ML19208D374
| ML19208D374 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000448 |
| Issue date: | 08/24/1979 |
| From: | Sells D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Cox E POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7909280327 | |
| Download: ML19208D374 (5) | |
Text
TEEA e
))['D DISTRiogilD'i(,
'" "p P ~Dl
~
%((j a {T EP-2 Rdg. File
~~
12,E R d g. I ! h l.
J-)
1 fiRC PDR LPDR v
'~
Attorney, ELD DSells/SKeblusek l0 1 ET "G.:
5^ 4C MDuncan NHinkle, ORNL i
AUG 241979 gggg
- r. Ellis T. Cox Y
l Executive Vice President i
Poterac Electric Power Com any j
1900 Pennsylvania Avenue, *..).'.
'leshington, D.C.
20.v8
Dear i:
- r. Cox:
During the ucek of August 13, 1979, the environnental review staff con-duc.ted a sita visit of the proposed Douglas Point site and its alterna-tives. As a result of the inspection of these sites and of the discussions with your technical staff, a listing of additional infomation required for the Douglas Point site has been cor. piled.
In order to continue our envircnmetal review, we need to pletely adequate responses,to tiese questions by S:pterber 15, 1979.
Please verify this j
date within seven days of the receipt of this letter or supply an alternate date so that we can accordingly adjust the revicu schedule.
Sincerely,
'j.5 Donald E. Sells, Acting Chief' Environnental Projects Cranch.!!o. 2 Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis Office of ?uclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Request for additional infomation cc: see attaci'ed page
~
~
_ _D.S E : E P-
,, D, 2.
,,J)3g.
2,,
orric,
suhm= >
S.h b..l.g.e k..:..f..
.. 'h
..MDuncan.,
[
. 08/$.79..'
.08/ R 9..
. 08(d/7.9..
4 I
o= >
MC IC Ut 313 (9 76) NROf 0240 W v.s. n ov e = = s v== =e== on
.c e :, e s e - no s. r e e -
1052 242
ia. Eliis T. Lx 2
sco s 57s cc: w/ enclosure George F. Trowbridge, Esquire Frederick Kelly, Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 15 School Street 1500 M Street, N.W.
Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Washington, D.C.
20036 Philip J. Mause, Esquire Alan G. Kirk. II, Esquire Environmental Defense Fund Vice President & General Counsel 1525 18th Street, N.W.
Potomac Electric Power Company Washington, D.C.
20036 1900 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20006 The Enorable Andrew P. Miller Attorney General J. Philip Smith, Esquire Comrnnwealth of Virginia Potomac Electric Power Company ll0i East Broad Street 1900 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Richmond, Virginia 23210 Washington, D.C.
20006 Edward J. Wojciechowicz The Honorable Edward Lawson Route 1, Box 248 Special Assistant Attorney General White Plains, Maryland 20695 Department of Natural Resources Tawes State Office Building (C-4)
A. Kevin Fahey, Esquire 580 Taylor Avenue Headquarters, U. S. Marine Corps Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Counsel for the Commandant Washington, D.C.
20380 The Honorable Frederick S. Fisher Assistant Attorney General The Prince George's Environment Commonwealth of Virginia Coalition 1101 East Broad Street Box 61.
Richmond, Virginia 23210 Hyattsville, Maryland 20781 Robert A. Vanderhye, Esquire John K. Keane, Jr., Esquire 7807 Cliffside Court People's Counsel Springfield, Virginia 22153 Eastern Building.- Suite 100 5010 Sunnyside Avenue T. Ray Jones Beltsville, Maryland 20705 Citizens Council for a. Clean Potomac 3720 Finsbury Park Drive Alan S. Rosenthal, Esquire Chairman Silver Spring, Maryle.1d 20902 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Wil'.iam H. Carroll, Jr., Esquire Washinr. ton, D.C.
20555 Headquarters, U. S. Marine Corps Counsel for the Commandant Dr. John H. Buck Washington, D.C.
20380 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 1052 243
Mr. Ellis T. rox 2
,,';; ; f, g,7g a
cc: w/ enclosure (continued)
Richard P. Salzman, Esquire Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U. S. fluclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Elizabeth S. Bowers, Esquire, Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. fluclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Glenn 0. Bright Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. fluclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Dr. Richard F. Cole Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. fluclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 1052 244
LIST OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REOUIRED FOR DOUGLAS POINT ALTERNATIVE SITE ASSESSMENT Please provide the following information for the final seven sites (M1, M2, M5, M6, M9, M10, and Mll) discussed in Chapter V of Dames & Moore SITE SELECTION STUDY FOR TWO 1100 MEGAWATT NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS and for the following sites:
M4, M7, M8, M12, M13, V5, and V6.
1.
Identify and qua,ntify all existing and proposed dedicated areas of which a portion or all is within a 5-mile radius of the site (i.e., national forests, parks, monuments, natural landmarks on the National Registry, state forests and parks, privately dedicated areas such as wildlife and bird sanctuaries, wild and scenic rivers).
2.
Identify the federal and state listed rare, threatened, and endangered plant anc animal species and their existing or proposed critical habitats present in the vicinity of each site.
3.
Indicate optimum cooling water body for each of the above sites.
If the lesser rivers or bays (Rapahannock R., Wicomico R., Patuxent R., St. Clements Bay, or Chaptico Bay) are probable cooling water,ources, provide annJal average and low flow data.
4.
Provide any information on the aquatic biota and water quality (temperature, dissolved oxygen, nutrients, turbidity, and trace elements), in the cooling water bodies identified in the previous question (from open literature pub-lications or technical reports of the company or public bodies).
5.
Provide any information on commercial and sport fisheries (including shellfish) of the cooling water body and onsite water bodies (from open literature pub-lications or technical reports of the company or public bodies).
6.
Provide approximate percentages of major land-use classifications (residential, agricultural, recreational, etc.) for the one-mile radius study area for each site.
7.
Identify extent of habitat of any recreationally important terrestrial species in each site vicinity.
8.
Provide a detailed map, with attached notes, describing existing and proposed transmission lines of 115 KV or greater in southeast Maryland and northern Virginia.
Indicate utility owner, voltage level, estimated date of operation of proposed lines.
9.
Provide approximate acreage of new transmission corridors and the amount of right-of-way clearing from each site to the optimum existing corridors.
(Refer to Table 4 in Dames & Moore study.)
- 10. Identify the probable expansion or upgrading of existing corridors to service area primary 500 KV loop. Provide approximate acreage disturbed in this expan-sion and include amount of right-of-way clearing.
1052 245
2
- 11. Why does Table 4 indicate that sites V7 and V8 are more than 10 miles from the Potomac River when both sites lie within the original study area?
- 12. Why were sites V7 and V8 rated 4 with regard to transmission lines when VEPCO-APS-BG and E interconnection (and tie to PEPC0) passes within 10 miles east of these sites? *
- 13. Define and illustrate the "Leonardtown access corridor" for site M4 in Table-4 of the Site Selection Study.
- 14. Provide documentation for waterfront protection district indicated for site Mll in Table 4.
4 1052 246 e