region I on February
21, 1979.
In addition, it is our understanding that you will conduct
tests of your own to demonstrate your TLD beta capability.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part
2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the
enclosures will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.
If this
report contains any information that you (or your contractor) believe to
be proprietary, it is necessary that you make a written application
within 20 days to this office to withhold such information from public
disclosure. Any such application must be accompanied by an affidavit
executed by the owner of the informaticn, which identifies the document
or part sought to be withheld, and which contains a statement of reasons
which addresses with specificity the items which will be considered by
the Commission as listed in subparagraph (b) (4) of Section 2.790.
The
information sought to be withheld shall be incorporated as far as possible
into a separate part of the affidavit.
If we do not hear from you in
this regard within the specified period, the report will be placed in
the Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be
pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
r
A
George H. Smith, Chief 'Rs
Fuel Facility and Materfals Safety
Branch
1127 054
.
.
Philadelphia Electric Company
3
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix A, Notice of Violation
2.
Office of Inspection and Enforcement Combined Inspection
Report Numbers 50-277/79-07 and 50-278/79-06
cc w/encls:
W. T. Ullrich, Station Superintendent
Troy B. Conner, Jr., Esquire (n'ithout Report)
Eugene J. Bradley, Esquire (Without Report)
Raymond L
Hovis, Esquire (Without Report)
Warren Rich, Esquire (Without Report)
1127
055