ML19208C583

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notifies That Request for ASLB Review of Decision Is Denied Per 10CFR2.786(b)(5).Forwards Kennedy 790814 Memo Re Motion to Quash Subpoena
ML19208C583
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/16/1979
From: Hoyle J
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To: Barry D, Taber T
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML19208C579 List:
References
PROJECT-564M NUDOCS 7909270104
Download: ML19208C583 (1)


Text

v

)

k h / dog (n /.3 4 cug /

. /,pm%q'o, UNITED STATES d

U AUG 1 6 gg

! 'g g,. gff g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION CA.t,tw /EveJ Nc

.; Ie),... s WASH LN CTCN, D.C. 2C555 19sEfI

%,;pj,#

Ausust 16. 1979

.a. 3g m.

A t

CFFICE oF THE j'

  1. fs [c SECRETARY 4

g c..

2 >,:J10 Of p.

a 7 9 qdg US."2.0-CELD

{.

j.egv David N. Barry, III, Esq.

e Thomas E. Taber, Esq.

fj Southern California Edison Co=pany 4

P.O. Box 800 Rosenead, California 91770 In the Matter of PACIFIC GAS A'O ELECTRIC C0!PANY, ET AL.

(Stanislaus Nuclear Proj ect, Unit No. 1)

Docket No. ?-564-A J

J

$ bdd thdus0Mj't

Dear Sirs:

On August 7,1979, the Co-4sion extended the ti=e for consideration of petitions to reviev the decision of the Ato=ic Safety and Licensing Appeal 3 card in the subject case.

That time period has cov elapsed without the Co-4ssion : anting the petition in whole or in part.

Accordingly, the petition is dee=ed denied as provided in 10 CIR

2. 786 (b) (5).

Co=nissioner Iennedy would have accepted review of the third and final cajor issue before the Appeal Board, i.e., "whether the Licensing 3 card erred in refusing to condition the denial of the motion to quash the subpoena on the assu=ption by DUR of all expenses incurred by Edison in complying with the subpoena." Eis detailed cocce2ts are contained in his ce=orandu= of August 14,, 1979, which is attached.

i Sincerely, f

/

accn C. 3 fle Acting Secretary of the Co dssion Attachnece ec:

Service List 1049 352 0927 0gotf

.